Post hoc analyses of response rates to pharmacological treatments in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Lack of consensus regarding how best to define treatment response hinders translation from trials to the clinic. These post hoc analyses examine three commonly used response criteria in six trials of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Data from four short-term randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two long-term open-label studies were analysed. Children and adolescents with ADHD received either dose-optimised (30-70 mg/day) or fixed-dose (70 mg/day) LDX. The RCTs included osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) or atomoxetine (ATX) as a head-to-head comparator or as a reference treatment. Three definitions of response were used in these analyses: reductions of ⩾30% or ⩾50% in ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score plus a Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) score of 1 or 2, or an ADHD-RS-IV total score of ⩽18. RESULTS: At the end point, LDX response rates for the least stringent criterion of ⩾30% reduction in ADHD-RS-IV total score plus a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 ranged from 69.6% to 82.6%. The proportion achieving the more stringent criterion of a reduction in ADHD-RS-IV total score of ⩾50% plus a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 at the end point ranged from 59.8% to 74.8%. An ADHD-RS-IV total score of ⩽18 at the end point was achieved by 56.7-79.9% of participants. Response rates remained stable throughout the long-term open-label studies. CONCLUSIONS: Response rates were similar for the two more stringent response criteria. The less stringent criterion resulted in higher response rates and may include partial responders

Functional impairment outcomes in clinical trials of different ADHD medications:post hoc responder analyses and baseline subgroup analyses

Several recent phase 3 clinical trials of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications have used the Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS-P). Here, we assess WFIRS-P response in individual patients in two pivotal trials of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) and guanfacine extended release (GXR). We also analysed pooled WFIRS-P data from seven phase 3 studies of ADHD medications to shed light on factors associated with baseline functional impairment. The proportion of patients with a change in WFIRS-P score that exceeded the minimal important difference (MID) criteria for response was greater for LDX than placebo in the Family, Learning and School, and Risky Activities domains, and was greater for GXR than placebo in the Social Activities, Learning and School, and Family domains. Responders had significantly worse baseline scores in all WFIRS-P domains (all p < 0.001) than non-responders. In the pooled analyses, baseline WFIRS-P scores in all domains were significantly worse in participants with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) than in those without ODD. Having combined type or hyperactive-impulsive type ADHD, being enrolled into a study in Europe, being male and being younger also had modest negative effects on baseline WFIRS-P scores. The present analysis of WFIRS-P response shows that previously reported group-level improvements in WFIRS-P functional impairment score translated into clinically relevant improvements in many individual participants. Functional impairment is a diverse and subjective construct that is influenced by multiple factors. Optimal management of individuals with ADHD should involve monitoring improvements in functioning and quality of life, as well as symptomatic improvement

Safety and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release in patients with treatment resistant depression

Funding Information: This study was sponsored by Janssen EMEA. Support for third\u2011party writing assistance for this article, provided by Phoebe Kennedy, MSc, and Andrew Wilhelmsen, PhD, Costello Medical, UK, was funded by Janssen EMEA in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP 2022) guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022).AHY: In the past 3 years, received consulting fees and speaker's honoraria from Allegan, AstraZeneca, Bionomics, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, LivaNova, Lundbeck, Servier, Takeda and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma and Sunovion; received grants from Janssen; independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London; the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.AF: Consulted for, received grants from or participated as a speaker in symposia sponsored by Angelini, Apsen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lundbeck, Mylan, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Rovi and Viatris.RSMcI: Received research grant support from CIHR/GACD/National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Milken Institute; speaker/consultation fees from Lundbeck, Janssen, Alkermes, Neumora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sage, Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Neurocrine, Neurawell, Sunovion, Bausch Health, Axsome, Novo Nordisk, Kris, Sanofi, Eisai, Intra-Cellular, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals, Viatris, Abbvie and Atai Life Sciences. Dr. Roger S. McIntyre is a CEO of Braxia Scientific Corp. Funding Information: This study was sponsored by Janssen EMEA. Support for third\u2011party writing assistance for this article, provided by Phoebe Kennedy, MSc, and Andrew Wilhelmsen, PhD, Costello Medical, UK, was funded by Janssen EMEA in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP 2022 ) guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022). Publisher Copyright: © 2024In ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), esketamine nasal spray (NS) significantly increased the probability of remission at Week 8, and of being relapse-free through Week 32 after remission at Week 8, versus quetiapine extended release (XR) in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Here, we explore the time course, burden and consequences of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the phase IIIb ESCAPE‑TRD trial. Patients with TRD were randomised 1:1 to esketamine NS or quetiapine XR, dosed per label alongside an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In this secondary publication, safety analyses (comprising patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment) included incidence, severity and durations (Kaplan‑Meier method) of TEAEs, and subsequent dispositional changes. P values were not adjusted for multiple testing. 336 patients were randomised to esketamine NS and 340 to quetiapine XR; 334 and 336 received ≥1 dose of study treatment, respectively. TEAEs were significantly more common with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (91.9 % versus 78.0 %; p < 0.001), but were typically mild/moderate and transient in nature: a greater proportion resolved on the same-day (92.0 % versus 12.1 %) and lead to treatment discontinuation in significantly fewer patients (4.2 % versus 11.0 %, respectively; p < 0.001). The proportion of days spent with TEAEs was significantly lower with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (median: 11.9 % versus 21.3 %; p < 0.001). Although more frequent with esketamine NS, TEAEs were typically transient and mild, with discontinuation less likely versus quetiapine XR. Data were consistent with established safety profiles, with no new safety signals identified. Alongside greater efficacy, the demonstrably more favourable tolerability profile of esketamine NS versus quetiapine XR further supports its use for TRD.publishersversionpublishe

