8 research outputs found

    Lack of Protection of Ischaemic Preconditioning in the Rat Model of Major Hepatectomy With Ischaemia Reperfusion Injury

    Get PDF
    Objective: To investigate the effects of ischaemic preconditioning (IP) on residual liver regeneration after major hepatectomy without portal blood bypass in rats, and to verify whether it can protect the residual liver from ischaemia reperfusion (IR) injury. Methods: Ninety rats were randomized into three groups: Group PH, rats were subjected to 70% hepatectomy alone; Group IR, rats were subjected to 30 minutes of total hepatic ischaemia, and 70% hepatectomy was performed just before reperfusion; Group IP, rats were pretreated with IP (5/10 minutes). During the preoperative period and at 0.5, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after the operation, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities were measured using an autoanalyser. Serum hyaluronic acid (HA) was measured by radioimmunoassay. Regenerated liver weight (RLW) of the rats was measured and the expressions of Ki-67 and cyclin D1 were determined by immunohistochemistry in remnant liver tissue. Results: There were no significant differences in serum AST and ALT levels in all the groups before the operation. After partial hepatectomy, AST and ALT levels increased rapidly. From 0.5 to 24 hours after operation, serum AST and ALT levels were significantly higher in IP group rats than in PH and IR rats (p <0.05). There were no significant differences in serum HA levels in all the groups before the operation. After partial hepatectomy, HA levels increased rapidly, reaching peak values at 12 hours. In the early stage (during 12 hours) after the operation, HA level was significantly higher in IP rats than in PH and IR rats (p <0.05). The RLW of the rats rapidly increased after partial hepatectomy, and significantly decreased in IP rats compared with PH and IR rats (p <0.05). Cyclin D1 and Ki-67 expression in all groups before the operation were low and were not significantly different. After partial hepatectomy, they rapidly increased. The expression of Ki-67 and cyclin D1 reached a peak at 24 hours after the operation in PH rats, and they were significantly higher compared with IR and IP rats (p <0.05). In groups IR and IP, the expression of cyclin D1 and Ki-67 reached peak values at 48 hours. A significant decrease (p <0.05) was observed after 24 and 48 hours of reperfusion in group IP compared with groups PH and IR. Conclusion: IP impairs residual liver regeneration after major hepatectomy without portal blood bypass in rats, and protection from IR injury disappears. IP-induced hyperperfusion may be the cause of reduced liver regeneration

    Novel Molecular Subtyping Scheme Based on In Silico Analysis of Cuproptosis Regulator Gene Patterns Optimizes Survival Prediction and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    No full text
    Background: The liver plays an important role in maintaining copper homeostasis. Copper ion accumulation was elevated in HCC tissue samples. Copper homeostasis is implicated in cancer cell proliferation and angiogenesis. The potential of copper homeostasis as a new theranostic biomarker for molecular imaging and the targeted therapy of HCC has been demonstrated. Recent studies have reported a novel copper-dependent nonapoptotic form of cell death called cuproptosis, strikingly different from other known forms of cell death. The correlation between cuproptosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not fully understood. Materials and Methods: The transcriptomic data of patients with HCC were retrieved from the Cancer Genome Atlas-Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma (TCGA-LIHC) and were used as a discovery cohort to construct the prognosis model. The gene expression data of patients with HCC retrieved from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were used as the validation cohort. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used to construct the prognosis model. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to evaluate the overall characteristics of cuproptosis regulator genes and obtain the PC1 and PC2 scores. Unsupervised clustering was performed using the ConsensusClusterPlus R package to identify the molecular subtypes of HCC. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify cuproptosis regulator genes that could predict the prognosis of patients with HCC. The receiver operating characteristics curve and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were used to understand the role of hub genes in predicting the diagnosis and prognosis of patients, as well as the prognosis risk model. A weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used for screening the cuproptosis subtype-related hub genes. The functional enrichment analysis was performed using Metascape. The ‘glmnet’ R package was used to perform the LASSO regression analysis, and the randomForest algorithm was performed using the ‘randomForest’ R package. The ‘pRRophetic’ R package was used to estimate the anticancer drug sensitivity based on the data retrieved from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer database. The nomogram was constructed using the ‘rms’ R package. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlations. Results: We constructed a six-gene signature prognosis model and a nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with a high-risk score, which was predicted by the six-gene signature model, had poor prognoses (log-rank test p p CDCA8, MCM6, and NCAPG2, were identified in patients in Cu-cluster B using WGCNA and the “randomForest” algorithm. A nomogram was constructed to screen patients in the Cu-cluster B subtype based on three genes: CDCA8, MCM6, and NCAPG2. Conclusion: Publicly available databases and various bioinformatics tools were used to study the heterogeneity of cuproptosis in patients with HCC. Three HCC subtypes were identified, with differences in the survival outcomes, genomic instability, senescence environment, and response to anticancer drugs. Further, three cuproptosis-related genes were identified, which could be used to design personalized therapeutic strategies for HCC

