510 research outputs found
Response to the Letter to the Editor
This paper has attracted interest around the world from the media (both TV
and newspapers). In addition, we have received letters, emails and telephone
calls. One of our favorites was a voicemail message asking us to return a call
to Australia at which point we would learn who really killed JFK. We welcome
the opportunity to respond to the letter to the editor from Mr. Fiorentino. Mr.
Fiorentino claims that our ``statement relating to the likelihood of a second
assassin based on the premise of three or more separate bullets is demonstrably
false.'' In response we would like to simply quote from page 327 of Gerald
Posner's book Case Closed, one of the most well known works supporting the
single assassin theory: ``If Connally was hit by another bullet, it had to be
fired from a second shooter, since the Warren Commission's own reconstructions
showed that Oswald could not have operated the bolt and refired in 1.4
seconds.'' Mr. Fiorentino also claims that the ``second fatal flaw is the use
of a rather uncomplicated formula based on Bayes Theorem.'' Let denote the
evidence and denote the theory that there were just two bullets (and hence
a single shooter). We used Bayes Theorem to hypothetically calculate
from and the prior probability . In order to make ten
times more likely than , the ratio of the prior probabilities
[i.e., ] would have to be greater than 15. Thus, we again
conclude that this casts serious doubt on Dr. Guinn's conclusion that the
evidence supported just two bullets. Sadly, this is far from the first time
that probability has been misunderstood and/or misapplied in a case of public
interest. A notable British example is the Clark case. See Nobles and Schiff
(2005) for details. Finally, we welcome and, in fact, encourage members of the
scientific community to provide alternative analyses of the data.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS154 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Chemical and forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullet lots: Is a second shooter possible?
The assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) traumatized the
nation. In this paper we show that evidence used to rule out a second assassin
is fundamentally flawed. This paper discusses new compositional analyses of
bullets reportedly to have been derived from the same batch as those used in
the assassination. The new analyses show that the bullet fragments involved in
the assassination are not nearly as rare as previously reported. In particular,
the new test results are compared to key bullet composition testimony presented
before the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). Matches of bullets
within the same box of bullets are shown to be much more likely than indicated
in the House Select Committee on Assassinations' testimony. Additionally, we
show that one of the ten test bullets is considered a match to one or more
assassination fragments. This finding means that the bullet fragments from the
assassination that match could have come from three or more separate bullets.
Finally, this paper presents a case for reanalyzing the assassination bullet
fragments and conducting the necessary supporting scientific studies. These
analyses will shed light on whether the five bullet fragments constitute three
or more separate bullets. If the assassination fragments are derived from three
or more separate bullets, then a second assassin is likely, as the additional
bullet would not easily be attributable to the main suspect, Mr. Oswald, under
widely accepted shooting scenarios [see Posner (1993), Case Closed, Bantam, New
York].Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-AOAS119 the Annals of
Applied Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aoas/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Hydrogeological controls on regional-scale indirect nitrous oxide (N2O) emission factors for rivers
Indirect nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from rivers are currently derived using poorly constrained default IPCC emission factors (EF5r) which yield unreliable flux estimates. Here, we demonstrate how hydrogeological conditions can be used to develop more refined regional-scale EF5r estimates required for compiling accurate national greenhouse gas inventories. Focusing on three UK river catchments with contrasting bedrock and superficial geologies, N2O and nitrate (NO3-) concentrations were analyzed in 651 river water samples collected from 2011 to 2013. Unconfined Cretaceous Chalk bedrock regions yielded the highest median N2O-N concentration (3.0 μg L-1), EF5r (0.00036) and N2O-N flux (10.8 kg ha-1 a-1). Conversely, regions of bedrock confined by glacial deposits yielded significantly lower median N2O-N concentration (0.8 μg L-1), EF5r (0.00016) and N2O-N flux (2.6 kg ha-1 a-1), regardless of bedrock type. Bedrock permeability is an important control in regions where groundwater is unconfined, with a high N2O yield from high permeability Chalk contrasting with significantly lower median N2O-N concentration (0.7 μg L-1), EF5r (0.00020) and N2O-N flux (2.0 kg ha-1 a-1) on lower permeability unconfined Jurassic mudstone. The evidence presented here demonstrates EF5r can be differentiated by hydrogeological conditions and thus provide a valuable proxy for generating improved regional-scale N2O emission estimates
Navigating International, Interdisciplinary, and Indigenous Collaborative Inquiry
This report describes how multiple community constituents came together with university researchers to develop a shared agenda for studying young indigenous people in five international circumpolar communities. The paper focuses on the setup and process of an initial face-to-face methodological planning workshop involving youth and adult community members and academics. Members of Yup’ik, Inupiat, Eveny, Inuit, and Sámi communities from Siberia to Norway participated in the workshop and engaged in negotiations to arrive at shared research interests. This was essential since the ultimate goal of the research is translational and transformative, spurring social action in communities. Describing the beginning stage of this project and the underlying participatory methodology offers insight into how the approach engaged community members with varying degrees of sustained interest and practical success. It, therefore, articulates a methodological approach for international community-based participatory research
ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principles
Large language model (LLM) prompting is a promising new approach for users to
create and customize their own chatbots. However, current methods for steering
a chatbot's outputs, such as prompt engineering and fine-tuning, do not support
users in converting their natural feedback on the model's outputs to changes in
the prompt or model. In this work, we explore how to enable users to
interactively refine model outputs through their feedback, by helping them
convert their feedback into a set of principles (i.e. a constitution) that
dictate the model's behavior. From a formative study, we (1) found that users
needed support converting their feedback into principles for the chatbot and
(2) classified the different principle types desired by users. Inspired by
these findings, we developed ConstitutionMaker, an interactive tool for
converting user feedback into principles, to steer LLM-based chatbots. With
ConstitutionMaker, users can provide either positive or negative feedback in
natural language, select auto-generated feedback, or rewrite the chatbot's
response; each mode of feedback automatically generates a principle that is
inserted into the chatbot's prompt. In a user study with 14 participants, we
compare ConstitutionMaker to an ablated version, where users write their own
principles. With ConstitutionMaker, participants felt that their principles
could better guide the chatbot, that they could more easily convert their
feedback into principles, and that they could write principles more
efficiently, with less mental demand. ConstitutionMaker helped users identify
ways to improve the chatbot, formulate their intuitive responses to the model
into feedback, and convert this feedback into specific and clear principles.
Together, these findings inform future tools that support the interactive
critiquing of LLM outputs
- …