Early alveolar bone grafting has a negative effect on maxillary dental arch dimensions of pre-school children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

Item does not contain fulltextOBJECTIVE: To evaluate maxillary dental arch dimensions in pre-school children with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) after early alveolar bone grafting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intercanine and intermolar widths, length of dental arch and mesiopalatal inclination of both maxillary segments were measured directly on the dental casts of 42 children (27 boys and 15 girls; mean age = 5.2 years, SD 0.5; Early-grafted group), 30 children (18 boys and 12 girls; mean age = 5.8 years, SD 0.8; Non-grafted group), and 40 children (25 boys and 15 girls, mean age = 5.8, SD 0.4; non-cleft Control group). Children from Early-grafted and Non-grafted groups had a CUCLP repaired with a one-stage closure of the entire cleft. An alveolar bone grafting was performed in the Early-grafted group between 2 and 4 years (mean = 2.4, SD 0.6). A one-way anova model with post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison procedures were used to identify intergroup differences. RESULTS: The mesiopalatal inclination of the lesser segment in the Early-grafted group was decreased in comparison with the Non-grafted and Control groups. The intercanine width had a tendency to be reduced in the Early-grafted group relative to Non-grafted group. CONCLUSIONS: Early bone grafting results in a larger collapse of the lesser segment than bone grafting carried out between 9 and 12 years of age

Prediction of the outcome of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusions--a systematic review

Item does not contain fulltextThe purpose of this study was to systematically review the orthodontic literature to assess the effectiveness of a prediction of outcome of orthodontic treatment in subjects with a Class III malocclusion. A structured search of electronic databases, as well as hand searching, retrieved 232 publications concerning the topic. Following application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 studies remained. Among other data, sample ethnicity, treatment method, age at the start and completion of treatment, age at follow-up, outcome measures, and identified predictors were extracted from the relevant studies. A subjective assessment of study quality was performed. The heterogeneity of the samples and treatment methods prevented carrying out a meta-analysis. Thirty-eight different predictors of treatment outcome were identified: 35 cephalometric and three derived from analysis of study casts. Prediction models comprising three to four predictors were reported in most studies. However, only two shared more than one predictor. Gonial angle was identified most frequently-in five publications. The studies were of low or medium quality. Due to the large variety of predictors and differences among developed prediction models, the existence of a universal predictor of outcome of treatment of Class III malocclusions is questionable