10 research outputs found

    A Modified Technique for the Treatment of Severe Adolescent Hallux Valgus: A Modification of the First Metatarsal Double Osteotomy

    No full text
    Adolescent hallux valgus is a deformity of childhood that is often difficult to treat conservatively because of its progressive nature and surgically because of its high risk of complications. Despite numerous procedures described, there is still little consensus on the best technique available for deformity correction. One of the standard procedures to address severe adult hallux valgus was described by Peterson and Newman in 1993. This procedure involved an excision of the medial eminence, an extra-articular distal closing wedge osteotomy to correct the hallux valgus, and a proximal transverse opening wedge osteotomy to correct the metatarsus primus varus. Although good outcomes have been reported, this approach is not without its own complications, including first metatarsophalangeal joint stiffness, avascular necrosis of the first metatarsal head, and painful pin removal. This paper presents a modification to the first metatarsal double osteotomy surgical technique (used by the principal investigator) to address severe adolescent hallux valgus. This technique avoids the complications associated with the traditional Peterson double osteotomy technique, whereas optimizing patient outcomes.Level of EvidenceLevel IV—Technique paper/case series with no control group. Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

    Trends in Hip Resection Arthroplasty in the Medicare Patient Population from 2005 to 2012

    No full text
    Abstract Hip resection arthroplasty (HRA) is a relatively uncommon, yet viable surgical procedure originally developed by Girdlestone for osteomyelitis of the proximal femur. Currently, HRA is primarily indicated as a salvage procedure after a failed total hip arthroplasty. Despite a continuous rise in the rates of primary and revision hip arthroplasty, there is a lack of published evidence regarding the extent of HRA's current use and its recent trends. We sought to provide an epidemiological description of the recent utilization patterns of HRA in the United States. A level of evidence IV, retrospective case series review of the entire Medicare files between 2005 and 2012 was conducted through the use of current procedural terminology codes and International Classification of Disease ninth edition codes. Linear regressions and chi-square tests were used for analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed by patient age. The total number of HRAs performed between 2005 and 2012 significantly decreased from 4,248 to 3,872 ( p  = 0.025). There was a significant increase in the annual incidence of HRA among patients younger than 65 years ( p  = 0.027; 9% increase) and patients 65 to 69 years old ( p  = 0.007; 22% increase), constituting 43% of the total patients. There was a significant decrease in HRA incidence among patients 80 to 84 years old ( p  = 0.001; 32% decrease) and patients 85 years old and over ( p  = 0.002; 24% decrease). Geographic analysis demonstrated the most HRA procedures were performed in the South, whereas gender focused analysis demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in HRA incidence for females ( p  = 0.003; 6% decrease) and a significant increase in incidence for males ( p  = 0.003; 7% increase). The overall annual incidence of HRA performed in the Medicare patient population has significantly decreased in recent years. However, this conceals an increased incidence among the relatively younger patient population. Potential causes for these opposing trends include changes in rates of revision surgery, alternative indications for surgery, advances in hardware, and surgeon expertise. This was a level of evidence IV, retrospective case series study

    Hepatitis C is an Independent Risk Factor for Perioperative Complications and Nonroutine Discharge in Patients Treated Surgically for Hip Fractures

    No full text
    To evaluate the relationship between noncirrhotic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, perioperative complications, and discharge status in patients undergoing surgical procedures for hip fractures. A retrospective epidemiological study was performed, querying the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Patients were selected using the International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnostic codes for hip fracture and primary procedural codes for open reduction internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, or internal fixation. Patients with concurrent cirrhosis, HIV, hepatitis A, B, D, or E were excluded. Pearson χ tests, independent-samples t test, and multivariable binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. Two cohorts surgically treated for a hip fracture were identified and compared. The first cohort included 5377 patients with a concurrent diagnosis of noncirrhotic HCV infection (HCV+) and the second included 4,712,159 patients without a diagnosis of HCV (HCV-). The HCV+ cohort was younger and had fewer medical comorbidities, yet was found to have a longer length of hospital stay, higher rates of nonroutine discharge, and higher rates of complications than the HCV- cohort. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that HCV+ is an independent risk factor for perioperative complications and nonroutine discharge. In conclusion, our study demonstrates a negative association between noncirrhotic HCV infection and hip fracture surgery outcomes. Caution and appropriate preparation should be taken when surgically treating hip fractures in HCV+ patients because of higher risk of perioperative complications and nonroutine discharge. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

    The Extensile Lateral Approach to the Calcaneus and the Sural Nerve

    No full text
    Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: Sural nerve related symptoms following the extensile lateral approach to the calcaneus (ELA) are a known postoperative complication despite awareness of the course the sural nerve. While the main trunk of the sural nerve and its location relative to the ELA have been previously described, the nerve gives rise to lateral calcaneal branches (LCBs) that may be at risk of injury. The relation of the LCBs to the ELA has not been previously reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to describe the course of the sural nerve and its LCBs in relation to the ELA. Methods: 17 cadaveric foot specimens were dissected, exposing the sural nerve and the LCBs. A line representing the ELA incision was then created. It was noted if the line crossed any of the LCBs, how many branches were crossed, and at what distance they were crossed using the distal tip of the fibula as a reference. Results: The sural nerve was identified in all specimens, and the main trunk was noted to cross the path of the ELA in no specimens. At least one LCB of the sural nerve was identified in all specimens. The mean number of LCBs was 2 (range, 1 – 4). The ELA crossed the path of at least one LCB in 15 specimens (88%). The mean number of LCBs that were crossed by the path of the ELA was 1 (range, 0 – 3) The mean distance from the distal tip of the fibula at which an LCB was encountered along the ELA path was 2.4 cm (+/- 1.2) posterior and 2.6 cm (+/- 1.6) inferior. Conclusion: The ELA traverses the paths of the LCBs in the majority of specimens, potentially accounting for the presence of sural nerve postoperative symptoms despite careful dissection
    corecore