6 research outputs found
A propos des céphalées et de la migraine (quelles actions développer en pharmacie d'officine ?)
LYON1-BU Santé (693882101) / SudocRENNES1-BU Santé (352382103) / SudocSudocFranceF
Accidents vasculaires cérébraux en hÎpital général (évaluation de la prise en charge locale et relations avec l'hÎpital de référence)
RENNES1-BU Santé (352382103) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF
StĂ©nose carotidienne du sujet ĂągĂ© et trĂšs ĂągĂ© (enquĂȘte sur les attitudes chirurgicales)
RENNES1-BU HĂŽpital Sud (352382126) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF
Prise en charge des urgences de fin de vie en EHPAD : quelles pistes dâamĂ©lioration ?
International audiencePrĂšs dâun quart des rĂ©sidents dâĂ©tablissement pour personnes ĂągĂ©es dĂ©pendantes (EHPAD) dĂ©cĂšdent Ă lâhĂŽpital, certains Ă©tant identifiĂ©s en situation de fin de vie en amont du transfert hospitalier. Certaines de ces hospitalisations seraient Ă©vitables. Le projet PUFPAE (Prise en charge des urgences de fin de vie chez les personnes ĂągĂ©es en EHPAD) visait Ă dĂ©crire les situations de fin de vie dans un Ă©chantillon dâEHPAD bretons et Ă identifier les Ă©lĂ©ments pratiques et organisationnels conditionnant la prise en charge dâune aggravation de lâĂ©tat de santĂ© de ces rĂ©sidents au sein de lâEHPAD ou un Ă©ventuel recours Ă lâhĂŽpital. Lâobjectif de cette derniĂšre phase du projet Ă©tait dâidentifier des actions dâamĂ©lioration concernant la prise en charge des « urgences de fin de vie » en EHPAD et dâen Ă©valuer la faisabilitĂ© dans les territoires de santĂ© bretons. Les principaux axes dâamĂ©ioration identifiĂ©s concernaient la connaissance par les professionnels dâEHPAD et les mĂ©decins libĂ©raux des structures extĂ©rieures participant Ă la prise en charge des rĂ©sidents en fin de vie, la formation des professionnels de santĂ© en soins palliatifs, la diffusion des fiches SAMU-Pallia et la mise en oeuvre dâastreintes infirmiĂšres mutualisĂ©es nuits et week-ends. Ces rĂ©sultats fourniront aux acteurs locaux des politiques de soins palliatifs, en sâappuyant sur le Plan national pour le dĂ©veloppement des soins palliatifs et lâaccompagnement en fin de vie 2015-2018 et les rĂ©centes recommandations de lâANESM, des Ă©lĂ©ments dâorientation sur les mesures prioritaires Ă mettre en oeuvre afin dâamĂ©liorer les pratiques en soins palliatifs en rĂ©gion Bretagne
Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data
Background:
General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care.
Methods:
For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered.
Findings:
Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09â2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75â3·10, p<0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14â2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low.
Interpretation:
Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons