Evaluation of a Reference Material for Glycated Haemoglobin

Peer Reviewe

The global impact of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Education and Management Division: engaging stakeholders and assessing HbA1c quality in a multicentre study across China

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major global issue and high quality testing is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. The IFCC Committee for the Education in the Utility of Biomarkers in Diabetes (C-EUBD) plays a global role in improving knowledge and understanding around diabetes testing. This paper describes a multi-stakeholder approach, to improving diagnostic and therapeutic testing for diabetes, using a multicentre study in China as an example of the global impact of the group. Methods: Educational workshops were developed to support the scientific aims of the study in which 30 centres around China received identical, fresh frozen whole blood samples with values assigned using IFCC secondary reference methods and undertook precision (EP-5) and trueness studies. Performance was assessed using sigma metrics. Results: A successful multi-stakeholder group was developed and sustained throughout the study through several educational workshops, which enabled the formation of a long-term collaboration with key opinion leaders and policy makers in China. All 30 centres showed good performance with within and between laboratory coefficient of variations (CVs) below 3% in SI units at both low and high haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. All individual laboratories met the criteria of a sigma of two or more at a total allowable error (TAE) of 5 mmol/mol (0.46% NGSP). Conclusions: The study led to a successful multi-partner approach to improving diabetes testing in China. All centres involved in the study meeting the published IFCC quality criteria, paving the way for future clinical trials and an expanded role for HbA1c testing across the country

One in Five Laboratories Using Various Hemoglobin A(1c) Methods Do Not Meet the Criteria for Optimal Diabetes Care Management

Background: We assessed the reference change value (RCV) of currently available hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) laboratory assays, which is defined as the critical difference between two consecutive HbA(1c) measurements representing a significant change in health status. Methods: We examined the individual laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) in the Dutch/Belgian quality scheme based on 24 lyophilized samples and calculated the RCV per laboratory (n-220) and per assay method. In addition, two pooled whole blood samples were sent to the participating laboratories. The individual laboratory results were compared to the assigned value +/- an allowable total error (TEa) of 6%. Results: At HbA(1c) values of 41.0 mmol/mol (5.9%-Diabetes Control and Complications Trial [DCCT]) and 61.8 mmol/mol (7.8%-DCCT), 99% and 98%, respectively, of the laboratories reported a value within a TEa limit of 6%. The analytical CV of the HbA(1c) method used in 78% of the laboratories is Conclusions: The analytical performance of the majority of laboratory HbA(1c) methods is within the clinical requirements. However, based on the calculated RCV, 21.8% of the laboratories using different HbA(1c) methods are not able to distinguish an HbA(1c) result of 59 mmol/mol (7.5%-DCCT) from a previous HbA(1c) result of 53 mmol/mol (7.0%-DCCT). It can be presumed that differences in HbA(1c) results of 5 mmol/mol (0.5%-DCCT) do influence treatment decisions

Performance of laboratory tests used to measure blood phenylalanine for the monitoring of patients with phenylketonuria

Analysis of blood phenylalanine is central to the monitoring of patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) and age‐related phenylalanine target treatment‐ranges (0‐12 years; 120‐360 μmol/L, and >12 years; 120‐600 μmol/L) are recommended in order to prevent adverse neurological outcomes. These target treatment‐ranges are based upon plasma phenylalanine concentrations. However, patients are routinely monitored using dried bloodspot (DBS) specimens due to the convenience of collection. Significant differences exist between phenylalanine concentrations in plasma and DBS, with phenylalanine concentrations in DBS specimens analyzed by flow‐injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry reported to be 18% to 28% lower than paired plasma concentrations analyzed using ion‐exchange chromatography. DBS specimens with phenylalanine concentrations of 360 and 600 μmol/L, at the critical upper‐target treatment‐range thresholds would be plasma equivalents of 461 and 768 μmol/L, respectively, when a reported difference of 28% is taken into account. Furthermore, analytical test imprecision and bias in conjunction with pre‐analytical factors such as volume and quality of blood applied to filter paper collection devices to produce DBS specimens affect the final test results. Reporting of inaccurate patient results when comparing DBS results to target treatment‐ranges based on plasma concentrations, together with inter‐laboratory imprecision could have a significant impact on patient management resulting in inappropriate dietary change and potentially adverse patient outcomes. This review is intended to provide perspective on the issues related to the measurement of phenylalanine in blood specimens and to provide direction for the future needs of PKU patients to ensure reliable monitoring of metabolic control using the target treatment‐ranges

