23 research outputs found

    Understanding the genetic complexity of puberty timing across the allele frequency spectrum

    Get PDF
    Pubertal timing varies considerably and is associated with later health outcomes. We performed multi-ancestry genetic analyses on ~800,000 women, identifying 1,080 signals for age at menarche. Collectively, these explained 11% of trait variance in an independent sample. Women at the top and bottom 1% of polygenic risk exhibited ~11 and ~14-fold higher risks of delayed and precocious puberty, respectively. We identified several genes harboring rare loss-of-function variants in ~200,000 women, including variants in ZNF483, which abolished the impact of polygenic risk. Variant-to-gene mapping approaches and mouse gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron RNA sequencing implicated 665 genes, including an uncharacterized G-protein-coupled receptor, GPR83, which amplified the signaling of MC3R, a key nutritional sensor. Shared signals with menopause timing at genes involved in DNA damage response suggest that the ovarian reserve might signal centrally to trigger puberty. We also highlight body size-dependent and independent mechanisms that potentially link reproductive timing to later life disease

    Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

    Get PDF
    Background: Detailed, comprehensive, and timely reporting on population health by underlying causes of disability and premature death is crucial to understanding and responding to complex patterns of disease and injury burden over time and across age groups, sexes, and locations. The availability of disease burden estimates can promote evidence-based interventions that enable public health researchers, policy makers, and other professionals to implement strategies that can mitigate diseases. It can also facilitate more rigorous monitoring of progress towards national and international health targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals. For three decades, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) has filled that need. A global network of collaborators contributed to the production of GBD 2021 by providing, reviewing, and analysing all available data. GBD estimates are updated routinely with additional data and refined analytical methods. GBD 2021 presents, for the first time, estimates of health loss due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The GBD 2021 disease and injury burden analysis estimated years lived with disability (YLDs), years of life lost (YLLs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries using 100 983 data sources. Data were extracted from vital registration systems, verbal autopsies, censuses, household surveys, disease-specific registries, health service contact data, and other sources. YLDs were calculated by multiplying cause-age-sex-location-year-specific prevalence of sequelae by their respective disability weights, for each disease and injury. YLLs were calculated by multiplying cause-age-sex-location-year-specific deaths by the standard life expectancy at the age that death occurred. DALYs were calculated by summing YLDs and YLLs. HALE estimates were produced using YLDs per capita and age-specific mortality rates by location, age, sex, year, and cause. 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) were generated for all final estimates as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentiles values of 500 draws. Uncertainty was propagated at each step of the estimation process. Counts and age-standardised rates were calculated globally, for seven super-regions, 21 regions, 204 countries and territories (including 21 countries with subnational locations), and 811 subnational locations, from 1990 to 2021. Here we report data for 2010 to 2021 to highlight trends in disease burden over the past decade and through the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings: Global DALYs increased from 2·63 billion (95% UI 2·44–2·85) in 2010 to 2·88 billion (2·64–3·15) in 2021 for all causes combined. Much of this increase in the number of DALYs was due to population growth and ageing, as indicated by a decrease in global age-standardised all-cause DALY rates of 14·2% (95% UI 10·7–17·3) between 2010 and 2019. Notably, however, this decrease in rates reversed during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, with increases in global age-standardised all-cause DALY rates since 2019 of 4·1% (1·8–6·3) in 2020 and 7·2% (4·7–10·0) in 2021. In 2021, COVID-19 was the leading cause of DALYs globally (212·0 million [198·0–234·5] DALYs), followed by ischaemic heart disease (188·3 million [176·7–198·3]), neonatal disorders (186·3 million [162·3–214·9]), and stroke (160·4 million [148·0–171·7]). However, notable health gains were seen among other leading communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional (CMNN) diseases. Globally between 2010 and 2021, the age-standardised DALY rates for HIV/AIDS decreased by 47·8% (43·3–51·7) and for diarrhoeal diseases decreased by 47·0% (39·9–52·9). Non-communicable diseases contributed 1·73 billion (95% UI 1·54–1·94) DALYs in 2021, with a decrease in age-standardised DALY rates since 2010 of 6·4% (95% UI 3·5–9·5). Between 2010 and 2021, among the 25 leading Level 3 causes, age-standardised DALY rates increased most substantially for anxiety disorders (16·7% [14·0–19·8]), depressive disorders (16·4% [11·9–21·3]), and diabetes (14·0% [10·0–17·4]). Age-standardised DALY rates due to injuries decreased globally by 24·0% (20·7–27·2) between 2010 and 2021, although improvements were not uniform across locations, ages, and sexes. Globally, HALE at birth improved slightly, from 61·3 years (58·6–63·6) in 2010 to 62·2 years (59·4–64·7) in 2021. However, despite this overall increase, HALE decreased by 2·2% (1·6–2·9) between 2019 and 2021. Interpretation: Putting the COVID-19 pandemic in the context of a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of causes of health loss is crucial to understanding its impact and ensuring that health funding and policy address needs at both local and global levels through cost-effective and evidence-based interventions. A global epidemiological transition remains underway. Our findings suggest that prioritising non-communicable disease prevention and treatment policies, as well as strengthening health systems, continues to be crucially important. The progress on reducing the burden of CMNN diseases must not stall; although global trends are improving, the burden of CMNN diseases remains unacceptably high. Evidence-based interventions will help save the lives of young children and mothers and improve the overall health and economic conditions of societies across the world. Governments and multilateral organisations should prioritise pandemic preparedness planning alongside efforts to reduce the burden of diseases and injuries that will strain resources in the coming decades. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

