Crossing barriers:a multidisciplinary approach to children and adults with young-onset movement disorders

Abstract Background Diagnosis of less common young-onset movement disorders is often challenging, requiring a broad spectrum of skills of clinicians regarding phenotyping, normal and abnormal development and the wide range of possible acquired and genetic etiologies. This complexity often leads to considerable diagnostic delays, paralleled by uncertainty for patients and their families. Therefore, we hypothesized that these patients might benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. We report on the first 100 young-onset movement disorders patients who visited our multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. Methods Clinical data were obtained from the medical records of patients with disease-onset before age 18 years. We investigated whether the multidisciplinary team, consisting of a movement disorder specialist, pediatric neurologist, pediatrician for inborn errors of metabolism and clinical geneticist, revised the movement disorder classification, etiological diagnosis, and/or treatment. Results The 100 referred patients (56 males) had a mean age of 12.5 ± 6.3 years and mean disease duration of 9.2 ± 6.3 years. Movement disorder classification was revised in 58/100 patients. Particularly dystonia and myoclonus were recognized frequently and supported by neurophysiological testing in 24/29 patients. Etiological diagnoses were made in 24/71 (34%) formerly undiagnosed patients, predominantly in the genetic domain. Treatment strategy was adjusted in 60 patients, of whom 43 (72%) reported a subjective positive effect. Conclusions This exploratory study demonstrates that a dedicated tertiary multidisciplinary approach to complex young-onset movement disorders may facilitate phenotyping and improve recognition of rare disorders, with a high diagnostic yield and minimal diagnostic delay. Future studies are needed to investigate the cost-benefit ratio of a multidisciplinary approach in comparison to regular subspecialty care

Paediatric motor phenotypes in early-onset ataxia, developmental coordination disorder, and central hypotonia

Aims To investigate the accuracy of phenotypic early-onset ataxia (EOA) recognition among developmental conditions, including developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and hypotonia of central nervous system origin, and the effect of scientifically validated EOA features on changing phenotypic consensus. Method We included 32 children (4-17y) diagnosed with EOA (n=11), DCD (n=10), and central hypotonia (n=11). Three paediatric neurologists independently assessed videotaped motor behaviour phenotypically and quantitatively (using the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia [SARA]). We determined: (1) phenotypic interobserver agreement and phenotypic homogeneity (percentage of phenotypes with full consensus by all three observers according to the underlying diagnosis); (2) SARA (sub)score profiles; and (3) the effect of three scientifically validated EOA features on phenotypic consensus. Results Phenotypic homogeneity occurred in 8 out of 11, 2 out of 10, and 1 out of 11 patients with EOA, DCD, and central hypotonia respectively. Homogeneous phenotypic discrimination of EOA from DCD and central hypotonia occurred in 16 out of 21 and 22 out of 22 patients respectively. Inhomogeneously discriminated EOA and DCD phenotypes (5 out of 21) revealed overlapping SARA scores with different SARA subscore profiles. After phenotypic reassessment with scientifically validated EOA features, phenotypic homogeneity changed from 16 to 18 patients. Interpretation In contrast to complete distinction between EOA and central hypotonia, the paediatric motor phenotype did not reliably distinguish between EOA and DCD. Reassessment with scientifically validated EOA features could contribute to a higher phenotypic consensus. Early-onset ataxia (EOA) and central hypotonia motor phenotypes were reliably distinguished. EOA and developmental coordination disorder (DCD) motor phenotypes were not reliably distinguished. The EOA and DCD phenotypes have different profiles of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia

Feasibility of Follow-Up Studies and Reclassification in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Gene Variants of Unknown Significance

Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders with autosomal dominant inheritance. Genetic testing for SCA leads to diagnosis, prognosis and risk assessment for patients and their family members. While advances in sequencing and computing technologies have provided researchers with a rapid expansion in the genetic test content that can be used to unravel the genetic causes that underlie diseases, the large number of variants with unknown significance (VUSes) detected represent challenges. To minimize the proportion of VUSes, follow-up studies are needed to aid in their reclassification as either (likely) pathogenic or (likely) benign variants. In this study, we addressed the challenge of prioritizing VUSes for follow-up using (a combination of) variant segregation studies, 3D protein modeling, in vitro splicing assays and functional assays. Of the 39 VUSes prioritized for further analysis, 13 were eligible for follow up. We were able to reclassify 4 of these VUSes to LP, increasing the molecular diagnostic yield by 1.1%. Reclassification of VUSes remains difficult due to limited possibilities for performing variant segregation studies in the classification process and the limited availability of routine functional tests

