35 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Understanding global flood hazard climatology for improved early flood warnings
Earth system models have become viable alternatives to traditional hydrological models in
supporting global hydrological forecasting of river flow during the last decades. Hydrological
forecasting systems rely on a climatology of flood hazard to derive flood thresholds, which are used
to generate early flood warnings. However, the derivation of these climatologies is not
straightforward and limitations, errors and uncertainties may play a major role and can significantly
influence the quality of the flood warnings.
This thesis evaluates some of the crucial characteristics of the reanalysis data sets used to produce
the flood hazard climatologies, such as the land data assimilation and snow scheme complexity.
Limitations of these data sets are identified, with suggestions presented to further improve the
hydrological modelling and threshold generation methodologies. This in turn will lead to improved
climatologies as crucial elements in delivering higher quality flood warnings.
It was found that increments produced by the land data assimilation of snow and soil moisture can
lead to systematic water budget errors and subsequently contribute to significant errors in river
discharge simulations. Results have also shown that a more complex snow scheme with multiple
layers can generally improve river discharge unless there is permafrost, where improvements
required further adjustments of the snow and soil freezing parametrisations. In addition, the linear
trend analysis of a state-of-the-art hydrological reanalysis data set revealed widespread,
dominantly negative trends globally, that can adversely impact on the use of thresholds in flood
warnings, derived from these reanalyses. In order to improve the quality of the flood hazard
climatologies, an alternative threshold generation method, using ensemble reforecasts, has been
developed and shown to deliver vastly improved forecast reliability and skill.
This thesis contributes to better understanding of the global flood hazard climatologies in Earth
system models and implements a more sophisticated method for producing these climatologies
which will deliver better flood warnings. Additional research avenues are also recommended to
further improve the hydrological representation of the Earth system models and the generation of
the flood hazard climatologies in order to achieve the best possible hydrological forecast quality
Daily ensemble river discharge reforecasts and real-time forecasts from the operational Global Flood Awareness System
Operational global-scale hydrological forecasting systems are used to help manage hydrological extremes such as floods and droughts. The vast amounts of raw data that underpin forecast systems and the ability to generate information on forecast skill have, until now, not been publicly available. As part of the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS; https://www.globalfloods.eu/, last access: 3 December 2022) service evolution, in this paper daily ensemble river discharge reforecasts and real-time forecast datasets are made free and openly available through the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). They include real-time forecast data starting on 1 January 2020 updated operationally every day and a 20-year set of reforecasts and associated metadata. This paper describes the model components and configuration used to generate the real-time river discharge forecasts and the reforecasts. An evaluation of ensemble forecast skill using the continuous ranked probability skill score (CRPSS) was also undertaken for river points around the globe. Results show that GloFAS is skilful in over 93 % of catchments in the short (1 to 3 d) and medium range (5 to 15 d) against a persistence benchmark forecast and skilful in over 80 % of catchments out to the extended range (16 to 30 d) against a climatological benchmark forecast. However, the strength of skill varies considerably by location with GloFAS found to have no or negative skill at longer lead times in broad hydroclimatic regions in tropical Africa, western coast of South America, and catchments dominated by snow and ice in high northern latitudes. Forecast skill is summarised as a new headline skill score available as a new layer on the GloFAS forecast Web Map Viewer to aid user interpretation and understanding of forecast quality
Recommended from our members
The impact of SMOS soil moisture data assimilation within the Operational Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS)
In this study the impacts of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) soil moisture data assimilation upon the streamflow prediction of the operational Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS) were investigated. Two GloFAS experiments were performed, one which used hydro-meteorological forcings produced with the assimilation of the SMOS data, the other using forcings which excluded the assimilation of the SMOS data. Both sets of experiment results were verified against streamflow observations in the United States and Australia. Skill scores were computed for each experiment against the observation datasets, the differences in the skill scores were used to identify where GloFAS skill may be affected by the assimilation of SMOS soil moisture data. In addition, a global assessment was made of the impact upon the 5th and 95th GloFAS flow percentiles to see how SMOS data assimilation affected low and high flows respectively. Results against in-situ observations found that GloFAS skill score was only affected by a small amount. At a global scale, the results showed a large impact on high flows in areas such as the Hudson Bay, central United States, the Sahel and Australia. There was no clear spatial trend to these differences as opposing signs occurred within close proximity to each other. Investigating the differences between the simulations at individual gauging stations showed that they often only occurred during a single flood event; for the remainder of the simulation period the experiments were almost identical. This suggests that SMOS data assimilation may affect the generation of surface runoff during high flow events, but may have less impact on baseflow generation during the remainder of the hydrograph. To further understand this, future work could assess the impact of SMOS data assimilation upon specific hydrological components such as surface and subsurface runoff
