Johann Friedrich Schannat erlernt die Praktiken der (kirchen-)historischen Gelehrsamkeit

Zusammenfassung: Alle Praktiken von Gelehrsamkeit stehen in Re­lation zu «epistemischen Tugenden», also einem Bezugsrahmen für den Gelehrten im Umgang mit seinem Material ebenso wie mit seiner sozialen Umgebung. Wenn diese Feststellung für alle Mit­glieder der Res publica literaria gilt, so tut sie dies in verstärktem Ausmaß für diejenigen unter ihnen, die sich bei ihrer Befassung mit Kirchengeschichte in einem institutionellen Rahmen bewegen, der ei­nige dieser Tugenden und Praktiken gleichsam in einen normativen Rang zu erheben vermag. Oft im Spannungsfeld dieser Pole angesiedelt, legen Gele­hrtenkorrespondenzen beredtes Zeugnis ab von der Erlernung und Anwendung, jedoch auch von der Ablehnung und Infragestellung solcher Praktiken und Tugenden durch die Gelehrten. Aus dieser theoretischen Perspektive bietet der vorliegenden Beitrag eine selektive Analyse der Korrespondenz von Johann Friedrich Schannat (1683–1739), einem aus Luxemburg stammenden Gelehrten im Dienst unterschiedlicher kirchlicher Würdenträger (Fulda, Worms, Prag) und damit zugleich einem «wandern­den» Kirchenhistoriker: Indem er nicht an einen archivischen oder bibliothekarischen Bestand und ebenso wenig an ein spezifisches patronales Umfeld dauerhaft gebunden war, musste Schannat sein Re­pertoire an Praktiken und Tugenden stets neu ak­tualisieren. Je nach Position des brieflichen Gegenü­bers konnten diesen unterschiedliche intellektuelle und soziale Ausprägungen zukommen, wie an den Briefwechseln Schannats mit dem Freiherrn Wil­helm von Crassier, dem Mauriner Edmond Martène und dem österreichischen Benediktinergelehrten Bernhard Pez deutlich wird. Abstract: All practices of erudition are related to «epis­temic virtues», meaning a reference frame for scholars defining how to interact with their objects and their social environment. If this as­sumption holds true for all members of the Res publica literaria, it does so even more for those who, in dealing with ecclesiastical history, are part of an institutional framework that elevates some of those practices and virtues to a norma­tive level. Often situated between these poles, learned correspondences testify to the learning and application, but also to the refusal and ques­tioning of such virtues and practices. Viewed from this theoretical basis, the presented paper offers a selective analysis of the corresponden­ce of Johann Friedrich Schannat (1683–1739), a scholar from Luxembourg who entered the ser­vices of various ecclesiastical dignitaries (Fulda, Worms, Prague), thereby becoming an «itine­rant» church historian: Not bound by long-las­ting ties to a specific archive or library, or to an individual environment of patronage, Schannat was required to constantly re-adapt his reper­toire of practices and virtues. Depending on the position of the correspondence partner, his framework of reference could assume different intellectual and social characteristics, as illus­trated by his correspondences with the Baron Crassier, the Maurist Martène and the Austrian Benedictine scholar Bernhard Pez. Stichwörter: Frühe Neuzeit, Res publica literaria, Gelehrtenkorres­pondenz, Kirchengeschichtsschreibung, Historiogra­phiegeschichte, Historische Epistemologie, Epistemische Tugenden. Key words: Early modern history, res publica literaria, eru­dite correspondence, ecclesiastical historiogra­phy, history of historiography, historical episte­mology, epistemic virtues

Communities, Harvesting, and CGIF: Building the Research Data Graph at NFDI4Culture

NFDI4Culture provides the Culture Knowledge Graph to facilitate FAIRness in its communities. It provides a lightweight infrastructure that interconnects research data from diverse domains such as architectural studies, art history, musicology, performing arts, and media studies. To allow further exploration of resources across individual knowledge silos, the graph is designed to be compatible with other research areas as well. It requires data providers to implement the Culture Graph Interchange Format, a subset of schema.org classes and properties, either as embedded metadata, an API, or a SPARQL endpoint that can be harvested, or as an RDF data dump. Connections between resources are established via controlled vocabularies, and ingested data is made available via the Culture Information Portal\u27s SPARQL endpoint. After introducing the infrastructural need, the paper reviews comparable solutions, describes the graph, discusses technical choices, and outlines our engagement within and beyond NFDI4Culture

Johann Friedrich Schannat. Disciple of the (Ecclesiastical) Historical Scholarship

All practices of erudition are related to «epistemic virtues», meaning a reference frame for scholars defining how to interact with their objects and their social environment. If this assumption holds true for all members of the Res publica literaria, it does so even more for those who, in dealing with ecclesiastical history, are part of an institutional framework that elevates some of those practices and virtues to a normative level. Often situated between these poles, learned correspondences testify to the learning and application, but also to the refusal and questioning of such virtues and practices. Viewed from this theoretical basis, the presented paper offers a selective analysis of the correspondence of Johann Friedrich Schannat (1683–1739), a scholar from Luxembourg who entered the services of various ecclesiastical dignitaries (Fulda, Worms, Prague), thereby becoming an «itinerant» church historian: Not bound by long-lasting ties to a specific archive or library, or to an individual environment of patronage, Schannat was required to constantly re-adapt his repertoire of practices and virtues. Depending on the position of the correspondence partner, his framework of reference could assume different intellectual and social characteristics, as illustrated by his correspondences with the Baron Crassier, the Maurist Martène and the Austrian Benedictine scholar Bernhard Pez

Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

non present