    Face au handicap: action syndicale et cadrages juridiques

    Full text link
    peer reviewedLes travailleurs en situation de handicap forment une catĂ©gorie invisibilisĂ©e et discriminĂ©e. Cet article examine la façon dont les militants syndicaux, en France, utilisent le droit et la justice pour dĂ©fendre les travailleurs handicapĂ©s et, par ce biais, pour rendre ce public visible, aux yeux des employeurs et de leurs propres organisations syndicales. Il montre tout d’abord comment les syndicalistes font Ă©merger la cause des travailleurs handicapĂ©s. Ensuite, il examine leurs usages du droit, trĂšs contrastĂ©s en fonction des arĂšnes mobilisĂ©es et des buts poursuivis. Il met enfin en Ă©vidence les cadrages pluriels du handicap au sein des organisations syndicales, qui allient leur action pour la protection des emplois des salariĂ©s Ă  des revendications d'Ă©galitĂ© professionnelle. Plus gĂ©nĂ©ralement, cette Ă©tude renouvelle les travaux sur les usages syndicaux du droit en portant attention aux rĂŽles du droit dans la visibilisation d’un public.Workers with disabilities are invisible and discriminated against. This article examines how labor unions representatives, in France, mobilize the law and the labor court to make this public visible among employers and members of unions. First, it shows how labor unions started to make the cause of disabled workers visible in their mobilization. Then, it examines their mobilization of the law and the court and how it varies according to the arenas and goals. Through this analysis, it shows the various framings of disability within labor unions, which combine mobilization to protect their members’ rights and claims for equal opportunity. More broadly, this study suggests new ways to analyze labor unions’ mobilization, by examining the role of the law in making a public visible.Handicap et amĂ©nagements raisonnables au travail: importation et usages d'une catĂ©gorie juridique en France et en Belgiqu

    Logiques, contraintes et effets du recours aux comparutions immĂ©diates. Etude de cinq juridictions de la Cour d’appel de Douai.

