Genetically modified parthenocarpic eggplants: improved fruit productivity under both greenhouse and open field cultivation

BACKGROUND: Parthenocarpy, or fruit development in the absence of fertilization, has been genetically engineered in eggplant and in other horticultural species by using the DefH9-iaaM gene. The iaaM gene codes for tryptophan monoxygenase and confers auxin synthesis, while the DefH9 controlling regions drive expression of the gene specifically in the ovules and placenta. A previous greenhouse trial for winter production of genetically engineered (GM) parthenocarpic eggplants demonstrated a significant increase (an average of 33% increase) in fruit production concomitant with a reduction in cultivation costs. RESULTS: GM parthenocarpic eggplants have been evaluated in three field trials. Two greenhouse spring trials have shown that these plants outyielded the corresponding untransformed genotypes, while a summer trial has shown that improved fruit productivity in GM eggplants can also be achieved in open field cultivation. Since the fruits were always seedless, the quality of GM eggplant fruits was improved as well. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the DefH9-iaaM gene is expressed during late stages of fruit development. CONCLUSIONS: The DefH9-iaaM parthenocarpic gene is a biotechnological tool that enhances the agronomic value of all eggplant genotypes tested. The main advantages of DefH9-iaaM eggplants are: i) improved fruit productivity (at least 30-35%) under both greenhouse and open field cultivation; ii) production of good quality (marketable) fruits during different types of cultivation; iii) seedless fruit with improved quality. Such advantages have been achieved without the use of either male or female sterility genes

Biocontrol traits of Bacillus licheniformis GL174, a culturable endophyte of Vitis vinifera cv. Glera

Background Bacillus licheniformis GL174 is a culturable endophytic strain isolated from Vitis vinifera cultivar Glera, the grapevine mainly cultivated for the Prosecco wine production. This strain was previously demonstrated to possess some specific plant growth promoting traits but its endophytic attitude and its role in biocontrol was only partially explored. In this study, the potential biocontrol action of the strain was investigated in vitro and in vivo and, by genome sequence analyses, putative functions involved in biocontrol and plant-bacteria interaction were assessed. Results Firstly, to confirm the endophytic behavior of the strain, its ability to colonize grapevine tissues was demonstrated and its biocontrol properties were analyzed. Antagonism test results showed that the strain could reduce and inhibit the mycelium growth of diverse plant pathogens in vitro and in vivo. The strain was demonstrated to produce different molecules of the lipopeptide class; moreover, its genome was sequenced, and analysis of the sequences revealed the presence of many protein-coding genes involved in the biocontrol process, such as transporters, plant-cell lytic enzymes, siderophores and other secondary metabolites. Conclusions This step-by-step analysis shows that Bacillus licheniformis GL174 may be a good biocontrol agent candidate, and describes some distinguished traits and possible key elements involved in this process. The use of this strain could potentially help grapevine plants to cope with pathogen attacks and reduce the amount of chemicals used in the vineyard

NOA1 Functions in a Temperature-Dependent Manner to Regulate Chlorophyll Biosynthesis and Rubisco Formation in Rice

NITRIC OXIDE-ASSOCIATED1 (NOA1) encodes a circularly permuted GTPase (cGTPase) known to be essential for ribosome assembly in plants. While the reduced chlorophyll and Rubisco phenotypes were formerly noticed in both NOA1-supressed rice and Arabidopsis, a detailed insight is still necessary. In this study, by using RNAi transgenic rice, we further demonstrate that NOA1 functions in a temperature-dependent manner to regulate chlorophyll and Rubisco levels. When plants were grown at 30°C, the chlorophyll and Rubisco levels in OsNOA1-silenced plants were only slightly lower than those in WT. However, at 22°C, the silenced plants accumulated far less chlorophyll and Rubisco than WT. It was further revealed that the regulation of chlorophyll and Rubisco occurs at the anabolic level. Etiolated WT seedlings restored chlorophyll and Rubisco accumulations readily once returned to light, at either 30°C or 15°C. Etiolated OsNOA1-silenced plants accumulated chlorophyll and Rubisco to normal levels only at 30°C, and lost this ability at low temperature. On the other hand, de-etiolated OsNOA1-silenced seedlings maintained similar levels of chlorophyll and Rubisco as WT, even after being shifted to 15°C for various times. Further expression analyses identified several candidate genes, including OsPorA (NADPH: protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase A), OsrbcL (Rubisco large subunit), OsRALyase (Ribosomal RNA apurinic site specific lyase) and OsPuf4 (RNA-binding protein of the Puf family), which may be involved in OsNOA1-regulated chlorophyll biosynthesis and Rubisco formation. Overall, our results suggest OsNOA1 functions in a temperature-dependent manner to regulate chlorophyll biosynthesis, Rubisco formation and plastid development in rice

Nitric oxide triggers a transient metabolic reprogramming in Arabidopsis

[EN] Nitric oxide (NO) regulates plant growth and development as well as responses to stress that enhanced its endogenous production. Arabidopsis plants exposed to a pulse of exogenous NO gas were used for untargeted global metabolomic analyses thus allowing the identification of metabolic processes affected by NO. At early time points after treatment, NO scavenged superoxide anion and induced the nitration and the S-nitrosylation of proteins. These events preceded an extensive though transient metabolic reprogramming at 6 h after NO treatment, which included enhanced levels of polyamines, lipid catabolism and accumulation of phospholipids, chlorophyll breakdown, protein and nucleic acid turnover and increased content of sugars. Accordingly, lipid-related structures such as root cell membranes and leaf cuticle altered their permeability upon NO treatment. Besides, NO-treated plants displayed degradation of starch granules, which is consistent with the increased sugar content observed in the metabolomic survey. The metabolic profile was restored to baseline levels at 24 h post-treatment, thus pointing up the plasticity of plant metabolism in response to nitroxidative stress conditions.This work was supported by grants BIO2011-27526 and BIO2014-56067-P from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER funds. We thank support and comments from Danny Alexander (Metabolon Inc., USA) on metabolomic analyses.Leon Ramos, J.; Costa-Broseta, Á.; Castillo López Del Toro, MC. (2016). Nitric oxide triggers a transient metabolic reprogramming in Arabidopsis. Scientific Reports. 6:1-14. doi:10.1038/srep37945S1146Arc, E., Galland, M., Godin, B., Cueff, G. & Rajjou, L. Nitric oxide implication in the control of seed dormancy and germination. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 346 (2013).Beligni, M. V. & Lamattina, L. Nitric oxide stimulates seed germination and de-etiolation, and inhibits hypocotyl elongation, three light-inducible responses in plants. Planta 210, 215–221 (2000).Lozano-Juste, J. & León, J. Nitric oxide regulates DELLA content and PIF expression to promote photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156, 1410–1123 (2011).He, Y. et al. Nitric oxide represses the Arabidopsis floral transition. Science 305, 1968–1971 (2004).Tsai, Y. C., Delk, N. A., Chowdhury, N. I. & Braam, J. Arabidopsis potential calcium sensors regulate nitric oxide levels and the transition to flowering. Plant Signal. Behav. 2, 446–454 (2007).Manjunatha, G., Lokesh, V. & Neelwarne, B. Nitric oxide in fruit ripening: trends and opportunities. Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 489–499 (2010).Liu, F. & Guo, F. Q. Nitric oxide deficiency accelerates chlorophyll breakdown and stability loss of thylakoid membranes during dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 8(2), e56345 (2013).Du, J. et al. Nitric oxide induces cotyledon senescence involving co-operation of the NES1/MAD1 and EIN2-associated ORE1 signalling pathways in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4051–4063 (2014).Siddiqui, M. H., Al-Whaibi, M. H. & Basalah, M. O. Role of nitric oxide in tolerance of plants to abiotic stress. Protoplasma 248, 447–455 (2011).Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M. & Floryszak-Wieczorek, J. Nitric oxide: an effective weapon of the plant or the pathogen? Mol. Plant Pathol. 15, 406–416 (2014).Thomas, D. D. Breathing new life into nitric oxide signaling: A brief overview of the interplay between oxygen and nitric oxide. Redox Biol. 5, 225–33 (2015).Groβ, F., Durner, J. & Gaupels, F. Nitric oxide, antioxidants and prooxidants in plant defence responses. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 419 (2013).Astier, J. & Lindermayr, C. Nitric oxide-dependent posttranslational modification in plants: an update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 15193–15208 (2012).Hess, D. T. & Stamler, J. S. Regulation by S-nitrosylation of protein post-translational modification. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 4411–4418 (2012).Guerra, D. D. & Callis, J. Ubiquitin on the move: the ubiquitin modification system plays diverse roles in the regulation of endoplasmic reticulum- and plasma membrane-localized proteins. Plant Physiol. 160, 56–64 (2012).Skalska, K., Miller, J. S. & Ledakowicz, S. Trends in NO(x) abatement: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 3976–3989 (2010).Pilegaard, K. Processes regulating nitric oxide emissions from soils. Phil. Transac. Royal Soc. London. Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 368, 20130126 (2013).Jaegle, L., Steinberger, L., Martin, R. V. & Chance, K. Global partitioning of NOx sources using satellite observations: Relative roles of fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and soil emissions. Faraday Discus. 130, 407–423 (2005).Gupta, K. J., Fernie, A. R., Kaiser, W. M. & van Dongen, J. T. On the origins of nitric oxide. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 160–168 (2011).Mur, L. A. et al. Nitric oxide in plants: an assessment of the current state of knowledge. AoB Plants 5, pls052 (2013).Correa-Aragunde, N., Foresi, N. & Lamattina, L. Nitric oxide is a ubiquitous signal for maintaining redox balance in plant cells: regulation of ascorbate peroxidase as a case study. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2913–2921 (2015).Noctor, G., Lelarge-Trouverie, C. & Mhamdi, A. The metabolomics of oxidative stress. Phytochemistry 112, 33–53 (2015).Allan, W. L., Simpson, J. P., Clark, S. M. & Shelp, B. J. Gamma-hydroxybutyrate accumulation in Arabidopsis and tobacco plants is a general response to abiotic stress: putative regulation by redox balance and glyoxylate reductase isoforms. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 2555–2564 (2008).Romero, L. C., Aroca, M. Á., Laureano-Marín, A. M., Moreno, I., García, I. & Gotor, C. Cysteine and cysteine-related signaling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 7, 264–276 (2014).Noctor, G. et al. Glutathione in plants: an integrated overview. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 454–484 (2012).Feussner, I. & Wasternack, C. The lipoxygenase pathway. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 275–297 (2002).Green, M. A. & Fry, S. C. Vitamin C degradation in plant cells via enzymatic hydrolysis of 4-O-oxalyl-L-threonate. Nature 433, 83–87 (2005).Szarka, A., Tomasskovics, B. & Bánhegyi, G. The ascorbate-glutathione-α-tocopherol triad in abiotic stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 4458–4483 (2012).Hurlock, A. K., Roston, R. L., Wang, K. & Benning, C. Lipid trafficking in plant cells. Traffic 15, 915–932 (2014).Blokhina, O., Virolainen, E. & Fagerstedt, K. V. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann. Bot. 91, 179–194 (2003).Yeats, T. H. & Rose, J. K. The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant Physiol. 163, 5–20 (2013).Lozano-Juste, J. & León, J. Enhanced abscisic acid-mediated responses in nia1nia2noa1-2 triple mutant impaired in NIA/NR- and AtNOA1-dependent nitric oxide biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152, 891–903 (2010).Hörtensteiner, S. Update on the biochemistry of chlorophyll breakdown. Plant Mol Biol. 82, 505–17 (2013).Pruzinská, A. et al. Chlorophyll breakdown in senescent Arabidopsis leaves: characterization of chlorophyll catabolites and of chlorophyll catabolic enzymes involved in the degreening reaction. Plant Physiol. 139, 52–63 (2005).Hirashima, M., Tanaka, R. & Tanaka, A. Light-independent cell death induced by accumulation of pheophorbide a in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 50, 719–29 (2009).Zottini, M., Costa, A., De Michele, R., Ruzzene, M., Carimi, F. & Lo Schiavo, F. Salicylic acid activates nitric oxide synthesis in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 58, 1397–1405 (2007).Mainz, E. R. et al. Monitoring intracellular nitric oxide production using microchip electrophoresis and laser-induced fluorescence detection. Analytical Methods 4, 414–420 (2012).Vandelle, E. & Delledonne, M. Peroxynitrite formation and function in plants. Plant Sci. 181, 534–539 (2011).Minocha, R., Majumdar, R. & Minocha, S. C. Polyamines and abiotic stress in plants: a complex relationship. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 175 (2014).Parsons H. T., Yasmin, T. & Fry, S. C. Alternative pathways of dehydroascorbic acid degradation in vitro and in plant cell cultures: novel insights into vitamin C catabolism. Biochem. J. 440, 375–383 (2011).Hou, Q., Ufer, G. & Bartels, D. Lipid signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 1029–4108 (2016).Zhou, X. R., Callahan, D. L., Shrestha, P., Liu, Q., Petrie, J. R. & Singh, S. P. Lipidomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed genetically engineered to contain DHA. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 41 (2014).Pohl, C. H. & Kock, J. L. Oxidized fatty acids as inter-kingdom signaling molecules. Molecules 19, 1273–1285 (2014).Araújo, W. L., Tohge, T., Ishizaki, K., Leaver, C. J. & Fernie, A. R. Protein degradation-an alternative respiratory substrate for stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 489–498 (2011).Sakamoto, W. & Takami, T. Nucleases in higher plants and their possible involvement in DNA degradation during leaf senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 3835–3843 (2014).Del Duca, S., Serafini-Fracassini, D. & Cai, G. Senescence and programmed cell death in plants: polyamine action mediated by transglutaminase. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 120 (2014).Franco, M. C. & Estévez, A. G. Tyrosine nitration as mediator of cell death. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71, 3939–3950 (2014).Palumbo, A., Fiore, G., Di Cristo, C., Di Cosmo, A. & d’Ischia, M. NMDA receptor stimulation induces temporary alpha-tubulin degradation signalled by nitric oxide-mediated tyrosine nitration in the nervous system of Sepia officinalis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 293, 1536–1543 (2002).Wang, Y. Y., Lin, S. Y., Chuang, Y. H., Mao, C. H., Tung, K. C. & Sheu, W. H. Protein nitration is associated with increased proteolysis in skeletal muscle of bile duct ligation-induced cirrhotic rats. Metabolism 59, 468–472 (2010).Castillo, M. C., Lozano-Juste, J., González-Guzmán, M., Rodriguez, L., Rodriguez, P. L. & León, J. Inactivation of PYR/PYL/RCAR ABA receptors by tyrosine nitration may enable rapid inhibition of ABA signaling by nitric oxide in plants. Sci. Signal. 8(392), ra89 (2015).Blaise, G. A., Gauvin, D., Gangal, M. & Authier, S. Nitric oxide, cell signaling and cell death. Toxicology 208, 177–192 (2005).Brüne, B. Nitric oxide: NO apoptosis or turning it ON? Cell Death Differ. 10, 864–869 (2003).Wang, Y., Chen, C., Loake, G. J. & Chu, C. Nitric oxide: promoter or suppressor of programmed cell death? Prot. Cell 1, 133–142 (2010).Serrano, I., Romero-Puertas, M. C., Sandalio, L. M. & Olmedilla, A. The role of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in programmed cell death associated with self-incompatibility. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 2869–2876 (2015).Huang, S., Hill, R. D. & Stasolla, C. Plant hemoglobin participation in cell fate determination. Plant Signal. Behavior 9, e29485 (2014).Maes, M. B., Scharpé, S. & De Meester, I. Dipeptidyl peptidase II (DPPII), a review. Clin. Chim. Acta 380, 31–49 (2007).Gibbs, D. J. et al. Nitric oxide sensing in plants is mediated by proteolytic control of group VII ERF transcription factors. Mol. Cell 53, 369–379 (2014).Kitamura, K. Inhibition of the Arg/N-end rule pathway-mediated proteolysis by dipeptide-mimetic molecules. Amino Acids 48, 235–243 (2016).Duek, P. D., Elmer, M. V., van Oosten, V. R. & Fankhauser C. The degradation of HFR1, a putative bHLH class transcription factor involved in light signaling, is regulated by phosphorylation and requires COP1. Curr Biol. 14, 2296–2301 (2004)

