Role of non-coding RNA networks in leukemia progression, metastasis and drug resistance.

Early-stage detection of leukemia is a critical determinant for successful treatment of the disease and can increase the survival rate of leukemia patients. The factors limiting the current screening approaches to leukemia include low sensitivity and specificity, high costs, and a low participation rate. An approach based on novel and innovative biomarkers with high accuracy from peripheral blood offers a comfortable and appealing alternative to patients, potentially leading to a higher participation rate.Recently, non-coding RNAs due to their involvement in vital oncogenic processes such as differentiation, proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and apoptosis have attracted much attention as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in leukemia. Emerging lines of evidence have shown that the mutational spectrum and dysregulated expression of non-coding RNA genes are closely associated with the development and progression of various cancers, including leukemia. In this review, we highlight the expression and functional roles of different types of non-coding RNAs in leukemia and discuss their potential clinical applications as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets

Performance evaluation of five ELISA kits for detecting anti-SARS-COV-2 IgG antibodies

ObjectivesTo evaluate and compare the performances of five commercial ELISA assays (EDI, AnshLabs, Dia.Pro, NovaTec, and Lionex) for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Methods70 negative control samples (collected before the COVID-19 pandemic) and samples from 101 RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients (collected at different time points from symptoms onset: ≤7, 8-14, and >14 days) were used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, agreement, positive and negative predictive values of each assay with RT-PCR. A concordance assessment between the five assays was also conducted. Cross-reactivity with other HCoV, non-HCoV respiratory viruses, non-respiratory viruses, and nuclear antigens was investigated. ResultsLionex showed the highest specificity (98.6%, 95%CI: 92.3-99.8), followed by EDI and Dia.Pro (97.1%, 95%CI: 90.2-99.2), NovaTec (85.7%, 95%CI: 75.7-92.1), then AnshLabs (75.7%, 95%CI: 64.5-84.2). All ELISA kits cross-reacted with one anti-MERS IgG positive sample except Lionex. The sensitivity was low during the early stages of the disease but improved over time. After 14 days from symptoms onset, Lionex and NovaTec showed the highest sensitivity at 87.9% (95%CI: 72.7-95.2) and 86.4% (95%CI: 78.5-91.7), respectively. The agreement with RT-PCR results based on Cohen’s kappa was as follows: Lionex (0.89)> NovaTec (0.70)> Dia.Pro (0.69)> AnshLabs (0.63)> EDI (0.55). ConclusionThe Lionex ELISA, which measures antibodies solely to the S1 protein, demonstrated the best performance.This work was made possible by grant No. RRC-2-032 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. GKN would like to acknowledge funds from Qatar University's internal grant QUERG-CMED-2020-2

Vaccine breakthrough hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia in patients with auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs

Life-threatening `breakthrough' cases of critical COVID-19 are attributed to poor or waning antibody response to the SARS- CoV-2 vaccine in individuals already at risk. Pre-existing autoantibodies (auto-Abs) neutralizing type I IFNs underlie at least 15% of critical COVID-19 pneumonia cases in unvaccinated individuals; however, their contribution to hypoxemic breakthrough cases in vaccinated people remains unknown. Here, we studied a cohort of 48 individuals ( age 20-86 years) who received 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine and developed a breakthrough infection with hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia 2 weeks to 4 months later. Antibody levels to the vaccine, neutralization of the virus, and auto- Abs to type I IFNs were measured in the plasma. Forty-two individuals had no known deficiency of B cell immunity and a normal antibody response to the vaccine. Among them, ten (24%) had auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs (aged 43-86 years). Eight of these ten patients had auto-Abs neutralizing both IFN-a2 and IFN-., while two neutralized IFN-omega only. No patient neutralized IFN-ss. Seven neutralized 10 ng/mL of type I IFNs, and three 100 pg/mL only. Seven patients neutralized SARS-CoV-2 D614G and the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) efficiently, while one patient neutralized Delta slightly less efficiently. Two of the three patients neutralizing only 100 pg/mL of type I IFNs neutralized both D61G and Delta less efficiently. Despite two mRNA vaccine inoculations and the presence of circulating antibodies capable of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2, auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs may underlie a significant proportion of hypoxemic COVID-19 pneumonia cases, highlighting the importance of this particularly vulnerable population

Making Biomarkers Relevant to Healthcare Innovation and Precision Medicine

Translational medicine, the exchange between laboratory (bench) and the clinic (bedside), is decidedly taking on a vital role. Many companies are now focusing on a translational medicinal approach as a therapeutic strategy in decision making upon realizing the expenses of drug attrition in late-stage advancement. In addition, the utility of biomarkers in clinical decision and therapy guidance seeks to improve the patient outcomes and decrease wasteful and harmful treatment. Efficient biomarkers are crucial for the advancement of diagnoses, better molecular targeted therapy, along with therapeutic advantages in a broad spectrum of various diseases. Despite recent advances in the discovery of biomarkers, the advancement route to a clinically validated biomarker remains intensely challenging, and many of the candidate biomarkers do not progress to clinical applications, thereby widening the innovation gap between research and application. The present article will focus on the clinical view of biomarkers in a reverse design, addressing how a biomarker program should appear if it is expected to create an impact on personalized medicine and patient care

A review of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): based on genomic structure, phylogeny, current shreds of evidence, candidate vaccines, and drug repurposing

