The Search for Higher TcT_c in Houston

It is a great pleasure to be invited to join the chorus on this auspicious occasion to celebrate Professor K. Alex Mueller's 90th birthday by Professors Annette Bussman-Holder, Hugo Keller, and Antonio Bianconi. As a student in high temperature superconductivity, I am forever grateful to Professor Alex Mueller and Dr. Georg Bednorz "for their important breakthrough in the discovery of superconductivity in the ceramic materials" in 1986 as described in the citation of their 1987 Nobel Prize in Physics. It is this breakthrough discovery that has ushered in the explosion of research activities in high temperature superconductivity (HTS) and has provided immense excitement in HTS science and technology in the ensuing decades till now. Alex has not been resting on his laurels and has continued to search for the origin of the unusual high temperature superconductivity in cuprates.Comment: Dedicated to Alex Mueller, whose "important breakthrough in the discovery of superconductivity in ceramic materials" in 1986 has changed the world of superconductivit

Preparation and Characterization of Fluorescence Probe from Assembly Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite

A new nanocomposite fluorescence probe with thioglycolic acid (TA) functional layers embedded inside the hydroxyapatite nanoribbon spherulites has been synthesized. The fluorescence intensity of the novel probe is about 1.5–3.3-fold increase compared with the probe containing no TA. When used to detect cadmium ion, the most of original assembly nanoribbon spherulites structure in the novel probe is found to have been damaged to new flake structures. The mechanism of determining cadmium ion in alcohol solution has been studied. The present systematic study provides significant information on the effect of assembly nanostructure on the metal-enhanced fluorescence phenomenon

Precision engineering for PRRSV resistance in pigs: Macrophages from genome edited pigs lacking CD163 SRCR5 domain are fully resistant to both PRRSV genotypes while maintaining biological function

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is a panzootic infectious disease of pigs, causing major economic losses to the world-wide pig industry. PRRS manifests differently in pigs of all ages but primarily causes late-term abortions and stillbirths in sows and respiratory disease in piglets. The causative agent of the disease is the positive-strand RNA PRRS virus (PRRSV). PRRSV has a narrow host cell tropism, limited to cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage. CD163 has been described as a fusion receptor for PRRSV, whereby the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich domain 5 (SRCR5) region was shown to be an interaction site for the virus in vitro. CD163 is expressed at high levels on the surface of macrophages, particularly in the respiratory system. Here we describe the application of CRISPR/Cas9 to pig zygotes, resulting in the generation of pigs with a deletion of Exon 7 of the CD163 gene, encoding SRCR5. Deletion of SRCR5 showed no adverse effects in pigs maintained under standard husbandry conditions with normal growth rates and complete blood counts observed. Pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) and peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) were isolated from the animals and assessed in vitro. Both PAMs and macrophages obtained from PBMCs by CSF1 stimulation (PMMs) show the characteristic differentiation and cell surface marker expression of macrophages of the respective origin. Expression and correct folding of the SRCR5 deletion CD163 on the surface of macrophages and biological activity of the protein as hemoglobin-haptoglobin scavenger was confirmed. Challenge of both PAMs and PMMs with PRRSV genotype 1, subtypes 1, 2, and 3 and PMMs with PRRSV genotype 2 showed complete resistance to viral infections assessed by replication. Confocal microscopy revealed the absence of replication structures in the SRCR5 CD163 deletion macrophages, indicating an inhibition of infection prior to gene expression, i.e. at entry/fusion or unpacking stages

Full design automation of multi-state RNA devices to program gene expression using energy-based optimization

