236 research outputs found
ããŠã¹ã«ãããCyp2Bèªå°ååç©ã«ããèè¥å€§åã³èçºãããžã®constitutive androstane receptor(CAR)ã®é¢äžã«é¢ããç 究
ãçŸä»£äººã¯ãç°å¢ãé£äºã»æ°Žãä»ããŠæ§ã
ãªååŠç©è³ªã«æŽé²ãããŠããããããã®ååŠç©è³ªã«ã€ããŠã¯ã人äœã«äžãã圱é¿ã®ããã³ã·ã£ã«ãæŽé²éãšã®é¢ä¿ã«ã€ããŠãªã¹ã¯è©äŸ¡ãè¡ãããŠããããã®äžã€ã®ææ³ãšããŠãäž»ã«ãã£æ¯é¡ãçšããæ¯æ§è©Šéšãåãå
¥ããããŠããããããžã®æ害æ§ã®æšæž¬ã«æçšãªæ
å ±ããããããŠãããäžæ¹ãççæ©èœã代è¬åå¿ã«ã¯åç©çš®å·®ãããããšãããæ¯æ§è©Šéšã®çµæã«ã€ããŠã¯å®éšåç©ã«ãããåå¿ã圱é¿ã®çºçŸã¡ã«ããºã ãèæ
®ããäžã§ãããžã®å€æ¿æ§ãæ€èšããå¿
èŠããããç¹ã«å®éšåç©ã§çºããæ§ãèªããããååŠç©è³ªã®å Žåããããžã®å€æ¿æ§ã®å€æã¯æ害æ§è©äŸ¡ã®æãéèŠãªãã€ã³ããšãªããããã£æ¯é¡ãšããã§ã®çºããæ§ã«ã€ããŠçš®å·®ãæãããšãªã£ãŠããååŠç©è³ªã®äžäŸãšããŠãã§ããã«ãã¿ãŒã«ïŒPBïŒãæãããããPBã¯å®éšçã«ãã£æ¯é¡ã§èè¥å€§ãèçºãããèµ·ããããšãç¥ãããŠãããäžæ¹ãããã«ãããŠã¯ç«åŠçç 究çµæããèçºããã«é¢äžããªãããšãç¥ãããŠããããã®çš®å·®ã«ã€ããŠã¯è¿å¹Žã®ç 究ã®é²å±ã«ããåŸã
ã«æããã«ãããŠãããããªãã¡ããã£æ¯é¡ã«ãããŠPBã¯ãcytochrome P450 2bïŒCyp2bïŒçã®ä»£è¬é
µçŽ èªå°ãè现èå¢æ®ãèµ·ãããèè¥å€§ã»èçºãããèªçºããããç°ç©ã®è§£æ¯ïŒä»£è¬ã«é¢ããæ žå
å容äœã§ããconstitutive androstane receptorïŒCARïŒãããã¯ã¢ãŠãããããŠã¹ïŒCARKOããŠã¹ïŒã§ã¯èè¥å€§ïŒèçºãããèªçºãããªããäžæ¹ãããç±æ¥ã®CARãçºçŸãããããŠã¹ãžã®æŽé²ã§ã¯èè¥å€§ã¯èµ·ãããã®ã®ãè现èå¢æ®ãèµ·ãããªãããããã®ç¥èŠã®èç©ã«ãããCyp2bèªå°ååç©ã«ãããã£æ¯é¡ã§ã®èçºããã«ã€ããŠãCARã®é¢äžããã®ä»PBã®ä»£è¬ãšããã€ãã®å
±éããkey eventãæããå Žåã¯ãããããžã®å€æ¿æ§ãªãããšããmode of actionïŒMOAïŒã®èãæ¹ãæå±ãããåºãåãå
¥ãããã€ã€ãããããããååŠç©è³ªã«ããCAR掻æ§åæ©åºããã®äžæµã®è¬ç©ä»£è¬é
µçŽ ã®èªå°ãã¹ãŠã§ã€ããããã¯çŽ°èå¢æ®ã«è³ãéçšã¯å®å
šã«ã¯è§£æãããŠããããæ§ã
ãªCyp2bèªå°ååç©ãããäžã§ãç»äžçãªåºæºã§èçºããæ§ã®ãªã¹ã¯è©äŸ¡ãè¡ã£ãŠããŸãããšã«ã¯å€§ããªæžå¿µãæ®ãããããã§æ¬ç 究ã§ã¯ããã£æ¯é¡ã§Cyp2bãèªå°ããŠèè¥å€§ã»èçºãããèµ·ããããããã«ãããã·ãïŒPBOïŒåã³ãã«ããã¢ãžãã§ãã«ãšãŒãã«ïŒDBDEïŒã«ã€ããŠãèè¥å€§åã³èçºãããšCARãšã®é¢é£æ§ã«ã€ããŠèª¿ã¹ããããCyp2bèªå°ååç©ã®èçºããæ§ã®ãããžã®å€æ¿æ§ãæ€èšããããšã第äžã®ç®çãšãããå®éšã§ã¯ãéçååã³CARKOããŠã¹ã«PBOåã¯DBDEãæ··é€æäžããèéé枬å®ãç
ççµç¹åŠçæ€æ»ãè现èå¢æ®æŽ»æ§ãåã³èè¬ç©ä»£è¬é
µçŽ ã®çºçŸéå€åã«ã€ããŠæ€èšãããšãšãã«ãPBåã®èçºããã«é¢ããå€åïŒèè¥å€§ãè现èå¢æ®æŽ»æ§ã®äº¢é²çïŒã®æ¯èŒãè¡ããå€æ¿æ§ã«ã€ããŠèå¯ããããŸããçºããæ§ã«ãããCAR以å€ã®æ žå
å容äœã®é¢äžã«ã€ããŠã調ã¹ãããšã§ãCyp2bèªå°ååç©ã®MOAåæã®åŠ¥åœæ§ãæ€èšããããšã第äºã®ç®çãšãããã第1ç« ã§ã¯ãéæ§ã®éçåããŠã¹åã³CARKOããŠã¹ã«PBOåã¯DBDEã1é±éã4é±éããããã¯èçºããã€ãã·ãšãŒã¿ãŒã§ãããžãšãã«ããããœã¢ãã³ïŒDENïŒååæäžåŸã«27é±éæ··é€æäžããèè¥å€§åã³èçºããã«ãããCARã®é¢äžã調ã¹ãããã®çµæãPBOã®5,000 ppmæ··é€æäžã§ã¯ãéçåããŠã¹ã§åŒ·ãCyp2bãèªå°ãCARã®æŽ»æ§åã瀺ãããããèè¥å€§ã¯éçåããŠã¹ãšCARKOããŠã¹ã®äž¡æ¹ã§èªãããããPBOã®æäžã§ã¯éºäŒååã«é¢ãããCyp3aã®èªå°ãã¿ãããæ¬å€ã«ããèè¥å€§ã«ã¯CAR以å€ã«pregnane X receptorïŒPXRïŒãé¢äžããŠããå¯èœæ§ã瀺ããããè现èå¢æ®æŽ»æ§ã¯ãéçåããŠã¹ã§ã¯PBOãšPBã§ãCARKOããŠã¹ã§ã¯PBOã®ã¿ã§äº¢é²ããŠãããèçºããæ§ã«ã€ããŠã¯ãPBOã¯PBãšåæ§ã«ãéçåããŠã¹ã§å¥œé
žæ§ã®å¢æ®æ§ç
å€ãèªçºããCARKOããŠã¹ã§ã¯ããã倧å¹
ã«æå¶ãããããšãããPBOã«ããèçºããã¯äž»ã«CARã«äŸåããŠããããšãæãããšãªã£ãããã ããPBOã¯CARKOããŠã¹ã«ãããŠãé°æ§å¯Ÿç
§çŸ€ãããå¢æ®æ§ç
å€ã®çºçé »åºŠåã³çºçæ°ãå
ããªããé«ããCAR以å€ã«ãé
žåã¹ãã¬ã¹ãPXRãä»ããèèã§ã®ä»£è¬å€åãè
«ççºçã«å¯äžããŠããå¯èœæ§ãèãããããDBDEã®50,000 ppmæ··é€æäžã§ã¯ãéçåããŠã¹ã®ã¿ã§Cyp2bã®èªå°åã³èè¥å€§ãèªããããDBDEã®èè¥å€§ã¯CARã«äŸåããŠããããšãæãããšãªã£ããäžæ¹ãDBDEã«ããèçºããæ§ã«ã€ããŠã¯ãéçååã³CARKOããŠã¹ã®äž¡æ¹ã§å¥œå¡©åºæ§ã®å¢æ®æ§ç
å€ãå¢å ãããCyp1a1, Cyp1a2ãCyp1b1ã®mRNAçºçŸã¬ãã«ãäžæãããããšãããèçºããä¿é²äœçšã«ã¯aryl hydrocarbon receptorïŒAhRïŒãé¢äžããŠããå¯èœæ§ãèãããããã第2ç« ã§ã¯ãããŠã¹ã®èè
«çã®çºçé »åºŠã«ã¯æ§å·®ãããããšãååç©ã«ãã£ãŠã¯CARã®æåæ§ã«ãæ§å·®ãããããšãããéæ§ã®éçåããŠã¹åã³CARKOããŠã¹ã«PBOåã¯DBDEã4é±éããããã¯DENååæäžåŸã«27é±éæ··é€æäžãã第1ç« ã«æºããåçš®æ€çŽ¢ãå®æœãééå·®ãæ€èšããããã®çµæãPBOã«ããèè¥å€§ãèçºããã«ã€ããŠééå·®ã¯èªããããªãã£ããããªãã¡ãéããŠã¹ã«ãããŠãèè¥å€§ã«ã¯CAR以å€ã«PXRã®é¢äžãçãããäžæ¹ã§ãèçºããã«ã€ããŠã¯CARã«äŸåããŠå¥œé
žæ§ã®å¢æ®æ§ç
å€ãèªçºããããDBDEã«ã€ããŠã¯ãéã§ã®èè¥å€§ã¯CARã«äŸåããŠããã®ã«å¯Ÿããéã§ã¯CAR以å€ã®çµè·¯ãèè¥å€§ã«å¯äžããå¯èœæ§ã瀺ãããããŸããéæ§ããŠã¹ã§DBDEæäžã«ããCARã«äŸåããå¢å ãã奜塩åºæ§ã®å¢æ®æ§ç
