Humble Leadership and Employee Resilience: Exploring the Mediating Mechanism of Work-Related Promotion Focus and Perceived Insider Identity

Although the topic of employee resilience has recently received increased attention, existing research has largely failed to explore its situational triggers. Drawing on social information processing theory, the current study integrates the literature of humility and resilience to theorize the underlying mechanism through which humble leadership facilitates employee resilience. This research proposes a potential heterogeneous effect that humble leadership catalyzes employee resilience through multiple pathways. Field (N = 434) and experimental studies (N = 104) conducted in Mainland China support hypotheses that humble leadership enhances employee resilience through simultaneous increases in work-related promotion focus and perceived insider identity. Research implications are discussed, and directions for future research are offered

Safety, Efficacy, and Ill Intent: Examining COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions among the New Undervaccinated Moveable Middle in a U.S. Cohort, October 2022

Individuals who received their primary vaccine series only (with no subsequent booster) may be a new type of “moveable middle” given their receipt of the original COVID-19 vaccination. One population within the moveable middle for whom tailored interventions may be needed is individuals with common mental disorders (CMD). The purpose of this paper is to understand the vaccine perceptions among this new moveable middle—the undervaccinated—and within the undervaccinated to examine the extent to which COVID-19 vaccine perceptions and motivations differ among those with and without symptoms of CMD. Using data from the CHASING COVID Cohort, we examine the relationship between vaccination status, CMD, and vaccine perceptions in the undervaccinated. Among 510 undervaccinated participants who had completed the primary vaccine series but were not boosted, the most common reasons for undervaccination focused on efficacy (not seeing a need for an additional dose, 42.4%; there not being enough evidence that a booster dose is effective, 26.5%; already having had COVID-19, 19.6%). Other concerns were related to safety (long-term side effects, 21.0%; short-term side effects, 17.6%) and logistics (plan to get a booster but haven’t had time yet, 18.8%). Overall, the greatest vaccine concerns (over 30%) for the undervaccinated focused on efficacy and safety issues. Symptoms of depression or anxiety were associated with lower levels of vaccine efficacy and greater safety concerns in adjusted models. The implications of our study are that campaigns that are hoping to maximize vaccination uptake should consider focusing on and emphasizing messaging on efficacy and safety issues

Changes in SARS-CoV-2 viral load and mortality during the initial wave of the pandemic in New York City

Funding: This work was partially supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR0023484 to Julianne Imperato-McGinley) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1 AI069470 to M.E.S).Public health interventions such as social distancing and mask wearing decrease the incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is unclear whether they decrease the viral load of infected patients and whether changes in viral load impact mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We evaluated 6923 patients with COVID-19 at six New York City hospitals from March 15-May 14, 2020, corresponding with the implementation of public health interventions in March. We assessed changes in cycle threshold (CT) values from reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests and in-hospital mortality and modeled the impact of viral load on mortality. Mean CT values increased between March and May, with the proportion of patients with high viral load decreasing from 47.7% to 7.8%. In-hospital mortality increased from 14.9% in March to 28.4% in early April, and then decreased to 8.7% by May. Patients with high viral loads had increased mortality compared to those with low viral loads (adjusted odds ratio 2.34). If viral load had not declined, an estimated 69 additional deaths would have occurred (5.8% higher mortality). SARS-CoV-2 viral load steadily declined among hospitalized patients in the setting of public health interventions, and this correlated with decreases in mortality.Peer reviewe

Synthesis, characterization, and application in rechargeable batteries of CuXS-rGO aerogels

Resumen del trabajo presentado a la XXXVIII Reunión Bienal de la Real Sociedad Española de Química, celebrada en el Palacio de Congresos de Granada, del 27 de junio al 30 de junio de 2022.Authors acknowledge the M-ERA.NET (NOEL) project, PCI2019-103637 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.Peer reviewe

Safety, Efficacy, and Ill Intent: Examining COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions among the New Undervaccinated Moveable Middle in a U.S. Cohort, October 2022

Individuals who received their primary vaccine series only (with no subsequent booster) may be a new type of “moveable middle” given their receipt of the original COVID-19 vaccination. One population within the moveable middle for whom tailored interventions may be needed is individuals with common mental disorders (CMD). The purpose of this paper is to understand the vaccine perceptions among this new moveable middle—the undervaccinated—and within the undervaccinated to examine the extent to which COVID-19 vaccine perceptions and motivations differ among those with and without symptoms of CMD. Using data from the CHASING COVID Cohort, we examine the relationship between vaccination status, CMD, and vaccine perceptions in the undervaccinated. Among 510 undervaccinated participants who had completed the primary vaccine series but were not boosted, the most common reasons for undervaccination focused on efficacy (not seeing a need for an additional dose, 42.4%; there not being enough evidence that a booster dose is effective, 26.5%; already having had COVID-19, 19.6%). Other concerns were related to safety (long-term side effects, 21.0%; short-term side effects, 17.6%) and logistics (plan to get a booster but haven’t had time yet, 18.8%). Overall, the greatest vaccine concerns (over 30%) for the undervaccinated focused on efficacy and safety issues. Symptoms of depression or anxiety were associated with lower levels of vaccine efficacy and greater safety concerns in adjusted models. The implications of our study are that campaigns that are hoping to maximize vaccination uptake should consider focusing on and emphasizing messaging on efficacy and safety issues

