Medical physicists' implication in radiological diagnostic procedures: results after 1 y of experience.

Since January 2008-de facto 2012-medical physics experts (MPEs) are, by law, to be involved in the optimisation process of radiological diagnostic procedures in Switzerland. Computed tomography, fluoroscopy and nuclear medicine imaging units have been assessed for patient exposure and image quality. Large spreads in clinical practice have been observed. For example, the number of scans per abdominal CT examination went from 1 to 9. Fluoroscopy units showed, for the same device settings, dose rate variations up to a factor of 3 to 7. Quantitative image quality for positron emission tomography (PET)/CT examinations varied significantly depending on the local image reconstruction algorithms. Future work will be focused on promoting team cooperation between MPEs, radiologists and radiographers and on implementing task-oriented objective image quality indicators

Derivation of an observer model adapted to irregular signals based on convolution channels.

Anthropomorphic model observers are mathe- matical algorithms which are applied to images with the ultimate goal of predicting human signal detection and classification accuracy across varieties of backgrounds, image acquisitions and display conditions. A limitation of current channelized model observers is their inability to handle irregularly-shaped signals, which are common in clinical images, without a high number of directional channels. Here, we derive a new linear model observer based on convolution channels which we refer to as the "Filtered Channel observer" (FCO), as an extension of the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) and the nonprewhitening with an eye filter (NPWE) observer. In analogy to the CHO, this linear model observer can take the form of a single template with an external noise term. To compare with human observers, we tested signals with irregular and asymmetrical shapes spanning the size of lesions down to those of microcalfications in 4-AFC breast tomosynthesis detection tasks, with three different contrasts for each case. Whereas humans uniformly outperformed conventional CHOs, the FCO observer outperformed humans for every signal with only one exception. Additive internal noise in the models allowed us to degrade model performance and match human performance. We could not match all the human performances with a model with a single internal noise component for all signal shape, size and contrast conditions. This suggests that either the internal noise might vary across signals or that the model cannot entirely capture the human detection strategy. However, the FCO model offers an efficient way to apprehend human observer performance for a non-symmetric signal

Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Our project was to investigate a complete methodology for the semiautomatic assessment of digital mammograms according to their density, an indicator known to be correlated to breast cancer risk. The BI-RADS four-grade density scale is usually employed by radiologists for reporting breast density, but it allows for a certain degree of subjective input, and an objective qualification of density has therefore often been reported hard to assess. The goal of this study was to design an objective technique for determining breast BI-RADS density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposed semiautomatic method makes use of complementary pattern recognition techniques to describe manually selected regions of interest (ROIs) in the breast with 36 statistical features. Three different classifiers based on a linear discriminant analysis or Bayesian theories were designed and tested on a database consisting of 1408 ROIs from 88 patients, using a leave-one-ROI-out technique. Classifications in optimal feature subspaces with lower dimensionality and reduction to a two-class problem were studied as well. RESULTS: Comparison with a reference established by the classifications of three radiologists shows excellent performance of the classifiers, even though extremely dense breasts continue to remain more difficult to classify accurately. For the two best classifiers, the exact agreement percentages are 76% and above, and weighted kappa values are 0.78 and 0.83. Furthermore, classification in lower dimensional spaces and two-class problems give excellent results. CONCLUSION: The proposed semiautomatic classifiers method provides an objective and reproducible method for characterizing breast density, especially for the two-class case. It represents a simple and valuable tool that could be used in screening programs, training, education, or for optimizing image processing in diagnostic tasks

Comparison of subjective and objective evaluation of screen-film systems for chest radiography

A subjective and an objective comparison of six screen-film systems is reported. Among the objective parameters which characterise image quality, resolution appeared to be the most critical one when compared with the averaged ranking produced by the radiologists. The results have shown that a relationship between dose and image quality can be established for most of screen-film systems tested. The problem which remains in the optimisation procedure of chest imaging, is the definition of the level of image quality requirements

European Survey of Image Quality Assessment Methods Used in Mammography

The definition of reference dose levels has to be linked with the definition of image quality. Unfortunately, there is still no general agreement on the definition of image quality in mammography, and most of the protocols used are based on the detectability of objects having various shapes and contrasts. To facilitate the task of assessing image quality, scoring methods are often used to produce a single number representative of the imaging chain performance. The goal of this study is to present a comparison between different ways of assessing image quality commonly used in Europe. A set of five mammograms, having different image quality levels, has been obtained with several test objects and compared. The results show large sensitivity variations among the different methods. Concerted work between radiologists and physicists is still required to define the radiological tasks and develop objective ways to measure image quality in mammography

Fluoroscopy-guided procedures in cardiology: is patient exposure being reduced over time?