å€ã¯ãéã§ã¯éçåããŠã¹ã§å€ç°è现èå·£ã®è¥å¹²ã®å¢å ãã¿ãããã®ã¿ã§ãããééã§æåæ§ã®éããã¿ããããDENã«ããã€ãã·ãšãŒã·ã§ã³äœçšã«ãã£ãŠèªçºããã奜塩åºæ§ã®èè
«çã¯æ§ãã«ã¢ã³ã«ãã圱é¿ãåããããšãç¥ãããŠãããæ¬å®éšã«ãããŠDBDEã«ããèªçºããã奜塩åºæ§ã®å¢æ®æ§ç
å€ã®æåæ§ã®ééå·®ãšäžèŽãããã®ã§ãã£ããã第3ç« ã§ã¯ãPBOã«ããèè¥å€§ã«ãããæäžçšéãšæŽ»æ§åãããæ žå
å容äœã®é¢é£æ§ã«ã€ããŠèª¿ã¹ããæ¬ç« ã§ã¯5,000 ppmïŒé«çšéïŒã«å ããäžçšéïŒ1,000 ppmïŒãäœçšéïŒ200 ppmïŒã®PBOæäžçŸ€ãèšå®ãã1é±éã®æ··é€æäžãè¡ããCARãPXRãperoxisome proliferator-activated receptorïŒPPARïŒãåã³AhRã®åæ žå
å容äœã®æšçã§ããCyp2bãCyp3aãCyp4aãåã³Cyp1aã®çºçŸãmRNAåã³ã¿ã³ãã¯ã¬ãã«ã§è§£æããããã®çµæãé«çšéãšç°ãªãäžçšéã§ã¯éçåããŠã¹ã®ã¿ã§èè¥å€§ãCyp2b10 mRNAçºçŸã¬ãã«ã®å¢å ãåã³æCyp2bæäœã«å¯Ÿããå°èäžå¿æ§ã®éœæ§åå¿å¢åŒ·ãã¿ãããããšãããäžçšéã§ã®èè¥å€§ã«ã¯CARã®ã¿ãå¯äžããŠããããšãæãããšãªã£ããæ¬ç« ã®å®éšçµæãããPBOã«ããé
µçŽ èªå°åã³èè¥å€§ã§ã¯ãæäžéã«ããé¢äžããæ žå
å容äœãç°ãªãããšã瀺ãããã以äžã®ç 究çµæãããDBDEã«ããçºããã«ã€ããŠã¯CAR以å€ã®çµè·¯ã瀺åãããPBãšã¯ç°ãªãã¿ã€ãã®èçºããããã¢ãŒã·ã§ã³äœçšãæãããšèããããMOAåæã«ãã£ãŠããããžã®å€æ¿æ§ãªãããšã®å€æã¯ã§ããªããšçµè«ãããããããDBDEã¯å¥œå¡©åºæ§ã®è
«çãããšããšå°ãªãéããŠã¹ã§ã¯è
«çãèªçºããªãã£ãããšãåã³æ¬ç 究ã§ã®DBDEã¯50,000 ppmãšéåžžã«é«æ¿åºŠã§ããããŸãDBDEã®çäœåžåæ§ã¯éåžžã«äœããšèšãããŠããããšãããå®éã®ãªã¹ã¯ç®¡çã«ãããŠã¯ããã£æ¯é¡ã§èªçºãããè
«çã®ã¿ã€ãã«å¿ããçºçã¡ã«ããºã èå¯ããããã§ã®æŽé²éãå«ããèå¯ãå¿
èŠã«ãªãã§ããããPBOã«ã€ããŠã¯ãCAR掻æ§åã奜é
žæ§ã®å€ç°è现èå·£ïŒè
ºè
«ã®èªçºãªã©ã®PBã¿ã€ãã®MOAã®key eventsãæºãããŠãããäžæ¹ãPBOã¯CARKOããŠã¹ã§ãå
ããªããã«å¢æ®æ§ç
å€ãå¢å ãããèè¥å€§ã«ã¯PXRãšãã£ãä»ã®æ žå
å容äœã®é¢äžã瀺ãããããšãããCAR以å€ã®çµè·¯ã匱ããªããèçºããä¿é²ã«å¯äžããå¯èœæ§ã瀺åããããããããªãããMOAåæçµæã®ãããžã®å€æ¿æ§ã«ã€ããŠã¯ãkey eventsã®ç¢ºèªã«å ããŠãããšå®éšåç©éã§ã®æŽé²éã代è¬æ©èœã®éããèæ
®ã«å
¥ããå¿
èŠãããã第3ç« ã§ã¯äžçšéã®PBOã«ããèè¥å€§ã«ã¯ãCARã®ã¿ãé¢äžããŠããããšãæããã«ããããã£ãŠãäžçšéã§ã¯å¢æ®æ§ç
å€ã®çºçãå®å
šã«CARã«äŸåããŠããããšãæšå¯ããããã®å Žåã¯ããããžã®å€æ¿æ§ãªãããšå€æã§ããå¯èœæ§ãé«ããšèããããååŠç©è³ªã®ãã£æ¯é¡ã§ã®èçºããæ§ã«ã€ããŠããããžã®å€æ¿æ§ãæ€èšããããã«çšããããMOAåæã¯ãååŠç©è³ªãé©åã«ç®¡çããªãã䜿çšããŠããããã«éåžžã«æçšãªããŒã«ã§ãããããããéåžžå®æœãããŠããéçåããŠã¹ãã©ãããçšããæ¯æ§è©Šéšã§ã¯ãCARã«äŸåããèè¥å€§ãèçºããã«ãã£ãŠä»ã®çµè·¯ãä»ããäœçšããã¹ã¯ãããŠããŸãå¯èœæ§ããããæœåšçãªãªã¹ã¯ãèŠéãæãããããæ¬ç 究ã§ã¯ããã£æ¯é¡ã§Cyp2bãèªå°ããééºäŒæ¯æ§ã®ååŠç©è³ªã§ããPBOåã³DBDEã«ã€ããŠãCARKOããŠã¹ãå¹æçã«çšããããšã§ãèè¥å€§ïŒèçºããã«ãããCARåã³ãã®ä»ã®æ žå
å容äœã®é¢äžãæããã«ãããã£æ¯é¡ã§ã®çºããæ§ã®ãããžã®å€æ¿æ§å€æãè¡ã£ãããŸããæ¬ç 究ã§çšããååç©ã«éãããCyp2bèªå°ååç©ã®çºããæ§ã«ã€ããŠCARKOããŠã¹ãçšããå®éšææ³ãMOAåæãšçµã¿åãããããšã§ãããæ£ç¢ºã§ä¿¡é Œæ§ã®é«ãè©äŸ¡ãè¡ãããšãã§ãããšçµè«ãããThere are many kinds of chemicals, which are naturally derived or artificially synthesized, in the atmosphere of modern life of humans. We are exposed to them by oral route as additives or residues in food or water, by respiration, or by cutaneous contact. To assess the effects of these chemicals to humans, a lot of experimental procedures have been undertaken. One of them is toxicity study with laboratory animals, usually with rodents such as rats and mice, and they provide useful information to speculate hazardous properties of the chemicals to humans. On the other hand, we have to consider the relevance of the toxic information obtained from animal studies to human reactions based on the mechanism of action, since each animal species have different physiological and metabological function. Especially in a case that carcinogenic potential was found in laboratory animals, the extrapolation to the humans would be the most important point in its risk assessment. One of the cases that species difference of carcinogenicity between rodents and humans has been clearly defined is phenobarbital (hereafter PB). PB is known to induce liver hypertrophy and liver tumor in rodents. In humans, it has been widely used as antiepileptic drug; however, comprehensive epidemiological researches revealed that hepatocarcinogenic property of PB in rodents is not relevant to humans. After late 1990âs, extensive researches using gene engineering have gradually revealed the mechanism of this species difference. PB induces liver hypertrophy accompanied by the induction of certain drug metabolic enzymes such as various cytochrome P450s (particularly Cyp2b), stimulation of cell proliferation activity, and inhibition of apoptosis, then long-term treatment with PB promotes liver tumorigenesis in rodents. However, in the mice lacking the gene of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR, NR1I3), the nuclear receptor related to detoxification and metabolism of xenobiotics, PB does not induce Cyp2b, liver hypertrophy, or liver tumor; clearly indicating that CAR is essential for PB-inducible liver hypertrophy and hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. On the contrary, it was reported that the mice which express human CAR in their hepatocytes shows liver hypertrophy but no hepatocellular proliferation, suggesting that CAR is involved in the difference of susceptibility in the hepatocarcinogenic potential of PB between rodent and human. These researches for the species difference in the PB-inducible liver hypertrophy and hepatocarcinogenesis developed into a concept of the Mode of Action (MOA) analysis, which is used to assess the extrapolation of chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis. In the MOA analysis, if rodents given a chemical show some key events like CAR activation, liver hypertrophy, hepatocellular proliferation, and so on, the hepatocarcinogenic potential of the chemical is considered ânot human relevant.â However, there are various compounds that induce Cyp2b, and the mechanism of CAR activation by those chemical substances, the induction pathway of drug-metabolizing enzymes downstream thereof, or the process leading to cell proliferation has not been fully elucidated. Under such circumstances, there is a great concern that risk assessment of liver carcinogenicity will be conducted according to a uniform standard. Therefore, in this research, the involvement of CAR in liver hypertrophy and liver tumor induction were examined for piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and decabromodiphenyl ether (DBDE), which are known to induce Cyp2b and cause liver hypertrophy and tumor in rodents, and examined the extrapolation of their hepatocarcinogenic property to humans. In the experiments, wild-type and CAR knock-out (CARKO) mice were given PBO and DBDE in the diet and examined liver weight, histopathological examination, hepatocyte proliferative activity, and expression levels of hepatic drug-metabolizing enzymes, then the extrapolation of the hepatocarcinogenic property of PBO and DBDE to humans were discussed by MOA analysis. In addition, involvement of nuclear receptors other than CAR was investigated in the experiments in order to discuss the validity of the MOA analysis. In the Chapter 1, male wild-type and CARKO mice were given PBO and DBDE in the diet for 1 week, 4 weeks, or 27 weeks (after a single intraperitoneal administration of diethyl nitrosamine (DEN), which is a liver tumor initiator), and the involvement of CAR in liver hypertrophy and hepatocarcinogenesis was investigated. As a result, strong induction of Cyp2b, which indicates CAR activation, was observed in wild-type mice at 5000 ppm of PBO, but increase in liver weights and hepatocellular hypertrophy were observed in both wild-type and CARKO mice. Since PBO induced Cyp3a regardless of genotype, it was supposed that not only CAR but the pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2) are