Extensions of rich words

In [X. Droubay et al, Episturmian words and some constructions of de Luca and Rauzy, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 255 (2001)], it was proved that every word w has at most |w|+1 many distinct palindromic factors, including the empty word. The unified study of words which achieve this limit was initiated in [A. Glen et al, Palindromic richness, Eur. Jour. of Comb. 30 (2009)]. They called these words rich (in palindromes). This article contains several results about rich words and especially extending them. We say that a rich word w can be extended richly with a word u if wu is rich. Some notions are also made about the infinite defect of a word, the number of rich words of length n and two-dimensional rich words.Comment: 19 pages, 3 figure

Rich Words and Balanced Words

This thesis is mostly focused on palindromes. Palindromes have been studied extensively, in recent years, in the field of combinatorics on words.Our main focus is on rich words, also known as full words. These are words which have maximum number of distinct palindromes as factors.We shed some more light on these words and investigate certain restricted problems. Finite rich words are known to be extendable to infinite rich words. We study more closely how many different ways, and in which situations, rich words can be extended so that they remain rich.The defect of a ord is defined to be the number of palindromes the word is lacking.We will generalize the definition of defect with respect to extending the word to be infinite.The number of rich words, on an alphabet of size $n$, is given an upper and a lower bound. Hof, Knill and Simon presented (Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 1995) a well-known question whether all palindromic subshifts which are enerated by primitive substitutions arise from substitutions which are in class P. Over the years, this question has transformed a bit and is nowadays called the class P conjecture. The main point of the conjecture is to attempt to explain how an infinite word can contain infinitely many palindromes.We will prove a partial result of the conjecture. Rich square-free words are known to be finite (Pelantov\'a and Sarosta, Discrete Math. 313, 2013). We will give another proof for that result. Since they are finite, there exists a longest such word on an $n$-ary alphabet.We give an upper and a lower bound for the length of that word. We study also balanced words. Oliver Jenkinson proved (Discrete Math., Alg. and Appl. 1(4), 2009) that if we take the partial sum of the lexicographically ordered orbit of a binary word, then the balanced word gives the least partial sum. The balanced word also gives the largest product. We will show that, at the other extreme, there are the words of the form $0^{q-p}1^p$ ($p$ and $q$ are integers with $1\leq p<q$), which we call the most unbalanced words. They give the greatest partial sum and the smallest product.Tässä väitöskirjassa käsitellään pääasiassa palindromeja. Palindromeja on tutkittu viime vuosina runsaasti sanojen kombinatoriikassa.Suurin kiinnostuksen kohde tässä tutkielmassa on rikkaissa sanoissa. Nämä ovat sanoja joissa on maksimaalinen määrä erilaisia palindromeja tekijöinä.Näitä sanoja tutkitaan monesta eri näkökulmasta. Äärellisiä rikkaita sanoja voidaan tunnetusti jatkaa äärettömiksi rikkaiksi sanoiksi.Työssä tutkitaan tarkemmin sitä, miten monella tavalla ja missä eri tilanteissa rikkaita sanoja voidaan jatkaa siten, että ne pysyvät rikkaina.Sanan vajauksella tarkoitetaan puuttuvien palindromien lukumäärää.Vajauksen käsite yleistetään tapaukseen, jossa sanaa on jatkettava äärettömäksi sanaksi.Rikkaiden sanojen lukumäärälle annetaan myös ylä- ja alaraja. Hof, Knill ja Simon esittivät kysymyksen (Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 1995), saadaanko kaikki äärettömät sanat joissa on ääretön määrä palindromeja tekijöinä ja jotka ovat primitiivisen morfismin generoimia, morfismeista jotka kuuluvat luokkaan P. Nykyään tätä ongelmaa kutsutaan luokan P konjektuuriksi ja sen tarkoitus on saada selitys sille,millä tavalla äärettömässä sanassa voi olla tekijöinä äärettömän monta palindromia. Osittainen tulos tästä konjektuurista todistetaan. Rikkaiden neliövapaiden sanojen tiedetään olevan äärellisiä (Pelantov\'a ja Starosta, Discrete Math. 313, 2013). Tälle tulokselle annetaan uudenlainen todistus.Koska kyseiset sanat ovat äärellisiä, voidaan selvittää mikä niistä on pisin.Ylä- ja alaraja annetaan tällaisen pisimmän sanan pituudelle. Työssä tutkitaan myös tasapainotettuja sanoja.Tasapainotetut sanat antavat pienimmän osittaissumman binäärisille sanoille (Jenkinson, Discrete Math., Alg. and Appl. 1(4), 2009).Lisäksi ne antavat suurimman tulon.Muotoa $0^{q-p}1^p$ ($p$ ja $q$ ovat kokonaislukuja joille $1\leq p<q$) olevien sanojen todistetaan vastaavasti antavan suurimman osittaissumman ja pienimmän tulon.Ne muodostavat täten toisen ääripään tasapainotetuille sanoille, ja asettavat kaikki muut sanat näiden väliin.Siirretty Doriast