[EN] Small RNAs (sRNAs) can operate as regulatory agents to control protein expression by interaction with the 59 untranslated region of the mRNA. We have developed a physicochemical framework, relying on base pair interaction energies, to design multi-state sRNA devices by solving an optimization problem with an objective function accounting for the stability of the transition and final intermolecular states. Contrary to the analysis of the reaction kinetics of an ensemble of sRNAs, we solve the inverse problem of finding sequences satisfying targeted reactions. We show here that our objective function correlates well with measured riboregulatory activity of a set of mutants. This has enabled the application of the methodology for an extended design of RNA devices with specified behavior, assuming different molecular interaction models based on Watson-Crick interaction. We designed several YES, NOT, AND, and OR logic gates, including the design of combinatorial riboregulators. In sum, our de novo approach provides a new paradigm in synthetic biology to design molecular interaction mechanisms facilitating future high-throughput functional sRNA design.Work supported by the grants FP7-ICT-043338 (BACTOCOM) to AJ, and BIO2011-26741 (Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Spain) to JAD. GR is supported by an EMBO long-term fellowship co-funded by Marie Curie actions (ALTF-1177-2011), and TEL by a PhD fellowship from the AXA Research Fund. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Rodrigo Tarrega, G.; Landrain, TE.; Majer, E.; Daros Arnau, JA.; Jaramillo, A. (2013). Full design automation of multi-state RNA devices to program gene expression using energy-based optimization. PLoS Computational Biology. 9(8):1003172-1003172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003172S1003172100317298Isaacs, F. J., Dwyer, D. J., & Collins, J. J. (2006). RNA synthetic biology. Nature Biotechnology, 24(5), 545-554. doi:10.1038/nbt1208Isaacs, F. J., Dwyer, D. J., Ding, C., Pervouchine, D. D., Cantor, C. R., & Collins, J. J. (2004). Engineered riboregulators enable post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Nature Biotechnology, 22(7), 841-847. doi:10.1038/nbt986Lucks, J. B., Qi, L., Mutalik, V. K., Wang, D., & Arkin, A. P. (2011). Versatile RNA-sensing transcriptional regulators for engineering genetic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(21), 8617-8622. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015741108Mutalik, V. K., Qi, L., Guimaraes, J. C., Lucks, J. B., & Arkin, A. P. (2012). Rationally designed families of orthogonal RNA regulators of translation. Nature Chemical Biology, 8(5), 447-454. doi:10.1038/nchembio.919Bayer, T. S., & Smolke, C. D. (2005). Programmable ligand-controlled riboregulators of eukaryotic gene expression. Nature Biotechnology, 23(3), 337-343. doi:10.1038/nbt1069Nakashima, N., & Tamura, T. (2009). Conditional gene silencing of multiple genes with antisense RNAs and generation of a mutator strain of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(15), e103-e103. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp498Callura, J. M., Cantor, C. R., & Collins, J. J. (2012). Genetic switchboard for synthetic biology applications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(15), 5850-5855. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203808109Beisel, C. L., Bayer, T. S., Hoff, K. G., & Smolke, C. D. (2008). Model‐guided design of ligand‐regulated RNAi for programmable control of gene expression. Molecular Systems Biology, 4(1), 224. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.62Qi, L., Lucks, J. B., Liu, C. C., Mutalik, V. K., & Arkin, A. P. (2012). Engineering naturally occurring trans -acting non-coding RNAs to sense molecular signals. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(12), 5775-5786. doi:10.1093/nar/gks168Carothers, J. M., Goler, J. A., Juminaga, D., & Keasling, J. D. (2011). Model-Driven Engineering of RNA Devices to Quantitatively Program Gene Expression. Science, 334(6063), 1716-1719. doi:10.1126/science.1212209Rodrigo, G., Landrain, T. E., & Jaramillo, A. (2012). De novo automated design of small RNA circuits for engineering synthetic riboregulation in living cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15271-15276. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203831109Brantl, S. (2002). Antisense-RNA regulation and RNA interference. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression, 1575(1-3), 15-25. doi:10.1016/s0167-4781(02)00280-4Majdalani, N., Vanderpool, C. K., & Gottesman, S. (2005). Bacterial Small RNA Regulators. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 40(2), 93-113. doi:10.1080/10409230590918702Selinger, D. W., Cheung, K. J., Mei, R., Johansson, E. M., Richmond, C. S., Blattner, F. R., … Church, G. M. (2000). RNA expression analysis using a 30 base pair resolution Escherichia coli genome array. Nature Biotechnology, 18(12), 1262-1268. doi:10.1038/82367Yelin, R., Dahary, D., Sorek, R., Levanon, E. Y., Goldstein, O., Shoshan, A., … Rotman, G. (2003). Widespread occurrence of antisense transcription in the human genome. Nature Biotechnology, 21(4), 379-386. doi:10.1038/nbt808Wang, X.