22 research outputs found

    Brain size regulations by cbp haploinsufficiency evaluated by in-vivo MRI based volumetry

    Full text link
    The Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome (RSTS) is a congenital disease that affects brain development causing severe cognitive deficits. In most cases the disease is associated with dominant mutations in the gene encoding the CREB binding protein (CBP). In this work, we present the first quantitative analysis of brain abnormalities in a mouse model of RSTS using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and two novel self-developed automated algorithms for image volumetric analysis. Our results quantitatively confirm key syndromic features observed in RSTS patients, such as reductions in brain size (-16.31%, p < 0.05), white matter volume (-16.00%, p < 0.05), and corpus callosum (-12.40%, p < 0.05). Furthermore, they provide new insight into the developmental origin of the disease. By comparing brain tissues in a region by region basis between cbp(+/-) and cbp(+/+) littermates, we found that cbp haploinsufficiency is specifically associated with significant reductions in prosencephalic tissue, such us in the olfactory bulb and neocortex, whereas regions evolved from the embryonic rhombencephalon were spared. Despite the large volume reductions, the proportion between gray-, white-matter and cerebrospinal fluid were conserved, suggesting a role of CBP in brain size regulation. The commonalities with holoprosencephaly and arhinencephaly conditions suggest the inclusion of RSTS in the family of neuronal migration disorders.We are grateful to Begona Fernandez for her excellent technical assistance. We would like to thank S. Sawiak (Wolfson Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom) for the mouse brain tissue probability maps and the SPMmouse plug-in, and to N. Kovacevic (Mouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) for the atlas of the mouse brain. Supported by grants from the Spanish MINECO to S.C. (BFU 2012-39958) and MINECO and FEDER to D.M. (TEC 2012-33778) and from MINECO (SAF2011-22855) and Generalitat Valenciana (Prometeo/2012/005) to A.B. The Instituto de Neurociencias is "Centre of Excellence Severo Ochoa".Ateca Cabarga, JC.; Cosa, A.; Pallares, V.; Lopez-Atalaya, JP.; Barco, A.; Canals, S.; Moratal PĂ©rez, D. (2015). Brain size regulations by cbp haploinsufficiency evaluated by in-vivo MRI based volumetry. Scientific Reports. 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16256S5Rubinstein, J. H. & Taybi, H. Broad thumbs and toes and facial abnormalities. A possible mental retardation syndrome. Am J Dis Child 105, 588–608 (1963).Van Belzen, M., Bartsch, O., Lacombe, D., Peters, D. J. & Hennekam, R. C. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (CREBBP, EP300). Eur J Hum Genet. 19, preceeding 118–120 (2011).Hennekam, R. C. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 14, 981–985 (2006).Wiley, S., Swayne, S., Rubinstein, J. H., Lanphear, N. E. & Stevens, C. A. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome medical guidelines. Am J Med Genet A. 119A, 101–110 (2003).Michail, J., Matsoukas, J. & Theodorou, S. Pouce bot arquĂ© en forte abduction-extension et autres symptomes concomitants. Rev Chir Orthop 43, 142–146 (1957).Barco A. The Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: modeling mental impairment in the mouse. Genes Brain Behav 6, 32–39 (2007).Lopez-Atalaya, J. P., Valor, L. M. & Barco, A. Epigenetic factors in intellectual disability: the Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome as a paradigm of neurodevelopmental disorder with epigenetic origin. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 128, 139–176 (2014).Petrij, F., Giles, R. H., Dauwerse, H. G., Saris, J. J., Hennekam, R. C. M., Masuno, M., Tommerup, N., Van Ommen, G. J. B., Goodman, R. H., Peters, D. J. M. & Breuning, M. H. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by mutations in the transcriptional co-activator CBP. Nature 376, 348–351 (1995).Zimmermann, N., Acosta, A. M., Kohlhase, J. & Bartsch, O. Confirmation of EP300 gene mutations as a rare cause of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 15, 837–842 (2007).Bartholdi, D. et al. Genetic heterogeneity in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: delineation of the phenotype of the first patients carrying mutations in EP300. J Med Genet. 44, 327–333 (2007).Roelfsema, J. H. et al. Genetic heterogeneity in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: mutations in both the CBP and EP300 genes cause disease. Am J Hum Genet. 76, 572–580 (2005).Tanaka, Y., Naruse, I., Maekawa, T., Masuya, H., Shiroishi, T. & Ishii, S. Abnormal skeletal patterning in embryos lacking a single Cbp allele: a partial similarity with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 10215–10220 (1997).LĂłpez-Atalaya, J. P. et al. CBP is required for environmental enrichment-induced neurogenesis and cognitive enhancement. EMBO J 30, 4287–4298 (2011).Wang, J. et al. CBP histone acetyltransferase activity regulates embryonic neural differentiation in the normal and Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome brain. Dev Cell. 18, 114–125 (2010).Marzuillo, P. et al. Brain magnetic resonance in the routine management of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS) can prevent life-threatening events and neurological deficits. Am J Med Genet A. 164A, 2129–2132 (2014).de Kort, E., Conneman, N. & Diderich, K. A case of Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and congenital neuroblastoma. Am J Med Genet A. 164A, 1332–1333 (2014).Lee, J. S. et al. Clinical and mutational spectrum in Korean patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: the spectrum of brain MRI abnormalities. Brain Dev. 37, 402–408 (2015).Marzuillo, P. et al. Novel cAMP binding protein-BP (CREBBP) mutation in a girl with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, GH deficiency, Arnold Chiari malformation and pituitary hypoplasia. BMC Med Genet. 14, 28 (2013). 10.1186/1471-2350-14-28.Li, Z. et al. Phenotypic expansion of the interstitial 16p13.3 duplication: a case report and review of the literature. Gene. 531, 502–505 (2013).Demeer, B. et al. Duplication 16p13.3 and the CREBBP gene: confirmation of the phenotype. Eur J Med Genet. 56, 26–31 (2013).Kumar, S., Suthar, R., Panigrahi, I. & Marwaha, R. K. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: Clinical profile of 11 patients and review of literature. Indian J Hum Genet. 