5 research outputs found
1966 Varto Depremi
Ankara : İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent Üniversitesi İktisadi, İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü, 2017.This work is a student project of the The Department of History, Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University.by Çekiç, Can Eyüp
Synthesis, carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity, anticancer activity and molecular docking studies of new imidazolyl hydrazone derivatives
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.A new series of imidazolyl hydrazone derivatives IA (1-12) were prepared from a condensation reaction between indoline-2,3-dione (isatin) and 2-benzylidenehydrazinecarboximidamide derivatives. The structure of compounds was elucidated using various spectral techniques including FTIR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS. The proposed structure of IA-2 was determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis. Synthesized compounds were evaluated for their inhibitory action against carbonic anhydrase I and II isoenzymes (hCA I and hCA II), as well as cytotoxicity activity in a cancer cell line (HT-29) and a healthy cell line (NIH 3T3). Among them, some compounds exhibited remarkable CA inhibitory activities compared to a standard inhibitor with Ki values in the range of 13.434 ± 3.278-522.549 ± 360.720 nM for hCA I (Ki value for standard inhibitor = 271.15 ± 74.620 nM) and 41.108 ± 10.180-271.171 ± 65.293 nM for hCA II (Ki value for standard inhibitor = 113.07 ± 20.980 nM) and significant antiproliferative activity with less toxicity to a health cell line. In addition, the theoretical parameters of the bioactive molecules were calculated to establish their drug-likeness qualities and ADME/T analysis was carried out to examine the drug properties of the synthesized compounds
The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-National Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity Evidence
Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) is a widely used measure that captures somatic symptoms of coronavirus-related anxiety. In a large-scale collaboration spanning 60 countries (Ntotal = 21,513), we examined the CAS’s measurement invariance and assessed the convergent validity of CAS scores in relation to the fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S) and the satisfaction with life (SWLS-3) scales. We utilized both conventional exact invariance tests and alignment procedures, with results revealing that the single-factor model fit the data well in almost all countries. Partial scalar invariance was supported in a subset of 56 countries. To ensure the robustness of results, given the unbalanced samples, we employed resampling techniques both with and without replacement and found the results were more stable in larger samples. The alignment procedure demonstrated a high degree of measurement invariance with 9% of the parameters exhibiting noninvariance. We also conducted simulations of alignment using the parameters estimated in the current model. Findings demonstrated reliability of the means but indicated challenges in estimating the latent variances. Strong positive correlations between CAS and FCV-19S estimated with all three different approaches were found in most countries. Correlations of CAS and SWLS-3 were weak and negative, but significantly differed from zero in several countries. Overall, the study provided support for the measurement invariance of the CAS and offered evidence of its convergent validity while also highlighting issues with variance estimation
The Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: Cross-National Measurement Invariance and Convergent Validity Evidence
Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) is a widely used measure that captures somatic symptoms of coronavirus-related anxiety. In a large-scale collaboration spanning 60 countries (Ntotal = 21,513), we examined the CAS’s measurement invariance and assessed the convergent validity of CAS scores in relation to the fear of COVID-19 (FCV-19S) and the satisfaction with life (SWLS-3) scales. We utilized both conventional exact invariance tests and alignment procedures, with results revealing that the single-factor model fit the data well in almost all countries. Partial scalar invariance was supported in a subset of 56 countries. To ensure the robustness of results, given the unbalanced samples, we employed resampling techniques both with and without replacement and found the results were more stable in larger samples. The alignment procedure demonstrated a high degree of measurement invariance with 9% of the parameters exhibiting noninvariance. We also conducted simulations of alignment using the parameters estimated in the current model. Findings demonstrated reliability of the means but indicated challenges in estimating the latent variances. Strong positive correlations between CAS and FCV-19S estimated with all three different approaches were found in most countries. Correlations of CAS and SWLS-3 were weak and negative, but significantly differed from zero in several countries. Overall, the study provided support for the measurement invariance of the CAS and offered evidence of its convergent validity while also highlighting issues with variance estimation
Trust in government moderates the association between fear of COVID-19 as well as empathic concern and preventive behaviour
With the COVID-19 pandemic, behavioural scientists aimed to illuminate reasons why people comply with (or not) large-scale cooperative activities. Here we investigated the motives that underlie support for COVID-19 preventive behaviours in a sample of 12,758 individuals from 34 countries. We hypothesized that the associations of empathic prosocial concern and fear of disease with support towards preventive COVID-19 behaviours would be moderated by trust in the government. Results suggest that the association between fear of disease and support for COVID-19 preventive behaviours was strongest when trust in the government was weak (both at individual- and country-level). Conversely, the association with empathic prosocial concern was strongest when trust in the government was high, but this moderation was only found at individual-level scores of governmental trust. We discuss how motivations may be shaped by socio-cultural context, and outline how findings may contribute to a better understanding of collective action during global crises