23 research outputs found

    Reasons for not reaching or using web-based self-management applications, and the use and evaluation of Oncokompas among cancer survivors, in the context of a randomised controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The web-based self-management application Oncokompas was developed to support cancer survivors to monitor health-related quality of life and symptoms (Measure) and to provide tailored information (Learn) and supportive care options (Act). In a previously reported randomised controlled trial (RCT), 68% of 655 recruited survivors were eligible, and of those 45% participated in the RCT. Among participants of the RCT that were randomised to the intervention group, 52% used Oncokompas as intended. The aim of this study was to explore reasons for not participating in the RCT, and reasons for not using Oncokompas among non-users, and the use and evaluation of Oncokompas among users. Methods: Reasons for not participating were assessed with a study-specific questionnaire among 243 survivors who declined participation. Usage was investigated among 320 participants randomised to the intervention group of the RCT via system data and a study-specific questionnaire that was assessed during the 1 week follow-up (T1) assessment. Results: Main reasons for not participating were not interested in participation in scientific research (40%) and not interested in scientific research and Oncokompas (28%). Main reasons for not being interested in Oncokompas were wanting to leave the period of being ill behind (29%), no symptom burden (23%), or lacking internet skills (18%). Out of the 320 participants in the intervention group 167 (52%) used Oncokompas as intended. Among 72 non-users, main reasons for not using Oncokompas were no symptom burden (32%) or lack of time (26%). Among 248 survivors that activated their account, satisfaction and user-friendliness were rated with a 7 (scale 0–10). Within 3 (IQR 1–4) sessions, users selected 32 (IQR 6–37) topics. Main reasons for not using healthcare options in Act were that the information in Learn was already sufficient (44%) or no supportive care needs (32%). Discussion: Main reasons for not reaching or using Oncokompas were no symptom burden, no supportive care needs, or lack of time. Users selected many cancer-generic and tumour-specific topics to address, indicating added value of the wide range of available topics

    A New Pacing Algorithm for Overdrive Suppression of Atrial Fibrillation

    No full text
    0For the CHORUS MULTICENTRE STUDY GROUP (including Brugmann University Hospital)info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Activation of the STAT1 pathway in rheumatoid arthritis

    Get PDF
    Background: Expression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), the mediator of interferon (IFN) signalling, is raised in synovial tissue (ST) from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: To determine the extent to which this pathway is activated by phosphorylation in RA synovium. Additionally, to investigate the cellular basis of STAT1 activation in RA ST. Methods: ST specimens from 12 patients with RA and 14 disease controls (patients with osteoarthritis and reactive arthritis) were analysed by immunohistochemistry, using antibodies to STAT1, tyrosine phosphorylated STAT1, and serine phosphorylated STAT1. Lysates of cultured fibroblast-like synoviocytes stimulated with IFNĂź were analysed by western blotting. Phenotypic characterisation of cells expressing STAT1 in RA ST was performed by double immunolabelling for STAT1 and CD3, CD22, CD55, or CD68. Results: Raised levels of total STAT1 protein and both its activated tyrosine and serine phosphorylated forms were seen in RA synovium as compared with controls. STAT1 was predominantly abundant in T and B lymphocytes in focal inflammatory infiltrates and in fibroblast-like synoviocytes in the intimal lining layer. Raised levels of STAT1 are sustained in cultured RA compared with OA fibroblast-like synoviocytes, and STAT1 serine and tyrosine phosphorylation is rapidly induced upon stimulation with IFNĂź. Conclusion: These results demonstrate activation of the STAT1 pathway in RA synovium by raised STAT1 protein expression and concomitantly increased tyrosine (701) and serine (727) phosphorylation. High expression of STAT1 is intrinsic to RA fibroblast-like synoviocytes in the intimal lining layer, whereas activation of the pathway by phosphorylation is an active process
    corecore