The number of fluoroscopy-guided procedures in cardiology is increasing over time and it is appropriate to wonder whether technological progress or change of techniques is influencing patient exposure. The aim of this study is to examine whether patient dose has been decreasing over the years. Patient dose data of more than 7700 procedures were collected from two cardiology centres. A steady increase in the patient dose over the years was observed in both the centres for the two cardiological procedures included in this study. Significant increase in dose was also observed after the installation of a flat-panel detector. The increasing use of radial access may lead to an increase in the patient exposure. The monitoring of dose data over time showed a considerable increase in the patient exposure over time. Actions have to be taken towards dose reduction in both the centre

Effects of various generations of iterative CT reconstruction algorithms on low-contrast detectability as a function of the effective abdominal diameter: A quantitative task-based phantom study.

To investigate how various generations of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms impact low-contrast detectability (LCD) in abdominal computed tomography (CT) for different patient effective diameters, using a quantitative task-based approach. Investigations were performed using an anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with two optional additional rings to simulate varying patient effective diameters (25, 30, and 35 cm), and containing multiple spherical targets (5, 6, and 8 mm in diameter) with a 20-HU contrast difference. The phantom was scanned using routine abdominal protocols (CTDI <sub>vol</sub> , 5.9-16 mGy) on four CT systems from two manufacturers. Images were reconstructed using both filtered back-projection (FBP) and various IR algorithms: ASiR 50%, SAFIRE 3 (both statistical IRs), ASiR-V 50%, ADMIRE 3 (both partial model-based IRs), or Veo (full model-based IR). Section thickness/interval was 2/1 mm or 2.5/1.25 mm, except 0.625/0.625 mm for Veo. We assessed LCD using a channelized Hotelling observer with 10 dense differences of Gaussian channels, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a figure of merit. For the smallest phantom (25-cm diameter) and smallest lesion size (5-mm diameter), AUC for FBP and the various IR algorithms did not significantly differ for any of the tested CT systems. For the largest phantom (35-cm diameter), Veo yielded the highest AUC improvement (8.5%). Statistical and partial model-based IR algorithms did not significantly improve LCD. In abdominal CT, switching from FBP to IR algorithms offers limited possibilities for achieving significant dose reductions while ensuring a constant objective LCD

Mass detection on mammograms: signal variations and performance changes for human and model observers

We studied the influence of signal variability on human and model observer performances for a detection task with mammographic backgrounds and computer generated clustered lumpy backgrounds (CLB). We used synthetic yet realistic masses and backgrounds that have been validated by radiologists during previous studies, ensuring conditions close to the clinical situation. Four trained non-physician observers participated in two-alternative forced-choice (2-AFC) experiments. They were asked to detect synthetic masses superimposed on real mammographic backgrounds or CLB. Separate experiments were conducted with sets of benign and malignant masses. Results under the signal-known-exactly (SKE) paradigm were compared with signal-known-statistically (SKS) experiments. In the latter case, the signal was chosen randomly for each of the 1,400 2-AFC trials (image pairs) among a set of 50 masses with similar dimensions, and the observers did not know which signal was present. Human observers' results were then compared with model observers (channelized Hotelling with Difference-of-Gaussian and Gabor channels) in the same experimental conditions. Results show that the performance of the human observers does not differ significantly when benign masses are superimposed on real images or on CLB with locally matched gray level mean and standard deviation. For both benign and malignant masses, the performance does not differ significantly between SKE and SKS experiments, when the signals' dimensions do not vary throughout the experiment. However, there is a performance drop when the SKS signals' dimensions vary from 5.5 to 9.5 mm in the same experiment. Noise level in the model observers can be adjusted to reproduce human observers' proportion of correct answers in the 2-AFC task within 5% accuracy for most condition