10 research outputs found

    Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and High Protein Diet Decrease Calpain-Mediated Proteolysis in Murine Muscular Dystrophy

    No full text
    Abstract In muscular dystrophy (MD) the imbalance between muscle protein synthesis and degradation may be an important factor leading to muscle wasting. The three major pathways of muscle proteolysis identified in skeletal muscle are: the lysosomal cathepsin pathway, the calcium-dependent calpain pathway, and the ATP-dependent ubiquitin pathway. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and a high-protein diet (HPD) have been shown to reduce proteolysis in skeletal muscle. We examined the effect of 6 weeks of recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-l) alone or in combination with HPD treatment on the proteolytic pathways in skeletal muscle of 129 ReJ dystrophic (dy) mice. (A group of normal (Norm) nondystrophic (129 J) mice were included as controls). Untreated dy mice exhibited increased net proteolysis (P < 0.05), elevated net calpain activity (P < 0.01), and increased ubiquitin levels when compared to control mice (P < 0.05). Our evidence suggests that HPD and rhIGF-l decrease proteolysis in the 129 ReJ dy mouse. This effect appears attributable, at least in part, to reduced calpain-mediated myofibrillar breakdown (P < 0.05) due to decreased calpain autolysis or increased calpastatin levels. In contrast to calpain, cathepsin B activity was increased in HPD and rhIGF-l + HPD-treated dy muscle (P < 0.05) and unaltered in the rhIGF-l treated animals. Levels of free and protein-conjugated ubiquitin were also increased in rhIGF-l, and rhIGF-l + HPD treated dy animals (P < 0.05). The amelioration of muscle wasting in the 129 ReJ dy model by HPD and/or rhIGF-l may have potential implications in the treatment of human MD

    Targeting the Microbiome With KB109 in Outpatients with Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Reduced Medically Attended Acute Care Visits and Improved Symptom Duration in Patients With Comorbidities [preprint]

    Get PDF
    Introduction In 2020, the world experienced the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), also known as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Mounting evidence indicates that the gut microbiome plays a role in host immune response to infections and, in turn, may have an impact on the disease trajectory of SARS-CoV2 infection. However, it remains to be established whether modulation of the microbiome can impact COVID-19–related symptomatology and patient outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a study designed to modulate the microbiome evaluating the safety and physiologic effects of KB109 combined with self-supportive care (SSC) vs SSC alone in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. KB109 is a novel synthetic glycan developed to increase the production of gut microbial metabolites that support immune system homeostasis through gut microbiome modulation. Our goal was to gain a better understanding of the safety of KB109, the natural course of COVID-19 symptomatology, and the possible role of the gut microbiome in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Methods Adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 were randomized 1:1 to receive KB109 combined with SSC or SSC alone for 14 days and were then followed for an additional 21 days (35 days in total). Patients self-assessed their COVID-19–related symptoms (8 cardinal symptoms plus 5 additional symptoms) and self-reported comorbidities. The primary and secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety of KB109 plus SSC compared with that of SSC alone and to evaluate selected measures of health, respectively. Results Between July 2, 2020 and December 23, 2020, 350 patients were randomized to receive KB109 and SSC (n=174) or SSC alone (n=176). Overall, the most common comorbidities reported were hypertension (18.0% [63/350 patients]) followed by chronic lung disease (8.6% 30/350 patients). KB109 was well tolerated with most treatment-emergent adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. The administration of KB109 plus SSC reduced medically-attended visits (ie, hospitalization, emergency room visits, or urgent care visits) by 50.0% in the overall population and by 61.7% in patients with ≥1 comorbidity; in patients aged ≥45 years or with ≥1 comorbidity, medically-attended visits were reduced by 52.8%, In the SSC group, patients reporting ≥1 comorbidity had a longer median time to resolution of symptoms than those who reported no comorbidities at baseline (13 overall symptoms: 30 vs 21 days, respectively; hazard ratio [HR]=1.163 [95% CI, 0.723-1.872]; 8 cardinal symptoms: 21 vs 15 days, respectively; HR=1.283 [95% CI, 0.809-2.035]). In patients reporting ≥1 comorbidity, median time to resolution of symptoms was shorter in the KB109 plus SSC group compared with the SSC alone group (13 overall symptoms: 30 vs 21 days, respectively; HR=1.422 [95% CI, 0.898-2.250]; 8 cardinal symptoms: 17 vs 21 days, respectively; HR=1.574 [95% CI, 0.997-2.485]). In the KB109 plus SSC group, patients aged ≥45 years or with ≥1 comorbidity had a shorter median time to resolution of symptoms compared with SSC alone (overall 13 symptoms: 21 vs 31 days; HR=1.597 [95% CI, 1.064-2.398]). Conclusions Results from our study show that KB109 is well tolerated among patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Patients with ≥1 comorbidity had a longer duration of COVID-19 symptoms than those without comorbidities. Moreover, in patients reporting ≥1 comorbidity or aged ≥45 years (at-risk population), administration of KB109 plus SSC improved median time to resolution of COVID-19–related symptoms and reduced the rate of medically-attended visits compared with SSC alone