-J., Gaasterland, T., & Chua, N.-H. (2005). Genome Biology, 6(4), R30. doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r30Stojanovic, M. N., & Stefanovic, D. (2003). A deoxyribozyme-based molecular automaton. Nature Biotechnology, 21(9), 1069-1074. doi:10.1038/nbt862Seelig, G., Soloveichik, D., Zhang, D. Y., & Winfree, E. (2006). Enzyme-Free Nucleic Acid Logic Circuits. Science, 314(5805), 1585-1588. doi:10.1126/science.1132493Yin, P., Choi, H. M. T., Calvert, C. R., & Pierce, N. A. (2008). Programming biomolecular self-assembly pathways. Nature, 451(7176), 318-322. doi:10.1038/nature06451Ran, T., Kaplan, S., & Shapiro, E. (2009). Molecular implementation of simple logic programs. Nature Nanotechnology, 4(10), 642-648. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.203Penchovsky, R., & Breaker, R. R. (2005). Computational design and experimental validation of oligonucleotide-sensing allosteric ribozymes. Nature Biotechnology, 23(11), 1424-1433. doi:10.1038/nbt1155Salis, H. M., Mirsky, E. A., & Voigt, C. A. (2009). Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nature Biotechnology, 27(10), 946-950. doi:10.1038/nbt.1568Laidler, K. J., & King, M. C. (1983). Development of transition-state theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 87(15), 2657-2664. doi:10.1021/j100238a002Sosnick, T. R., & Pan, T. (2003). RNA folding: models and perspectives. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 13(3), 309-316. doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(03)00066-6Yurke, B. (2003). Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 4(2), 111-122. doi:10.1023/a:1023928811651Bandyra, K. J., Said, N., Pfeiffer, V., Górna, M. W., Vogel, J., & Luisi, B. F. (2012). The Seed Region of a Small RNA Drives the Controlled Destruction of the Target mRNA by the Endoribonuclease RNase E. Molecular Cell, 47(6), 943-953. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.015Dawid, A., Cayrol, B., & Isambert, H. (2009). RNA synthetic biology inspired from bacteria: construction of transcription attenuators under antisense regulation. Physical Biology, 6(2), 025007. doi:10.1088/1478-3975/6/2/025007Lioliou, E., Romilly, C., Romby, P., & Fechter, P. (2010). RNA-mediated regulation in bacteria: from natural to artificial systems. New Biotechnology, 27(3), 222-235. doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2010.03.002Dirks, R. M., Bois, J. S., Schaeffer, J. M., Winfree, E., & Pierce, N. A. (2007). Thermodynamic Analysis of Interacting Nucleic Acid Strands. SIAM Review, 49(1), 65-88. doi:10.1137/060651100Das, R., Karanicolas, J., & Baker, D. (2010). Atomic accuracy in predicting and designing noncanonical RNA structure. Nature Methods, 7(4), 291-294. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1433Vogel, J., & Luisi, B. F. (2011). Hfq and its constellation of RNA. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9(8), 578-589. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2615Friedland, A. E., Lu, T. K., Wang, X., Shi, D., Church, G., & Collins, J. J. (2009). Synthetic Gene Networks That Count. Science, 324(5931), 1199-1202. doi:10.1126/science.1172005Rodrigo, G., Carrera, J., Landrain, T. E., & Jaramillo, A. (2012). Perspectives on the automatic design of regulatory systems for synthetic biology. FEBS Letters, 586(15), 2037-2042. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2012.02.031Chin, J. W. (2006). Modular approaches to expanding the functions of living matter. Nature Chemical Biology, 2(6), 304-311. doi:10.1038/nchembio789McCaskill, J. S. (1990). The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure. Biopolymers, 29(6-7), 1105-1119. doi:10.1002/bip.360290621Chitsaz, H., Salari, R., Sahinalp, S. C., & Backofen, R. (2009). A partition function algorithm for interacting nucleic acid strands. Bioinformatics, 25(12), i365-i373. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp212Hofacker, I. L., Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F., Bonhoeffer, L. S., Tacker, M., & Schuster, P. (1994). Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures. Monatshefte f�r Chemie Chemical Monthly, 125(2), 167-188. doi:10.1007/bf00818163Andronescu, M., Zhang, Z. C., & Condon, A. (2005). Secondary Structure Prediction of Interacting RNA Molecules. Journal of Molecular Biology, 345(5), 987-1001. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.082Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M., & Turner, D. H. (1999). Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. Journal of Molecular Biology, 288(5), 911-940. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671-680. doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.67