39 research outputs found

    Diversity of Acanthaceae in Phu Wua Forest, Bueng Kan Province

    Get PDF
    āļšāļ—āļ„āļąāļ”āļĒāđˆāļ­ āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļģāļĢāļ§āļˆāļžāļ·āļŠāļ§āļ‡āļĻāđŒāđ€āļŦāļ‡āļ·āļ­āļāļ›āļĨāļēāļŦāļĄāļ­ āļšāļĢāļīāđ€āļ§āļ“āđ€āļŠāđ‰āļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļēāļ•āļīāđƒāļ™āļ›āđˆāļēāļ āļđāļ§āļąāļ§ āļˆāļąāļ‡āļŦāļ§āļąāļ”āļšāļķāļ‡āļāļēāļŽ āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļžāļĪāļĻāļˆāļīāļāļēāļĒāļ™ āļž.āļĻ. 2559 āļ–āļķāļ‡āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™āļžāļĪāļĐāļ āļēāļ„āļĄ āļž.āļĻ. 2561 āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļ™āļīāđ€āļ§āļĻāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļē āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ­āļ­āļāļ”āļ­āļāđāļĨāļ°āļ•āļīāļ”āļœāļĨ āļˆāļąāļ”āļ—āļģāļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļžāļĢāļĢāļ“āđ„āļĄāđ‰āđāļŦāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ­āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļīāļ‡ āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļĢāļđāļ›āļ§āļīāļ˜āļēāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļŠāļ™āļīāļ” āļžāļšāļžāļ·āļŠāļ§āļ‡āļĻāđŒāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™ 26 āļŠāļ™āļīāļ” 17 āļŠāļāļļāļĨ āļŠāļāļļāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļšāļĄāļēāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āļ„āļ·āļ­ Justicia L. āđāļĨāļ° Strobilanthes Blume āļžāļš 4 āļŠāļ™āļīāļ” āļĢāļ­āļ‡āļĨāļ‡āļĄāļēāļ„āļ·āļ­ āļŠāļāļļāļĨ Andrographis Wall. ex Nees, Phlogacanthus Nees āđāļĨāļ° Ruellia L. āļžāļš 2 āļŠāļ™āļīāļ” āļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļŠāļāļļāļĨāļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļšāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļ™āļīāļ” āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ Asystasia Blume, Barleria L., Chroesthes Benoist, Dyschoriste Ness in Wall., Hemigraphis Nees, Hygrophila R.Br., Lepidagathis Willd., Nelsonia R.Br., Peristrophe Nees, Phaulopsis Willd., Rungia Nees āđāļĨāļ° Staurogyne Wall. āđƒāļ™āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰āđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļĢāļ°āļšāļļāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāđ„āļ”āđ‰ 2 āļŠāļ™āļīāļ” āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđāļāđˆ Dyschoriste sp. āđāļĨāļ° Strobilanthes sp. āļ„āļģāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļ: āļ­āļ™āļļāļāļĢāļĄāļ§āļīāļ˜āļēāļ™āļžāļ·āļŠ, āļāļēāļĢāļ­āļ™āļļāļĢāļąāļāļĐāđŒ, āļšāļķāļ‡āļāļēāļŽÂ ABSTRACT Acanthaceae species were surveyed along the nature trails in Phu Wua forest, Bueng Kan province from November 2016 to May 2018. Ecological and phonological data, as well as Voucher specimens, were provided. A key to species was constructed. There are 26 species and 17 genera, the most common genera were Justicia L. and Strobilanthes Blume with four species each. Andrographis Wall. ex Nees, Phlogacanthus Nees and Ruellia L. were the second most common genera with two species each. Asystasia Blume, Barleria L., Chroesthes Benoist, Dyschoriste Ness in Wall., Hemigraphis Nees, Hygrophila R.Br., Lepidagathis Willd., Nelsonia R.Br., Peristrophe Nees, Phaulopsis Willd., Rungia Nees and Staurogyne Wall. were found in one species each. Among these, two species Dyschoriste sp. and Strobilanthes sp. could not be identified.Keywords: Plant taxonomy, Conservation, Bueng Kan