Effect of rescue medication on seizure duration in non-institutionalized children with epilepsy

Objectives: characterize the real-world management of and outcomes for children with epilepsy receiving rescue medication for prolonged acute convulsive seizures (PACS) in the community.Methods: PERFECT-3 (Practices in Emergency and Rescue medication For Epilepsy managed with Community-administered Therapy 3) was a European, retrospective observational study. Eligible patients were non-institutionalized children with epilepsy aged 3-16 years who had experienced ≥1 PACS in the past year and had ≥1 currently prescribed PACS rescue medication. Investigators provided clinical assessments and parents/guardians completed questionnaires. Statistical tests were post hoc; p values are descriptive.Results: at enrollment (N = 286), most patients had prescriptions for diazepam (69.2%) and/or midazolam (55.9%); some had two (26.6%) or three (2.4%) prescribed rescue medications. Most patients experienced PACS despite regular anti-epilepsy medication. According to parents, the average duration of their child's seizures without rescue medication was &lt;5 min in 35.7% of patients, 5-&lt;20 min in 42.6%, and ≥20 min in 21.7% (n = 258); with rescue medication seizure duration was &lt;5 min in 69.4% of patients, 5-&lt;20 min in 25.6%, and ≥20 min in 5.0%. Rescue medication use was significantly associated with average seizures lasting &lt;5 min (χ2 = 58.8; p &lt; 0.0001). At the time of their most recent PACS, 58.5-67.8% of children reportedly received rescue medication within 5 min of seizure onset, and 85.4-94.1% within 10 min.Conclusion: this study provides the first real-world data that rescue medications administered in the community reduce the duration of PACS in children with epilepsy. Study limitations including potential recall bias are acknowledged.</p

Health-related quality of life and the burden of prolonged seizures in noninstitutionalized children with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide information on the burden of illness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with epilepsy who experience prolonged acute convulsive seizures (PACS) in the community setting, and to investigate factors that may predict poor HRQoL in this population. METHODS: Noninstitutionalized children (aged 3-16 years) who had experienced at least one PACS within the past year and had currently prescribed PACS rescue medication were enrolled in a cross-sectional study in Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (Practices in Emergency and Rescue medication For Epilepsy managed with Community-administered Therapy 3 [PERFECT-3]). Clinicians, parents/guardians, and patients completed web-based questionnaires regarding clinical characteristics, PACS frequency, and day-to-day impairment. Patients' HRQoL was rated by clinicians, parents/guardians, and patients themselves using the 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) and summarized as a utility score. Potential predictors of poor HRQoL were tested in individual univariate generalized linear models and a global multivariable model. RESULTS: Enrolled children (N = 286) had experienced 1-400 PACS (median: 4) in the past year. Clinicians reported that 216/281 patients (76.9%) had learning disabilities of varying severity. Mean EQ-5D utility scores rated by clinicians (n = 279), parents (n = 277), and patients (n = 85) were 0.52 (standard deviation: 0.41), 0.51 (0.39), and 0.74 (0.29), respectively. Increasing PACS frequency, increasing severity of learning disability, and specialist school attendance were significantly associated with decreasing EQ-5D utility score. In the multivariable model, having learning disabilities was the best predictor of poor HRQoL. SIGNIFICANCE: Health-related quality of life was very poor in many children with epilepsy whose PACS were managed with rescue medication in the community, with learning disability being the most powerful predictor of patients' HRQoL. Mean EQ-5D utility scores were lower (worse) than published values for many other chronic disorders, indicating that optimal treatment should involve helping children and their families to manage learning disabilities and day-to-day impairments, in addition to preventing seizures.status: publishe

