Design and baseline characteristics of SALT-HF trial: hypertonic saline therapy in ambulatory heart failure

Aims: Hypertonic saline solution (HSS) plus intravenous (IV) loop diuretic appears to enhance the diuretic response in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The efficacy and safety of this therapy in the ambulatory setting have not been evaluated. We aimed to describe the design and baseline characteristics of the SALT-HF trial participants. Methods and results: ‘Efficacy of Saline Hypertonic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients with HF’ (SALT-HF) trial was a multicenter, double-blinded, and randomized study involving ambulatory patients who experienced worsening heart failure (WHF) without criteria for hospitalization. Enrolled patients had to present at least two signs of volume overload, use ≥ 80 mg of oral furosemide daily, and have elevated natriuretic peptides. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with a 1-h infusion of IV furosemide plus HSS (2.6–3.4% NaCl depending on plasmatic sodium levels) versus a 1-h infusion of IV furosemide at the same dose (125–250 mg, depending on basal loop diuretic dose). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were collected at baseline and after 7 days, and a telephone visit was planned after 30 days. The primary endpoint was 3-h diuresis after treatment started. Secondary endpoints included (a) 7-day changes in congestion data, (b) 7-day changes in kidney function and electrolytes, (c) 30-day clinical events (need of IV diuretic, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality or HF-hospitalization). Results: A total of 167 participants [median age, 81 years; interquartile range (IQR), 73–87, 30.5% females] were randomized across 13 sites between December 2020 and March 2023. Half of the participants (n = 82) had an ejection fraction >50%. Most patients showed a high burden of comorbidities, with a median Charlson index of 3 (IQR: 2–4). Common co-morbidities included diabetes mellitus (41%, n = 69), atrial fibrillation (80%, n = 134), and chronic kidney disease (64%, n = 107). Patients exhibited a poor functional NYHA class (69% presenting NYHA III) and several signs of congestion. The mean composite congestion score was 4.3 (standard deviation: 1.7). Ninety per cent of the patients (n = 151) presented oedema and jugular engorgement, and 71% (n = 118) showed lung B lines assessed by ultrasound. Median inferior vena cava diameter was 23 mm, (IQR: 21–25), and plasmatic levels of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) were increased (median NT-proBNP 4969 pg/mL, IQR: 2508–9328; median CA125 46 U/L, IQR: 20–114). Conclusions: SALT-HF trial randomized 167 ambulatory patients with WHF and will determine whether an infusion of hypertonic saline therapy plus furosemide increases diuresis and improves decongestion compared to equivalent furosemide administration alone

Design and baseline characteristics of SALT‐HF trial: hypertonic saline therapy in ambulatory heart failure

Aims Hypertonic saline solution (HSS) plus intravenous (IV) loop diuretic appears to enhance the diuretic response in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The efficacy and safety of this therapy in the ambulatory setting have not been evaluated. We aimed to describe the design and baseline characteristics of the SALT-HF trial participants. Methods and results 'Efficacy of Saline Hypertonic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients with HF' (SALT-HF) trial was a multicenter, double-blinded, and randomized study involving ambulatory patients who experienced worsening heart failure (WHF) without criteria for hospitalization. Enrolled patients had to present at least two signs of volume overload, use >= 80 mg of oral furosemide daily, and have elevated natriuretic peptides. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with a 1-h infusion of IV furosemide plus HSS (2.6-3.4% NaCl depending on plasmatic sodium levels) versus a 1-h infusion of IV furosemide at the same dose (125-250 mg, depending on basal loop diuretic dose). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were collected at baseline and after 7 days, and a telephone visit was planned after 30 days. The primary endpoint was 3-h diuresis after treatment started. Secondary endpoints included (a) 7-day changes in congestion data, (b) 7-day changes in kidney function and electrolytes, (c) 30-day clinical events (need of IV diuretic, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality or HF-hospitalization). Results A total of 167 participants [median age, 81 years; interquartile range (IQR), 73-87, 30.5% females] were randomized across 13 sites between December 2020 and March 2023. Half of the participants (n = 82) had an ejection fraction >50%. Most patients showed a high burden of comorbidities, with a median Charlson index of 3 (IQR: 2-4). Common co-morbidities included diabetes mellitus (41%, n = 69), atrial fibrillation (80%, n = 134), and chronic kidney disease (64%, n = 107). Patients exhibited a poor functional NYHA class (69% presenting NYHA III) and several signs of congestion. The mean composite congestion score was 4.3 (standard deviation: 1.7). Ninety per cent of the patients (n = 151) presented oedema and jugular engorgement, and 71% (n = 118) showed lung B lines assessed by ultrasound. Median inferior vena cava diameter was 23 mm, (IQR: 21-25), and plasmatic levels of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) were increased (median NT-proBNP 4969 pg/mL, IQR: 2508-9328; median CA125 46 U/L, IQR: 20-114). Conclusions SALT-HF trial randomized 167 ambulatory patients with WHF and will determine whether an infusion of hypertonic saline therapy plus furosemide increases diuresis and improves decongestion compared to equivalent furosemide administration alone

