55 research outputs found
Class III Orthodontic Camouflage: Is the “Ideal” Treatment Always the Best Option? A Documented Case Report
Angle’s Class III is one of the most complex malocclusions to treat. In nongrowing skeletal class III malocclusions, the choice between orthognathic surgery and camouflage treatment remains a challenge to the orthodontist. In class III borderline cases, clinicians are called to find the best compromise between functional and aesthetics outcomes, with the latter which often turns in avoiding worsening of profile characteristics, which makes the treatment of these patients quite challenging. This case report describes a borderline nongrowing patient with skeletal class III malocclusion, upper incisor proclination and spacing, lower crowding, and arch width discrepancy, which has already undergone previous orthodontic treatment. The orthodontic treatment involved the mandibular first premolar extraction, resulting in class I canine relation with good overjet and overbite as well as good arch coordination. The orthodontic camouflage improved the dental relationship with normalization of upper incisor inclination without a relevant retroclination of lower incisors; the skeletal facial pattern of the patient experienced a slight improvement. The tendency to skeletal class III has remained nearly unaffected. Treatment outcomes were stable after 1-year posttreatment follow-up
A Full Computerized Workflow for Planning Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion and Orthognathic Surgery in a Skeletal Class III Patient
: In the present case report, we present and discuss the digital workflow involved in the orthodontic/orthognathic combined treatment of a skeletal malocclusion correction in a 17-year-old male patient affected by a skeletal class III, facial asymmetry, sagittal and transversal deficiency of the medium third of the skull, dental crowding, and bilateral cross-bite. The first stage of the treatment involved surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion and occlusal decompensation, using fixed self-ligating appliance. An orthodontic software package (i.e., Dolphin 3D Surgery module) was used to perform virtual treatment objective evaluation by integrating data from cone beam computer tomography acquisition, intraoral scan, and extraoral photographs. The software allowed a comprehensive evaluation of skeletal, dento-alveolar, and soft-tissue disharmonies, qualitative and quantitative simulation of surgical procedure according to skeletal and aesthetic objectives, and, consequently, the treatment of the malocclusion. Using a specific function of the software, the surgical splint was designed according to the pre-programmed skeletal movements, and subsequently, the physical splint was generated with a three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Once a proper occlusal decompensation was reached, a Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla and a bilateral sagittal surgical osteotomy of the mandible were executed to restore proper skeletal relations. The whole treatment time was 8 months. The orthodontic/orthognathic combined treatment allowed to correct the skeletal and the dental imbalance, as well as the improvement of facial aesthetics. Accordingly, the treatment objectives planned in the virtual environment were achieved. Virtual planning offers new possibilities for visualizing the relationship between dental arches and surrounding bone and soft structures in a single virtual 3D model, allowing the specialists to simulate different surgical and orthodontic procedures to achieve the best possible result for the patient and providing an accurate and predictable outcome in the treatment of challenging malocclusions
Evaluation of the changes of orbital cavity volume and shape after tooth-borne and bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME)
Objective: To assess and compare volumetric and shape changes of the orbital cavity in patients treated with
tooth-borne (TB) and bone-borne (BB) rapid maxillary expansion (RME).
Study design: Forty adolescents with bilateral maxillary cross-bite received tooth-borne (TB group = 20; mean age
14.27 \ub1 1.36 years) or bone-borne (BB group = 20; mean age of 14.62 \ub1 1.45 years) maxillary expander. Cone-beam
computed tomography (CBCT) were taken before treatment (T1) and 6-month after the expander activation (T2).
Volumetric and shape changes of orbital cavities were detected by referring to a specific 3D digital technology
involving deviation analysis of T1/T2 CBCT-derived models of pulp chamber. Student\u2019s t tests were used to 1)
compare T1 and T2 volumes of orbital cavities in TB and BB groups, 2) compare volumetric changes and the
percentage of matching of 3D orbital models (T1-T2) between the two groups.
Results: Both TB and BB groups showed a slight increase of the orbital volume (0.64 cm3 and 0.77 cm3
) (p < 0.0001).
This increment were significant between the two groups (p < 0.05) while no differences were found in the
percentage of matching of T1/T2 orbital 3D models (p > 0.05). The areas of greater changes were detected in the
proximity of the frontozygomatic and frontomaxillary sutures.