    Nasal allergies in the Latin American population: Results from the Allergies in Latin America survey

    No full text
    Allergies in Latin America is the first cross-national survey that describes the symptoms, impact, and treatment of nasal allergies (NAs) in individuals >= 4 years old in Latin America (LA). in total, 22,012 households across the Latin American countries of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela were screened for children, adolescents, and adults with a diagnosis of NA and either symptoms or treatment in the past 12 months. A total of 1088 adults and 457 children and adolescents were included and the sample was probability based to ensure valid statistical inference to the population. Approximately 7% of the LA population was diagnosed with NAs with two of three respondents stating that their allergies were seasonal or intermittent in nature. A general practice physician or otolaryngologist diagnosed the majority of individuals surveyed. Nasal congestion was the most common and bothersome symptom of NAs. Sufferers indicated that their symptoms affected productivity and sleep and had a negative impact on quality of life. Two-thirds of patients reported taking some type of medication for their NAs, with a roughly equal percentage of patients reporting taking over-the-counter versus prescription medications. Changing medications was most commonly done in those reporting inadequate efficacy. the most common reasons cited for dissatisfaction with current medications were related to inadequate effectiveness, effectiveness wearing off with chronic use, failure to provide 24-hour relief, and bothersome side effects (e.g., unpleasant taste and retrograde drainage into the esophagus). Findings from this cross-national survey on NAs have confirmed a high prevalence of physician-diagnosed NAs and a considerable negative impact on daily quality of life and work productivity as well as substantial disease management challenges in LA. Through identification of disease impact on the LA population and further defining treatment gaps, clinicians in LA may better understand and treat NAs, thus leading to improvements in overall patient satisfaction and quality of life. (Allergy Asthma Proc 31:S9-S27, 2010; doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3347)NycomedChildrens Hosp Orlando Alassia, Resp Med Unit, Santa Fe, ArgentinaUniv São Paulo, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Sch Med, BR-05508 São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy, São Paulo, BrazilUniv Buenos Aires, Hosp Clin Jose de San Martin, Buenos Aires, DF, ArgentinaUniv Autonoma Mexico, Mexico City, DF, MexicoMexican Assoc Resp Care, Mexico City, DF, MexicoHosp Angeles de las Lomas, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Mexico City, DF, MexicoUniv Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Mexico City 04510, DF, MexicoSchulman Ronca & Bucuvalas Inc, New York, NY USANycomed GmbH, Florham Pk, NJ USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

    Nasal allergies in the Latin American population: Results from the Allergies in Latin America survey

    No full text
    Allergies in Latin America is the first cross-national survey that describes the symptoms, impact, and treatment of nasal allergies (NAs) in individuals >= 4 years old in Latin America (LA). In total, 22,012 households across the Latin American countries of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela were screened for children, adolescents, and adults with a diagnosis of NA and either symptoms or treatment in the past 12 months. A total of 1088 adults and 457 children and adolescents were included and the sample was probability based to ensure valid statistical inference to the population. Approximately 7% of the LA population was diagnosed with NAs with two of three respondents stating that their allergies were seasonal or intermittent in nature. A general practice physician or otolaryngologist diagnosed the majority of individuals surveyed. Nasal congestion was the most common and bothersome symptom of NAs. Sufferers indicated that their symptoms affected productivity and sleep and had a negative impact on quality of life. Two-thirds of patients reported taking some type of medication for their NAs, with a roughly equal percentage of patients reporting taking over-the-counter versus prescription medications. Changing medications was most commonly done in those reporting inadequate efficacy. The most common reasons cited for dissatisfaction with current medications were related to inadequate effectiveness, effectiveness wearing off with chronic use, failure to provide 24-hour relief, and bothersome side effects (e.g., unpleasant taste and retrograde drainage into the esophagus). Findings from this cross-national survey on NAs have confirmed a high prevalence of physician-diagnosed NAs and a considerable negative impact on daily quality of life and work productivity as well as substantial disease management challenges in LA. Through identification of disease impact on the LA population and further defining treatment gaps, clinicians in LA may better understand and treat NAs, thus leading to improvements in overall patient satisfaction and quality of life. (Allergy Asthma Proc 31:S9-S27, 2010; doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3347)Nycome
    corecore