13 research outputs found

    Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis

    Get PDF
    Objective: To assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme. Design: All individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screening in 2019 and 2020 were included using individual-level data. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between either the different time periods (ie, 'before', 'during' and 'after' the first COVID-19 wave) or the invitation interval on screen-detected and interval CRCs. Results: Positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia (AN) was slightly lower during (OR=0.83) and after (OR=0.92) the first COVID-19 wave, but no significant difference was observed for the different invitation intervals. Out of all individuals that previously tested negative, 84 (0.004%) had an interval CRC beyond the 24 months since their last invitation. The time period of invitation as well as the extended invitation interval was not associated with detection rates for AN and interval CRC rate. Conclusion: The impact of the first COVID-19 wave on screening yield was modest. A very small proportion of the FIT negatives had an interval CRC possibly due to an extended interval, which potentially could have been prevented if they had received the invitation earlier. Nonetheless, no increase in interval CRC rate was observed, indicating that an extended invitation interval up to 30 months had no negative impact on the performance of the CRC screening programme and a modest extension of the invitation interval seems an appropriate intervention.Cellular mechanisms in basic and clinical gastroenterology and hepatolog

    Intensive insulin therapy increases the risk of hypoglycemia in neurocritical care patients

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Intensive insulin therapy protocols are widely used in intensive care medicine. A disadvantage of these protocols may be the occurrence of hypoglycemic episodes. Neurocritical care patients are particularly vulnerable to the effects of hypoglycemia. We aimed to study the risk of hypoglycemia in neurocritical care patients in relation to intensive insulin therapy. METHODS: To determine the effects of 2 different intensive insulin therapy protocols on glucose levels and hypoglycemia incidence, we collected data before and after implementation of the protocols in 2 university hospitals. The risk of hypoglycemia (blood glucose level below 3.0 mmol/L) was studied retrospectively with logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: In hospital A, data were obtained on 152 patients before implementation of the protocol and on 649 patients after implementation of the protocol. In hospital B, data were obtained on 111 patients before implementation of the protocol and on 118 patients thereafter. Implementation of intensive insulin therapy protocols increased the time spent in the desired blood glucose range of 4.6 to 6.0 mmol/L in both hospitals, but increased the risk of hypoglycemia: the absolute risk of hypoglycemia during intensive care unit admission increased in hospital A from 14.5% to 20.3% (adjusted odds ratio=1.3; 95% confidence interval: 0.8-2.3) and in hospital B from 3.6% to 29.7% (adjusted odds ratio=28.6; 95% confidence interval: 5.9-138.9). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of intensive insulin therapy protocols in neurocritical care patients not only seems to increase the time spent in the desired blood glucose range, but also seems to increase the risk of hypoglycemia. The risk of hypoglycemia strongly depends on characteristics of the intensive insulin therapy protocol

    Risk factors for hypoglycaemia in neurocritical care patients

    No full text
    Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: To identify risk factors for hypoglycaemia in neurocritical care patients receiving intensive insulin therapy (IIT). METHODS: We performed a nested case-control study. All first episodes of hypoglycaemia (glucose 10 mmol/L, >180.0 mg/dL) in the 24 h preceding the index moment (OR 2.40, 95 % CI 1.26-4.58), gastric residual in the 6 h preceding the index moment without insulin dose reduction (OR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.05-2.96) and dosage of insulin at the index moment (OR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.76-0.90). CONCLUSION: Hypoglycaemia occurs in a considerable proportion of neurocritical care patients. We recommend the identification of these risk factors in these patients to avoid the occurrence of hypoglycaemia

    Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND The use of multidetector computed tomography (CT) in lung-cancer screening trials involving subjects with an increased risk of lung cancer has highlighted the problem for the clinician of deciding on the best course of action when noncalcified pulmonary nodules are detected by CT. METHODS A total of 7557 participants underwent CT screening in years 1, 2, and 4 of a randomized trial of lung-cancer screening. We used software to evaluate a noncalcified nodule according to its volume or volume-doubling time. Growth was defined as an increase in volume of at least 25% between two scans. The first-round screening test was considered to be negative if the volume of a nodule was less than 50 mm(3), if it was 50 to 500 mm3 but had not grown by the time of the 3-month follow-up CT, or if, in the case of those that had grown, the volume-doubling time was 400 days or more. RESULTS In the first and second rounds of screening, 2.6% and 1.8% of the participants, respectively, had a positive test result. In round one, the sensitivity of the screen was 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.5 to 98.0) and the negative predictive value 99.9% (95% CI, 99.9 to 100.0). In the 7361 subjects with a negative screening result in round one, 20 lung cancers were detected after 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Among subjects at high risk for lung cancer who were screened in three rounds of CT scanning and in whom noncalcified pulmonary nodules were evaluated according to volume and volume-doubling time, the chances of finding lung cancer 1 and 2 years after a negative first-round test were 1 in 1000 and 3 in 1000, respectively. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN63545820.)
    corecore