The disabling role of fluctuations in physical activity in patients with chronic low back pain.

Patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) often report a disabling decrease in their activity level due to pain. The nature of the association between disability, activity, and pain over time is however, unclear. An intriguing issue here is whether a high level of pain-related disability is associated with a low activity level or are changes in the level of activity over time pain provoking and thus more disabling? The objectives of this study were to investigate associations between disability, pain intensity, pain-related fear, and characteristics of physical activity in patients with CLBP. A total of 42 patients with CLBP were recruited from the Pain Clinic of the Maastricht University Hospital. Each pain patient carried an electronic diary for one week, in which questions about current pain intensity, and the level of physical activity were completed at 8 moments a day. Disability was scored by the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), Fear of movement by the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). To explain the level of disability regression analyses were performed with disability as dependent variable and pain intensity, pain-related fear, and consecutively the level of physical activity in daily life and fluctuations in physical activity as independent variables. Results, based on 34 patients, showed that activity fluctuations (beta = 0.373, p <0.05) rather than the mean activity level over time (beta = -0.052, ns) contributed significantly in explaining disability. The results are discussed in the light of current theories, previous research, and clinical implications

Social work practice with traumatic brain injury: the results of a structured review

Objectives: To determine public perception of: 1) mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) amongst British service personnel; and 2 (veteran healthcare). Methods: The study was posted online and participants were also recruited offline from town councils, public libraries, religious organisations, social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. Twelve questions of public perceptions of mild traumatic brain injury and veteran healthcare were presented after a vignette on a service personnel’s account of mild traumatic brain injury. The responses were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Three themes were identified. The right to quality healthcare, awareness or lack thereof of the injury, and empathy towards the experiences of service personnel with mTBI. Members of the public have a firm opinion that veterans have a right to healthcare. Their service to their nation warrants proper treatment. There is empathy towards service personnel with the injury. However there is little awareness as to the nature of mTBI and the full extent of its impact on the lives of service personnel. Respondents cited that this might be due to the issue being low on the political agenda. Conclusion: Participants indicated that they had not previously given thought to the injury or had not heard about it previously. Most respondents were also not familiar with the services available to veterans with the injury. Empathising with the experiences while at the same time recognising the extent of their ability to render support for service personnel with the injury seemed to resonant. More public awareness campaigns on the extent of the injury and what the injury entails would ensure greater understanding of service personnel with the injury

Do depression and pain intensity interfere with physical activity in daily life in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain?

Patients with chronic pain may have difficulties estimating their own physical activity level in daily life. Pain-related factors such as depression and pain intensity may affect a patients' ability to estimate their own daily life activity level. This study evaluates whether patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) who are more depressed and/or report more pain indeed have a lower objectively assessed daily life activity level or whether they only perceive their activity level as lower. Patients with CLBP were included in a cross-sectional study. During 14 days physical activity in daily life was measured, with both an electronic diary and an accelerometer. Multilevel analyses were performed to evaluate whether a higher level of depression and/or pain intensity was associated with a lower objectively assessed activity level or the discrepancy between the self-reported and objectively assessed daily life activity levels. Results, based on 66 patients with CLBP (mean RDQ score 11.8), showed that the objectively assessed daily life activity level is not associated with depression or pain intensity. There was a moderate association between the self-reported and objectively assessed activity levels (beta = 0.39, p <0.01). The discrepancy between the two was significantly and negatively related to depression (beta = -0.19, p = 0.01), indicating that patients who had higher levels of depression judged their own activity level to be relatively low compared to their objectively assessed activity level. Pain intensity was not associated with the perception of a patient's activity level (beta = 0.12, ns)

The (cost-)effectiveness and cost-utility of a novel integrative care initiative for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain:the pragmatic trial protocol of Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation care for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is not optimally organized. The Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg 2.0 (NPRL2.0) provides integrated care with a biopsychosocial approach and strives to improve the Quadruple Aim outcomes: pain-related disability of patients with CMP; experiences of care of patients with CMP; meaning in the work of healthcare professionals; and healthcare costs. Firstly, in this study, the effectiveness (with regard to the functioning and participation of patients) of primary care for patients with CMP will be assessed, comparing care organized following the NPRL2.0 procedure with usual care. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility with regard to health-related quality of life and healthcare costs will be assessed. And thirdly, the effect of duration of participation in a local network in primary care will be studied. METHODS: In this pragmatic study, it is expected that two local networks with 105 patients will participate in the prospective cohort study and six local networks with 184 patients in the stepped-wedge based design. Healthcare professionals in the local networks will recruit patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA: age ≥ 18 years; having CMP; willing to improve functioning despite pain; and adequate Dutch literacy. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: pregnancy; and having a treatable medical or psychiatric disease. Patients will complete questionnaires at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 9 months (T4). Questionnaires at T1 and T4 will include the Pain Disability Index and Short Form Health Survey. Questionnaires at T1, T2, T3, and T4 will include the EQ-5D-5L, and iMTA Medical Consumption and Productivity Cost Questionnaires. Outcomes will be compared using linear mixed-model analysis and costs will be compared using bootstrapping methods. DISCUSSION: NPRL2.0 is a multidimensional, complex intervention, executed in daily practice, and therefore needing a pragmatic study design. The current study will assess NPRL2.0 with respect to the Quadruple Aim outcomes: patient health and costs. This will provide more information on the (cost-) effectiveness of the organization of care in a network structure regarding patients with CMP. The other two Quadruple Aim outcomes will be examined alongside this study. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NL7643. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7643