Continuous vs Intermittent Meropenem Administration in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis

Importance: Meropenem is a widely prescribed β-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug levels above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Compared with intermittent administration, continuous administration of meropenem may improve clinical outcomes. Objective: To determine whether continuous administration of meropenem reduces a composite of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria compared with intermittent administration in critically ill patients with sepsis. Design, setting, and participants: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial enrolling critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock who had been prescribed meropenem by their treating clinicians at 31 intensive care units of 26 hospitals in 4 countries (Croatia, Italy, Kazakhstan, and Russia). Patients were enrolled between June 5, 2018, and August 9, 2022, and the final 90-day follow-up was completed in November 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive an equal dose of the antibiotic meropenem by either continuous administration (n = 303) or intermittent administration (n = 304). Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. There were 4 secondary outcomes, including days alive and free from antibiotics at day 28, days alive and free from the intensive care unit at day 28, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Seizures, allergic reactions, and mortality were recorded as adverse events. Results: All 607 patients (mean age, 64 [SD, 15] years; 203 were women [33%]) were included in the measurement of the 28-day primary outcome and completed the 90-day mortality follow-up. The majority (369 patients, 61%) had septic shock. The median time from hospital admission to randomization was 9 days (IQR, 3-17 days) and the median duration of meropenem therapy was 11 days (IQR, 6-17 days). Only 1 crossover event was recorded. The primary outcome occurred in 142 patients (47%) in the continuous administration group and in 149 patients (49%) in the intermittent administration group (relative risk, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81-1.13], P = .60). Of the 4 secondary outcomes, none was statistically significant. No adverse events of seizures or allergic reactions related to the study drug were reported. At 90 days, mortality was 42% both in the continuous administration group (127 of 303 patients) and in the intermittent administration group (127 of 304 patients). Conclusions and relevance: In critically ill patients with sepsis, compared with intermittent administration, the continuous administration of meropenem did not improve the composite outcome of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452839

Atypical Cellular Chorangioma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall With Worrisome Aspects but a Favorable Prognosis

Chorangiomas are rather frequent neoplasms encountered on placental examination but in rare cases they present some worrisome histological features that could alarm the pathologist and be misinterpreted as a malignant neoplasm, even if their biological behavior is favorable. We describe an unusual chorangioma with high cellularity and abundant mitosis that, after careful examination and postpartum follow-up, showed benign clinical course for mother and child confirming previous reported cases. This type of tumor is known in the literature as atypical cellular chorangioma and its identification is important in order to exclude potentially dangerous overtreatment

Autoimmune Myocarditis and Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse: An Unexpected Overlap Syndrome

Background: both myocarditis and mitral valve prolapse (MVP) are known uncommon causes of ventricular arrhythmias in young patients. Aim: to report the first clinical case of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)-proven autoimmune myocarditis and associated arrhythmogenic MVP in a patient with recurrent ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes. Methods: myocarditis was diagnosed both by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and EMB. Arrhythmogenic MVP was documented by transthoracic echocardiogram, CMR, and electroanatomical mapping of the trigger premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Results: a 22-year-old woman underwent immunosuppressive therapy after EMB-proven diagnosis of autoimmune myocarditis with VF onset and early implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement. Three years later, she experienced two VF recurrences and persistent PVCs, despite no signs of myocarditis recurrence. An echocardiogram revealed bileaflet MVP with high arrhythmic risk features. Finally, electroanatomical mapping and ablation of the trigger PVC were successfully performed. Conclusion: in patients with recurrent VF episodes despite evidence-based medical treatment for myocarditis, MVP should be considered as an alternative arrhythmogenic substrate, and warrants early ICD implant and PVC-targeted therapy

Rare Complication Post-Conization for Cervical Dysplasia: Rectovaginal Fistula

(1) Background: High-grade cervical dysplasia is primarily caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Conservative surgery is the preferred treatment approach for this condition. The most commonly employed technique is the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), which involves removing the affected portion of the cervix. Excisional treatments are often curative, and complications are typically rare and minor. (2) Methods: The loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is the standard method used for conservative surgery in high-grade cervical dysplasia. It entails the excision of the specific area of the cervix where the abnormal cells are present. The procedure employs a wire loop carrying an electrical current to remove the affected tissue. (3) Results: Excisional treatments, such as LEEP, have shown to be effective in treating high-grade cervical dysplasia. They have a high success rate in eliminating abnormal cells and reducing the risk of cervical cancer. Complications associated with LEEP are infrequent and usually minor. Short-term complications may include bleeding, which can be managed easily. Long-term complications may involve cervical canal stenosis, which can impact fertility. (4) Conclusions: Conservative surgery, particularly the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), is the preferred and effective treatment for high-grade cervical dysplasia caused by HPV infection. It offers a high cure rate with rare and minor complications. While short-term bleeding is a common occurrence, it is manageable. Long-term complications such as cervical canal stenosis may impact fertility. However, an extremely rare and possibly unique complication described in this case is the development of a vaginorectal fistula. This complication is likely due to indirect thermal injury resulting from compromised tissue. Further research is needed to better understand and prevent such complications

