Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: what have we achieved and where are we now? follow-up to the 2015 Lorentz Workshop

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare progressive genetic disease effecting one in a million individuals. During their life, patients with FOP progressively develop bone in the soft tissues resulting in increasing immobility and early death. A mutation in the ACVR1 gene was identified as the causative mutation of FOP in 2006. After this, the pathophysiology of FOP has been further elucidated through the efforts of research groups worldwide. In 2015, a workshop was held to gather these groups and discuss the new challenges in FOP research. Here we present an overview and update on these topics

Gene Therapy for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Feasibility and Obstacles

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare and devastating genetic disease, in which soft connective tissue is converted into heterotopic bone through an endochondral ossification process. Patients succumb early as they gradually become trapped in a second skeleton of heterotopic bone. Although the underlying genetic defect is long known, the inherent complexity of the disease has hindered the discovery of effective preventions and treatments. New developments in the gene therapy field have motivated its consideration as an attractive therapeutic option for FOP. However, the immune system\u27s role in FOP activation and the as-yet unknown primary causative cell, are crucial issues which must be taken into account in the therapy design. While gene therapy offers a potential therapeutic solution, more knowledge about FOP is needed to enable its optimal and safe application

Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury: A survey in 68 centers participating in the CENTER-TBI study

Background Neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging, with only low-quality evidence. We aimed to explore differences in neurosurgical strategies for TBI across Europe. Methods A survey was sent to 68 centers participating in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. The questionnaire contained 21 questions, including the decision when to operate (or not) on traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and intracerebral hematoma (ICH), and when to perform a decompressive craniectomy (DC) in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Results The survey was completed by 68 centers (100%). On average, 10 neurosurgeons work in each trauma center. In all centers, a neurosurgeon was available within 30 min. Forty percent of responders reported a thickness or volume threshold for evacuation of an ASDH. Most responders (78%) decide on a primary DC in evacuating an ASDH during the operation, when swelling is present. For ICH, 3% would perform an evacuation directly to prevent secondary deterioration and 66% only in case of clinical deterioration. Most respondents (91%) reported to consider a DC for refractory high ICP. The reported cut-off ICP for DC in refractory high ICP, however, differed: 60% uses 25 mmHg, 18% 30 mmHg, and 17% 20 mmHg. Treatment strategies varied substantially between regions, specifically for the threshold for ASDH surgery and DC for refractory raised ICP. Also within center variation was present: 31% reported variation within the hospital for inserting an ICP monitor and 43% for evacuating mass lesions. Conclusion Despite a homogeneous organization, considerable practice variation exists of neurosurgical strategies for TBI in Europe. These results provide an incentive for comparative effectiveness research to determine elements of effective neurosurgical care

Variation in neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury

Background: Neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging, with only low-quality evidence. We aimed to explore differences in neurosurgical strategies for TBI across Europe. Methods: A survey was sent to 68 centers participating in the Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. The questionnaire contained 21 questions, including the decision when to operate (or not) on traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and intracerebral hematoma (ICH), and when to perform a decompressive craniectomy (DC) in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Results: The survey was completed by 68 centers (100%). On average, 10 neurosurgeons work in each trauma center. In all centers, a neurosurgeon was available within 30 min. Forty percent of responders reported a thickness or volume threshold for evacuation of an ASDH. Most responders (78%) decide on a primary DC in evacuating an ASDH during the operation, when swelling is present. For ICH, 3% would perform an evacuation directly to prevent secondary deterioration and 66% only in case of clinical deterioration. Most respondents (91%) reported to consider a DC for refractory high ICP. The reported cut-off ICP for DC in refractory high ICP, however, differed: 60% uses 25 mmHg, 18% 30 mmHg, and 17% 20 mmHg. Treatment strategies varied substantially between regions, specifically for the threshold for ASDH surgery and DC for refractory raised ICP. Also within center variation was present: 31% reported variation within the hospital for inserting an ICP monitor and 43% for evacuating mass lesions. Conclusion: Despite a homogeneous organization, considerable practice variation exists of neurosurgical strategies for TBI in Europe. These results provide an incentive for comparative effectiveness research to determine elements of effective neurosurgical care

TGF-Beta Induces Activin A Production in Dermal Fibroblasts Derived from Patients with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a catastrophic, ultra-rare disease of heterotopic ossification caused by genetic defects in the ACVR1 gene. The mutant ACVR1 receptor, when triggered by an inflammatory process, leads to heterotopic ossification of the muscles and ligaments. Activin A has been discovered as the main osteogenic ligand of the FOP ACVR1 receptor. However, the source of Activin A itself and the trigger of its production in FOP individuals have remained elusive. We used primary dermal fibroblasts from five FOP patients to investigate Activin A production and how this is influenced by inflammatory cytokines in FOP. FOP fibroblasts showed elevated Activin A production compared to healthy controls, both in standard culture and osteogenic transdifferentiation conditions. We discovered TGFβ1 to be an FOP-specific stimulant of Activin A, shown by the upregulation of the INHBA gene and protein expression. Activin A and TGFβ1 were both induced by BMP4 in FOP and control fibroblasts. Treatment with TNFα and IL6 produced negligible levels of Activin A and TGFβ1 in both cell groups. We present for the first time TGFβ1 as a triggering factor of Activin A production in FOP. As TGFβ1 can promote the induction of the main driver of FOP, TGFβ1 could also be considered a possible therapeutic target in FOP treatment