Impact of early follow-up from primary care on 30 days readmission after heart failure hospitalization

Introducción Reducir ingresos por insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) es uno de los principales objetivos en el control de la enfermedad, por su impacto en el pronóstico y en el gasto sanitario. Los modelos transicionales al alta se imponen como una estrategia capaz de reducirlos, la mayoría basados en unidades hospitalarias específicas. Tratamos de valorar el impacto del seguimiento post-alta realizado desde atención primaria (AP). Material y métodos Estudio ecológico observacional retrospectivo en el área de referencia de un hospital terciario. Se efectúa un análisis de regresión lineal entre la tasa de seguimiento precoz desde el centro de salud tras un ingreso por IC y las tasas de reingreso a 30 días por todas las causas a lo largo de 2021. Resultados El grado de seguimiento desde AP tras un alta hospitalaria por insuficiencia cardiaca se asocia con un menor reingreso a 30 días por todas las causas (R de Pearson = 0,53; p = 0,02), con un descenso del 20%, similar al observado cuando se realiza desde otros dispositivos asistenciales y que se mantiene cuando se ajusta por complejidad de los pacientes. Conclusiones Tras un ingreso por IC, el seguimiento post-alta desde AP puede ser eficaz, reduciendo ingresos evitables y complementario al realizado por las unidades hospitalarias.Introduction Reducing heart failure (HF) admissions is one of the main objectives in disease control, due to its impact on prognosis and costs. The transitional models at discharge are imposed as a strategy capable of reducing hospitalizations, most of them based on specific hospital units. We analyzed the impact of the primary care (PC) post-discharge follow-up. Material and methods Retrospective observational study at the referral area of a tertiary hospital. Linear regression analysis was performed between early follow-up from the PC center after HF admission rate and the 30-day all-cause readmission rate throughout 2021. Results The degree of follow-up from PC after hospital discharge for heart failure is associated with fewer 30-day readmissions for all causes (Pearson's R = 0.53, P = .02); with a decrease of 20%, similar to that observed when it is performed from other care facilities and which is maintained when adjusting for the complexity of the patients. Conclusions PC heart failure post-discharge follow-up could be effective in reducing hospitalizations, and is complementary to that carried out by hospital units.Sin financiación1.1 Q4 JCR 20220.193 Q3 SJR 2022No data IDR 2022UE

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Recovery in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan

Background: A significant number of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) experience ventricular function recovery during follow-up. We studied the variables associated with LVEF recovery in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan (SV) in clinical practice. Methods: We analyzed data from a prospective and multicenter registry including 249 HF outpatients with reduced LVEF who started SV between October 2016 and March 2017. The patients were classified into 2 groups according to LVEF at the end of follow-up (>35%: group R, or ≤35%: group NR). Results: After a mean follow-up of 7 ± 0.1 months, 62 patients (24.8%) had LVEF >35%. They were older (71.3 ± 10.8 vs. 67.5 ± 12.1 years, p = 0.025), and suffered more often from hypertension (83.9 vs. 73.8%, p = 0.096) and higher blood pressure before and after SV (both, p < 0.01). They took more often high doses of beta-blockers (30.6 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.002), with a smaller proportion undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (14.8 vs. 29.0%, p = 0.028) and fewer implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD; 32.8 vs. 67.9%, p < 0.001), this being the only predictive variable of NR in the multivariate analysis (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13–0.47, p < 0.0001). At the end of follow-up, the mean LVEF in group R was 41.9 ± 8.1% (vs. 26.3 ± 4.7% in group NR, p < 0.001), with an improvement compared with the initial LVEF of 14.6 ± 10.8% (vs. 0.8 ± 4.5% in group NR, p < 0.0001). Functional class improved in both groups, mainly in group R (p = 0.035), with fewer visits to the emergency department (11.5 vs. 21.6%, p = 0.07). Conclusions: In patients with LVEF ≤35% treated with SV, not carrying an ICD was independently associated with LVEF recovery, which was related to greater improvement in functional class.Sin financiación1.869 JCR (2020) Q4, 116/142 Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems0.547 SJR (2020) Q3, 174/349 Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineNo data IDR 2020UE

