Dating and Digging Stratified Archaeology in Circumpolar North America : A View from Nunalleq, Southwestern Alaska

The results presented in this paper were funded by a NERC Radiocarbon Facility grant (NRCF 1917.0415), while the wider project is funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/K006029/1). The authors wish to thank all the members of the excavation crew from the 2014 field season for their hard work in the challenging weather conditions of southwest Alaska – without their attention to detail this study would not have been possible. Additional thanks are also due to Qanirtuuq Incorporated for logistical support and warm hospitality in Quinhagak. We also wish to thank Kevin Edwards and Kate Britton, who read an earlier draft of this paper, and three anonymous reviewers for highly constructive criticism that helped us to improve the final manuscript.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Additional file 1: of Priority-setting in public health research funding organisations: an exploratory qualitative study among five high-profile funders

Appendix S1 Case: NHMRC (Australia). Appendix S2 Case: L’Institut de Recherche en Santé publique (IReSP). Appendix S3 Case: National Institutes for Health Research Public Health Research Programme (NIHR PHRP). Appendix S4 Case: Wellcome Trust. Appendix S5 Case: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (DOCX 35 kb

ヒトプロテイン/肺クララ細胞10kDa蛋白の病態検査上の意義の解明

出版社

Additional file 1: of Factors affecting the implementation of childhood vaccination communication strategies in Nigeria: a qualitative study

Guide for interviews with programme managers, social mobilization officers and development partners. (PDF 340 kb

Stakeholder perceptions of communication about vaccination in two regions of Cameroon: A qualitative case study

Background: Understanding stakeholders’ (parents’, communities’ and health workers’) perspectives of communication about childhood vaccination, including their preferences for its format, delivery and content, is an important step towards designing better communication strategies and ensuring more informed parents. Our objectives were to explore stakeholders’ views, experiences and preferences for childhood vaccination communication in Cameroon. Methods: In 2014, in the Central and North West Regions of Cameron, we gathered qualitative data for our case study using the following methods: semi structured interviews; observations and informal conversations during routine immunization clinics and three rounds of the National Polio Immunization Campaign; document analysis of reports and mass media communications about vaccination; and a survey of parents. We conducted a thematic analysis of the qualitative data to identify themes relating to views, experiences and perceptions of vaccination information and its delivery. Survey data were analysed using simple descriptive statistics. Results: All of the parents interviewed felt that vaccinating their child was important, and trusted the information provided by health workers. However, many parents wanted more information. Parents did not always feel that they could ask questions during vaccination appointments. All participants felt that health workers and vaccination clinics were important sources of information. Social mobilisation activities such as door-to-door visits and announcements during religious services were important and accepted ways of communicating information, especially during vaccination campaigns. Information communicated through mass media and text messages was also seen as important. In general, stakeholders believed that more consistent messaging about routine vaccination through community channels would be helpful to remind parents of the importance of routine vaccination during ongoing rounds of vaccination campaigns against polio. Conclusions: This study confirms that parents regard information about childhood vaccination as important, but that health services need to be organized in ways that prioritize and facilitate communication, particularly about routine vaccination

A comparison of health workers’ and caregivers’ views regarding preferred sources of childhood vaccination information.

<p>A comparison of health workers’ and caregivers’ views regarding preferred sources of childhood vaccination information.</p

Rural-urban distribution of focus group discussions, interviews and observation of respondents.

<p>Rural-urban distribution of focus group discussions, interviews and observation of respondents.</p

Overview of data collection methods and participants.

<p>Overview of data collection methods and participants.</p