Outstanding negative prediction performance of solid pulmonary nodule volume AI for ultra-LDCT baseline lung cancer screening risk stratification

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of AI as a standalone reader in ultra-low-dose CT lung cancer baseline screening, and compare it to that of experienced radiologists. METHODS: 283 participants who underwent a baseline ultra-LDCT scan in Moscow Lung Cancer Screening, between February 2017-2018, and had at least one solid lung nodule, were included. Volumetric nodule measurements were performed by five experienced blinded radiologists, and independently assessed using an AI lung cancer screening prototype (AVIEW LCS, v1.0.34, Coreline Soft, Co. ltd, Seoul, Korea) to automatically detect, measure, and classify solid nodules. Discrepancies were stratified into two groups: positive-misclassification (PM); nodule classified by the reader as a NELSON-plus /EUPS-indeterminate/positive nodule, which at the reference consensus read was < 100 mm3, and negative-misclassification (NM); nodule classified as a NELSON-plus /EUPS-negative nodule, which at consensus read was ≥ 100 mm3. RESULTS: 1149 nodules with a solid-component were detected, of which 878 were classified as solid nodules. For the largest solid nodule per participant (n = 283); 61 [21.6 %; 53 PM, 8 NM] discrepancies were reported for AI as a standalone reader, compared to 43 [15.1 %; 22 PM, 21 NM], 36 [12.7 %; 25 PM, 11 NM], 29 [10.2 %; 25 PM, 4 NM], 28 [9.9 %; 6 PM, 22 NM], and 50 [17.7 %; 15 PM, 35 NM] discrepancies for readers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that through the use of AI as an impartial reader in baseline lung cancer screening, negative-misclassification results could exceed that of four out of five experienced radiologists, and radiologists' workload could be drastically diminished by up to 86.7%

A Challenge for Emphysema Quantification Using a Deep Learning Algorithm With Low-dose Chest Computed Tomography

Purpose: We aimed to identify clinically relevant deep learning algorithms for emphysema quantification using low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) through an invitation-based competition. Materials and Methods: The Korean Society of Imaging Informatics in Medicine (KSIIM) organized a challenge for emphysema quantification between November 24, 2020 and January 26, 2021. Seven invited research teams participated in this challenge. In total, 558 pairs of computed tomography (CT) scans (468 pairs for the training set, and 90 pairs for the test set) from 9 hospitals were collected retrospectively or prospectively. CT acquisition followed the hospitals&apos; protocols to reflect the real-world clinical setting. Using the training set, each team developed an algorithm that generated converted LDCT by changing the pixel values of LDCT to simulate those of standard-dose CT (SDCT). The agreement between SDCT and LDCT was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 2-way random effects, absolute agreement, and single rater) for the percentage of low-attenuated area below -950 HU (LAA(-950 HU)), kappa value for emphysema categorization (LAA(-950 HU), &lt;5%, 5% to 10%, and &gt;= 10%) and cosine similarity of LAA(-950 HU). Results: The mean LAA(-950 HU) of the test set was 14.2%+/- 10.5% for SDCT, 25.4%+/- 10.2% for unconverted LDCT, and 12.9%+/- 10.4%, 11.7%+/- 10.8%, and 12.4%+/- 10.5% for converted LDCT (top 3 teams). The agreement between the SDCT and converted LDCT of the first-place team was 0.94 (95% confidence interval: 0.90, 0.97) for ICC, 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.58, 0.84) for categorical agreement, and 0.97 (interquartile range: 0.94 to 0.99) for cosine similarity. Conclusions: Emphysema quantification with LDCT was feasible through deep learning-based CT conversion strategies.N