Virologic Response to Very Early HIV Treatment in Neonates

Factors that influence viral response when antiretroviral therapy (ART) is initiated in neonates are not well characterized. We assessed if there is consistency in predictive factors when operationalizing viral response using different methods. Data were collected from a clinical study in South Africa that started ART in neonates within 14 days of birth (2013–2018). Among 61 infants followed for ≥48 weeks after ART initiation, viral response through 72 weeks was defined by three methods: (1) clinical endpoints (virologic success, rebound, and failure); (2) time to viral suppression, i.e., any viral load (VL: copies/mL) <400, <50, or target not detected (TND) using time-to-event methods; and (3) latent class growth analysis (LCGA) to empirically estimate discrete groups with shared patterns of VL trajectories over time. We investigated the following factors: age at ART initiation, sex, birthweight, preterm birth, mode of delivery, breastfeeding, pre-treatment VL and CD4, maternal ART during pregnancy, and maternal VL and CD4 count. ART was initiated 0–48 h of birth among 57.4% of the infants, 48 h–7 days in 29.5% and 8–14 days in 13.1%. By Method 1, infants were categorized into ‘success’ (54.1%), ‘rebound’ (21.3%), and ‘failure’ (24.6%) for viral response. For Method 2, median time to achieving a VL <400, <50, or TND was 58, 123, and 331 days, respectively. For Method 3, infants were categorized into three trajectories: ‘rapid decline’ (29.5%), ‘slow decline’ (47.5%), and ‘persistently high’ (23.0%). All methods found that higher pre-treatment VL, particularly >100,000, was associated with less favorable viral outcomes. No exposure to maternal ART was associated with a better viral response, while a higher maternal VL was associated with less favorable viral response and higher maternal CD4 was associated with better viral response across all three methods. The LCGA method found that infants who initiated ART 8–14 days had less favorable viral response than those who initiated ART earlier. The other two methods trended in a similar direction. Across three methods to operationalize viral response in the context of early infant treatment, findings of factors associated with viral response were largely consistent, including infant pre-treatment VL, maternal VL, and maternal CD4 count

Early antiretroviral treatment of infants to attain HIV remission.

BackgroundStudies in adults and children suggested that starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) soon after infection positively influences early events in HIV infection raising the possibility that remission may be achieved in some.MethodsWe designed an analytic treatment interruption (ATI) trial to test the hypothesis that a sizable minority of HIV-infected neonates who initiated ART <14 days of birth and maintained on ART would be able to maintain viral suppression when ART was withdrawn. To yield the target cohort for this trial, 73 HIV-infected neonates identified at one hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, were initiated on ART <14 days of birth and maintained on ART tracking viral load (VL) decline and immune recovery (clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02431975).FindingsThree HIV-infected infants (4.1%) died and nine (12.3%) were lost to follow-up before 48 weeks of age. Of those surviving on study, 52.5% attained and sustained VL <50 copies/ml and half of these sustained CD4+ T-cell percentage >30% which were the primary entry criteria for the ATI trial. Proportions achieving ATI eligibility criteria were similar in the 46 infants starting ART <48 h (19.6%) to 27 infants starting 2-14 days (25.9%) (p = 0.567).InterpretationVery early ART on its own, using regimens available when the trial was designed, is insufficient to attain minimum entry criteria needed to justify our trial of ART interruption. Decisions about how quickly to start ART should be based on optimizing standard clinical outcomes rather than with the expectation that remission can be attained.FundingNICHD/NIAID (U01HD080441), South African Research Chairs Initiative of DST and NRF (South Africa)

Early antiretroviral treatment of infants to attain HIV remission.

Background:Studies in adults and children suggested that starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) soon after infection positively influences early events in HIV infection raising the possibility that remission may be achieved in some. Methods:We designed an analytic treatment interruption (ATI) trial to test the hypothesis that a sizable minority of HIV-infected neonates who initiated ART <14 days of birth and maintained on ART would be able to maintain viral suppression when ART was withdrawn. To yield the target cohort for this trial, 73 HIV-infected neonates identified at one hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, were initiated on ART <14 days of birth and maintained on ART tracking viral load (VL) decline and immune recovery (clinicaltrials.gov # NCT02431975). Findings:Three HIV-infected infants (4.1%) died and nine (12.3%) were lost to follow-up before 48 weeks of age. Of those surviving on study, 52.5% attained and sustained VL <50 copies/ml and half of these sustained CD4+ T-cell percentage >30% which were the primary entry criteria for the ATI trial. Proportions achieving ATI eligibility criteria were similar in the 46 infants starting ART <48 h (19.6%) to 27 infants starting 2-14 days (25.9%) (p = 0.567). Interpretation:Very early ART on its own, using regimens available when the trial was designed, is insufficient to attain minimum entry criteria needed to justify our trial of ART interruption. Decisions about how quickly to start ART should be based on optimizing standard clinical outcomes rather than with the expectation that remission can be attained. Funding:NICHD/NIAID (U01HD080441), South African Research Chairs Initiative of DST and NRF (South Africa)