High concordance of BRAF mutational status in matched primary and metastatic melanoma

Background: Techniques for the accurate identification of activating mutations of BRAF in metastatic melanoma are of great clinical importance, due to the availability of targeted therapies for these tumours. There is uncertainty regarding the frequency with which BRAF status differs between primary and metastatic sites. Methods: Between 2011 and 2016, 219 melanoma cases underwent BRAF testing in our institution. In 53 of these, paired primary and metastatic specimens were available for PCR and immunohistochemical evaluation. Results: 52 out of 53 cases (98%) showed concordant BRAF status between primary and metastatic site by IHC. In one case, a metastasis and its matched primary were positive by IHC but the metastasis was negative on PCR. On further investigation, PCR was positive in the primary and repeat PCR in the metastasis was positive, following macrodissection. Conclusions: Our results suggest that discordance of BRAF mutational status between primaries and metastases is a rare occurrence. In one case, immunohistochemistry provided strong evidence that initial PCR testing had provided a false negative result due to low tumour volume. Thus, in cases where tissue is difficult to obtain from a metastasis or unavailable, the primary tumour can be used with confidence

The role of tumour morphology in assigning HPV status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: There is no consensus on the optimal approach to human papilloma virus (HPV) testing in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our objective was to classify OPSCC as HPV positive or negative based on (1) morphology alone, (2) p16 status alone, (3) combined morphology and p16 status with additional HPV testing in discordant cases in keeping with 2012 College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines (combined approach), and to evaluate and compare survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 168 patients, 146 with OPSCC and 22 with cervical SCC of unknown primary site (SCCUP). Morphology was classified as keratinizing or non-keratinizing, p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed and additional HPV DNA PCR testing undertaken in cases in which morphology and p16 status were discordant. Survival statistics were evaluated and compared for the 3 different approaches to classification. RESULTS: On univariate analysis all 3 classification methods significantly predicted for overall survival (OS). Both p16 status and the combined approach also predicted for disease specific survival (DSS), whereas morphology fell just outside significance (p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis only the combined approach retained significance for both OS and DSS, whilst morphology was also significant for DSS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that tumour morphology significantly predicts for survival in OPSCC. However, we found combined tumour morphology and p16 IHC, with additional testing for discordant cases to be superior to either morphology or p16 IHC alone. Further study is required to establish the optimal testing method for HPV in OPSCC particularly in low prevalence populations

Multicenter evaluation of the Idylla NRAS-BRAF mutation test in metastatic colorectal cancer

Treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) with monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor requires the assessment of the mutational status of exons 2, 3, and 4 of the NRAS and KRAS oncogenes. Moreover, the mutational status of exon 15 of the BRAF oncogene is a marker of poor prognosis in CRC. The Idylla NRAS-BRAF Mutation Test is a reliable, simple (<2 minutes hands-on time), and quick (<2 hours turnaround time) sample-to-result solution, enabling the detection of clinically relevant mutations in NRAS (18 mutations) and BRAF (5 mutations). A multicenter study was conducted in 14 centers using the Idylla NRAS-BRAF Mutation Test to assess the NRAS and BRAF mutational status of 418 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from CRC patients. Results were compared with those obtained earlier by routine reference methods, including next-generation sequencing, pyrosequencing, mass spectrometry-based assays, PCR-based assays, and Sanger sequencing. In case of discordance, additional tests were performed by digital droplet PCR. Overall, after testing confirmation and excluding invalids/errors by design, concordances between the Idylla NRAS-BRAF Mutation Test and the reference test results were found in almost perfect agreement. In conclusion, the Idylla NRAS-BRAF Mutation Test enables the routine detection of all NRAS and BRAF mutations deemed clinically relevant according to the latest clinical guidelines, without necessitating molecular expertise or infrastructure