18, 161–166 (2012).Giussani, C. et al. The association of neural axis and craniovertebral junction anomalies with scoliosis in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 28, 2163–2168 (2012).Parsley, L., Bellus, G., Handler, M. & Tsai, A. C. Identical twin sisters with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome associated with Chiari malformations and syrinx. Am J Med Genet A. 155A, 2766–2770 (2011).Thienpont, B. et al. Duplications of the critical Rubinstein-Taybi deletion region on chromosome 16p13.3 cause a novel recognisable syndrome. J Med Genet. 47, 155–161 (2010).Kim, S. H., Lim, B. C., Chae, J. H., Kim, K. J. & Hwang, Y. S. A case of Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome with a CREB-binding protein gene mutation. Korean J Pediatr. 53, 718–721 (2010).WĂłjcik, C. et al. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome associated with Chiari type I malformation caused by a large 16p13.3 microdeletion: a contiguous gene syndrome? Am J Med Genet A. 152A, 479–483 (2010).Wachter-Giner, T., Bieber, I., Warmuth-Metz, M., Bröcker, E. B. & Hamm, H. Multiple pilomatricomas and gliomatosis cerebri--a new association? Pediatr Dermatol. 26, 75–78 (2009).Verstegen, M. J., van den Munckhof, P., Troost, D. & Bouma, G. J. Multiple meningiomas in a patient with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Case report. J Neurosurg. 102, 167–168 (2005).Agarwal, R., Aggarwal, R., Kabra, M. & Deorari, A. K. Dandy-Walker malformation in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: a rare association. Clin Dysmorphol. 11, 223–224 (2002).Ihara, K., Kuromaru, R., Takemoto, M. & Hara, T. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: a girl with a history of neuroblastoma and premature thelarche. Am J Med Genet. 83, 365–366 (1999).Sener, R. N. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome: cranial MR imaging findings. Comput Med Imaging Graph 19, 417–418 (1995).Robinson, T. W., Stewart, D. L. & Hersh, J. H. Monozygotic twins concordant for Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and implications for genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet. 45, 671–673 (1993).Guion-Almeida, M. L. & Richieri-Costa, A. Callosal agenesis, iris coloboma and megacolon in a Brazilian boy with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 43, 929–931 (1992).Albanese, A. et al. [Role of diagnostic imaging in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. personal experience with 8 cases]. Radiol Med. 81, 253–261 (1991).Rubinstein, J. H. Broad thumb-hallux (Rubinstein-Taybi) syndrome 1957-1988. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 6, 3–16 (1990).Hennekam, R. C., Stevens, C. A. & Van de Kamp, J. J. Etiology and recurrence risk in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 6, 56–64 (1990).Bonioli, E., Bellini, C. & Di Stefano, A. Unusual association: Dandy-Walker-like malformation in the Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 33, 420–421 (1989).Beluffi, G., Pazzaglia, U. E., Fiori, P., Pricca, P. & Poznanski, A. K. [Oto-palato-digital syndrome. Clinico-radiological study]. Radiol Med. 74, 176–184 (1987).Cantani, A. & Gagliesi, D. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Review of 732 cases and analysis of the typical traits. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2, 81–87 (1998).Viosca, J., Lopez-Atalaya, J. P., Olivares, R., Eckner, R. & Barco, A. Syndromic features and mild cognitive impairment in mice with genetic reduction on p300 activity: Differential contribution of p300 and CBP to Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome etiology. Neurobiol Dis. 37, 186–194 (2010).MartĂ­nez-MartĂ­nez, M. A., Pacheco-Torres, J., Borrell, V. & Canals, S. Phenotyping the central nervous system of the embryonic mouse by magnetic resonance microscopy. Neuroimage. 97, 95–106 (2014).Heikkinen, T. et al. Characterization of neurophysiological and behavioral changes, MRI brain volumetry and 1H MRS in zQ175 knock-in mouse model of Huntington’s disease. PLoS One. 7, e50717 (2012), 10.1371/journal.pone.0050717.AlarcĂłn, J. M. et al. Chromatin acetylation, memory and LTP are impaired in CBP+/− mice: a model for the cognitive deficit in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and its amelioration. Neuron. 42, 947–959 (2004).Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 Supp 1, S208–19 (2004).Smith, S. M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17, 143–155 (2002).Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26, 839–851 (2005).Sawiak, S. J., Wood, N. I., Williams, G. B., Morton, A. J. & Carpenter, T. A. Voxel-based morphometry in the R6/2 transgenic mouse reveals differences between genotypes not seen with manual 2D morphometry. Neurobiol Dis 33, 20–27 (2009).Kovačević, N. et al. A three-dimensional MRI atlas of the mouse brain with estimates of the average and variability. Cereb Cortex 15, 639–645 (2005).Zacharoff, L. et al. Cortical metabolites as biomarkers in the R6/2 model of Huntington’s disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 32, 502–514 (2012).Petryk, A., Graf, D. & Marcucio, R. Holoprosencephaly: signaling interactions between the brain and the face, the environment and the genes and the phenotypic variability in animal models and humans. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 4, 17–32 (2015).Solomon, B. D., Gropman, A. & Muenke, M. Holoprosencephaly Overview. In: GeneReviews (eds Pagon, R. A. et al.), Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2014, 2000 Dec 27 [Updated 2013 Aug 29]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1530/ [Date of access: September 4, 2015].Mazzone, D., Milana, A., PraticĂČ, G. & Reitano, G. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome associated with Dandy-Walker cyst. Case report in a newborn. J Perinat Med. 17, 381–384 (1989).Barson, A. J. Proceedings: Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 49, 495 (1974).Tsui, D. et al. CBP regulates the differentiation of interneurons from ventral forebrain neural precursors during murine development. Dev Biol. 385, 230–241 (2014).Ross, M. E. & Walsh, C. A. Human brain malformations and their lessons for neuronal migration. Annu Rev Neurosci. 24, 1041–1070 (2001).Tanaka, T., Ling, B. C., Rubinstein, J. H. & Crone, K. R. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome in children with tethered spinal cord. J Neurosurg. 105, 261–264 (2006).Dubourg, C. et al. Holoprosencephaly. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2, 2–8 (2007)