The most unbalanced words 0q−p1p and majorization

A finite word w &isin; {0, 1}&lowast; is balanced if for every equal-length factors u and v of every cyclic shift of w we have ||u|1 &minus; |v|1| &le; 1. This new class of finite words was defined in [O. Jenkinson and L. Q. Zamboni, Characterisations of balanced words via orderings, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 310(1&ndash;3) (2004) 247&ndash;271]. In [O. Jenkinson, Balanced words and majorization, Discrete Math. Algorithms Appl. 1(4) (2009) 463&ndash;484], there was proved several results considering finite balanced words and majorization. One of the main results was that the base-2 orbit of the balanced word is the least element in the set of orbits with respect to partial sum. It was also proved that the product of the elements in the base-2 orbit of a word is maximized precisely when the word is balanced. It turns out that the words 0q&minus;p1p have similar extremal properties, opposite to the balanced words, which makes it meaningful to call these words the most unbalanced words. This paper contains the counterparts of the results mentioned above. We will prove that the orbit of the word u = 0q&minus;p1p is the greatest element in the set of orbits with respect to partial sum and that it has the smallest product. We will also prove that u is the greatest element in the set of orbits with respect to partial product.</p

On Kaluza’s sign criterion for reciprocal power series

T. Kaluza has given a criterion for the signs of the power series of a function that is the reciprocal of another power series. In this note the sharpness of this condition is explored and various examples in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric series are given. A criterion for the monotonicity of the quotient of two power series due to M. Biernacki and J. Krzyż is applied

On Kaluza's sign criterion for reciprocal power series

T. Kaluza has given a criterion for the signs of the power series of a function that is the reciprocal of another power series. In this note the sharpness of this condition is explored and various examples in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric series are given. A criterion for the monotonicity of the quotient of two power series due to M. Biernacki and J. Krzy\.z is applied.Comment: 13 page

On Kaluza’s sign criterion for reciprocal power series

T. Kaluza has given a criterion for the signs of the power series of a function that is the reciprocal of another power series. In this note the sharpness of this condition is explored and various examples in terms of the Gaussian hypergeometric series are given. A criterion for the monotonicity of the quotient of two power series due to M. Biernacki and J. Krzyż is applied

On a question of Hof, Knill and Simon on palindromic substitutive systems

International audienceIn a 1995 paper, Hof, Knill and Simon obtain a sufficient combinatorial criterion on the subshift Ω of the potential of a discrete Schrödinger operator which guarantees purely singular continuous spectrum on a generic subset of Ω. In part, this condition requires that the subshift Ω be palindromic, i.e., contains an infinite number of distinct palindromic factors. In the same paper, they introduce the class P of morphisms f : A * → B * of the form a → pq a with p and q a palindromes, and ask whether every palindromic subshift generated by a primitive substitution arises from morphisms of class P or by morphisms of the form a → q a p. In this paper we give a partial affirmative answer to the question of Hof, Knill and Simon: we show that every rich primitive substitutive subshift is generated by at most two morphisms each of which is conjugate to a morphism of class P. More precisely, we show that every rich (or almost rich in the sense of finite defect) primitive morphic word y ∈ B ω is of the form y = f (x) where f : A * → B * is conjugate to a morphism of class P, and where x is a rich word fixed by a primitive substitution g : A * → A * conjugate to one in class P