involved in the liver hypertrophy caused by PBO. Hepatocellular proliferative activity was increased in PBO and PB groups in wild-type mice and in PBO group in CARKO mice. Regarding hepatocarcinogenesis, PBO induced eosinophilic proliferative lesions in wild-type mice as in PB, and those were considerably suppressed in CARKO mice, hence hepatocarcinogenesis by PBO is mainly dependent on CAR. In CARKO mice, however, PBO has a higher incidence of proliferative lesions than those in the negative control group, thus oxidative stress or the change in metabolic status in the liver via PXR may also contribute to tumorigenesis in addition to CAR. In DBDE treatment at 50000 ppm in the diet, induction of Cyp2b and liver hypertrophy were observed only in wild-type mice, and it was revealed that liver hypertrophy by DBDE is dependent on CAR. On the other hand, DBDE increased the number of basophilic proliferative lesions in both wild-type and CARKO mice, suggested that DBDE promotes liver carcinogenesis by a route independent on CAR. Since DBDE increased the mRNA expression levels of Cyp1a1, 1a2, and 1b1, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) may be involved in the liver tumor promoting effect by DBDE. In the Chapter 2, sex difference in the relationship between liver hypertrophy/tumor induction and CAR activation was examined, since incidences of liver tumor in mice are generally different by sex and some chemicals were reported to have different effect on CAR activation between males and females. Female wild-type and CARKO mice were treated with PBO and DBDE for 4 weeks, or 27 weeks after single administration of DEN, then various examinations such as histopathology and mRNA expression levels were carried out in accordance with the Chapter 1. In consequence, there was no sex difference in liver hypertrophy and hepatocarcinogenesis induced by PBO. That is, PXR was suspected to be involved in liver hypertrophy in addition to CAR, while eosinophilic proliferative lesions were induced depending on CAR in female mice as well as in males. As for DBDE, liver hypertrophy in males was dependent on CAR, whereas in females a route other than CAR could contribute to liver hypertrophy. In addition, there was a sex difference in the promoting effect of basophilic proliferative lesions which were CAR-independently induced by DBDE in male mice but not obviously induced in female mice. The sex difference in susceptibility of basophilic proliferative lesions by DBDE is probably related to sex hormones considering the report which says that the induction of basophilic tumors by DEN initiation is altered by sex hormones. In Chapter 3, the relationship between dose levels of PBO and the involvement of nuclear receptors including CAR and others. In this experiment, in addition to 5000 ppm, male mice were treated with 1000 and 200 ppm of PBO in the diet for 1 week, and investigate the activation of CAR, PXR, PPAR and AhR by examine the target phase I liver metabolizing enzymes of each nuclear receptors, Cyp2b, Cyp3a, Cyp4a, and Cyp1a, respectively, in mRNA and protein levels. As a result, 5000 ppm of PBO induced liver hypertrophy regardless of CAR and the involvement of PXR was indicated by Cyp3a induction. On the contrary, 1000 ppm of PBO exhibited liver hypertrophy and Cyp2b induction only in wild-type mice; indicated that only CAR contributes at 1000 ppm of PBO. The result of this experiment revealed that the involvement of nuclear receptors alters by the dose levels of PBO.Based on the results from the experiments in the Chapter 1 to 3, liver tumor induction by DBDE has a pathway other than CAR and DBDE has a different mechanism of liver tumor promotion when compared to PB. Therefore, according to the MOA analysis, it cannot be said ânot human relevant.