Health-related quality of life and the burden of prolonged seizures in noninstitutionalized children with epilepsy

Objective: this study aimed to provide information on the burden of illness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with epilepsy who experience prolonged acute convulsive seizures (PACS) in the community setting, and to investigate factors that may predict poor HRQoL in this population. Methods: noninstitutionalized children (aged 3–16 years) who had experienced at least one PACS within the past year and had currently prescribed PACS rescue medication were enrolled in a cross-sectional study in Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (Practices in Emergency and Rescue medication For Epilepsy managed with Community-administered Therapy 3 [PERFECT-3]). Clinicians, parents/guardians, and patients completed web-based questionnaires regarding clinical characteristics, PACS frequency, and day-to-day impairment. Patients' HRQoL was rated by clinicians, parents/guardians, and patients themselves using the 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) and summarized as a utility score. Potential predictors of poor HRQoL were tested in individual univariate generalized linear models and a global multivariable model. Results: enrolled children (N = 286) had experienced 1–400 PACS (median: 4) in the past year. Clinicians reported that 216/281 patients (76.9%) had learning disabilities of varying severity. Mean EQ-5D utility scores rated by clinicians (n = 279), parents (n = 277), and patients (n = 85) were 0.52 (standard deviation: 0.41), 0.51 (0.39), and 0.74 (0.29), respectively. Increasing PACS frequency, increasing severity of learning disability, and specialist school attendance were significantly associated with decreasing EQ-5D utility score. In the multivariable model, having learning disabilities was the best predictor of poor HRQoL. Significance: health-related quality of life was very poor in many children with epilepsy whose PACS were managed with rescue medication in the community, with learning disability being the most powerful predictor of patients' HRQoL. Mean EQ-5D utility scores were lower (worse) than published values for many other chronic disorders, indicating that optimal treatment should involve helping children and their families to manage learning disabilities and day-to-day impairments, in addition to preventing seizures.</p

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and occupational outcomes: The role of educational attainment, comorbid developmental disorders, and intellectual disability.

BackgroundIndividuals with ADHD are at increased risk for poor occupational outcomes. Educational attainment and psychiatric comorbidity may be important contributing factors for these outcomes, but the role of these factors is not well characterized. This study aimed to investigate the associations between ADHD and occupational outcomes, and to examine the influence of educational attainment, comorbid developmental disorders and intellectual disability on these associations.MethodsWe linked the Swedish population graduating from compulsory school 1998-2008 (N = 1.2 millions) to population-wide register-based data on clinical psychiatric diagnoses and medications, objective annual measures of educational, and occupational outcomes. Individuals were followed for between 6 to 16 years after graduation.ResultsIndividuals with ADHD had annually on average 17 percent lower income, ratio = 0.83 (95% CI 0.83-0.84), 12.19 (11.89-12.49) more days of unemployment, and a higher likelihood of receiving disability pension, odds-ratio = 19.0 (18.4-19.6), compared to controls. Comorbid diagnoses of intellectual disability and developmental disorder explained most of the association between ADHD and disability pension, while lifetime educational attainment partially explained associations between ADHD and all occupational outcomes. Analyses of occupational trajectories found that income was lower and unemployment elevated relative to controls with the same educational attainment. Higher educational attainment correlated with higher income similarly among individuals with ADHD and controls after accounting for individual background factors.ConclusionsThe occupational burden associated with ADHD is substantial. Comorbid developmental disorders, intellectual disability and educational difficulties (e.g., failing grades) from childhood to adulthood are important factors to consider when designing interventions to improve occupational outcomes in individuals with ADHD