Cardiac magnetic resonance abnormalities in patients with acute myocarditis proven by septal endomyocardial biopsy

Background: Previous studies suggest low diagnostic sensitivity of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging based on Lake Louise criteria (LLC) to identify patients with complicated presentations of acute myocarditis (AM). We evaluated classic and updated LLC in patients with AM proven by right ventricular septal endomyocardial biopsy (RVS-EMB). Methods: From an initial population of 499 patients with clinically suspected AM from a multicenter retrospective cohort, we included 74 patients with histologically proven myocarditis on RVS-EMB and available CMR within 30 days since admission. The prevalence of total and septal CMR abnormalities [namely, T2-weighted images (T2W), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T2 and T1 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV)] were assessed in patients with complicated vs. uncomplicated AM. Results: Among 74 patients [mean age 38 ± 15 years, 65% males, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40 ± 18%] with RVS-EMB-proven AM, 53 (72%) had a complicated presentation. The classic LLC were positive in 56/74 patients (76%), whereas the updated ones were positive in 41/41 of cases (100%). Septal involvement, documented in 48/74 patients (65%) by conventional T2W/LGE and in 39/41 cases (95%) by mapping techniques (p < 0.001), was more common in patients with complicated AM. In the 41 patients undergoing both evaluations, CMR sensitivity for myocarditis was 85% for the classic LLC vs. 100% for the updated LLC (p = 0.006). Conclusion: In patients with myocarditis on RVS-EMB, CMR using updated LLC has high sensitivity in the detection of AM when performed within 30 days. Septal abnormalities are more common in patients with complicated AM

Exercise Stress Test Late after Arrhythmic versus Nonarrhythmic Presentation of Myocarditis

Background. Exercise stress test (EST) has been scarcely investigated in patients with arrhythmic myocarditis. Objectives. To report the results of EST late after myocarditis with arrhythmic vs. nonarrhythmic presentation. Methods. We enrolled consecutive adult patients with EST performed at least six months after acute myocarditis was diagnosed using gold-standard techniques. Patients with ventricular arrhythmia (VA) at presentation were compared with the nonarrhythmic group. Adverse events occurring during follow-up after EST included cardiac death, disease-related rehospitalization, malignant VA, and proven active myocarditis. Results. The study cohort was composed of 128 patients (age 41 &plusmn; 9 y, 70% males) undergoing EST after myocarditis. Of them, 64 (50%) had arrhythmic presentation. EST was performed after 15 &plusmn; 4 months from initial diagnosis, and was conducted on betablockers in 75 cases (59%). During EST, VA were more common in the arrhythmic group (43 vs. 4, p &lt; 0.001), whereas signs and symptoms of ischemia were more prevalent in the nonarrhythmic one (6 vs. 1, p = 0.115). By 58-month mean follow-up, 52 patients (41%) experienced adverse events, with a greater prevalence among arrhythmic patients (39 vs. 13, p &lt; 0.001). As documented both in the arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic subgroups, patients had greater prevalence of adverse events following a positive EST (40/54 vs. 12/74 with negative EST, p &lt; 0.001). Electrocardiographic features of VA during EST correlated with the subsequent inflammatory restaging of myocarditis. Nonarrhythmic patients with uneventful EST both on- and off-treatment were free from subsequent adverse events. Conclusions. Late after the arrhythmic presentation of myocarditis, EST was frequently associated with recurrent VA. In both arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic myocarditis, EST abnormalities correlated with subsequent adverse outcomes

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination: a multicenter collection of 27 cases

Objectives To assess clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging features of patients with peri-myocarditis following Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Methods We retrospectively collected a case series of 27 patients who underwent CMR in the clinical suspect of heart inflammation following COVID-19 vaccination, from 16 large tertiary centers. Our patient's cohort was relatively young (36.6 +/- 16.8 years), predominately included males (n = 25/27) with few comorbidities and covered a catchment area of approximately 8 million vaccinated patients. Results CMR revealed typical mid-subepicardial non-ischemic late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in 23 cases and matched positively with CMR T2 criteria of myocarditis. In 7 cases, typical hallmarks of acute pericarditis were present. Short-term follow-up (median = 20 days) from presentation was uneventful for 25/27 patients and unavailable in two cases. Conclusions While establishing a causal relationship between peri-myocardial inflammation and vaccine administration can be challenging, our clinical experience suggests that CMR should be performed for diagnosis confirmation and to drive clinical decision-making and follow-up