Discussion as a Factor in the Racial Disparity in Advance Directive Completion at Nursing Home Admission

Studies have consistently shown racial disparities in advance directive completion among nursing home residents but have not examined whether this disparity is due to differences in interactions with healthcare providers. This study had two aims: to determine whether the racial disparity in advance directive completion by nursing home residents is related to differences in discussion of treatment restrictions with healthcare providers, and to examine if there is a racial disparity in perceptions of residents’ significant others that additional discussions would be helpful. Participants were 2,171 white or black (16% of sample) residents newly admitted to 59 nursing homes. Data were collected from structured interviews with residents’ significant others and review of nursing home charts. Questions included whether advance directives were completed, whether treatment restrictions were discussed with the resident and/or family, and whether more discussion would have been helpful. Frequencies by race were determined for each question; p-values and logistic regression models were obtained using SAS. Black residents were less likely to have completed any advance directives (p<0.001). Also, black residents (p<.001) and their family members (p<.001) were less likely than whites to have discussed treatment restrictions with healthcare providers. Logistic regression models indicated that disparity in treatment restrictions narrowed when these discussions occurred. Significant others of black residents were more likely to consider further discussion helpful (p<0.001), especially with physicians. Racial disparity in treatment restrictions may be due in part to a difference in discussion with healthcare providers; increasing discussion may narrow this disparity

Burden and Well-Being Among a Diverse Sample of Cancer, Congestive Heart Failure, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Caregivers

Three important causes of death in the U.S. (cancer, congestive heart failure [CHF], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) are preceded by long periods of declining health; often, family members provide the majority of care for individuals who are living with serious illnesses and are at risk for impaired well-being

Domestic Violence and Partner Notification: Implications for Treatment and Counseling of Women with HIV

Current public health policy encourages partner notification to protect those at risk of HIV infection. Provider experiences with partner notification, domestic violence, and women with HIV compel a reassessment of this strategy. In a survey of 136 health care providers in Baltimore, substantial numbers reported knowledge of their HIV-infected patients’ experiences with domestic violence before and after partner notification. Providers believed that fear of physical abuse, emotional abuse, and abandonment are important reasons why many female patients resist partner notification. Provider opposition to partner notification was strong in cases where female patients faced a risk of domestic violence. The realization that HIV-infected women fear and experience domestic violence has broad implications for health care practice. The authors recommend changes in provider practices to insure that the risk of domestic violence is identified and addressed, and that partner notification strategies do not threaten the safety of HIV-infected women. They also highlight areas for further research on the connection among partner notification, domestic violence, and women with HIV

The Imperative to Reimagine Assisted Living

Assisted living (AL) has existed in the United States for decades, evolving in response to older adults\u27 need for supportive care and distaste for nursing homes and older models of congregate care. AL is state-regulated, provides at least 2 meals a day, around-the-clock supervision, and help with personal care, but is not licensed as a nursing home. The key constructs of AL as originally conceived were to provide person-centered care and promote quality of life through supportive and responsive services to meet scheduled and unscheduled needs for assistance, an operating philosophy emphasizing resident choice, and a residential environment with homelike features. As AL has expanded to constitute half of all long-term care beds, the increasing involvement of the real estate, hospitality, and health care sectors has raised concerns about the variability of AL, the quality of AL, and standards for AL. Although the intent to promote person-centered care and quality of life has remained, those key constructs have become mired under tensions related to models of AL, regulation, financing, resident acuity, and the workforce. These tensions have resulted in a model of care that is not as intended, and which must be reimagined if it is to be an affordable care option truly providing quality, person-centered care in a suitable environment. Toward that end, 25 stakeholders representing diverse perspectives conferred during 2 half-day retreats to identify the key tensions in AL and discuss potential solutions. This article presents the background regarding those tensions, as well as potential solutions that have been borne out, paving the path to a better future of assisted living

Burden and Well-Being Among a Diverse Sample of Cancer, Congestive Heart Failure, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Caregivers

CONTEXT: Three important causes of death in the U.S. (cancer, congestive heart failure [CHF], and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]) are preceded by long periods of declining health; often, family members provide the majority of care for individuals who are living with serious illnesses and are at risk for impaired well-being. OBJECTIVES: To expand understanding of caregiver burden and psychosocial-spiritual outcomes among understudied groups of caregivers – cancer, CHF, and COPD caregivers – by including differences by disease in a diverse population. METHODS: The current study included 139 caregiver/patient dyads. Independent variables included patient diagnosis and function; and caregiver demographics, and social and coping resources. Cross-sectional analyses examined distributions of these independent variables between diagnoses, and logistic regression examined correlates of caregiver burden, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and spiritual well-being. RESULTS: There were significant differences in patient functioning and caregiver demographics and socioeconomic status between diagnosis groups, but few differences in caregiver burden or psychosocial-spiritual outcomes by diagnosis. The most robust social resources indicator of caregiver burden was desire for more help from friends and family. Anxious preoccupation coping style was robustly associated with caregiver psychosocial-spiritual outcomes. CONCLUSION: Caregiver resources, not patient diagnosis or illness severity, are the primary correlates associated with caregiver burden. Additionally, caregiver burden is not disease-specific to those examined here, but rather a relatively universal experience that may be buffered by social resources and successful coping styles