    No full text
    La comparution immĂ©diate (CI) a connu une forte croissance de son usage au cours des annĂ©es 2000. La procĂ©dure s’est par ailleurs largement diffusĂ©e dans l’ensemble des juridictions, alors qu’elle a longtemps Ă©tĂ© surtout mobilisĂ©e dans les grandes juridictions. Une telle croissance interroge sur les ressorts du recours aux comparutions immĂ©diates. Plusieurs rĂ©formes ont Ă©tĂ© adoptĂ©es au cours de cette dĂ©cennie mais ne suffisent pas Ă  expliquer la diffusion de la procĂ©dure. Par ailleurs, le volume de jugements en CI invite Ă  mieux caractĂ©riser la procĂ©dure, ses cibles et ses effets en termes de peine, dans la mesure oĂč elle concerne aujourd’hui un nombre relativement important de cas. Etudier les comparutions immĂ©diates est ainsi une façon de questionner les pratiques judiciaires et leur Ă©volution de façon plus large. Trois objectifs ont ainsi Ă©tĂ© fixĂ©s Ă  la recherche, au-delĂ  de l’analyse de la croissance du nombre de comparutions immĂ©diates : prĂ©ciser le profil des individus jugĂ©s en comparution immĂ©diate, tester l’hypothĂšse selon laquelle les comparutions immĂ©diates conduisent Ă  des peines plus sĂ©vĂšres, identifier et expliquer la variĂ©tĂ© des pratiques. Ce dernier point visait notamment Ă  dĂ©passer une analyse en termes de critĂšres prĂ©sidant au choix de la CI, ou de telle peine dans le cadre de la CI, pour tenter de saisir les contraintes ou conditions spĂ©cifiques façonnant l’usage de la procĂ©dure. L’analyse s’appuie sur l’étude de 5 juridictions de la Cour d’appel de Douai (Lille, BĂ©thune, Arras, Hazebrouck et Avesnes-sur-Helpe). Un Ă©chantillon de minutes de jugement (7882 affaires) a fait l’objet d’une analyse statistique, en vue de l’analyse des peines et du profil des prĂ©venus. Une trentaine d’entretiens a par ailleurs Ă©tĂ© rĂ©alisĂ© auprĂšs de magistrats et d’avocats, et des observations ont Ă©tĂ© rĂ©alisĂ©es dans deux salles de permanence du parquet.Les rĂ©sultats relatifs au profil des prĂ©venus et aux peines prononcĂ©es Ă  l’issue d’un jugement en CI confirment largement ceux d’autres travaux portant sur d’autres juridictions. Un autre rĂ©sultat important de la recherche est la mise en Ă©vidence de la variabilitĂ© des pratiques, pour ce qui est de la frĂ©quence du recours aux comparutions immĂ©diates, des affaires susceptibles d’ĂȘtre traitĂ©es par la voie de cette procĂ©dure et des jugements prononcĂ©s. Ce deuxiĂšme rĂ©sultat renforce paradoxalement le premier : les diffĂ©rences constatĂ©es dans l’usage des comparutions immĂ©diates n’empĂȘchent pas que cette procĂ©dure concerne un « public » aux caractĂ©ristiques bien identifiables (individus ayant un « passĂ© pĂ©nal » et/ou en situation de prĂ©caritĂ©) ; elles ne contrecarrent pas non plus un effet propre de la procĂ©dure, qui favorise le prononcĂ© de peines plus sĂ©vĂšres que d’autres procĂ©dures.L’attention portĂ©e aux variations observables d’une juridiction Ă  l’autre met en Ă©vidence des profils de magistrats, des conditions matĂ©rielles et des configurations locales freinant ou encourageant le recours aux comparutions immĂ©diates. Par ailleurs, l’analyse localisĂ©e de pratiques met en Ă©vidence un certain nombre de facteurs structurant le recours aux comparutions immĂ©diate : ainsi la logique de « l’ordre public », principe dont le contenu est dĂ©fini localement, ou encore l’attractivitĂ© et la taille des juridictions, qui ont des effets sur le profil des magistrats en poste et sur la nature des relations entre les professionnels qui interviennent en matiĂšre de CI

    Handicap et aménagements raisonnables: importation et usages d'une catégorie juridique en France et en Belgique

    Full text link
    La notion d’amĂ©nagement raisonnable dĂ©signe toute tentative, dans une sociĂ©tĂ©, de s’accommoder ou de s’ajuster aux besoins d’un individu qui dĂ©coulent de son appartenance Ă  une minoritĂ©, dans le respect de l’égalitĂ© de traitement entre tous les ĂȘtres humains et des libertĂ©s fondamentales. CentrĂ©e sur les amĂ©nagements Ă  destination des travailleurs en situation de handicap, cette enquĂȘte interroge l’émergence de cette catĂ©gorie en droit, ainsi que les usages qu’en font les acteurs sociaux dans le domaine du travail. Ce rapport examine les lĂ©gislations en vigueur, la jurisprudence et la doctrine. Il donne Ă  voir les conditions d’importation de cette catĂ©gorie juridique en France et en Belgique et son articulation avec d’autres lĂ©gislations qui encadrent les relations de travail (obligation de reclassement, bien-ĂȘtre au travail, etc.). Il prĂ©sente, ensuite, les rĂ©sultats d’une enquĂȘte inĂ©dite menĂ©e auprĂšs de professionnels – syndicalistes, avocats et agents des organismes publics de lutte contre les discriminations –, d’employeurs et de travailleurs avec un handicap, et met en lumiĂšre la façon dont cette catĂ©gorie juridique est mobilisĂ©e, contournĂ©e ou Ă©vitĂ©e. Les mobilisations syndicales et professionnelles, ainsi que les expĂ©riences du handicap au travail, s’inscrivent dans des configurations de relations professionnelles et des catĂ©gorisations administratives et juridiques du handicap diffĂ©rentes en France et en Belgique. Plus gĂ©nĂ©ralement, cette recherche montre les effets produits par l’introduction de cette obligation lĂ©gale. Les acteurs du monde du travail se rĂ©fĂšrent peu aux lĂ©gislations en matiĂšre d’amĂ©nagement raisonnable, le pouvoir contraignant de ces normes Ă©tant contrebalancĂ© par d’autres impĂ©ratifs et logiques : discours managĂ©rial, droit du travail, etc. NĂ©anmoins, ceci ne veut pas dire que le droit aux amĂ©nagements raisonnables n’a aucune effectivitĂ©, ni qu’il ne produit aucun effet. Les discours changent, les employeurs et les travailleurs se saisissent des cadres juridiques existants, les intĂšgrent dans leurs discours et parfois dans leurs pratiques, lui donnent sens, et contribuent ainsi Ă  remodeler les contours des normes juridiques
    corecore