Levosimendán ambulatorio repetitivo como puente al trasplante cardiaco

Introduction and objectives Repetitive ambulatory doses of levosimendan are an option as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT), but evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this treatment is scarce. The objective of the LEVO-T Registry is to describe the profile of patients on the HT list receiving levosimendan, prescription patterns, and clinical outcomes compared with patients not on levosimendan. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients listed for elective HT from 2015 to 2020 from 14 centers in Spain. Results A total of 1015 consecutive patients were included, of whom 238 patients (23.4%) received levosimendan. Patients treated with levosimendan had more heart failure (HF) admissions in the previous year and a worse clinical profile. The most frequent prescription pattern were fixed doses triggered by the patients’ clinical needs. Nonfatal ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 2 patients (0.8%). No differences in HF hospitalizations were found between patients who started levosimendan in the first 30 days after listing and those who did not (33.6% vs 34.5%; P=.848). Among those who did not, 102 patients (32.9%) crossed over to levosimendan after an HF admission. These patients had a rate of 0.57 HF admissions per month before starting levosimendan and 0.21 afterwards. Propensity score matching analysis showed no differences in survival at 1 year after listing between patients receiving levosimendan and those who did not (HR, 1.03; 95%CI, 0.36-2.97; P=.958) or in survival after HT (HR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.60-1.56; P=.958). Conclusions Repetitive levosimendan in an ambulatory setting as a bridge to heart transplantation is commonly used, is safe, and may reduce HF hospitalizations.Introducción y objetivos El levosimendán ambulatorio repetitivo es una opción como puente al trasplante cardiaco (TxC), aunque la evidencia sobre su eficacia y su seguridad es escasa. El objetivo del registro LEVO-T es describir a los pacientes en lista de TxC que reciben levosimendán, sus pautas y los eventos clínicos durante el seguimiento, en comparación con los que no lo reciben. Métodos Se revisó en retrospectiva a los pacientes en lista de espera para TxC electivo de 14 centros españoles desde 2015 hasta 2020. Resultados Se incluyó a 1.015 pacientes consecutivos; los 238 (23,4%) que recibieron levosimendán mostraron más ingresos por insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) el año anterior y peor perfil clínico. Las dosis fijas por necesidades clínicas fueron la pauta más frecuente. Dos pacientes (0,8%) presentaron arritmias ventriculares no mortales. No hubo diferencias en hospitalizaciones por IC entre los que comenzaron levosimendán en los primeros 30 días después de inclusión y los que no (el 33,6 frente al 34,5%; p=0,848). De estos últimos, 102 (32,9%) pasaron a levosimendán después de un ingreso por IC, y la tasa de ingresos por IC/mes varió de 0,57 antes del levosimendán a 0,21 después. El análisis mediante emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión no mostró diferencias entre los pacientes con y sin levosimendán en la supervivencia a 1 año tras la inclusión en lista (HR=1,03; IC95%, 0,36-2,97; p=0,958) ni en la supervivencia tras el TxC (HR=0,97; IC95%, 0,60-1,56; p=0,958). Conclusiones El levosimendán ambulatorio repetitivo como puente al trasplante cardiaco es un tratamiento frecuente y seguro que podría reducir ingresos por IC.Sin financiación5.9 Q1 JCR 20220.442 Q3 SJR 2022No data IDR 2022UE

Influence of the medical treatment schedule in new diagnoses patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Aims: Heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend treating all patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with quadruple therapy, although they do not establish how to start it. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of these recommendations, analyzing the efficacy and safety of the different therapeutic schedules. Methods and results: Prospective, observational, and multicenter registry that evaluated the treatment initiated in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF and its evolution at 3 months. Clinical and analytical data were collected, as well as adverse reactions and events during follow-up. Five hundred and thirty-three patients were included, selecting four hundred and ninety-seven, aged 65.5 ± 12.9 years (72% male). The most frequent etiologies were ischemic (25.5%) and idiopathic (21.1%), with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 28.7 ± 7.4%. Quadruple therapy was started in 314 (63.2%) patients, triple in 120 (24.1%), and double in 63 (12.7%). Follow-up was 112 days [IQI 91; 154], with 10 (2%) patients dying. At 3 months, 78.5% had quadruple therapy (p < 0.001). There were no differences in achieving maximum doses or reducing or withdrawing drugs (< 6%) depending on the starting scheme. Twenty-seven (5.7%) patients had any emergency room visits or admission for HF, less frequent in those with quadruple therapy (p = 0.02). Conclusion: It is possible to achieve quadruple therapy in patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF early. This strategy makes it possible to reduce admissions and visits to the emergency room for HF without associating a more significant reduction or withdrawal of drugs or significant difficulty in achieving the target doses.Sin financiación5.0 Q2 SJR 20221.461 Q1 SJR 2022No data IDR 2022UE