14 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
SREBP: A Key Effector of mTORC1 Signaling in Metabolism and Cancer
The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), a master regulator of cell growth and proliferation, is aberrantly activated in cancer, genetic tumor syndromes and obesity. Much progress has been made to understand the upstream pathways that regulate mTORC1, most of which converge upon its negative regulator, the Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) 1-TSC2 complex. However, the cell intrinsic consequences of aberrant mTORC1 activation remain poorly characterized. Using systems in which mTORC1 is constitutively activated by genetic loss of TSC1 or TSC2 and pharmacologically inhibited by treatment with an mTORC1-specific inhibitor rapamycin, we have identified that mTORC1 controls specific aspects of cellular metabolism, including glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and de novo lipogenesis. Induction of the pentose phosphate pathway and de novo lipogenesis is achieved by activation of a transcriptional program affecting metabolic gene targets of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP). We have demonstrated that mTORC1 stimulates the accumulation of processed, active SREBP, although details of the molecular mechanism remain to be elucidated. To understand the physiological and pathological relevance of mTORC1-dependent activation of SREBPs and lipogenesis, we explored these findings in the liver and in cancer. While we find that the induction of hepatic SREBP1c and lipogenesis by insulin requires mTORC1, mTORC1 activation is not sufficient to stimulate hepatic SREBP1c in the absence of Akt signaling, revealing the existence of an additional downstream pathway also required for this induction. We demonstrate that this mTORC1-independent pathway involves Akt-mediated suppression of Insig2a, a liver-specific transcript encoding the SREBP1c inhibitor INSIG2. In cancer, our initial findings demonstrate that mTORC1 plays a role downstream of TSC-deficiency and oncogenic PIK3CA and K-Ras to activate lipogenic SREBP targets and de novo lipogenesis. Further studies of the connection between mTORC1 and SREBPs in disease may offer insights into novel therapeutic approaches
Recommended from our members
Oncogenic signaling upstream of mTORC1 drives lipogenesis and proliferation through SREBP
Chewing the Fat on Tumor Cell Metabolism
Tumor cells undergo a metabolic shift toward specific bioenergetic (glycolysis) and anabolic (protein and lipid synthesis) processes that promote rapid growth. Nomura et al. (2010) now demonstrate that an increase in monoacylglycerol lipase (MAGL) drives tumorigenesis through the lipolytic release and remodeling of free fatty acids
Activation of a Metabolic Gene Regulatory Network Downstream of mTOR Complex 1
Aberrant activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a common molecular event in a variety of pathological settings, including genetic tumor syndromes, cancer, and obesity. However, the cell-intrinsic consequences of mTORC1 activation remain poorly defined. Through a combination of unbiased genomic, metabolomic, and bioinformatic approaches, we demonstrate that mTORC1 activation is sufficient to stimulate specific metabolic pathways, including glycolysis, the oxidative arm of the pentose phosphate pathway, and de novo lipid biosynthesis. This is achieved through the activation of a transcriptional program affecting metabolic gene targets of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1α) and sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP1 and SREBP2). We find that SREBP1 and 2 promote proliferation downstream of mTORC1, and the activation of these transcription factors is mediated by S6K1. Therefore, in addition to promoting protein synthesis, mTORC1 activates specific bioenergetic and anabolic cellular processes that are likely to contribute to human physiology and disease
Activation of a metabolic gene regulatory network downstream of mTOR complex 1
Aberrant activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) complex 1 (mTORC1) is a common molecular event in a large variety of pathological settings, including genetic tumor syndromes, cancer, and obesity. However, the cell intrinsic consequences of mTORC1 activation remain poorly defined. Through a combination of unbiased genomic, metabolomic, and bioinformatic approaches, we demonstrate that mTORC1 activation is sufficient to stimulate specific metabolic pathways, including glycolysis, the oxidative arm of the pentose phosphate pathway, and de novo lipid biosynthesis. This is achieved through the activation of a transcriptional program affecting metabolic gene targets of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1) and sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP1 and SREBP2). We find that SREBP1 and 2 promote proliferation downstream of mTORC1, and the activation of these transcription factors is mediated by S6K1. Therefore, in addition to promoting protein synthesis, mTORC1 activates specific bioenergetic and anabolic cellular processes that are likely to contribute to human physiology and disease
Recommended from our members
Zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma : interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial
PurposeZanubrutinib is a potent, irreversible next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor designed to maximize BTK occupancy and minimize off-target kinase inhibition. We hypothesized that complete/sustained BTK occupancy may improve efficacy outcomes and increased BTK specificity may minimize off-target inhibition-related toxicities.Patients and methodsALPINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03734016) is a global, randomized, open-label phase III study of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). The preplanned interim analysis was scheduled approximately 12 months after the first 415 patients were enrolled.ResultsBetween November 1, 2018, and December 14, 2020, 652 patients were enrolled. We present the interim analysis of the first 415 enrolled patients randomly assigned to receive zanubrutinib (n = 207) or ibrutinib (n = 208). At 15 months of median follow-up, ORR (partial or complete response) was significantly higher with zanubrutinib (78.3%; 95% CI, 72.0 to 83.7) versus ibrutinib (62.5%; 95% CI, 55.5 to 69.1; two-sided P < .001). ORR was higher with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in subgroups with del(17p)/TP53 mutations (80.5% v 50.0%) and del(11q) (83.6% v 69.1%); 12-month progression-free survival in all patients was higher with zanubrutinib (94.9%) versus ibrutinib (84.0%; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.69). Atrial fibrillation rate was significantly lower with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib (2.5% v 10.1%; two-sided P = .001). Rates of cardiac events, major hemorrhages, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation/death were lower with zanubrutinib.ConclusionZanubrutinib had a significantly higher ORR, lower atrial fibrillation rate, and improved progression-free survival and overall cardiac safety profile versus ibrutinib. These data support improved efficacy/safety outcomes with selective BTK inhibition