Validation of Aura-OMI QA4ECV NO₂ climate data records with ground-based DOAS networks: the role of measurement and comparison uncertainties

International audienceThe QA4ECV version 1.1 stratospheric and tropospheric NO2 vertical column density (VCD) climate data records (CDR) from the satellite sensor OMI are validated, using NDACC zenith scattered light DOAS (ZSL-DOAS) and Multi Axis-DOAS (MAX-DOAS) data as a reference. The QA4ECV OMI stratospheric VCD have a small bias of ~ 0.2 Pmolec cm-2 (5–10 %) and a dispersion of 0.2 to 1 Pmolec cm-2 with respect to the ZSL-DOAS measurements. QA4ECV tropospheric VCD observations from OMI are restricted to near-cloud-free scenes, leading to a negative sampling bias (with respect to the unrestricted scene ensemble) of a few Pmolec cm-2 up to −10 Pmolec cm-2 (−40 %) in one extreme high-pollution case. QA4ECV OMI tropospheric VCD has a negative bias with respect to the MAX-DOAS data (−1 to −4 Pmolec cm-2), a feature also found for the OMI OMNO2 standard data product. The tropospheric VCD discrepancies between satellite and ground-based data exceed by far the combined measurement uncertainties. Depending on the site, part of the discrepancy can be attributed to a combination of comparison errors (notably horizontal smoothing difference error), measurement/retrieval errors related to clouds and aerosols, and to the difference in vertical smoothing and a priori profile assumptions

Validation of Aura-OMI QA4ECV NO2 Climate Data Records with ground-based DOAS networks: role of measurement and comparison uncertainties

International audienceThe QA4ECV version 1.1 stratospheric and tropospheric NO2 vertical column density (VCD) climate data records (CDR) from the satellite sensor OMI are validated, using NDACC zenith scattered light DOAS (ZSL-DOAS) and Multi Axis-DOAS (MAX-DOAS) data as a reference. The QA4ECV OMI stratospheric VCD have a small bias of ~ 0.2 Pmolec cm-2 (5–10 %) and a dispersion of 0.2 to 1 Pmolec cm-2 with respect to the ZSL-DOAS measurements. QA4ECV tropospheric VCD observations from OMI are restricted to near-cloud-free scenes, leading to a negative sampling bias (with respect to the unrestricted scene ensemble) of a few Pmolec cm-2 up to −10 Pmolec cm-2 (−40 %) in one extreme high-pollution case. QA4ECV OMI tropospheric VCD has a negative bias with respect to the MAX-DOAS data (−1 to −4 Pmolec cm-2), a feature also found for the OMI OMNO2 standard data product. The tropospheric VCD discrepancies between satellite and ground-based data exceed by far the combined measurement uncertainties. Depending on the site, part of the discrepancy can be attributed to a combination of comparison errors (notably horizontal smoothing difference error), measurement/retrieval errors related to clouds and aerosols, and to the difference in vertical smoothing and a priori profile assumptions

Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5p TROPOMI NO₂ measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks

International audienceThis paper reports on consolidated ground-based validation results of the atmospheric NO2 data produced operationally since April 2018 by the TROPOMI instrument on board of the ESA/EU Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5p) satellite. Tropospheric, stratospheric, and total NO2 column data from S5p are compared to correlative measurements collected from, respectively, 19 Multi-Axis DOAS (MAX-DOAS), 26 NDACC Zenith-Scattered-Light DOAS (ZSL-DOAS), and 25 PGN/Pandora instruments distributed globally. The validation methodology gives special care to minimizing mismatch errors due to imperfect spatio-temporal co-location of the satellite and correlative data, e.g., by using tailored observation operators to account for differences in smoothing and in sampling of atmospheric structures and variability, and photochemical modelling to reduce diurnal cycle effects. Compared to the ground-based measurements, S5p data show, on an average: (i) a negative bias for the tropospheric column data, of typically −23 to −37 % in clean to slightly polluted conditions, but reaching values as high as −51 % over highly polluted areas; (ii) a slight negative bias for the stratospheric column data, of about −0.2 Pmolec/cm2, i.e. approx. −2 % in summer to −15 % in winter; and (iii) a bias ranging from zero to −50 % for the total column data, found to depend on the amplitude of the total NO2 column, with small to slightly positive bias values for columns below 6 Pmolec/cm2 and negative values above. The dispersion between S5p and correlative measurements contains mostly random components, which remain within mission requirements for the stratospheric column data (0.5 Pmolec/cm2), but exceed those for the tropospheric column data (0.7 Pmolec/cm2). While a part of the biases and dispersion may be due to representativeness differences, it is known that errors in the S5p tropospheric columns exist due to shortcomings in the (horizontally coarse) a-priori profile representation in the TM5-MP chemistry transport model used in the S5p retrieval, and to a lesser extent, to the treatment of cloud effects. Although considerable differences (up to 2 Pmolec/cm2 and more) are observed at single ground-pixel level, the near-real-time (NRTI) and off-line (OFFL) versions of the S5p NO2 operational data processor provide similar NO2 column values and validation results when globally averaged, with the NRTI values being on average 0.79 % larger than the OFFL values