Low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol versus azathioprine monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (AAUC)::An investigator-initiated, open, multicenter, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies suggest that for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) combination therapy with low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol (L-AZA/ALLO) may result in higher remission rates than monotherapy with azathioprine (AZA). We prospectively investigated the effects of these drugs for remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. METHODS: Open-label, unblinded, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, multicentre study conducted at eight hospital sites in Denmark. Adult patients with established UC, who were steroid dependent/refractory, thiopurine naïve, had a normal thiopurine methyltransferase, and achieved remission with steroids or infliximab were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned by the investigators (1:1) to 52 weeks of treatment with once daily oral AZA (median dose 50 mg) combined with ALLO 100 mg versus AZA monotherapy (median dose 200 mg), using a computer-generated randomisation list with blocks of six. The trial was open without masking. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in primary and safety analyses (intention to treat population). The primary outcome was steroid and infliximab free remission after 52 weeks, defined as a Mayo Score of ≤1 and no rectal bleeding. The trial is completed and is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03101800). FINDINGS: Between January 9, 2017 and February 10, 2021, 47 patients were randomised to l-AZA/ALLO and 42 to AZA and received at least one dose of the study drug. After 52 weeks, 20 of 47 (43%) patients in the l-AZA/ALLO group and nine of 42 (21%) patients in the AZA group achieved remission (odds ratio 2·54 [95% CI 1·00 to 6.78, p < 0·048]). Fourteen patients (30%) in the l-AZA/ALLO group and 16 (38%) in the AZA group were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that after one year l-AZA/ALLO therapy may be associated with a beneficial effect on steroid- and infliximab-free clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC and should be considered as first line therapy. FUNDING: Funding for AAUC was provided by The Capital Region of Denmark (Regionernes Medicinpulje (6062/16))

Infant Ustekinumab Clearance, Risk of Infection, and Development After Exposure During Pregnancy

Background:Evidence on ustekinumab safety in pregnancy is gradually expanding, but its clearance in the postnatal period is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate ustekinumab concentrations in umbilical cord blood and rates of clearance after birth, as well as how these correlate with maternal drug concentrations, risk of infection, and developmental milestones during the first year of life. Methods: Pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease were prospectively recruited from 19 hospitals in Denmark and the Netherlands between 2018 and 2022. Infant infections leading to hospitalization/antibiotics and developmental milestones were assessed. Serum ustekinumab concentrations were measured at delivery and specific time points. Nonlinear regression analysis was applied to estimate clearance. Results:In 78 live-born infants from 76 pregnancies, we observed a low risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and normal developmental milestones. At birth, the median infant-mother ustekinumab ratio was 2.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.69–2.81). Mean time to infant clearance was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1–7.3 months). One in 4 infants at 6 months had an extremely low median concentration of 0.015 μg/mL (range 0.005–0.12 μg/mL). No variation in median ustekinumab concentration was noted between infants with (2.8 [range 0.4–6.9] μg/mL) and without (3.1 [range 0.7–11.0] μg/mL) infections during the first year of life (P = .41). Conclusions: No adverse signals after intrauterine exposure to ustekinumab were observed with respect to pregnancy outcome, infections, or developmental milestones during the first year of life. Infant ustekinumab concentration was not associated with risk of infections. With the ustekinumab clearance profile, live attenuated vaccination from 6 months of age seems of low risk.</p

Data from: Characteristics of randomised trials on diseases in the digestive system registered in ClinicalTrials.gov - a retrospective analysis

Objectives: To evaluate the adequacy of reporting of protocols for randomised trials on diseases of the digestive system registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and the consistency between primary outcomes, secondary outcomes and sample size specified in ClinicalTrials.gov and published trials. Design: Randomised phase III trials on adult patients with gastrointestinal diseases registered before January 2009 in ClinicalTrials.gov were eligible for inclusion. From ClinicalTrials.gov all data elements in the database required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) member journals were extracted. The subsequent publications for registered trials were identified. For published trials, data concerning publication date, primary and secondary endpoint, sample size, and whether the journal adhered to ICMJE principles were extracted. Differences between primary and secondary outcomes, sample size and sample size calculations data in ClinicalTrials.gov and in the published paper were registered. Results: 105 trials were evaluated. Sixty-six trials (63%) were published. Thirty-one percent of trials were registered incorrectly after their completion date. Several data elements of the required ICMJE data list were not filled in, with lacking data in 22% and 11% of cases concerning the primary outcome measure and sample size. In 26% of the published papers data of sample size calculations were missing and discrepancies between sample size reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov and published trials existed. Conclusion: The quality of registration of randomised controlled trials still needs improvement

An altered composition of the microbiome in microscopic colitis is driven towards the composition in healthy controls by treatment with budesonide

Background and aim: Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disease of the bowel, hypothetically induced by an immunologic response to a luminal microbial agent. We aimed to characterize the microbiome composition in MC and subtypes collagenous colitis (CC) and lymphocytic colitis (LC) and to identify a possible microbial effect of treatment. Method: Stool samples were collected from MC patients prior to treatment, at 8 weeks (during treatment) and at 16 weeks (after treatment), and from healthy controls, not receiving treatment, at matched time-points. Microbiome composition was analyzed by sequencing of the 16S and 18S genes. Differences between patients and controls were analyzed by Shannon’s diversity index (mean, standard deviation (SD)) and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) complemented with a permanova test of UniFrac distances. Results: Ten LC patients, 10 CC patients and 10 controls were included. By PCoA, the bacterial composition in MC patients differed from controls at baseline (p = .02), but not during and after treatment (p = .09 and p = .33, respectively). At baseline, bacterial diversity was lower in MC patients compared to controls (2.5, SD: 0.5 vs 3.5, SD: 0.3, p p p = .06) with no effect of treatment. Conclusion: Microbiome composition is altered in MC patients. During and after treatment with budesonide the microbiome composition in MC patients was driven towards the composition in healthy controls.</p

updated_english_version_of_trial_registration_study, final

An Excel file, with data extracted from the database: ClinicalTrials.gov and related publications. Abbreviations for column headings - see the uploaded ReadMe file