TGF-Beta Induces Activin A Production in Dermal Fibroblasts Derived from Patients with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a catastrophic, ultra-rare disease of heterotopic ossification caused by genetic defects in the ACVR1 gene. The mutant ACVR1 receptor, when triggered by an inflammatory process, leads to heterotopic ossification of the muscles and ligaments. Activin A has been discovered as the main osteogenic ligand of the FOP ACVR1 receptor. However, the source of Activin A itself and the trigger of its production in FOP individuals have remained elusive. We used primary dermal fibroblasts from five FOP patients to investigate Activin A production and how this is influenced by inflammatory cytokines in FOP. FOP fibroblasts showed elevated Activin A production compared to healthy controls, both in standard culture and osteogenic transdifferentiation conditions. We discovered TGFβ1 to be an FOP-specific stimulant of Activin A, shown by the upregulation of the INHBA gene and protein expression. Activin A and TGFβ1 were both induced by BMP4 in FOP and control fibroblasts. Treatment with TNFα and IL6 produced negligible levels of Activin A and TGFβ1 in both cell groups. We present for the first time TGFβ1 as a triggering factor of Activin A production in FOP. As TGFβ1 can promote the induction of the main driver of FOP, TGFβ1 could also be considered a possible therapeutic target in FOP treatment

TGF-Beta Induces Activin A Production in Dermal Fibroblasts Derived from Patients with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a catastrophic, ultra-rare disease of heterotopic ossification caused by genetic defects in the ACVR1 gene. The mutant ACVR1 receptor, when triggered by an inflammatory process, leads to heterotopic ossification of the muscles and ligaments. Activin A has been discovered as the main osteogenic ligand of the FOP ACVR1 receptor. However, the source of Activin A itself and the trigger of its production in FOP individuals have remained elusive. We used primary dermal fibroblasts from five FOP patients to investigate Activin A production and how this is influenced by inflammatory cytokines in FOP. FOP fibroblasts showed elevated Activin A production compared to healthy controls, both in standard culture and osteogenic transdifferentiation conditions. We discovered TGFβ1 to be an FOP-specific stimulant of Activin A, shown by the upregulation of the INHBA gene and protein expression. Activin A and TGFβ1 were both induced by BMP4 in FOP and control fibroblasts. Treatment with TNFα and IL6 produced negligible levels of Activin A and TGFβ1 in both cell groups. We present for the first time TGFβ1 as a triggering factor of Activin A production in FOP. As TGFβ1 can promote the induction of the main driver of FOP, TGFβ1 could also be considered a possible therapeutic target in FOP treatment

Monitoring and Management of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Current Perspectives

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), sometimes known as myositis ossificans progressiva, is an ultra-rare disease in which bone is formed in muscular tissue, tendons and ligaments. This is known as heterotopic ossification (HO). FOP is caused by a heterozygous mutation in the highly conserved ACVR1/ALK2 gene which affects about 1 in 1.5–2 million individuals. At birth, patients with the predominant R206H mutation only exhibit a bilateral hallux valgus. During childhood, heterotopic bone formation develops in a typical pattern, affecting the axial muscles first before appendicular body parts are involved. HO can start spontaneously but is often elicited by soft tissue trauma or medical procedures. After soft tissue injury, an inflammatory process called a flare-up can start, followed by the formation of HO. HO leads to a limited range of motion, culminating in complete ankylosis of nearly all joints. As a result of HO surrounding the thorax, patients often suffer from thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS). TIS is the most common cause of a limited life expectancy for FOP patients, with a median life expectancy of 56 years. Management is focused on preventing soft-tissue injury that can provoke flare-ups. This includes prevention of iatrogenic damage by biopsies, intramuscular injections and surgery. Anti-inflammatory medication is often started when a flare-up occurs but has a poor basis of evidence. Several forms of potential treatment for FOP are being researched in clinical trials. Progression of the disease is monitored using CT and 18F-NaF PET/ CT combined with functional assessments. Patients are regularly evaluated for frequently occurring complications such as restrictive lung disease. Here, we review the current management, monitoring and treatment of FOP

Precancerous liver diseases do not cause increased mutagenesis in liver stem cells

Inflammatory liver disease increases the risk of developing primary liver cancer. The mechanism through which liver disease induces tumorigenesis remains unclear, but is thought to occur via increased mutagenesis. Here, we performed whole-genome sequencing on clonally expanded single liver stem cells cultured as intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids (ICOs) from patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Surprisingly, we find that these precancerous liver disease conditions do not result in a detectable increased accumulation of mutations, nor altered mutation types in individual liver stem cells. This finding contrasts with the mutational load and typical mutational signatures reported for liver tumors, and argues against the hypothesis that liver disease drives tumorigenesis via a direct mechanism of induced mutagenesis. Disease conditions in the liver may thus act through indirect mechanisms to drive the transition from healthy to cancerous cells, such as changes to the microenvironment that favor the outgrowth of precancerous cells