18 research outputs found
Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>After total knee arthroplasty (TKA) only 75-89% of patients are satisfied. Because patient satisfaction is a prime goal of all orthopaedic procedures, optimization of patient satisfaction is of major importance. Factors related to patient satisfaction after TKA have been explored, but no studies have included two potentially relevant factors, i.e. the functional capacity of daily activities and actual daily activity. This present prospective study examines whether functional capacity and actual daily activity (in addition to an extensive set of potential factors) contribute to patient satisfaction six months after TKA.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 44 patients were extensively examined preoperatively and six months post surgery. Functional capacity was measured with three capacity tests, focusing on walking, stair climbing, and chair rising. Actual daily activity was measured in the patient's home situation by means of a 48-hour measurement with an Activity Monitor. To establish which factors were related to patient satisfaction six months post surgery, logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Preoperative and postoperative functional capacity and actual daily activity had no relation with patient satisfaction. Preoperatively, only self-reported mental functioning was positively related to patient satisfaction. Postoperatively, based on multivariate analysis, only fulfilled expectations regarding pain and experienced pain six months post surgery were related to patient satisfaction.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after TKA. Patients with a better preoperative self-reported mental functioning, and patients who experienced less pain and had fulfilled expectations regarding pain postoperatively, were more often satisfied.</p
Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: After total knee arthroplasty (TKA) only 75-89% of patients are satisfied. Because patient satisfaction is a
prime goal of all orthopaedic procedures, optimization of patient satisfaction is of major importance. Factors related to
patient satisfaction after TKA have been explored, but no studies have included two potentially relevant factors, i.e. the
functional capacity of daily activities and actual daily activity. This present prospective study examines whether
functional capacity and actual daily activity (in addition to an extensive set of potential factors) contribute to patient
satisfaction six months after TKA.
Methods: A total of 44 patients were extensively examined preoperatively and six months post surgery. Functional
capacity was measured with three capacity tests, focusing on walking, stair climbing, and chair rising. Actual daily
activity was measured in the patient's home situation by means of a 48-hour measurement with an Activity Monitor. To
establish which factors were related to patient satisfaction six months post surgery, logistic regression analyses were
used to calculate odds ratios.
Results: Preoperative and postoperative functional capacity and actual daily activity had no relation with patient
satisfaction. Preoperatively, only self-reported mental functioning was positively related to patient satisfaction.
Postoperatively, based on multivariate analysis, only fulfilled expectations regarding pain and experienced pain six
months post surgery were related to patient satisfaction.
Conclusions: Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after TKA. Patients
with a better preoperative self-reported mental functioning, and patients who experienced less pain and had fulfilled
expectations regarding pain postoperatively, were more often satisfied
Ten year follow-up study comparing conservative versus operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A matched-pair analysis of high level athletes
DC-STAMP, a novel multimembrane-spanning molecule preferentially expressed by dendritic cells
Evaluation of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes in the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort
Purpose Returning patient-reported outcomes to patients might aid patients in detecting symptoms and might facilitate early intervention. This descriptive study evaluates the use of an individual feedback report on patient-reported outcomes for colorectal cancer patients and aims to assess differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics and cohort retention between patients who opt and do not opt for the feedback report. Methods Patients with colorectal cancer participating in the nationwide Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Cohort, who filled in questionnaires digitally between June 2018 and January 2019, were included. Participants were given the option to receive a feedback report at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The usefulness, content, and layout of the feedback report were evaluated. Differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and cohort retention at subsequent questionnaires between participants who did and did not opt for feedback were assessed. Results A total of 484 participants were included of whom 293 (61%) opted for feedback. The feedback report was considered useful by 92%. No differences in patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were found between participants who did and did not opt for feedback. The response rate was higher among patients who opted for feedback compared to patients who did not opt for feedback at T3 (84 vs 74%), but not at T6 and T12. Conclusion The feedback report was used by 6 out of 10 patients. The feedback report was considered valuable and associated with a higher subsequent response rate
Mutations in DDX3X are a common cause of unexplained intellectual disability with gender-specific effects on wnt signaling
Intellectual disability (ID) affects approximately 1%ā3% of humans with a gender bias toward males. Previous studies have identified mutations in more than 100 genes on the X chromosome in males with ID, but there is less evidence for de novo mutations on the X chromosome causing ID in females. In this study we present 35 unique deleterious de novo mutations in DDX3X identified by whole exome sequencing in 38 females with ID and various other features including hypotonia, movement disorders, behavior problems, corpus callosum hypoplasia, and epilepsy. Based on our findings, mutations in DDX3X are one of the more common causes of ID, accounting for 1%ā3% of unexplained ID in females. Although no de novo DDX3X mutations were identified in males, we present three families with segregating missense mutations in DDX3X, suggestive of an X-linked recessive inheritance pattern. In these families, all males with the DDX3X variant had ID, whereas carrier females were unaffected. To explore the pathogenic mechanisms accounting for the differences in disease transmission and phenotype between affected females and affected males with DDX3X missense variants, we used canonical Wnt defects in zebrafish as a surrogate measure of DDX3X function in vivo. We demonstrate a consistent loss-of-function effect of all tested de novo mutations on the Wnt pathway, and we further show a differential effect by gender. The differential activity possibly reflects a dose-dependent effect of DDX3X expression in the context of functional mosaic females versus one-copy males, which reflects the complex biological nature of DDX3X mutations