    Two mycoheterotrophic orchids from Thailand tropical dipterocarpacean forests associate with a broad diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Mycoheterotrophic plants are considered to associate very specifically with fungi. Mycoheterotrophic orchids are mostly associated with ectomycorrhizal fungi in temperate regions, or with saprobes or parasites in tropical regions. Although most mycoheterotrophic orchids occur in the tropics, few studies have been devoted to them, and the main conclusions about their specificity have hitherto been drawn from their association with ectomycorrhizal fungi in temperate regions.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We investigated three Asiatic Neottieae species from ectomycorrhizal forests in Thailand. We found that all were associated with ectomycorrhizal fungi, such as Thelephoraceae, Russulaceae and Sebacinales. Based on <sup>13</sup>C enrichment of their biomass, they probably received their organic carbon from these fungi, as do mycoheterotrophic Neottieae from temperate regions. Moreover, <sup>13</sup>C enrichment suggested that some nearby green orchids received part of their carbon from fungi too. Nevertheless, two of the three orchids presented a unique feature for mycoheterotrophic plants: they were not specifically associated with a narrow clade of fungi. Some orchid individuals were even associated with up to nine different fungi.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results demonstrate that some green and mycoheterotrophic orchids in tropical regions can receive carbon from ectomycorrhizal fungi, and thus from trees. Our results reveal the absence of specificity in two mycoheterotrophic orchid-fungus associations in tropical regions, in contrast to most previous studies of mycoheterotrophic plants, which have been mainly focused on temperate orchids.</p

    An overview of floral and vegetative evolution in the Asian clade of Bulbophyllum (Orchidaceae)

    Get PDF
    Background and aims – Bulbophyllum, the largest genus in Orchidaceae, exhibits a diverse morphology in both reproductive and vegetative characters. While trait diversity and evolution has been extensively studied in Malagasy species and within the Cirrhopetalum alliance clade, the evolution of reproductive and vegetative characters at the whole level of the Asian clade remains largely unexplored. Material and methods – We reconstructed the phylogeny of approximately 11% of all Asian Bulbophyllum species using Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood estimation based on nuclear (ITS) and chloroplast (matK, psbA-trnH) DNA sequence data. This phylogenetic framework allowed us to examine the evolution of two vegetative and four floral characters through ancestral state reconstruction. Key results and conclusion – The ancestral character states of the Asian clade of Bulbophyllum include a single leaf, distinct pseudobulbs, multiple-flowered inflorescences, and lateral and dorsal sepals similar in length. One-leaved pseudobulbs evolved into two-leaved pseudobulbs multiple times. Distinct pseudobulbs gave rise to indistinct pseudobulbs twice. Multiple-flowered inflorescences shifted to solitary flowers and 2–3-flowered inflorescences multiple times, with some instances of evolutionary reversal. Lateral sepal elongation also presents a convergent evolutionary scenario

    The Pomatocalpa maculosum Complex (Orchidaceae) Resolved by Multivariate Morphometric Analysis

    No full text
    Principal components analysis (PCA) was employed to analyse the morphological variation among 63 herbarium specimens tentatively identified as Pomatocalpa andamanicum (Hook.f.) J. J. Sm., P. koordersii (Rolfe) J. J. Sm., P. latifolium (Lindl.) J. J. Sm., P. linearifolium Seidenf., P. maculosum (Lindl.) J. J. Sm., P. marsupiale (Kraenzl.) J. J. Sm., P. naevatum J. J. Sm., or P. siamense (Rolfe ex Downie) Summerh. Thirty-seven quantitative and 5 binary characters were included in the analyses. Taxa were delimited according to the observed clustering of specimens in the PCA plots, diagnostic characters were identified, and the correct nomenclature was established through examination of type material. Four species could be recognized viz, P. diffusum Breda (syn. P. latifolium), P. fuscum (Lindl.) J. J. Sm. (syn. P. latifolium), P. marsupiale (syn. P. koordersii) and P. maculosum. For the latter species, two subspecies could be recognized, viz P. maculosum (Lindl.) J. J. Sm. subsp. maculosum (syn. P. maculosum, P. naevatum p.p.) and P. maculosum (Lindl.) J. J. Sm. subsp. andamanicum (Hook.f.) S. Watthana (syn. P. andamanicum, P. linearifolium, P. siamense, P. naevatum p.p.). An identification key and a taxonomic synopsis are provided

    Habenaria longitheca Seidenf., Dansk Bot. Ark.