A Review of the Challenge in Measuring Hemoglobin A1c

The attraction of the simple biochemical concept combined with a clinical requirement for a long-term marker of glycolic control in diabetes has made hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) one of the most important assays undertaken in the medical laboratory. The diversity in the biochemistry of glycation, clinical requirements, and management demands has resulted in a broad range of methods being developed since HbA1c was described in the late 1960s. A range of analytic principles are used for the measurement of HbA1c. The charge difference between hemoglobin A0 and HbA1c has been widely utilized to separate these two fractions, most notably found these days in ion-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography systems; the difference in molecular structure (affinity chromatography and immunochemical methods) are becoming widely available. Different results found in different laboratories using a variety of HbA1c analyses resulted in the need for standardization, most notably in the United States, Japan, and Sweden. Designated comparison methods are now located in these three countries, but as they are arbitrarily chosen and have differences in specificity, results of these methods and the reference values and action limits of the methods differ and only harmonized HbA1c in specific geographic areas. A reference measurement system within the concept of metrological traceability is now globally accepted as the only valid analytic anchor. However, there is still discussion over the units to be reported. The consensus statement of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC), the American Diabetes Association, the International Diabetes Federation, and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes suggests reporting HbA1c in IFCC units (mmol/mol), National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program units (%), and estimated average glucose (either in mg/dl or mmol/liter). The implementation of this consensus statement raised new questions, to be answered in a concerted action of clinicians, biochemists, external quality assessment organizers, patient groups, and manufacturers

HbA1c Standardisation: History, Science and Politics

Significant analytical improvements have occurred since glycated haemoglobin (GHb), measured as total HbA1, was first used in routine clinical laboratories around 1977. Following the publication of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) study in 1993 the issue of international standardisation became an important objective for scientists and clinicians. The lack of international standardisation led several countries to develop national standardisation programs. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Working Group on Standardisation of HbA1c established a true international reference measurement system for HbA1c and the successful preparation of pure HbA1c calibration material that should lead to further improvements in inter-method and inter-laboratory variability. Reporting of HbA1c has been agreed using the units of mmol/mol (IFCC) and percent (National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program, NGSP)

The risk of clinical misinterpretation of HbA1c: Modelling the impact of biological variation and analytical performance on HbA1c used for diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes

Background: The validity of clinical interpretation of HbA1c depends on the analytical performance of the method and the biological variation of HbA1c in patients. The contribution of non-glucose related factors to the biological variation of HbA1c (NGBVA1c) is not known. This paper explores the cumulative impact of analytical errors and NGBVA1c on the risk of misinterpretation. Methods: A model has been developed to predict the risk of misinterpretation of HbA1c for diagnosis and monitoring with variables for analytical performance and levels of NGBVA1c. Results: The model results in probabilities of misinterpretation for a given HbA1c. Example: for an HbA1c 43 mmol/mol (6.1%), bias 1 mmol/mol (0.09%), CV 3% (2%) used for diagnosis, the probabilities of misinterpretation range from 1 to 19% depending on the contribution of NGBVA1c to the biological variation of HbA1c. Conclusions: In addition to analytical bias and imprecision, NGBVA1c contributes to the risk of misinterpretation, but the relative impact is different per clinical application of HbA1c. For monitoring, imprecision is the predominating factor, for diagnosis both biological variation and analytical bias. Given the increasing use of HbA1c for diagnosis, increase of knowledge on NGBVA1c, decrease of analytical bias, and awareness of the risk of misinterpretation are required