    A Solve-RD ClinVar-based reanalysis of 1522 index cases from ERN-ITHACA reveals common pitfalls and misinterpretations in exome sequencing

    Get PDF
    Purpose Within the Solve-RD project (https://solve-rd.eu/), the European Reference Network for Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism and Congenital Anomalies aimed to investigate whether a reanalysis of exomes from unsolved cases based on ClinVar annotations could establish additional diagnoses. We present the results of the “ClinVar low-hanging fruit” reanalysis, reasons for the failure of previous analyses, and lessons learned. Methods Data from the first 3576 exomes (1522 probands and 2054 relatives) collected from European Reference Network for Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism and Congenital Anomalies was reanalyzed by the Solve-RD consortium by evaluating for the presence of single-nucleotide variant, and small insertions and deletions already reported as (likely) pathogenic in ClinVar. Variants were filtered according to frequency, genotype, and mode of inheritance and reinterpreted. Results We identified causal variants in 59 cases (3.9%), 50 of them also raised by other approaches and 9 leading to new diagnoses, highlighting interpretation challenges: variants in genes not known to be involved in human disease at the time of the first analysis, misleading genotypes, or variants undetected by local pipelines (variants in off-target regions, low quality filters, low allelic balance, or high frequency). Conclusion The “ClinVar low-hanging fruit” analysis represents an effective, fast, and easy approach to recover causal variants from exome sequencing data, herewith contributing to the reduction of the diagnostic deadlock

    PHYSICAL ADAPTATION OF CHILDREN TO LIFE AT HIGH-ALTITUDE

    No full text
    Children permanently exposed to hypoxia at altitudes of > 3000 m above sea level show a phenotypical form of adaptation. Under these environmental conditions, oxygen uptake in the lungs is enhanced by increases in ventilation, lung compliance, and pulmonary diffusion. Lung and thorax volumes in children growing up at high altitude are increased. The haemoglobin concentration in highlanders is elevated. With respect to the decreased arterial oxygen tension at high altitude, this seems a useful adaptation. Blood viscosity also increases as a result of the increase in red blood cell concentrations however, and this has potentially negative effects on the microcirculation in the tissues. The decreased partial pressure of oxygen in the lungs of highland children is associated with a higher pulmonary artery pressure. Pulmonary hypertension, high altitude pulmonary oedema, and chronic mountain sickness form part of the pathophysiology afflicting highland dwellers. Birth weight at high altitude is decreased. Decreased postnatal growth has been widely reported in populations at high altitude, particularly in early studies from the Andes. Recent studies taking into account the effects of socio-economic deprivation, suggest that long-term exposure to altitudes of 2500-3900 m is associated with a moderate reduction in linear growth in children
    corecore