10 research outputs found

    Soluble ICAM-1 serum levels in patients with intermediate uveitis

    Get PDF
    AIM—To investigate whether serum levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) can serve as a marker of the presence of systemic disease in intermediate uveitis.
METHODS—In a multicentre study sICAM-1 serum levels were measured in 61 patients with idiopathic intermediate uveitis, controls included 56 uveitis patients with a systemic disease (26 sarcoid associated uveitis and 30 HLA-B27 positive acute anterior uveitis), 58 uveitis patients without systemic disease (30 toxoplasma chorioretinitis and 28 Fuchs' hetrochromic cyclitis), and 21 normal controls. The clinical records of the patients with intermediate uveitis were analysed for disease characteristics at the time of blood sampling and for a relation with the development of a systemic disease after a mean follow up of 4.5( )years. 
RESULTS—Increased serum levels of sICAM-1 were found in 34 out of 61 patients with intermediate uveitis and were significantly different when compared with toxoplasmosis, Fuchs' cyclitis, and healthy controls (p<0.001). Elevated sICAM-1 levels were also found in 18 out of 26 patients with sarcoid uveitis and in 11 out of 30( )patients with HLA-B27 associated anterior uveitis. Raised sICAM-1 levels in the intermediate uveitis group were significantly associated with active ocular disease (p<0.01) and the presence of vitreous exudates (p<0.05). Increased levels of sICAM-1 correlated with interleukin 8 levels (IL-8) (tested in a previous study in the same group of intermediate uveitis patients) in patients with active systemic involvement. Follow up of the patients showed that an established or suspected systemic disease was found more often in the 21 intermediate uveitis patients with increased sICAM-1 and IL-8 levels compared with the other 40 patients with intermediate uveitis (p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS—The measurement of both sICAM-1 and IL-8 can be used as a marker for ocular disease activity and for a predisposition of developing an associated systemic disease in intermediate uveitis patients.


    Diagnostic tips for ophthalmic zoster

    No full text

    Clinical Validation of Point-Source Corneal Topography in Keratoplasty

    No full text
    Purpose. To validate the clinical performance of point-source corneal topography (PCT) in postpenetrating keratoplasty (PKP) eyes and to compare it with conventional Placido-based topography. Methods. Corneal elevation maps of the anterior corneal surface were obtained from 20 post-PKP corneas using PCT (VU topographer, prototype; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and Placido-based topography (Keratron, Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). Corneal surface parameters are calculated in terms of radius and asphericity. Corneal aberrations were characterized using standard Zernike convention. An artificial surface with quadrafoil feature (SUMIPRO, Almelo, The Netherlands) was measured and used as a reference to assess instrument performance compared with the gold standard. Results. The differences (mean ± std of PCT − Placido) found between the two types of topographers in measurements of post-PKP eyes are 0.02 ± 0.21 mm (p = 0.64) for radius of curvature, 0.14 ± 0.49 (p = 0.23) for asphericity, −0.19 ± 1.67 μm (p = 0.61) for corneal astigmatism, −0.25 ± 1.34 μm (p = 0.41) for corneal coma, 0.23 ± 0.82 μm (p = 0.23) for corneal trefoil, and 0.15 ± 0.28 μm (p = 0.02) for corneal quadrafoil. The PCT measured the artificial surface more accurate (rms error 0.16 μm; 0.12 eq. Dpt.) than the Placido-based topographer (rms error 1.50 μm; 1.15 eq. Dpt.). Conclusions. PCT is more accurate than Placido-based topography in measuring quadrafoil aberration

    Economic Evaluation of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in The Netherlands

    No full text
    Contains fulltext : 95839.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in The Netherlands. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized, multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with corneal stromal pathologic features not affecting the endothelium were included with 28 patients in the DALK group and 25 in the PK group. Quality of life was measured before surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The main outcome measures were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per clinically improved patient on the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire and per patient with endothelial cell loss of maximally 20% within the first year. RESULTS: Mean total bootstrapped costs per patient were euro7607 (US10,498)intheDALKgroupandeuro6552(US10,498) in the DALK group and euro6552 (US9042) in the PK group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were euro9977 (US13,768)perclinicallyimprovedpatientonthe25−itemNationalEyeInstituteVisualFunctioningQuestionnaireandeuro6900(US13,768) per clinically improved patient on the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire and euro6900 (US9522) per patient with cell loss of maximally 20%. In patients without perforation of the Descemet membrane, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was euro5250 (US$7245) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that DALK is more costly and more effective as compared with PK. Results on the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire were in favor of DALK, and endothelial cell loss in DALK patients remained stable after 6 months, whereas cell loss in PK patients continued. Furthermore, DALK procedures performed without perforation of the Descemet membrane were more effective. However, because it is unknown what society is willing to pay for an additional improved patient, cost effectiveness of DALK within a limited follow-up period of 12 months is unclear. Cost effectiveness of DALK may improve over time because of lower graft failure

    Therapy of ocular toxoplasmosis

    No full text
    We performed a prospective multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic strategies currently used for ocular toxoplasmosis in a large number of patients (n = 106). Treatment was given for at least four weeks and consisted of three triple drug combinations: group 1, pyrimethamine, sulphadiazine and corticosteroids (n = 29); group 2. clindamycin, sulphadiazine and corticosteroids (n = 37); and group 3. cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole) and corticosteroids (n = 8). Patients with peripheral retinal lesions remained without systemic therapy (group 4, n = 32). Patients from group 1 received leucovorin 5 mg twice a week. No difference in the duration of inflammatory activity was observed between the treated and untreated patients or between the separate groups of patients. The most important factor predicting the duration of inflammatory activity was the size of the retinal focus itself, independently of the therapy given (P less than 0.05). We showed a reduction in size of the retinal inflammatory focus in 52% of the pyrimethamine patients as compared to 25% of untreated cases. However the most frequent side effects were also associated with pyrimethamine medication and included hematologic complications as thrombocytopenia and leucopenia despite leucovorin medicatio

    Therapy for ocular toxoplasmosis

    No full text
    We conducted a prospective multicenter study of the efficacy of current therapeutic strategies for ocular toxoplasmosis in 149 patients. Treatment consisted of the following three triple-drug combinations: group 1, pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine, and corticosteroids; group 2, clindamycin, sulfadiazine, and corticosteroids; and group 3, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and corticosteroids. Patients with peripheral retinal lesions were not treated systemically. No difference in the duration of inflammatory activity was observed between treated and untreated patients (P = .5). The most important factor predicting the duration of inflammatory activity was the size of the retinal lesion itself, independent of the treatment (P <.001). We found a reduction in size of the retinal inflammatory lesion for 49% of the pyrimethamine-treated patients (17 of 35) compared to 20% of the untreated patients (eight of 41) (P <.01). However, the most frequent occurrence of side effects was also associated with pyrimethamine medication (26%, nine of 35). The mean recurrence rate after three years of follow-up was 49% for all patients (60 of 122 patients), with no differences between treated and untreated patients (P = .6)
    corecore