82 research outputs found
Genetic diversity and host alternation of the egg parasitoid Oencyrtus pityocampae between the pine processionary moth and caper bug
Research ArticleThe increased use of molecular tools for species identification in recent decades revealed
that each of many apparently generalist parasitoids are actually a complex of morphologically
similar congeners, most of which have a rather narrow host range. Ooencyrtus pityocampae
(OP), an important egg parasitoid of the pine processionary moth (PPM), is
considered a generalist parasitoid. OP emerges from PPM eggs after winter hibernation,
mainly in spring and early summer, long before the eggs of the next PPM generation occurs.
The occurrence of OP in eggs of the variegated caper bug (CB) Stenozygum coloratum in
spring and summer suggests that OP populations alternate seasonally between PPM and
CB. However, the identity of OP population on CB eggs seemed uncertain; unlike OP-PPM
populations, the former displayed apparently high male/female ratios and lack of attraction
to the PPM sex pheromone. We studied the molecular identities of the two populations
since the morphological identification of the genus Ooencyrtus, and OP in particular, is difficult.
Sequencing of COI and ITS2 DNA fragments and AFLP analysis of individuals from
both hosts revealed no apparent differences between the OP-PPM and the OP-CB populations
for both the Israeli and the Turkish OPs, which therefore supported the possibility of
host alternation. Sequencing data extended our knowledge of the genetic structure of OP
populations in the Mediterranean area, and revealed clear separation between East and
West Mediterranean populations. The overall level of genetic diversity was rather small,
with the Israeli population much less diverse than all others; possible explanations for this
finding are discussed. The findings support the possibility of utilizing the CB and other hosts
for enhancing biological control of the PPMinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis
International audiencePurposeThe aims of this study are to review the advantages and drawbacks of the ambulatory management of patients scheduled for haemorrhoidal surgery and to highlight the reasons for unplanned hospital admission and suggest preventive strategies.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 1999 to January 2013 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Manuscripts were specifically analysed for failure and side effects of haemorrhoidal surgery in ambulatory settings.ResultsFifty relevant studies (6082 patients) were retrieved from the literature review. The rate of ambulatory management failure ranged between 0 and 61 %. The main reasons for failure were urinary retention, postoperative haemorrhage and unsatisfactory pain control. Spinal anaesthesia was associated with the highest rates of urinary retention. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation has less frequent side effects susceptible to impair ambulatory management than haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy. However, the fact that haemorrhoidopexy is less painful than haemorrhoidectomy may allow ambulatory management.ConclusionDay-case haemorrhoidal surgery can be performed whatever the surgical procedure. Postoperative pain deserves special prevention measures after haemorrhoidectomy, especially by using perineal block or infiltrations. Urinary retention is a common issue that can be responsible for failure; it requires a preventive strategy including short duration spinal anaesthesia. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation is easy to perform in outpatients but deserves more complete evaluation in this setting
- …