Conclusion: TB-RME and BB-RME would not seem to considerably affect the anatomy or the volume of the orbital
cavity in adolescents
One Step before 3D Printing\u2014Evaluation of Imaging Software Accuracy for 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Mandible: A Comparative Study Using a Surface-to-Surface Matching Technique
Abstract: The accuracy of 3D reconstructions of the craniomaxillofacial region using cone beam
computed tomography (CBCT) is important for the morphological evaluation of specific anatomical
structures. Moreover, an accurate segmentation process is fundamental for the physical reconstruction
of the anatomy (3D printing) when a preliminary simulation of the therapy is required. In this
regard, the objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of four dierent types of software for the
semiautomatic segmentation of the mandibular jaw compared to manual segmentation, used as a
gold standard. Twenty cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with a manual approach (Mimics)
and a semi-automatic approach (Invesalius, ITK-Snap, Dolphin 3D, Slicer 3D) were selected for the
segmentation of the mandible in the present study. The accuracy of semi-automatic segmentation was
evaluated: (1) by comparing the mandibular volumes obtained with semi-automatic 3D rendering and
manual segmentation and (2) by deviation analysis between the two mandibular models. An analysis
of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate dierences in mandibular volumetric recordings and for
a deviation analysis among the dierent software types used. Linear regression was also performed
between manual and semi-automatic methods. No significant dierences were found in the total
volumes among the obtained 3D mandibular models (Mimics = 40.85 cm3, ITK-Snap = 40.81 cm3,
Invesalius = 40.04 cm3, Dolphin 3D = 42.03 cm3, Slicer 3D = 40.58 cm3). High correlations were found
between the semi-automatic segmentation and manual segmentation approach, with R coecients
ranging from 0,960 to 0,992. According to the deviation analysis, the mandibular models obtained
with ITK-Snap showed the highest matching percentage (Tolerance A = 88.44%, Tolerance B = 97.30%),
while those obtained with Dolphin 3D showed the lowest matching percentage (Tolerance A = 60.01%,
Tolerance B = 87.76%) (p < 0.05). Colour-coded maps showed that the area of greatest mismatch
between semi-automatic and manual segmentation was the condylar region and the region proximate
to the dental roots. Despite the fact that the semi-automatic segmentation of the mandible showed,
in general, high reliability and high correlation with the manual segmentation, caution should be
taken when evaluating the morphological and dimensional characteristics of the condyles either on
CBCT-derived digital models or physical models (3D printing)
Root Resorption of Maxillary Posterior Teeth after Rapid Maxillary Expansion: A Comprehensive Review of the Current Evidence from in-vitro and in-vivo Studies
Background:
The application of heavy forces to the dentition, as those produced during a Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME), has been associated in the literature with the development of root resorption of maxillary posterior teeth.
Objective:
The aim of the present manuscript was to report the available data from in-vitro and in-vivo studies that can elucidate the biological processes of resorption and repair of radicular cementum after RME.
Methods:
Studies evaluating the occurrence of root resorption after RME by means of histological and radiographic methodology were included. We detailed the changes of the radicular anatomy after RME and provided a synthesis of the most valuable scientific evidence showing the biological processes behind the potential modifications of radicular anatomy. Results. Loss of cementum material and reduction of radicular volumes were seen after rapid maxillary expansion. A small radicular volumetric recovery of anchored teeth occurred after the retention period; this reparative phenomenon was caused by cementum deposition without the reattachment of periodontal fibers, supporting the detrimental effects associated with RR.
Conclusion:Retention period and the timing of radiographic examination could influence the extension of radicular resorption detected after RME since root resorption and cementum repair may occur at the same time at this stage
Digital Models for the Analysis of Little's Irregularity Index in Subjects with a Different Degree of Crowding: A Reproducibility Study
Background: To investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of digital measurements of Little's Irregularity Index and to evaluate if different degrees of dental crowding could influence these measurements. Methods: The study included 40 dental models and 5 sub-groups were created according to the severity of the crowding. In both the digital models and the study cast, Little's Irregularity Index was recorded by measuring (1) the mesiodistal width of each tooth and (2) the arch lengths in both the maxillary and mandibular jaw. Two operators performed measurements on plaster and digital models using, respectively, a digital caliper and OrthoAnalyzerTM 3D software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). Statistical analysis was performed to assess intra- and inter-operator variability, the accuracy between manual and digital measurements and if the amount of crowding could affect the accuracy of the digital measurements. Results: Concerning intra-examiner reliability, no statistically significant differences were detected (p > 0.05). In the maxillary and mandibular arch, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) value was 0.996 and 0.997 for the analogic measurements and 0.998 and 0.978 for the digital measurements. For the maxillary arch, the mean difference between the analogic and digital Little's Irregularity Index (LII) measurements was 0.43 mm while for the mandibular arch the mean difference was 0.24 mm, showing some overestimation of the digital measurements (p 0.05). Conclusions: Digital measurements of LII could be considered as a valid substitute of the gold standard analogical measurement
Accuracy of digital workflow for placing orthodontic miniscrews using generic and licensed open systems. A 3d imaging analysis of non-native .stl files for guided protocols
Abstract Background This study aimed to assess the accuracy of digital workflow for guided insertion of miniscrews in the anterior palate using restorative implant dentistry software and licensed software for orthodontic applications. Methods Twenty subjects (8 males, 12 females, mean age = 16.7 ± 2.1 years) were prospectively selected to receive guided insertion of bicortical palatal miniscrews. Virtual planning was performed using restorative implant dentistry software (Blue Sky Plan*, version 4.7) (group 1 = 10 subjects) and licensed orthodontic software (Dolphin Imaging Software, version 11.0) (group 2 = 10 subjects). A specific 3D Imaging technology was applied to permit the registration of the planned and achieved position of the miniscrews based on the superimposition of maxillary models. The angular deviation (accuracy error) between the planned and the achieved positions of the miniscrews were recorded. Independent Student’s test was used with statistical significance set at p value  0.05); instead, miniscrews placed on the right side were almost one degree higher than the left side (p < 0.05) in both groups. Conclusions The clinical accuracy error was similar when using generic and licensed orthodontic software for guided systems
Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition
Background: The study's objective was to assess the accuracy (trueness and precision) of orthodontic models obtained from crowded and spaced dentition finalized for the production of clear aligners. Four 3D printers featuring different technologies and market segments were used for this purpose. Methods: Two digital master models were obtained from two patients featuring respectively crowded dentition (CM group) and diastema/edentulous spaces (DEM group). The 3D printers tested were: Form 3B (SLA technology, medium-professional segment), Vector 3SP (SLA technology, industrial segment), Asiga Pro 4K65 (DLP technology, high-professional segment), and Anycubic Photon M3 (LCD technology, entry-level segment). Each 3D printed model was scanned and superimposed onto the reference master model and digital deviation analysis was performed to assess the trueness and precision calculated as root mean square (RMS). All data were statistically examined to obtain intra-group and inter-groups comparisons(p 0.05). Results: In both CM and DEM groups, SLA 3D printers (Vector 3SP and Form 3B) showed lower trueness error compared to DLP/LCD technologies (Asiga Pro 4K65, Anycubic Photon M3) (p < 0.001). In general, the entry-level printer (Anycubic Photon M3) showed the greatest trueness error (p < 0.001). Comparing CM and DEM models generated with the same 3D printer, statistically significant differences were found only for Asiga Pro 4k65 and Anycubic Photon M3 printers (p > 0.05). Concerning data of precision, the DLP technology (Asiga Pro 4k65) showed lower error compared to the other 3D printers tested. The trueness and precision errors were within the accepted clinical error for clear aligner manufacturing (< 0.25 mm), with the entry-level 3D printer nearly reaching this value. Conclusions: The accuracy of orthodontic models generated for clear aligners can be affected by different 3D printer technologies and anatomical characteristics of dental arches
Description of a Digital Work-Flow for CBCT-Guided Construction of Micro-Implant Supported Maxillary Skeletal Expander
The introduction of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) has widened the boundaries of orthodontic skeletal correction of maxillary transversal deficiency to late adolescence and adult patients. In this respect, Maxillary Skeletal Expander (MSE) is a particular device characterized by the engagement of four miniscrews in the palatal and nasal cortical bone layers. Thus, the availability of sufficient supporting bone and the perforation of both cortical laminas (bi-corticalism) are two mandatory parameters for mini-screw stability, especially when orthopedic forces are used. Virtual planning and construction of MSE based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-derived stereolithography (.stl) files have been recently described in the literature. In this manuscript we described: (a) a user-friendly digital workflow which can provide a predictable placement of maxillary skeletal expander (MSE) appliance according to the patient’s anatomical characteristics, (b) the construction of a positional template of the MSE that allows lab technician to construct the MSE appliance in a reliable and accurate position, according to the virtual project planned by the orthodontist on the patient CBCT scans. We also described a case report of an adult female patient affected by skeletal transversal maxillary deficiency treated with MSE appliance that was projected according to the described workflow
- …