Recommended from our members
A global streamflow reanalysis for 1980–2018
Global and continental scale hydrological reanalysis datasets receive growing attention due to their increasing number of applications, ranging from water resources management, climate change studies, water related hazards and policy support. Until recently, their use was mostly limited to qualitative assessments, due to their coarse spatial and temporal resolution, large uncertainty and bias in the model output, and limited extent of the dataset in space and time. This research reports on the setup of a gridded hydrological model with quasi-global coverage, able to reproduce a seamless 39-year streamflow simulation in all world’s medium to large river basins. The model was calibrated at 1226 river sections with a total drainage area of 51 million km2 within 66 countries, using ECMWF’s latest atmospheric reanalysis ERA5. A performance assessment revealed large improvements in reproducing past discharge observations, in comparison to the calibration used in the current operational setup of the hydrological model as part of the Copernicus – Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS, www.globalfloods.eu), with median scores of Kling-Gupta Efficiency KGE = 0.67 and correlation r = 0.8. The simulation bias was also dramatically reduced and narrowed around zero, with more than 60% of stations showing percent bias within ±20%. Pronounced regional differences in the simulation results remain, pointing out the need for detailed investigation of the hydrological processes in specific regions, including parts of Africa and South Asia. In addition, observed discharges with high data quality is key to achieving skillful model output. The new calibrated model will become part of the operational runs of GloFAS in the next system release foreseen for Spring 2020, together with a near real time extension of the streamflow reanalysis
Hydrological impact of the new ECMWF multi-Layer snow scheme
The representation of snow is a crucial aspect of land-surface modelling, as it has a strong influence on energy and water balances. Snow schemes with multiple layers have been shown to better de-scribe the snowpack evolution and bring improvements to soil freezing and some hydrological processes. In this paper, the wider hydrological impact of the multi-layer snow scheme, implemented in the ECLand model, was analyzed globally on hundreds of catchments. ERA5-forced reanalysis simulations of ECLand were coupled to CaMa-Flood, as the hydrodynamic model to produce river discharge. Different sensitivity experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of the ECLand snow and soil freezing scheme changes on the terrestrial hydrological processes, with particular focus on permafrost. It was found that the default multi-layer snow scheme can generally improve the river discharge simulation, with the exception of permafrost catchments, where snowmelt-driven floods are largely underestimated, due to the lack of surface runoff. It was also found that appropriate changes in the snow vertical discretization, destructive metamorphism, snow-soil thermal conductivity and soil freeze temperature could lead to large river discharge improvements in permafrost by adjusting the evolution of soil temperature, infiltration and the partitioning between surface and subsurface runoff
Recommended from our members
Developing a global operational seasonal hydro-meteorological forecasting system: GloFAS-Seasonal v1.0
Global overviews of upcoming flood and drought events are key for many applications, including disaster risk reduction initiatives. Seasonal forecasts are designed to provide early indications of such events weeks, or even months, in advance, but seasonal forecasts for hydrological variables at large or global scales are few and far between. Here, we present the first operational global scale seasonal hydro-meteorological forecasting system: GloFAS-Seasonal. Developed as an extension of the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS), GloFAS-Seasonal couples seasonal meteorological forecasts from ECMWF with a hydrological model, to provide openly available probabilistic forecasts of river flow out to 4 months ahead for the global river network. This system has potential benefits not only for disaster risk reduction through early awareness of floods and droughts, but also for water-related sectors such as agriculture and water resources management, in particular for regions where no other forecasting system exists. We describe the key hydro-meteorological components and computational framework of GloFAS-Seasonal, alongside the forecast products available, before discussing initial evaluation results and next steps
Recommended from our members
Assessing the performance of global hydrological models for capturing peak river flows in the Amazon basin
Extreme flooding impacts millions of people that
live within the Amazon floodplain. Global hydrological models (GHMs) are frequently used to assess and inform the
management of flood risk, but knowledge on the skill of
available models is required to inform their use and development. This paper presents an intercomparison of eight different GHMs freely available from collaborators of the Global
Flood Partnership (GFP) for simulating floods in the Amazon basin. To gain insight into the strengths and shortcomings of each model, we assess their ability to reproduce daily
and annual peak river flows against gauged observations at
75 hydrological stations over a 19-year period (1997–2015).