â DBDE, however, did not induce basophilic-type tumors in female mice, thus more detailed disccusion depending on the type of tumor induced in rodents will be needed for the risk management of DBDE. Also, considering that the dose level of DBDE in this research was extremely high at 50000 ppm, and that it was reported that the orally administrated DBDE has very low absorbance to the body, it will be very important to discuss the exposure levels to humans in the risk management of the chemical.Meanwhile, the effects of PBO coincide with the key events in PB-type MOA such as Cyp2b induction, increase in hepatocellular proliferative activity, and induction of eosinophilic altered foci/adenomas. However, PBO slightly increased liver proliferative lesions even in CARKO mice and the involvement of PXR was suspected in the liver hypertrophy, suggesting the possibility that other pathways other than CAR contribute to the promotion of hepatocarcinogenesis. In the MOA analysis, it is necessary to take into consideration the key events as well as the differences on exposures or metabological function between laboratory animals and humans. The experiment in Chapter 3 revealed that only CAR is responsible for the liver hypertrophy induced by low dose of PBO. Hepatocarcinogenic property of PBO at low dose has not been investigated in this research, but it is supposed that the occurrence of liver tumors is also dependent on CAR at low dose, and in that case, it could be judged as ânot human relevantâ.The MOA analysis used to examine the extrapolation to humans for chemical hepatocarcinogenicity in rodents is a helpful tool for appropriate risk management of chemicals which can enrich our life. However, with traditional toxicity studies using wild-type mice or rats, there is a possibility that strong effect of CAR on the liver hypertrophy and tumor induction may cover the involvement of other pathway and that may make us misunderstand the potential risk of the chemical. In the present research, the effective use of CARKO mice shed light on the involvement of CAR and other nuclear receptors in liver hypertrophy and hepatocarcinogenesis. From the above, by combining experiments with CARKO mice and the MOA analysis, it is possible to conduct more accurate and highly reliable evaluation for hepatocarcinogenic property of Cyp2b-inducible chemicals.å士(ç£å»åŠ)麻åžå€§
A Case of Right Hepatic Artery Syndrome Diagnosed by Using SpyGlassDSTM System
We report the case of a 68-year-old woman who had abdominal pain and slightly elevated biliary enzymes. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography detected biliary duct stenosis, while contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed that the right hepatic artery transversed the extrahepatic bile duct at the level of bifurcation of the bile duct. We performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and peroral cholangioscopy with the SpyGlass DS? system. Then, mild extrinsic pulsatile compression of the bile duct was observed at stricture level with an intact bile duct epithelium. Therefore, she was diagnosed with right hepatic artery syndrome and underwent cholecystectomy. Six months later, her biliary enzyme level decreased, and the recurrence of pain gradually decreased
