PRNP is a pan-cancer prognostic and immunity-related to EMT in colorectal cancer

BackgroundPrion protein gene (PRNP) is widely expressed in a variety of tissues. Although the roles of PRNP in several cancers have been investigated, no pan-cancer analysis has revealed its relationship with tumorigenesis and immunity.MethodsComprehensive analyses were conducted on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Pan-Cancer dataset from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) database to determine the expression of PRNP and its potential prognostic implications. Immune infiltration and enrichment analysis methods were used to ascertain correlations between PRNP expression levels, tumor immunity, and immunotherapy. Additionally, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) methods were employed to examine possible signaling pathways involving PRNP. In vitro experiments using CCK-8 assay, Wound healing assay, and Transwell assay to detect the effect of Cellular prion protein (PrPC) on proliferation, migration, and invasion in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. The expression levels of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins (N-cadherin, E-cadherin, Vimentin and Snail) were detected by western blot.ResultsAmong most cancer types, PRNP is expressed at high levels, which is linked to the prognosis of patients. PRNP expression is strongly associated with immune infiltrating cells, immunosuppressive cell infiltration and immune checkpoint molecules. In addition to tumor mutation burden (TMB), substantial correlations are detected between PRNP expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) in several cancers. In vitro cell studies inferred that PrPC enhanced the proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT of CRC cells.ConclusionPRNP serves as an immune-related prognostic marker that holds promise for predicting outcomes related to CRC immunotherapy while simultaneously promoting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion activities. Furthermore, it potentially plays a role in governing EMT regulation within CRC

Effect of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor on atrial electrical instability in atrial fibrillation

Background and objectiveAround 33.5 million patients suffered from atrial fibrillation (AF), causing complications and increasing mortality and disability rate. Upstream treatment for AF is getting more popular in clinical practice in recent years. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) is one of the potential treatment options. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of ARNI on atrial electrical instability and structural remodeling in AF.MethodsOur research consisted of two parts – a retrospective real-world clinical study and an animal experiment on calmness to verify the retrospective founding. In the retrospective study, we reviewed all patients (n = 110) who had undergone the first AF ablation from 1 August 2018 to 1 March 2022. Patients with ARNI (n = 36) or angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB) (n = 35) treatment were enrolled. Their clinical data, ultrasound cardiogram (UCG) and Holter parameters were collected before radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) as baseline and at 24-week follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. In the animal experiment, we established an AF model (n = 18) on canines by rapid atrial pacing. After the successful procedure of pacing, all the 15 alive beagles were equally and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 5 each): Control group, ARB group, and ARNI group. UCG was performed before the pacing as baseline. Physiological biopsy, UCG, and electrophysiological study (EPS) were performed at 8-week.ResultsClinical data showed that the atrial arrhythmia rate at 24-week was significantly lower in ARNI group compared to ARB group (P < 0.01), and ARNI was independently associated with a lower atrial arrhythmia rate (P < 0.05) at 24-week in multivariate regression logistic analysis. In the animal experiment, ARNI group had a higher atrial electrical stability score and a shorter AF duration in the EPS compared to Control and ARB group (P < 0.05). In the left atrium voltage mapping, ARNI group showed less low voltage and disordered zone compared to Control and ARB group. Compared to Control group, right atrium diameter (RAD), left ventricle end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), E/A, and E/E′ were lower in ARNI group (P < 0.05) at the 8-weeks follow-up, while left atrium ejection fraction (LAEF) and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were higher (P < 0.01). Compared to ARB group, LVEF was higher in ARNI group at the 8-week follow-up (P < 0.05). ARB and ARNI group had a lower ratio of fibrotic lesions in the left atrium tissues compared to Control group (P < 0.01), but no difference was found between the ARB and the ARNI group.ConclusionARNI could reduce atrial electrical instability in AF in comparison with ARB in both retrospective study and animal experiment

Data_Sheet_1_Effect of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor on atrial electrical instability in atrial fibrillation.docx

Background and objectiveAround 33.5 million patients suffered from atrial fibrillation (AF), causing complications and increasing mortality and disability rate. Upstream treatment for AF is getting more popular in clinical practice in recent years. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) is one of the potential treatment options. Our study aimed to investigate the effect of ARNI on atrial electrical instability and structural remodeling in AF.MethodsOur research consisted of two parts – a retrospective real-world clinical study and an animal experiment on calmness to verify the retrospective founding. In the retrospective study, we reviewed all patients (n = 110) who had undergone the first AF ablation from 1 August 2018 to 1 March 2022. Patients with ARNI (n = 36) or angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB) (n = 35) treatment were enrolled. Their clinical data, ultrasound cardiogram (UCG) and Holter parameters were collected before radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) as baseline and at 24-week follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. In the animal experiment, we established an AF model (n = 18) on canines by rapid atrial pacing. After the successful procedure of pacing, all the 15 alive beagles were equally and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 5 each): Control group, ARB group, and ARNI group. UCG was performed before the pacing as baseline. Physiological biopsy, UCG, and electrophysiological study (EPS) were performed at 8-week.ResultsClinical data showed that the atrial arrhythmia rate at 24-week was significantly lower in ARNI group compared to ARB group (P ConclusionARNI could reduce atrial electrical instability in AF in comparison with ARB in both retrospective study and animal experiment.</p