Genetically modified parthenocarpic eggplants: Improved fruit productivity under both greenhouse and open field cultivation

Parthenocarpy, or fruit development in the absence of fertilization, has been genetically engineered in eggplant and in other horticultural species by using the DefH9-iaaM gene. The iaaM gene codes for tryptophan monoxygenase and confers auxin synthesis, while the DefH9 controlling regions drive expression of the gene specifically in the ovules and placenta. A previous greenhouse trial for winter production of genetically engineered (GM) parthenocarpic eggplants demonstrated a significant increase (an average of 33% increase) in fruit production concomitant with a reduction in cultivation costs. Results GM parthenocarpic eggplants have been evaluated in three field trials. Two greenhouse spring trials have shown that these plants outyielded the corresponding untransformed genotypes, while a summer trial has shown that improved fruit productivity in GM eggplants can also be achieved in open field cultivation. Since the fruits were always seedless, the quality of GM eggplant fruits was improved as well. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the DefH9-iaaM gene is expressed during late stages of fruit development. Conclusions The DefH9-iaaM parthenocarpic gene is a biotechnological tool that enhances the agronomic value of all eggplant genotypes tested. The main advantages of DefH9-iaaM eggplants are: i) improved fruit productivity (at least 30-35%) under both greenhouse and open field cultivation; ii) production of good quality (marketable) fruits during different types of cultivation; iii) seedless fruit with improved quality. Such advantages have been achieved without the use of either male or female sterility gene