Improved brain MRI indices in the acute brain stem infarct sites treated with hydroxyl radical scavengers, Edaravone and hydrogen, as compared to Edaravone alone. A non-controlled study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In acute stage of cerebral infarction, MRI indices (rDWI & rADC) deteriorate during the first 3-7 days after the ictus and then gradually normalize in approximately 10 days (pseudonormalization time), although the tissue is already infarcted. Since effective treatments improve these indices significantly and in less than the natural pseudonormalization time, a combined analysis of these changes provides an opportunity for objective evaluation on the effectiveness of various treatments for cerebral infarction. Hydroxyl radicals are highly destructive to the tissue and aggravate cerebral infarction. We treated brainstem infarction patients in acute stage with hydroxyl radical scavengers (Edaravone and hydrogen) by intravenous administration and evaluated the effects of the treatment by a serial observation and analysis of these MRI indices. The effects of the treatment were evaluated and compared in two groups, an Edaravone alone group and a combined group with Edaravone and hydrogen, in order to assess beneficial effects of addition of hydrogen.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The patients were divided in Edaravone only group (E group. 26 patients) and combined treatment group with Edaravone and hydrogen enriched saline (EH group. 8 patients). The extent of the initial hump of rDWI, the initial dip of rADC and pseudo-normalization time were determined in each patient serially and averages of these data were compared in these two groups and also with the natural course in the literatures.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The initial hump of rDWI reached 2.0 in the E group which was better than 2.5 of the natural course but was not as good as 1.5 of the EH group. The initial dip of rADC was 0.6 in the E group which was close to the natural course but worse than 0.8 of the EH group. Pseudonormalization time of rDWI and rADC was 9 days only in EH group but longer in other groups. Addition of hydrogen caused no side effects.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Administration of hydroxyl radical scavengers in acute stage of brainstem infarction improved MRI indices against the natural course. The effects were more obvious and significant in the EH group. These findings may imply the need for more frequent daily administration of hydroxyl scavenger, or possible additional hydrogen effects on scavenger mechanisms.</p
Development of a novel mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis using a high-fat, choline-deficient diet and intraperitoneal injection of diethylnitrosamine
Hydrogen(H2) treatment for acute erythymatous skin diseases. A report of 4 patients with safety data and a non-controlled feasibility study with H2 concentration measurement on two volunteers
BACKGROUND: We have treated 4 patients of acute erythematous skin diseases with fever and/or pain by H(2) enriched intravenous fluid. We also added data from two volunteers for assessing the mode of H(2) delivery to the skin for evaluation of feasibility of H(2) treatment for this type of skin diseases. METHODS: All of the four patients received intravenous administration of 500âml of H2 enriched fluid in 30âmin for more than 3âdays except in one patient for only once. From two volunteers (one for intravenous H2 administration and the other for H2 inhalation), blood samples were withdrawn serially and air samples were collected from a heavy duty plastic bag covering a leg, before, during and after H2 administration. These samples were checked for H2 concentration immediately by gas chromatography. Multiple physiological parameters and blood chemistry data were collected also. RESULTS: Erythema of these 4 patients and associated symptoms improved significantly after the H2 treatment and did not