As well as highlighting regional variability in the accuracy of
simulated streamflow, these results indicate that (a) the meteorological input is the dominant control on the accuracy of
both daily and annual maximum river flows, and (b) groundwater and routing calibration of Lisflood based on daily river
flows has no impact on the ability to simulate flood peaks
for the chosen river basin. These findings have important relevance for applications of large-scale hydrological models,
including analysis of the impact of climate variability, assessment of the influence of long-term changes such as land-use and anthropogenic climate change, the assessment of flood
likelihood, and for flood forecasting systems
Recommended from our members
Using ensemble reforecasts to generate flood thresholds for improved global flood forecasting
Global flood forecasting systems rely on predefining flood thresholds to highlight potential upcoming flood events. Existing methods for flood threshold definition are often based on reanalysis datasets using a single threshold across all forecast lead times, such as in the Global Flood Awareness System. This leads to inconsistencies between how the extreme flood events are represented in the flood thresholds and the ensemble forecasts.
This paper explores the potential benefits of using river flow ensemble reforecasts to generate flood thresholds that can deliver improved reliability and skill, increasing the confidence in the forecasts for humanitarian and civil protection partners. The choice of dataset and methods used to sample annual maxima in the threshold computation, both for reanalysis and reforecast, are analysed in terms of threshold magnitude, forecast reliability and skill for different flood severity levels and lead times. The variability of threshold magnitudes, when estimated from the different annual maxima samples, can be extremely large, as can the subsequent impact on forecast skill. Reanalysis-based thresholds should only be used for the first few days, after which ensemble-reforecast-based thresholds, that vary with forecast lead time and can account for the forecast bias trends, provide more reliable and skilful flood forecasts
Recommended from our members
GloFAS-ERA5 operational global river discharge reanalysis 1979-present
Estimating how much water is flowing through rivers at the global scale is challenging due to a lack of observations in space and time. A way forward is to optimally combine the global network of earth system observations with advanced numerical weather prediction (NWP) models to generate consistent spatio-temporal maps of land, ocean, and atmospheric variables of interest, known as a reanalysis. While the current generation of NWP output runoff at each grid cell, they currently do not produce river discharge at catchment scales directly, and thus have limited utility in hydrological applications such as
flood and drought monitoring and forecasting. This is overcome in the Global Flood Awareness System (GloFAS; http://www.globalfloods.eu/) by coupling surface and sub surface runoff from the HTESSEL land surface model used within ECMWF’s latest global atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) with the LISFLOOD hydrological and channel routing model. The aim of this paper is to describe and evaluate the GloFAS-ERA5 global river discharge reanalysis dataset launched on 25 November 2019 (version 2.1 release). The river discharge reanalysis is a global gridded dataset with a horizontal resolution of 0.1° at a daily time step. An innovative feature is that it is produced in an operational environment so is available to users from 1 January 1979 until near real time (2 to 5 days behind real time). The reanalysis was evaluated against a global network of 1801 daily river discharge observation stations. Results found that the GloFAS-ERA5 reanalysis was skilful against a mean flow benchmark in 86 % of catchments according to the modified Kling-Gupta Efficiency Skill Score, although the strength of skill varied considerably with location. The global median Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.61 with an interquartile range of 0.44 to 0.74. The long-term and operational nature of the GloFAS-ERA5 reanalysis dataset provides a valuable dataset to the user community for applications ranging from monitoring global flood and drought conditions, identification of hydroclimatic variability and change, and as raw input to post processing and machine learning methods that can add further value. The dataset is openly available from the Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/cems-glofas-historical?tab=overview with the following DOI:
10.24381/cds.a4fdd6b9 (C3S, 2019)
Recommended from our members
Beyond El Niño: unsung climate modes drive African floods
The El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) dominates the conversation about predictability of climate extremes and early warning and preparedness for floods and droughts, but in Africa other modes of climate variability are also known to influence rainfall anomalies. In this study, we compare the role of ENSO in driving flood hazard over sub-Saharan Africa with modes of climate variability in the Indian and Atlantic Oceans. This is achieved by applying flood frequency approaches to a hydrological reanalysis dataset and streamflow observations for different phases of the ENSO, Indian Ocean Dipole and Tropical South Atlantic climate modes. Our results highlight that Indian and Atlantic Ocean modes of climate variability are equally as important as ENSO for driving changes in the frequency of impactful floods across Africa. We propose that in many parts of Africa a larger consideration of these unsung climate modes could provide improved seasonal predictions of associated flood hazard and better inform adaptation to the changing climate