MÖGLICHKEITEN UND GRENZEN DER GENDIAGNOSTIK

Forschungsgegenstand der Humangenetik ist die genetisch bedingte Variabilität zwischen den Menschen. Die klinische Genetik als medizinisches Anwendungsgebiet der Humangenetik beschäftigt sich mit den genetischen Grundlagen von Erkrankungen. Erblich bedingte Erkrankungen sind häufiger als meistens angenommen. Ungefähr 5 % aller Neugeborenen weisen genetisch bedingte Erkrankungen oder Fehlbildungen auf. Viele genetisch bedingte Erkrankungen werden allerdings erst im Laufe des Lebens manifest. Unter Berücksichtigung dieser spät manifestierenden Erkrankungen dürften ca. zwei Drittel aller Menschen im Laufe ihres Lebens von einer oder mehreren erblich (mit)bedingten Erkrankungen betroffen sein. Auch wenn die klinische Genetik zu den jüngsten medizinischen Disziplinen gehört, sind Beobachtungen über erbliche Zusammenhänge und Versuche, Konsequenzen daraus abzuleiten, recht alt. Zum Beispiel wird im babylonischen Talmud erwähnt, daß man von der Beschneidung eines Knaben absehen sollte, wenn bei einem Bruder oder Onkel mütterlicherseits schwere Blutungen im Rahmen dieses Eingriffs aufgetreten sind. Hinter dieser „genetischen Beratung“ steckt die Beobachtung, daß Frauen Überträgerinnen der Hämophilie sein können, von der aufgrund des X-chromosomal-rezessiven Erbgangs männliche Personen mehrfach in einer Familie betroffen sein können. Die Erkenntnis formalgenetischer Aspekte beim Menschen nach der Wiederentdeckung der Mendelschen Regeln im letzten Jahrhundert hat erstmals wissenschaftlich begründete Aussagen zur Wahrscheinlichkeit für das Auftreten erblich bedingter Erkrankungen erlaubt. Die Fortschritte der Humangenetik, vor allem der molekularen Humangenetik, machen es zunehmend möglich, aus solchen Wahrscheinlichkeiten Gewißheiten zu machen. Damit werden einerseits Hoffnungen geknüpft, daß Erkrankungen immer sicherer diagnostiziert werden und sich in wachsendem Maße therapeutische Konsequenzen daraus ableiten lassen. Andererseits ruft die Vorstellung, daß immer mehr erbliche Merkmale identifizierbar und voraussehbar werden, bei den meisten Unbehagen hervor. In diesem Zusammenhang sollen Möglichkeiten, Grenzen und einige ethische Aspekte der gegenwärtigen Gendiagnostik diskutiert werden

Summaries

       &nbsp

Copy Number Variants in Patients with Severe Oligozoospermia and Sertoli-Cell-Only Syndrome

A genetic origin is estimated in 30% of infertile men with the common phenotypes of oligo- or azoospermia, but the pathogenesis of spermatogenic failure remains frequently obscure. To determine the involvement of Copy Number Variants (CNVs) in the origin of male infertility, patients with idiopathic severe oligozoospermia (N = 89), Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (SCOS, N = 37)) and controls with normozoospermia (N = 100) were analysed by array-CGH using the 244A/400K array sets (Agilent Technologies). The mean number of CNVs and the amount of DNA gain/loss were comparable between all groups. Ten recurring CNVs were only found in patients with severe oligozoospermia, three only in SCOS and one CNV in both groups with spermatogenic failure but not in normozoospermic men. Sex-chromosomal, mostly private CNVs were significantly overrepresented in patients with SCOS. CNVs found several times in all groups were analysed in a case-control design and four additional candidate genes and two regions without known genes were associated with SCOS (P<1×10−3). In conclusion, by applying array-CGH to study male infertility for the first time, we provide a number of candidate genes possibly causing or being risk factors for the men's spermatogenic failure. The recurring, patient-specific and private, sex-chromosomal CNVs as well as those associated with SCOS are candidates for further, larger case-control and re-sequencing studies

Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations among 802 women with unilateral triple-negative breast cancer without family cancer history