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is instigated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of March 13, 2021, more than 118.9 million cases were infected with COVID-19 worldwide. SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA beta-CoV. Most COVID-19 infected individuals recover within 1–3 weeks. Nevertheless, approximately 5% of patients develop acute respiratory distress syndrome and other systemic complications, leading to death. Structural genetic analyses of SARS-CoV-2 have shown genomic resemblances but a low evolutionary correlation to SARS-CoV-1 responsible for the 2002–2004 outbreak. The S glycoprotein is critical for cell adhesion and the entrance of the virus into the host. The process of cell entry uses the cellular receptor named angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Recent evidence proposed that the CD147 as a SARS-CoV-2′s potential receptor. The viral genome is mainly held by two non-structural proteins (NSPs), ORF1a and ORF1ab, along with structural proteins. Although NSPs are conserved among the βCoVs, mutations in NSP2 and NSP3 may play critical roles in transmitting the virus and cell tropism. To date, no specific/targeted anti-viral treatments exist. Notably, more than 50 COVID-19 candidate vaccines in clinical trials, and a few being administered. Preventive precautions are the primary strategy to limit the viral load transmission and spread, emphasizing the urgent need for developing significant drug targets and vaccines against COVID-19. This review provides a cumulative overview of the genomic structure, transmission, phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 from Indian clusters, treatment options, updated discoveries, and future standpoints for COVID-19

An integrative analysis to distinguish between emphysema (EML) and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-related emphysema (ADL)-A systems biology approach

Lung Emphysema is an abnormal enlargement of the air sacs followed by the destruction of alveolar walls without any prominent fibrosis. This study primarily identifies the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), interactions between them, and their significant involvement in the activated signaling cascades. The dataset with ID GSE1122 (five normal lung tissue samples, five of usual emphysema, and five of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-related emphysema) from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) was analyzed using the GEO2R tool. The physical association between the DEGs were mapped using the STRING tool and was visualized in the Cytoscape software. The enriched functional processes were identified with the ClueGO plugin's help from Cytoscape. Further integrative functional annotation was performed by implying the GeneGo Metacore to distinguish the enriched pathway maps, process networks, and GO processes. The results from this analysis revealed the critical signaling cascades that have been either activated or inhibited due to identified DEGs. We found the activated pathways such as immune response IL-1 signaling pathway, positive regulation of smooth muscle migration, BMP signaling pathway, positive regulation of leukocyte migration, NIK/NF-kappB signaling, and cytochrome-c oxidase activity. Finally, we mapped four crucial genes (CCL5, ALK, TAC1, CD74, and HLA-DOA) by comparing the functional annotations that could be significantly influential in emphysema molecular pathogenesis. Our study provides insights into the pathogenesis of emphysema and helps in developing potential drug targets against emphysema. 2021 Elsevier Inc.Mr. Udhaya Kumar. S, one of the authors, gratefully acknowledges the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), India, for providing him a Senior Research Fellowship [ISRM/11(93)/2019]. The authors would like to thank the Vellore Institute of Technology, India, and Qatar University, Qatar, for providing the necessary research facilities and encouragement to carry out this work. The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist. UKS, HZ, and GPDC, contributed to designing the study and data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation. UKS, TKD, MPN, VAP, VK, DN, SY, and MR are involved in the acquisition, analysis, and interpreting of the results. UKS, MPN, TKD, MR, VAP, VK, DN, SY, and CGPD contributed to data interpretation, conducted, and drafting the manuscript. CGPD and HZ supervised the entire study and studied, acquiring, analyzing, understanding the data, and drafting the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed and approved by all the authors. No funding agency is involved in the present study.Scopu

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder : genetic, pharmacogenetic, and metabolomic insights

ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects children, adolescents, and adults at a high rate around the globe, resulting in significant impairment. Inattention, impulsivity, restlessness, and hyperactivity are all hallmarks of ADHD. Symptoms may persist into adulthood in 55–66% of all cases. The causes of ADHD remain unclear, but it is believed to be a complex disease with a variety of contributing variables, including heredity, neurodevelopmental problems, severe brain traumas, neuroinflammation, consanguineous marriages, prematurity, and exposure to environmental toxins. Numerous genetic polymorphisms linked with ADHD have been discovered in the twenty-first century. These findings have already given a starting point for the study of ADHD biology and innovative treatment options. Pharmacotherapy using methylphenidate (MPH) seems to be the first-line treatment option for adults with ADHD. Moreover, research has been done on genes that influence the response to MPH among ADHD-affected individuals. Furthermore, a few peripheral biomarkers have been discovered in ADHD adults. In this chapter, the authors summarize current evidence on genetic, pharmacogenetic, and biochemical (metabolomics) investigations in ADHD. Also, the authors address the neurobiology of ADHD, with a focus on functional or structural alterations in the brain of ADHD-affected individuals and their connections with complicated chromosomal variants using imaging genetics methods. In addition, the biological mechanisms involved in ADHD have been summarized. Finally, the scope for additional research for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of ADHD in the context of disrupted signaling pathways is reviewed, which could eventually lead to the discovery of possible therapeutic targets and novel treatment strategies

Principal molecular pathways affected in autism spectrum disorder

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) development is a highly multifaceted process as evidenced by the complexity of the factors involved in the etiology of ASD, including genetic and nongenetic factors. Several forms of ASD result from genetic alterations in genes that regulate the process of protein synthesis. A growing body of evidence suggests that abnormal synaptic protein synthesis might contribute to ASD and ASD-like clinical features. Several reports of different mutated genes responsible for ASD cases and genetic models have emerged, revealing dysregulation of many crucial signaling pathways. In this chapter, the authors summarize the various factors described to contribute to ASD, both genetic and nongenetic, and their association with WNT, SHH, RA, FGF, and BMP/TGF-β signaling pathways. In addition, the authors discuss the scope for additional research for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of ASD in the context of disrupted signaling pathways, which could help open the doors to identify possible gene targets and novel therapeutic strategies

Correction to: Role of non-coding RNA networks in leukemia progression, metastasis and drug resistance

Following the publication of the original article [1], authors have noticed that one of the authors, Syed Shadab Raza, was missing in the Authors’ Contributions section. Please see below updated section