The Fragility of a Culture of Lawfulness

The concept of a culture of lawfulness is appealing for its aspirational and open-ended nature. However, the concept still has to prove itself as a concrete basis for action. The article argues that the practical value of that concept lies in its promise to create a fresh common narrative to support a broad range of human-rights inspired and democratically derived justice reforms. The authors reflect on what makes a culture of lawfulness possible, how it always remains fragile, and how one might recognize signs it is under attack. A culture of lawfulness is based on the genuine willingness of government officials and members of society to hold themselves and one another accountable to the law, which requires a certain level of trust and confidence in justice institutions and their ability to protect everyone from injustice and insecurity. The article emphasizes the role of justice reforms in sustaining such a culture. Law reform initiatives and the strengthening of justice institutions play a central role in fostering and shouldering a culture of lawfulness, particularly when such reforms are not limited to capacity building measures but also address the more fundamental need for greater fairness, accountability, transparency, and inclusiveness. What is a grave concern in many societies is the political failure to defend the rule of law and to proceed with the necessary justice reforms to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. One of the most important tasks today is to consolidate the culture of lawfulness wherever it has taken root.Yvon Dandurand: [email protected] Jahn: [email protected] Dandurand is a criminologist, Professor Emeritus, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of the Fraser Valley, as well as a Fellow and Senior Associate of the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, a United Nations affiliated institute in Vancouver, BC (Canada). He specializes in comparative criminal law and criminal justice research and has been extensively involved in numerous justice reform and policy development projects in Canada, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. He is particularly interested in access to justice research, the justice reform process, the measurement of reform outcomes, and the practical relevance of international norms and standards.Jessica Jahn is a Researcher at the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy (Vancouver, BC, Canada). She is a graduate of the University of the Fraser Valley, at which she studied criminology and criminal justice. Her primary research interests include access to justice, justice innovation, gender-based violence, juvenile justice, technology misuses, and organized and politicized crimes.Yvon Dandurand -International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Vancouver (Canada)Jessica Jahn - International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Vancouver (Canada)Anthony T., Crofts P., Limits and Prospects of Criminal Law Reform, “International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy” 2017, vol. 6, no. 3.Berman G., Fox A., Trial and Error in Criminal Justice Reform: Learning from Failure (Revised Edition), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham 2016.Bradford B., Myhill A., Triggers of Change to Public Confidence in the Police and Criminal Justice System: Finding from the Crime Survey for England and Wales Panel Experiment, “Criminology and Criminal Justice” 2015, vol. 15, no. 1.Bradford B., Policing and Social Identity: Procedural Justice, Inclusion and Cooperation between Police and Public, “Policing and Society” 2014, vol. 24, no. 1.Brown D., Quilter J., Speaking Too Soon: The Sabotage of Bail Reform in New South Wales, “International Journal of Crime, Justice and Social Democracy” 2014, vol. 3, no. 3.Cowper G., A Criminal Justice System for the 21st Century, Ministry of Justice of British Columbia, Victoria 2012.Dandurand Y., Kittayarak, K., MacPhail A., Justice Indicators and Criminal Justice Reform, International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy & the Thailand Institute of Justice, Vancouver & Bangkok 2015.E/CN.15/2018/CRP.1, Discussion Guide for the Fourteenth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice.Edelman R., The Battle for Truth, in Executive Summary – 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer, London 2018EKOS, National Justice Survey: Canada’s Criminal Justice System: A Report Submitted to the Department of Justice Canada, EKOS Research Associates, Ottawa 2017.Fedotov Y., If We’re to Truly Beat Corruption, We Need to Instill a Culture of Lawfulness Today – Opinion Editorial by the Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 9.12.2016, https://www.unodc.org/dohadeclaration/news/2016/12/if-were-to-truly-beatcorruption-we-need-to-instil-a-culture-of-lawfulness-today.html (1.05.2018).Foa R. S., Mounk Y., The Democratic Disconnect, “Journal of Democracy” 2016, vol. 27, no. 3.Frum D., Trumpocracy: The Corruption of the American Republic, Harper, New York 2018.Godson R., Guide to Developing a Culture of Lawfulness, “Trends in Organized Crime” 2000, vol. 5, no. 3.Harari Y. N., Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, Signal Books, Toronto 2016.Harari Y. N., Homo Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, Signal Books, Toronto 2015.Hart H. L. A., The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1961.Inglehart R., The Age of Insecurity: Can Democracy Save Itself? “Foreign Affairs” 2018, vol. 97, no. 3.Jackson J., Bradford B., Crime, Policing and Social Order: On the Expressive Nature of Public Confidence in Policing, “British Journal of Sociology” 2009, vol. 60, no. 3.Jackson J., Bradford B., Hough M., Quinton, P., Tyler T.R., Why Do People Comply with the Law?: Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions, “British Journal of Criminology” 2012, vol. 52, no. 1.Hohl K., Bradford B., Stanko E., Influencing Trust and Confidence in the Metropolitan Police: Results from an Experiment in Testing the Effects of Leaflet-Drops on Public Opinion, “British Journal of Criminology” 2010, vol. 50, no. 3.Levitsky S., Ziblatt D., How Democracies Die, Crown, New York 2018.McKay L., Toward a Rule of Law Culture – Exploring Effective Responses to Justice and Security Challenges, US Institute for Peace, Washington (D.C) 2015.Mounk Y., Foa R. S., The End of the Democratic Century: Autocracy’s Global Ascendance, Foreign Affairs, 2018, vol. 97, no. 3.Mounk Y., The Undemocratic Dilemma, “Journal of Democracy” 2018, vol. 29, no. 2.Naylor B., Tyson D., Reforming Defences to Homicide in Victoria: Another Attempt to Address the Gender Question. “International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy” 2017, vol. 6, no. 3.Nichols T., How America Lost Faith in Expertise and Why That’s a Giant Problem, Foreign Affairs, vol. 96, no. 2, 03-04.2017.Noor M., Vollgardt J. R., Mari A., Nadler A., The Social Psychology of Collective Victimhood, “European Journal of Social Psychology” 2017, vol. 47.Obama B., The President’s Role in Advancing Criminal Justice Reform, “Harvard Law Review” 2017, vol. 130, no. 3.Parker P. B., Upin T., So the Juvenile Justice Reform Legislation has Passed – Now What? Corrections Today, 05 – 06.2016.World Bank, World Development Report 2011, Washington D.C. 2011.Zakaria F., The Rise of Illiberal Democracies, “Foreign Affairs” 1997, vol. 76, no. 6.233132