Background: There is no international consensus up to which age women with a diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and no family history of breast or ovarian cancer should be offered genetic testing for germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCA) mutations. Here, we explored the association of age at TNBC diagnosis with the prevalence of pathogenic gBRCA mutations in this patient group. Methods: The study comprised 802 women (median age 40 years, range 19–76) with oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 negative breast cancers, who had no relatives with breast or ovarian cancer. All women were tested for pathogenic gBRCA mutations. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between age at TNBC diagnosis and the presence of a pathogenic gBRCA mutation. Results: A total of 127 women with TNBC (15.8%) were gBRCA mutation carriers (BRCA1: n = 118, 14.7%; BRCA2: n = 9, 1.1%). The mutation prevalence was 32.9% in the age group 20–29 years compared to 6.9% in the age group 60–69 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant increase of mutation frequency with decreasing age at diagnosis (odds ratio 1.87 per 10 year decrease, 95%CI 1.50–2.32, p &lt; 0.001). gBRCA mutation risk was predicted to be &gt; 10% for women diagnosed below approximately 50 years. Conclusions: Based on the general understanding that a heterozygous mutation probability of 10% or greater justifies gBRCA mutation screening, women with TNBC diagnosed before the age of 50 years and no familial history of breast and ovarian cancer should be tested for gBRCA mutations. In Germany, this would concern approximately 880 women with newly diagnosed TNBC per year, of whom approximately 150 are expected to be identified as carriers of a pathogenic gBRCA mutation

Clinical spectrum of SIX3-associated mutations in holoprosencephaly: correlation between genotype, phenotype and function

BACKGROUND: Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is the most common structural malformation of the human forebrain. There are several important HPE mutational target genes, including the transcription factor SIX3, which encodes an early regulator of Shh, Wnt, Bmp and Nodal signalling expressed in the developing forebrain and eyes of all vertebrates. OBJECTIVE: To characterise genetic and clinical findings in patients with SIX3 mutations. METHODS: Patients with HPE and their family members were tested for mutations in HPE-associated genes and the genetic and clinical findings, including those for additional cases found in the literature, were analysed. The results were correlated with a mutation-specific functional assay in zebrafish. RESULTS: In a cohort of patients (n = 800) with HPE, SIX3 mutations were found in 4.7% of probands and additional cases were found through testing of relatives. In total, 138 cases of HPE were identified, 59 of whom had not previously been clinically presented. Mutations in SIX3 result in more severe HPE than in other cases of non-chromosomal, non-syndromic HPE. An over-representation of severe HPE was found in patients whose mutations confer greater loss of function, as measured by the functional zebrafish assay. The gender ratio in this combined set of patients was 1.5:1 (F:M) and maternal inheritance was almost twice as common as paternal. About 14% of SIX3 mutations in probands occur de novo. There is a wide intrafamilial clinical range of features and classical penetrance is estimated to be at least 62%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that SIX3 mutations result in relatively severe HPE and that there is a genotype-phenotype correlation, as shown by functional studies using animal models

X-exome sequencing of 405 unresolved families identifies seven novel intellectual disability genes

X-linked intellectual disability (XLID) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder. During the past two decades in excess of 100 X-chromosome ID genes have been identified. Yet, a large number of families mapping to the X-chromosome remained unresolved suggesting that more XLID genes or loci are yet to be identified. Here, we have investigated 405 unresolved families with XLID. We employed massively parallel sequencing of all X-chromosome exons in the index males. The majority of these males were previously tested negative for copy number variations and for mutations in a subset of known XLID genes by Sanger sequencing. In total, 745 X-chromosomal genes were screened. After stringent filtering, a total of 1297 non-recurrent exonic variants remained for prioritization. Co-segregation analysis of potential clinically relevant changes revealed that 80 families (20%) carried pathogenic variants in established XLID genes. In 19 families, we detected likely causative protein truncating and missense variants in 7 novel and validated XLID genes (CLCN4, CNKSR2, FRMPD4, KLHL15, LAS1L, RLIM and USP27X) and potentially deleterious variants in 2 novel candidate XLID genes (CDK16 and TAF1). We show that the CLCN4 and CNKSR2 variants impair protein functions as indicated by electrophysiological studies and altered differentiation of cultured primary neurons from Clcn4−/− mice or after mRNA knock-down. The newly identified and candidate XLID proteins belong to pathways and networks with established roles in cognitive function and intellectual disability in particular. We suggest that systematic sequencing of all X-chromosomal genes in a cohort of patients with genetic evidence for X-chromosome locus involvement may resolve up to 58% of Fragile X-negative cases

Mammalian sex determination—insights from humans and mice

Disorders of sex development (DSD) are congenital conditions in which the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical. Many of the genes required for gonad development have been identified by analysis of DSD patients. However, the use of knockout and transgenic mouse strains have contributed enormously to the study of gonad gene function and interactions within the development network. Although the genetic basis of mammalian sex determination and differentiation has advanced considerably in recent years, a majority of 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis patients still cannot be provided with an accurate diagnosis. Some of these unexplained DSD cases may be due to mutations in novel DSD genes or genomic rearrangements affecting regulatory regions that lead to atypical gene expression. Here, we review our current knowledge of mammalian sex determination drawing on insights from human DSD patients and mouse models