European consensus statement on essential colposcopy

Peer reviewedPostprin

Screening for human papillomavirus: is urine useful?

Persistent infection with high-risk Human papillomavirus (hr-HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45) is the main risk factor for developing malignant genital lesions. Screening methods and follow-up schedules for cervical cancer are well known. A golden standard to screen and monitor men does not exist yet, because HPV-related, life threatening malignancies in men are rare. The importance of male HPV screening lies mainly in HPV vaccination. Young females are the target group for HPV, but men are considered to be the reservoir for HPV and to have a role in the perpetuation of the infection in the general population. We looked at the usefulness of urine as a tool for HPV screening. Pubmed was searched with the words ''HPV'', ''Urine,'' and ''HPV-DNA''. The chance of finding HPV-DNA in urine is higher in men with lesions in the urethra than outside the urethra, and in women with abnormal cervical cytology. In general, the results of testing urine for HPV-DNA are better for women than for men, probably because of the anatomical position of the urethra to the vagina, vulva, and cervix. In both genders, urine HPV prevalence is higher in HIV pos patients and in high-risk populations. Urine, to screen asymptomatic low-risk-profile (wo)men seems less useful because their urine samples are often inadequate. If urine proves to be the best medium to screen, a low-risk population remains controversial

Screening for anal malignancies in men and women

Item does not contain fulltex

Letter to the Editor referring to the manuscript entitled: "Human papillomavirus DNA and mRNA positivity of the anal canal in women with lower genital tract HPV lesions: predictors and clinical implications." reported by Valari O, et al., (Gynecol Oncol 2011; 122(3): 505-8).

Item does not contain fulltext1 september 201

Impact of medical education on knowledge and attitudes regarding the human papilloma virus and vaccination: Comparison before and 6 years after the introduction of the vaccines

Item does not contain fulltextAIM: The lifetime risk for acquiring a human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is 80% for sexually active people. High-risk HPVs are causally related to almost every case of cervical cancer, and to a subgroup of vaginal, vulvar, anal, penile and oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Low-risk HPVs are related to cutaneous, anogenital, and oral warts. Two prophylactic vaccines were launched in 2007: they were included in the national vaccination program in Belgium (2009) and in the Netherlands (2010). The objectives of the present study were to determine and compare knowledge and attitudes regarding HPV and vaccination among a study population in 2006 and in 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Shortly before the introduction, and three years after the inclusion, 715 (2006) and 678 participants (2012) were questioned. Participants were categorised as into non-medics, medics, or paramedics. RESULTS: In general, knowledge about HPV has increased over time (p94% in 2006; >96% in 2012), and that an HPV infection might be asymptomatic (>95% in 2006; >99% in 2012). In 2012, versus in 2006, paramedics and non-medics (both p<0.01), were more likely to vaccinate all female teenagers. Medics were less likely to support this (p=0.001). More respondents agreed to vaccinate their daughters (p<0.01), as well as their sons (p<0.01). In 2012, when compared with 2006, less non-medics and medics (both p<0.01) and more paramedics (p=0.001) would accept a free catch-up vaccination. Arguments against catch-up vaccination reflected the belief not being at risk and doubts about the vaccines' safety. CONCLUSION: The facts that vaccination programs are regarded as being important, and that knowledge on HPV increased, do not automatically result in an increase in participation in HPV vaccination programs. To increase participation, information must be provided with arguments that cannot be misinterpreted