24 research outputs found

    Whole-genome sequencing reveals host factors underlying critical COVID-19

    Get PDF
    Critical COVID-19 is caused by immune-mediated inflammatory lung injury. Host genetic variation influences the development of illness requiring critical care1 or hospitalization2,3,4 after infection with SARS-CoV-2. The GenOMICC (Genetics of Mortality in Critical Care) study enables the comparison of genomes from individuals who are critically ill with those of population controls to find underlying disease mechanisms. Here we use whole-genome sequencing in 7,491 critically ill individuals compared with 48,400 controls to discover and replicate 23 independent variants that significantly predispose to critical COVID-19. We identify 16 new independent associations, including variants within genes that are involved in interferon signalling (IL10RB and PLSCR1), leucocyte differentiation (BCL11A) and blood-type antigen secretor status (FUT2). Using transcriptome-wide association and colocalization to infer the effect of gene expression on disease severity, we find evidence that implicates multiple genes—including reduced expression of a membrane flippase (ATP11A), and increased expression of a mucin (MUC1)—in critical disease. Mendelian randomization provides evidence in support of causal roles for myeloid cell adhesion molecules (SELE, ICAM5 and CD209) and the coagulation factor F8, all of which are potentially druggable targets. Our results are broadly consistent with a multi-component model of COVID-19 pathophysiology, in which at least two distinct mechanisms can predispose to life-threatening disease: failure to control viral replication; or an enhanced tendency towards pulmonary inflammation and intravascular coagulation. We show that comparison between cases of critical illness and population controls is highly efficient for the detection of therapeutically relevant mechanisms of disease

    Le transport dans les aires urbaines - Tendances actuelles et perspectives

    No full text
    This submission describes the changes affecting transport in urban areas and, after setting out the causes, examines the effects. It then specifies what the objectives of urban transport planning should be and indicates certain measures that can be taken to achieve these objectives, such as making better use of existing resources, investment, and a joint transport/land-use approach.Cette communication dĂ©crit les tendances qui affectent le transport dans les aires urbaines. AprĂšs en avoir explicitĂ© les causes, elle en Ă©tudie les effets. Elle s'efforce ensuite de prĂ©ciser ce que devraient ĂȘtre les objectifs de la planification des transports urbains et indique les types de mesures susceptibles d'ĂȘtre appliquĂ©es pour atteindre ces objectifs : meilleure utilisation des ressources existantes, investissements, approche combinĂ©e transport/utilisation du sol

    The importance of cost minimisation in public transport operations

    No full text
    SIGLELD:8547.36(TRRL-SR--766) / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

    Average travel time estimations for urban routes that consider exit turning movements

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a methodology for real-time estimation of exit movement-specific average travel time on urban routes by integrating real-time cumulative plots, probe vehicles, and historic cumulative plots. Two approaches, component based and extreme based, are discussed for route travel time estimation. The methodology is tested with simulation and is validated with real data from Lucerne, Switzerland, that demonstrate its potential for accurate estimation. Both approaches provide similar results. The component-based approach is more reliable, with a greater chance of obtaining a probe vehicle in each interval, although additional data from each component is required. The extreme-based approach is simple and requires only data from upstream and downstream of the route, but the chances of obtaining a probe that traverses the entire route might be low. The performance of the methodology is also compared with a probe-only method. The proposed methodology requires only a few probes for accurate estimation; the probe-only method requires significantly more probes
    corecore