    No full text
    &lt;i&gt;Habenaria longitheca&lt;/i&gt; Seidenf., &lt;i&gt;Dansk Bot. Ark.&lt;/i&gt; 31 (3): 89, 1977 &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Specimens examined:&mdash;&lt;/b&gt; SHAN STATE. Taunggyi District: 28 Jul 2019, &lt;i&gt;Hervouet s.n.&lt;/i&gt;, photo; same loc., 28 Jul 2019, &lt;i&gt;Buscail s.n.&lt;/i&gt;, photo.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution:&mdash;&lt;/b&gt; Eastern Myanmar and northern Thailand.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Note:&mdash;&lt;/b&gt; Detailed description and illustrations of the record from Myanmar in Kurzweil (2020: 29).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;Habenaria lucida&lt;/i&gt; Wall. ex Lindl., &lt;i&gt;Gen. Sp. Orchid. Pl&lt;/i&gt;.: 319, 1835. Type:&mdash; MYANMAR. Rangoon: 1826, &lt;i&gt;Wallich, Numer. List: no. 7047&lt;/i&gt; (holotype: K)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Homotypic synonyms: &lt;i&gt;Platantheroides lucida&lt;/i&gt; (Wall. ex Lindl.) Szlach., &lt;i&gt;Richardiana&lt;/i&gt; 4: 107, 2004. &lt;i&gt;Habenella lucida&lt;/i&gt; (Wall. ex Lindl.) Szlach. &amp; Kras-Lap., &lt;i&gt;Richardiana&lt;/i&gt; 6: 37, 2006.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Heterotypic synonym: &lt;i&gt;Habenaria recurva&lt;/i&gt; Rolfe ex Downie, &lt;i&gt;Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew&lt;/i&gt; 1925: 420, 1925.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Specimens examined:&mdash;&lt;/b&gt; CHIN. Mindat District: 7 Aug 2016, &lt;i&gt;Kim s.n.&lt;/i&gt;, photo. MANDALAY. Myingyan District: 10 Sep 2005, &lt;i&gt;Khin Myo Htwe 61&lt;/i&gt; (TNS [s]), &lt;i&gt;fide&lt;/i&gt; Tanaka &lt;i&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt; (2015: 81). YANGON. Unspecified: type; same loc., 27 Sep 1972, &lt;i&gt;Thein Pe s.n.&lt;/i&gt; (K); central part: 30 m, 18 Aug 1948, &lt;i&gt;Po Khant 661&lt;/i&gt; (RAF); same loc., 30 m, 15 Sep 1948, &lt;i&gt;Po Khant 835&lt;/i&gt; (K, RAF). MON. Mawlamyine District: &lt;i&gt;Parish 118 (or?110)&lt;/i&gt; (K, W). Also reported from Bago and Tanintharyi regions by Kress &lt;i&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt; (2003: 80), but we have not seen material from these areas.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Distribution:&mdash;&lt;/b&gt; Myanmar, Thailand, Indochina, southwestern and southern China and Taiwan.&lt;/p&gt;Published as part of &lt;i&gt;Ormerod, Paul, Kurzweil, Hubert &amp; Watthana, Santi, 2021, Annotated List of Orchidaceae for Myanmar, pp. 1-262 in Phytotaxa 481 (1)&lt;/i&gt; on pages 145-146, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.481.1.1, &lt;a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5417592"&gt;http://zenodo.org/record/5417592&lt;/a&gt
    corecore