Effect of painful Ledderhose disease on dynamic plantar foot pressure distribution during walking:a case-control study

Background: Plantar pressure distribution during walking in patients with painful Ledderhose disease is unknown.Research question: Do patients with painful Ledderhose disease have an altered plantar pressure distribution during walking compared to individuals without foot pathologies? It was hypothesized that plantar pressure is shifted away from the painful nodules.Methods: Pedobarography data of 41 patients with painful Ledderhose disease (cases, mean age: 54.2 ± 10.4 years) was collected and compared to pedobarography data from 41 individuals without foot pathologies (controls, mean age: 21.7 ± 2.0 years). Peak Pressure (PP), Maximum Mean Pressure (MMP) and Force-Time Integral (FTI) were calculated for eight regions (heel, medial midfoot, lateral midfoot, medial forefoot, central forefoot, lateral forefoot, hallux and other toes) under the soles of the feet. Differences between cases and controls were calculated and analysed by means of linear (mixed models) regression.Results: Proportional differences in PP, MMP and FTI showed increased values for the cases compared to the controls, especially in the heel, hallux and other toes regions, and decreased values in the medial- and lateral midfoot regions. In naïve regression analysis, being a patient was a predictor for increased- and decreased values for PP, MMP and FTI for several regions. When dependencies in the data were taken into account with linear mixed-model regression analysis, the increased- and decreased values for the patients were most prevalent for FTI at the heel, medial midfoot, hallux and other toes regions.Significance: In patients with painful Ledderhose disease, during walking, a shift of pressure was found towards the proximal and distal foot regions, while offloading the midfoot regions.</p

An economic evaluation of radiotherapy for patients with symptomatic Ledderhose disease

BACKGROUND: Evidence for effectiveness of radiotherapy for Ledderhose disease was demonstrated in the LedRad-study. However, the health economic impact of Ledderhose disease is unclear. Therefore, an economic evaluation alongside the LedRad-study was planned.METHODS: The economic evaluation was performed as a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis from the societal perspective. Primary outcome parameters were pain burden and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY), until 12 months after the end of treatment. Secondary analyses were performed with outcomes until 18 months. Incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) and cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were calculated to express costs per unit improvement in pain burden and costs per QALY gained, for radiotherapy compared to sham-radiotherapy. Bootstrap replication was used to assess uncertainty surrounding the ratios and to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for QALY gain.RESULTS: Previous analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in pain- and QoL scores in favour of radiotherapy at 12 and 18 months. At these timepoints and excluding treatment costs, cumulative total costs were considerably lower in the radiotherapy group. The ICER until 12 months after treatment was 4987 euro per unit of pain burden reduction. The ICUR was 14249 euro per QALY gained. Most of the bootstrap replications were in the upper right quadrant, indicating that health gain can be achieved at higher costs. At increasing levels of willingness to pay for a gain in QALY, the probability of cost-utility gradually increased to approximately 85%.CONCLUSIONS: In patients with symptomatic Ledderhose disease, radiotherapy, at a moderate threshold for willingness to pay, is cost-effective in terms of QoL gain.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT03507010, NL62429.042.17.</p

Patients’ needs and preferences in routine follow-up for early breast cancer; an evaluation of the changing role of the nurse practitioner

International audienceIn evaluating follow-up of early breast cancer, patients' views on care are important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the introduction of nurse practitioners (NPs) in a breast cancer unit on patients' informational needs, preferences and attitude towards follow-up

Radiotherapy for Ledderhose disease:Results of the LedRad-study, a prospective multicentre randomised double-blind phase 3 trial

Background and purpose: Radiotherapy is considered a treatment option for Ledderhose disease. However, its benefits have never been confirmed in a randomised controlled trial. Therefore, the LedRad-study was conducted. Materials and methods: The LedRad-study is a prospective multicentre randomised double-blind phase three trial. Patients were randomised to sham-radiotherapy (placebo) or radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pain reduction at 12 months after treatment, measured with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary endpoints were pain reduction at 6 and 18 months after treatment, quality of life (QoL), walking abilities and toxicity.Results: A total of 84 patients were enrolled. At 12 and 18 months, patients in the radiotherapy group had a lower mean pain score compared to patients in the sham-radiotherapy group (2.5 versus 3.6 (p = 0.03) and 2.1 versus 3.4 (p = 0.008), respectively). Pain relief at 12 months was 74% in the radiotherapy group and 56% in the sham-radiotherapy group (p = 0.002). Multilevel testing for QoL scores showed higher QoL scores in the radiotherapy group compared to the sham-radiotherapy group (p &lt; 0.001). Moreover, patients in the radiotherapy group had a higher mean walking speed and step rate with barefoot speed walking (p = 0.02). Erythema, skin dryness, burning sensations and increased pain were the most frequently reported side effects. These side effects were generally graded as mild (95%) and the majority (87%) were resolved at 18 months follow-up.Conclusion: Radiotherapy for symptomatic Ledderhose disease is an effective treatment resulting in a significant pain reduction, improvement of QoL scores and bare feet walking abilities, in comparison to sham-radiotherapy.</p