recur. Administration of H2 did not change physiological parameters and did not cause deterioration of the blood chemistry. The H2 concentration in the blood from the volunteers rapidly increased with H2 inhalation and slowly decreased with cessation of H2 particularly in the venous blood, while H2 concentration of the air from the surface of the leg showed much slower changes even after H2 inhalation was discontinued, at least during the time of sample collection. CONCLUSION: An improvement in acute erythemtous skin diseases followed the administration of H2 enriched fluid without compromising the safety. The H2 delivery study of two volunteers suggested initial direct delivery and additional prolonged delivery possibly from a slowly desaturating reservoir in the skin to the surface
Immobilization-induced hypersensitivity associated with spinal cord sensitization during cast immobilization and after cast removal in rats
This study examined mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity in the rat hind paw during cast immobilization of the hind limbs for 4 or 8 weeks and following cast removal. Blood flow, skin temperature, and volume of the rat hind paw were assessed in order to determine peripheral circulation of the hind limbs. Sensitization was analyzed by measuring the expression of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the spinal dorsal horn following cast immobilization. Two weeks post immobilization, mechanical and thermal sensitivities increased significantly in all rats; however, peripheral circulation was not affected by immobilization. Cast immobilization for 8 weeks induced more serious hypersensitivity compared to cast immobilization for 4 weeks. Moreover, CGRP expression in the deeper lamina layer of the spinal dorsal horn increased in the rats immobilized for 8 weeks but not in those immobilized for 4 weeks. These findings suggest that immobilization-induced hypersensitivity develops during the immobilization period without affecting peripheral circulation. Our results also highlight the possibility that prolonged immobilization induces central sensitization in the spinal cord.The final publication is available at link.springer.co
A basic study on molecular hydrogen (H2) inhalation in acute cerebral ischemia patients for safety check with physiological parameters and measurement of blood H2 level
BACKGROUND: In animal experiments, use of molecular hydrogen ( H(2)) has been regarded as quite safe and effective, showing benefits in multiple pathological conditions such as ischemia-reperfusion injury of the brain, heart, kidney and transplanted tissues, traumatic and surgical injury of the brain and spinal cord, inflammation of intestine and lung , degenerative striatonigral tissue and also in many other situations. However, since cerebral ischemia patients are in old age group, the safety information needs to be confirmed. For the feasibility of H(2) treatment in these patients, delivery of H(2) by inhalation method needs to be checked for consistency. METHODS: Hydrogen concentration (HC) in the arterial and venous blood was measured by gas chromatography on 3 patients, before, during and after 4% (case 1) and 3% (case2,3) H(2) gas inhalation with simultaneous monitoring of physiological parameters. For a consistency study, HC in the venous blood of 10 patients were obtained on multiple occasions at the end of 30-min H(2) inhalation treatment. RESULTS: The HC gradually reached a plateau level in 20 min after H(2) inhalation in the blood, which was equivalent to the level reported by animal experiments. The HC rapidly decreased to 10% of the plateau level in about 6 min and 18 min in arterial and venous