9 research outputs found

    Çoklu Primer Tümörler - Tek Merkez Deneyimi

    No full text
    Amaç: Onkolojik hastalıkların erken tanı ve tedavisinde yeni gelişmeler hayatta kalma oranlarının artmasına neden olsa da, artmış sağ kalım oranlarına bağlı olarak gelişen uzun takipler sırasında ikinci primer maligniteler ortaya çıkabilmektedir. İkincil primer tümörlerin gelişimi için birçok faktör vardır. En önemlisi, yaşlı hastalar ın uzun vadede kanserojenlere maruz kalma olasılıkları daha yüksektir. Çoklu primer tümörler, genellikle iki malignite tanısı arasındaki zaman çizelgesine bağlı olarak metakron veya senkron olarak görülür. Senkron hastalıklar sıklıkla benzer karsinojenlere maruz kalma sonucu oluşsa da, metakron olanlar daha çok primer tümörün tedavisine bağlı advers etkilerle ilişkili olabilir. Bu tek merkezli çalışma, Ocak 2007 ile Aralık 2016 arasında multipl primer tümörlü hastaların klinikopatolojik özelliklerini araştırmayı amaçladı ve bunlardan 20'si senkron, 36'sı metakron olarak toplam 56 hasta dahil edildi. En yaygın kanser çiftlerinin erkeklerde kolon-akciğer ve prostat-mesane, kadınlarda meme-kolon ve meme-tiroid olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yöntemler: Ocak 2007 ile Aralık 2017 tarihleri arasında merkezimizde takip edilen ÇPT’ lü hastaların dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi, 56 hastada multiple primer tümör olduğu tespit edildi. Hastaların cinsiyetler, yaşları tespit edildi. Tümörün hangi organlarda oluştuğu, ne zaman geliştiği, bulunabilen etyolojik veriler, sağ kalım oranları araştırıldı. Tüm istatistiksel analizler Package for Social Sciences (SPSS v 15.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) ile yapıldı. Sonuç: Senkron hastalıklar genellikle benzer kanserojenlere maruz kalmanın bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkarken, metakronöz hastalıkların primer tümörlerin tedavisinin yan etkileri ile ilişkili olması muhtemeldi

    Evaluation of prognostic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection

    No full text
    WOS: 000408269300020PubMed ID: 27670893This is a multicenter study to assess the prognostic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). A total of 78 patients with SBA diagnosed with completely resected SBA were involved in the study. Only status of surgical margin was determined to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with SBA who underwent curative resection. Neither disease-free survival nor overall survival was found to be significantly improved by the adjuvant chemotherapy Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare tumor of the gastrointestinal system with poor prognosis. Because these are rarely encountered tumors, the aim of this multicenter study was evaluation of prognostic factors and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected SBA. Materials and Methods: A total of 78 patients diagnosed with curatively resected SBA were involved in the retrospective study. Forty-eight patients received 1 of 3 different chemotherapy regimens, whereas 30 patients did not receive any adjuvant treatment. No adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy cohorts were matched (1: 1) by propensity scores based on the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy or the survival hazard from Cox modeling. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: Median age of 78 patients with curatively resected SBA was 58, and 59% of these were men. According to TNM classification, 8 (10%) of the patients were at stage I, 26 (34%) were at stage II, and 44 (56%) were at stage III. Median follow-up duration was 29 months. Three-year median disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were 62.5% and 67.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, presence of vascular invasion, perineural invasion, lymph node involvement, and presence of positive surgical margin were significant predictors of poor survival. Multivariate analysis showed that the only adverse prognostic factor independently related with OS was the presence of positive surgical margin (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-1.26; P = .01). Neither DFS nor OS was found to be significantly improved by the adjuvant chemotherapy in both matched and unmatched cohorts. Conclusions: Only status of surgical margin was determined to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with SBA who underwent curative resection

    Lorlatinib in ALK- or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients: Experience from an early access program in Turkey

    No full text
    Background: Lorlatinib, a third generation ALK and ROS1 inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of patients with ALK+ metastatic NSCLC whose disease has progressed on crizotinib and at least one second-generation ALK inhibitor. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in an Expanded Access Program (EAP) in Turkey. Method: The EAP was open-label, multicenter, and single-arm. Patients were eligible to receive lorlatinib (100 mg po/day) if they had advanced stage ALK-or ROS1-positive NSCLC and had progressed on crizotinib and/or second generation ALK inhibitors such as ceritinib or alectinib. The primary endpoint was PFS with lorlatinib. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate, overall survival, and safety

    Glass: Global lorlatinib for ALK(+) and ROS1(+) retrospective study: Real world data of 123 NSCLC patients

    Get PDF
    Lorlatinib is a third-generation tyrosine-kinases inhibitor (TKI) targeting ALK/ROS1 fusions. The FDA has approved lorlatinib for TKI-pretreated ALK(+) NSCLC, while its approval for ROS1( + ) is still pending. Here we present the largest real-world data of NSCLC patients harboring ALK/ROS1 rearrangements treated with lorlatinib.Methods: 123 patients were enrolled retrospectively (data cut-off 1/1/2019). Lorlatinib was administered through an early access program for patients with no other available therapy. Outcome and response were defined by each investigator upon RECIST 1.1 criteria.Results: 106 ALK(+) and 17 ROS1(+) patients recruited from 8 different countries. The ALK( + ) cohort included 50 % males, 73 % never-smokers and 68 % with brain metastases. Extracranial (EC) and intracranial (IC) response rates (RR) were 60 % and 62 %, with disease control rates (DCR) of 91 % and 88 % respectively. Mean duration of therapy (DoT) was 23.9 +/- 1.6 months and median overall survival (mOS) was 89.1 +/- 19.6 months. ROS1 cohort enrolled 53 % males, 65 % never-smokers and 65 % had brain metastases. EC and IC RR were 62 % and 67 % with DCR of 92 % and 78 % respectively. Median DoT was 18.1 +/- 2.5 months and mOS of 90.3 +/- 24.4 months. OS and DoT in both cohorts were not significantly correlated with line of therapy nor other parameters.The most common adverse events of any grade were peripheral edema (48 %), hyperlipidemia (47 %), weight gain (25 %) and fatigue (30 %). CNS adverse events such as cognitive effect of grade 1-2 were reported in 18 % of patients.Conclusion: Lorlatinib shows outstanding EC/IC efficacy in ALK/ROS1(+) NSCLC. The observed mOS of 89 +/- 19 months in ALK(+) NSCLC supports previous reports, while mOS from of 90 +/- 24 months is unprecedented for ROS1( + ) NSCLC.Pfize
    corecore