Predictive testing of minors for Huntington's disease: The UK and Netherlands experiences

A consistent feature of predictive testing guidelines for Huntington's disease (HD) is the recommendation not to undertake predictive tests on those < 18 years. Exceptions are made but the extent of, and reasons for, deviation from the guidelines are unknown. The UK Huntington's Prediction Consortium has collected data annually on predictive tests undertaken from the 23 UK genetic centers. DNA analysis for HD in the Netherlands is centralized in the Laboratory for Diagnostic Genome Analysis in Leiden. In the UK, 60 tests were performed on minors between 1994 and 2015 representing 0.63% of the total number of tests performed. In the Netherlands, 23 tests were performed on minors between 1997 and 2016. The majority of the tests were performed on those aged 16 and 17 years for both countries (23% and 57% for the UK, and 26% and 57% for the Netherlands). Data on the reasons for testing were identified for 36 UK and 22 Netherlands cases and included: close to the age of 18 years, pregnancy, currently in local authority care and likely to have less support available after 18 years, person never having the capacity to consent and other miscellaneous reasons. This study documents the extent of HD testing of minors in the UK and the Netherlands and suggests that, in general, the recommendation is being followed. We provide some empirical evidence as to reasons why clinicians have departed from the recommendation. We do not advise changing the recommendation but suggest that testing of minors continues to be monitored

Breakpoint mapping of 13 large parkin deletions/duplications reveals an exon 4 deletion and an exon 7 duplication as founder mutations

Early-onset Parkinson’s disease (EOPD) has been associated with recessive mutations in parkin (PARK2). About half of the mutations found in parkin are genomic rearrangements, i.e., large deletions or duplications. Although many different rearrangements have been found in parkin before, the exact breakpoints involving these rearrangements are rarely mapped. In the present study, the exact breakpoints of 13 different parkin deletions/duplications, detected in 13 patients out of a total screened sample of 116 EOPD patients using Multiple Ligation Probe Amplification (MLPA) analysis, were mapped using real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), long-range PCR and sequence analysis. Deletion/duplication-specific PCR tests were developed as a rapid and low cost tool to confirm MLPA results and to test family members or patients with similar parkin deletions/duplications. Besides several different deletions, an exon 3 deletion, an exon 4 deletion and an exon 7 duplication were found in multiple families. Haplotype analysis in four families showed that a common haplotype of 1.2 Mb could be distinguished for the exon 7 duplication and a common haplotype of 6.3 Mb for the deletion of exon 4. These findings suggest common founder effects for distinct large rearrangements in parkin

Characteristics of dystonia in the 18p deletion syndrome, including a new case

Objective of the present study was to evaluate the possible pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of dystonia in patients with the 18p deletion syndrome by describing a new case and reviewing the literature. Dystonia in patients with the 18p deletion syndrome seems to present heterogeneously with a variable age of onset and distribution of symptoms. It may be accompanied with white matter lesions on the MRI. Deletion of 2 known dystonia loci on chromosome 18p, DYT7 and DYT15, or the deletion of another dystonia gene just above the centromere of chromosome 18p may be the cause of dystonia in patients with the 18p deletion syndrome. However, dystonia may also be secondary to structural brain changes often seen in patients with the 18p deletion syndrome. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Predictive genetic testing in Huntington's disease:should a neurologist be involved?

International guidelines on Huntington's Disease recommend neurological examination in the predictive testing trajectory. Experiences and personal wishes of persons at risk of Huntington's Disease regarding this topic have never been evaluated. The objective was to provide an overview of the experiences of Dutch at-risk persons, opting for predictive testing, in consulting a neurologist before and after DNA analysis. Persons who were counseled in four Dutch clinics between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively or prospectively approached for a questionnaire which listed topics as experiences with consultation and personal wishes. From 71 participants, 44 participants visited a neurologist. 41 participants indicated their visit to a neurologist as positive (93.2%). The majority of participants (n = 59) desired consulting a neurologist. Thirty-two participants indicated consultation shortly after (Desired After Group) and twenty-seven before DNA analysis (Desired Before Group) as personal wish. The Desired Before Group consisted of a significantly higher number of participants who actually consulted a neurologist before predictive testing (n = 26) compared with the number of participants who actually consulted a neurologist after DNA analysis in the Desired After Group (n = 11) (p <0.001). The Desired After Group (n = 19) had a significantly higher number of Huntington's disease gene expansion carriers compared with the Desired Before Group (n = 5) (p 0.003). Participants are content with consultation. However, persons without the gene expansion still feel the need to get in touch with a neurologist. Therefore, offering a consultation with a neurologist before DNA analysis might be beneficial for all