blood, respectively after H(2) inhalation was discontinued. Physiological parameters on these 3 patients were essentially unchanged by use of hydrogen. The consistency study of 10 patients showed the HC at the end of 30-min inhalation treatment was quite variable but the inconsistency improved with more attention and encouragement. CONCLUSION: H(2) inhalation of at least 3% concentration for 30 min delivered enough HC, equivalent to the animal experiment levels, in the blood without compromising the safety. However, the consistency of H(2) delivery by inhalation needs to be improved
å¥åžžäººã«ãããA1åãšA2åã®ãããªãã¹ç¥çµæ¯çŽ ã®é»æ°ççåŠçæ€æ»ã«ããæ¯èŒ
Botulinum neurotoxin type A1 (BoNTs/A1) and type B (BoNT/B) have been used for treating hyperactive muscle contractions. In the present study, we compared the effect of botulinum neurotoxin subtype A2 (6.5 mouse LD50 units A2 neurotoxin, A2NTX) and onabotulinumtoxinA (10 mouse LD50 units BoNT/A1 product) by measuring the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) before and after administration.
In total, 8 healthy subjects were examined in the present study. A2NTX was injected into the extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscle, followed by onabotulinumtoxinA injection into the contralateral EDB muscle after 16 weeks. The CMAP amplitudes from the EDB, abductor hallucis (AH), and abductor digiti minimi pedis (ADM) muscles were measured after each BoNT injection on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, 84, and 112 to assess the effect of the toxin. On day 14, both A2NTX and onabotulinumtoxinA produced an approximately 70% decline in EDB CMAP amplitude compared to the baseline values; significant reduction of the CMAP continued through day 112. The CMAP amplitudes from neighboring muscles (AH and ADM) remained intact throughout the study period, except for a slight but significant drop at day 28 after onabotulinumtoxinA injection compared to A2NTX. The current findings indicate that small doses (6.5 units and 10 units) of A2NTX and onabotulinumtoxinA have at least comparable onset and duration of action, although similar clinical effects were obtained with lower dose using A2NTX
Optimization of the proliferation and persistency of CAR T cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells
CARã·ã°ãã«ãè£å®ããéºäŒåæ¹å€ã«ãã *iCAR-T现èã®åºåœ¢ããæ²»çå¹æãæ¹åããã. 京éœå€§åŠãã¬ã¹ãªãªãŒã¹. 2022-12-13.Genetic modifications boosting CAR signaling improve the therapeutic efficacy of iPSC-derived CAR-T cells against solid tumors. 京éœå€§åŠãã¬ã¹ãªãªãŒã¹. 2022-12-13.The effectiveness of chimaeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapies against solid tumours relies on the accumulation, proliferation and persistency of T cells at the tumour site. Here we show that the proliferation of CD8αβ cytotoxic CAR T cells in solid tumours can be enhanced by deriving and expanding them from a single human induced-pluripotent-stem-cell clone bearing a CAR selected for efficient differentiation. We also show that the proliferation and persistency of the effector cells in the tumours can be further enhanced by genetically knocking out diacylglycerol kinase, which inhibits antigen-receptor signalling, and by transducing the cells with genes encoding for membrane-bound interleukin-15 (IL-15) and its receptor subunit IL-15Rα. In multiple tumour-bearing animal models, the engineered hiPSC-derived CAR T cells led to therapeutic outcomes similar to those of primary CD8 T cells bearing the same CAR. The optimization of effector CAR T cells derived from pluripotent stem cells may aid the development of long-lasting antigen-specific T-cell immunotherapies for the treatment of solid tumours
- âŠ