    Peptidase inhibitor 15 as a novel blood diagnostic marker for cholangiocarcinomaResearch in context

    No full text
    Background: We aimed to screen a specific secretory protein that could serve as blood diagnostic marker for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: Starting with the analysis of gene expression profiles in tumor tissues and matched normal tissues from cases with CCA and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we identified peptidase inhibitor 15 (PI15) was a potential diagnostic marker for CCA. We demonstrated PI15 expression levels in CCA, HCC, and normal liver tissues. Furthermore, quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assessed plasma PI15 levels in CCA (n = 61), HCC (n = 72), benign liver disease (n = 28), chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients (n = 45), and healthy individuals (n = 45). The diagnostic value of PI15 was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Findings: The positive rate of PI15 expression was 70% in CCA and only 9.1% in HCC; PI15 was not detected in normal liver tissue. High levels of plasma PI15 were evident in CCA patients, whereas only low levels were observed in cases involving HCC, benign liver disease, CHB patients, and healthy individuals. Plasma PI15 levels in CCA patients were obviously reduced (p = .0014) after surgery. The AUC of plasma PI15 for discriminating between CCA and HCC was 0.735. Furthermore, with a specificity of 94.44%, the combination of CA19–9 (>98.5 U/ml) and PI15 (>13 ng/ml) yielded a sensitivity of 80.39% for CCA and HCC. Interpretation: PI15 exhibits promise as a novel marker for predicting the diagnosis and follow-up of CCA patients. Fund: Natural Science Research Foundation of Anhui Province and Natural Science Foundation of China Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma, PI15, Biomarker, Blood diagnosi

    Protocol for a gallbladder cancer registry study in China: the Chinese Research Group of Gallbladder Cancer (CRGGC) study

    No full text
    Introduction Gallbladder cancer (GBC), the sixth most common gastrointestinal tract cancer, poses a significant disease burden in China. However, no national representative data are available on the clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of GBC in the Chinese population.Methods and analysis The Chinese Research Group of Gallbladder Cancer (CRGGC) study is a multicentre retrospective registry cohort study. Clinically diagnosed patient with GBC will be identified from 1 January 2008 to December, 2019, by reviewing the electronic medical records from 76 tertiary and secondary hospitals across 28 provinces in China. Patients with pathological and radiological diagnoses of malignancy, including cancer in situ, from the gallbladder and cystic duct are eligible, according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019 guidelines. Patients will be excluded if GBC is the secondary diagnosis in the discharge summary. The demographic characteristics, medical history, physical examination results, surgery information, pathological data, laboratory examination results and radiology reports will be collected in a standardised case report form. By May 2021, approximately 6000 patient with GBC will be included. The clinical follow-up data will be updated until 5 years after the last admission for GBC of each patient. The study aimed (1) to depict the clinical characteristics, including demographics, pathology, treatment and prognosis of patient with GBC in China; (2) to evaluate the adherence to clinical guidelines of GBC and (3) to improve clinical practice for diagnosing and treating GBC and provide references for policy-makers.Ethics and dissemination The protocol of the CRGGC has been approved by the Committee for Ethics of Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SHEC-C-2019–085). All results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.Trial registration number NCT04140552, Pre-results
    corecore