17 research outputs found
Vampires in the village Žrnovo on the island of Korčula: following an archival document from the 18th century
Središnja tema rada usmjerena je na raščlambu spisa pohranjenog u Državnom arhivu u Mlecima (fond: Capi del Consiglio de’ Dieci: Lettere di Rettori e di altre cariche) koji se odnosi na događaj iz 1748. godine u korčulanskom selu Žrnovo, kada su mještani – vjerujući da su se pojavili vampiri – oskvrnuli nekoliko mjesnih grobova. U radu se podrobno iznose osnovni podaci iz spisa te rečeni događaj analizira u širem društvenom kontekstu i prate se lokalna vjerovanja.The main interest of this essay is the analysis of the document from the State Archive in Venice (file: Capi del Consiglio de’ Dieci: Lettere di Rettori e di altre cariche) which is connected with the episode from 1748 when the inhabitants of the village Žrnove on the island of Korčula in Croatia opened tombs on the local cemetery in the fear of the vampires treating.
This essay try to show some social circumstances connected with this event as well as a local vernacular tradition concerning superstitions
Corticosteroids in acute bacterial meningitis
BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial meningitis remains a disease with high mortality rate, ranging from 10 to 30 percent, despite advances in critical care. It has been estimated that between 5 to 40 percent of all patients can suffer hearing loss. The use of corticosteroids as adjuvant therapy in the treatment of acute bacterial meningitis is controversial despite several controlled clinical trials and three meta-analyses. In particular there are few data on the use of corticosteroids in adult meningitis. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review examining the efficacy and safety of adjuvant corticosteroid therapy in children and adults with acute bacterial meningitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003)); MEDLINE (1966 to April 2002); EMBASE (1974 to April 2002); and HEALTHLINE (1988 to April 2002) and Current Contents for trials published before the April 1st 2002, and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies were published or non-published randomised controlled trials on corticosteroids as adjuvant therapy in acute bacterial meningitis. Patients of any age and in any clinical condition, treated with antibacterial agents and randomised to corticosteroid therapy (or placebo) of any type, could be included. At least case fatality rate or hearing loss had to be recorded for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 1853 people were included. Overall, adjuvant corticosteroids were associated with lower case fatality (relative risk (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59 to 0.98) and lower rates of both severe hearing loss (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.60) and long-term neurological sequelae (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.99). In children, corticosteroids reduced severe hearing loss in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.62), as well as in meningitis caused by other bacteria than H. influenzae (RR 0.42, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.89). In adults there was a reduction in case-fatality (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.78), however there were few data. Adverse events were not increased significantly with the use of corticosteroids. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant corticosteroids are beneficial in the treatment of children with acute bacterial meningitis. The limited data available in adults shows a trend in favour of adjuvant corticosteroids but a definite recommendation must await more studies. ERRATUM: During the review process of this systematic review the results of the European Dexamethasone in Adulthood Bacterial Meningitis Trial were published. (De Gans 2002) In this prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicenter trial, which included 301 adults with bacterial meningitis, treatment with dexamethasone was associated with a reduction in mortality (relative risk of death, 0.48; 95 CI 0.24 to 0.96; p = 0.04). Therefore, dexamethasone should be given to all adults with bacterial meningitis and should be initiated before or with the first dose of antibiotic
Dexamethasone for adult community-acquired bacterial meningitis: 20 years of experience in daily practice
The aim of the study was to assess adjunctive intravenous dexamethasone in adult community-acquired bacterial meningitis (BM) in daily practice. Analysis of consecutive patients (1990-2009) with acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis in a single centre in Zagreb, Croatia, N = 304. Adjusted relative risks [RR, dexamethasone vs. no dexamethasone (control)] of Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) = 1 (death) and GOS = 5 (full recovery) at discharge/end of specific treatment were estimated considering demographics; co-morbidity; BM pathogenesis and on-admission characteristics, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) inflammation markers; causative agent and antibiotic use. Two hundred forty (79%) patients had proven BM (43.1% Streptococcus pneumoniae, any other agent ≤ 8.2%). No independent effects of dexamethasone on GOS = 1 or GOS = 5 were observed in the entire cohort (dexamethasone n = 119, control n = 185; RR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.45 and RR = 0.99, CI 0.83-1.20, respectively), microbiologically proven disease (dexamethasone n = 104, control n = 136; RR = 0.97, CI 0.69-1.38 and RR = 1.03, CI 0.82-1.28), pneumococcal disease (dexamethasone n = 71, control n = 60; RR = 0.95, CI 0.53-1.70 and RR = 0.82, CI 0.57-1.18), and also in other BM, subgroups based on consciousness disturbance, CSF markers, prior use of antibiotics and timing of appropriate antibiotic treatment. CSF markers did not predict the outcomes. Conclusions: Our experience does not substantiate the reported benefits of adjunctive dexamethasone in adult BM. Socio-economic and methodological factors do not seem to explain this discrepancy. Empirical use of dexamethasone in this setting appears controversial