Psychological Factors Affecting the Willingness to Accept a Possible Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Discontinuation in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) Patients

Purpose: Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who present a sustained deep molecular response (DMR) for a stable period of time might benefit from discontinuing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A significant number of patients seem able to reach this stage due to the availability of TKIs. However, many patients remain reluctant about TKI discontinuation and may refuse treatment interruption. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical and psycho-cognitive factors that may influence the decision to discontinue TKI therapy, thereby gaining a better understanding of patients’ viewpoints on TKI discontinuation. Patients and Methods: One hundred and nineteen patients diagnosed with CML aged between 34 and 69 were enrolled (67 males and 52 females). Different clinical information and psycho-cognitive aspects such as attitude toward risk behaviours, risk preferences, need for cognitive closure, and tendency to resist to changes were assessed through the administration of a battery of questionnaires. Results: A higher tendency toward risk behaviours and the tendency to focus on possible gain in the short term rather than on losses might represent important predictors for the willingness to accept TKI discontinuation. Possible relapses following interruption of the therapy are the most common reason for concern. Furthermore, lower levels of resistance to change and having previously experienced the desire to interrupt the therapy might lead patients to accept a higher probability of relapse risk when facing such a decision. Conclusion: TKI discontinuation appears appealing and challenging at the same time for many CML patients, and different factors may influence this decision. Psychology plays a crucial role in assisting physician-patient communication and informed decisionmaking

Clear Improvement in Real-World Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Survival: A Comparison With Randomized Controlled Trials.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been improving the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but there are still large differences in survival among European countries. This raises questions on the added value of results from population-based studies, which use real-world data, compared to results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with CML. There are also questions about the extent of the findings on RCTs effectiveness for patients in the general population. We compare survival data extracted from our previous systematic review and meta-analysis of CML RCTs with the latest updated population-based survival data of EUROCARE-6, the widest collaborative study on cancer survival in Europe. The EUROCARE-6 CML survival estimated in patients (15-64 years) diagnosed in 2000-2006 vs. 2007-2013 revealed that the prognostic improvement highlighted by RCTs was confirmed in real-world settings, too. The study shows, evaluating for the first time all European regions, that the optimal outcome figures obtained in controlled settings for CML are also achievable (and indeed achieved) in real-world settings with prompt introduction of TKIs in daily clinical practice. However, some differences still persist, particularly in Eastern European countries, where overall survival values are lower than elsewhere, probably due to a delayed introduction of TKIs. Our results suggest an insufficient adoption of adequate protocols in daily clinical practice in those countries where CML survival values remain lower in real life than the values obtained in RCTs. New high-resolution population-based studies may help to identify failures in the clinical pathways followed there

Presepsin (Soluble CD14 Subtype): Reference Ranges of a New Sepsis Marker in Term and Preterm Neonates.

OBJECTIVE:Presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype) has been shown to be beneficial as a sepsis marker in adults. Nevertheless, very few data are available in neonates. The aim of the present study was to determine reference ranges of presepsin in term and preterm neonates. METHODS:Healthy term neonates and preterm neonates without clinical signs of infection admitted to the Neonatal Unit were consecutively enrolled. Presepsin concentrations in whole blood were measured using a point-of-care assay system located in the Unit. Demographic data, antenatal and perinatal variables commonly affecting C-reactive protein and procalcitonin values were considered. RESULTS:Of the 684 neonates enrolled in the study, 484 (70.8%) were born at term and 200 (29.2%) were preterm (24-36 weeks' gestation). In term infants, presepsin median value was 603.5 pg/mL (interquartile range: 466.5-791 pg/mL; 5th and 95th centiles: 315 and 1178 pg/mL respectively). In preterm infants, presepsin median value was slightly higher, equal to 620 pg/mL (interquartile range: 503-864 pg/mL; 5th and 95th centiles: 352 and 1370 pg/mL respectively). The reference ranges of presepsin we determined were much higher than those seen in healthy adults. No correlation between presepsin levels and postnatal age was observed, as well as no significant difference was demonstrated in preterm neonates at different gestational ages. None of the variables analyzed affected presepsin levels at a clinical significant extent. CONCLUSION:For the first time, this study provides reference ranges of presepsin in term and preterm neonates. Having reliable reference values is crucial for obtaining an adequate diagnostic accuracy. Based on our results, most variables commonly affecting C-reactive protein and procalcitonin values do not affect presepsin levels, which suggests that presepsin could be an effective sepsis marker. Further investigations in large groups of neonates with sepsis are needed to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of this biomarker

Epidemiology, management and outcome of status epilepticus in adults: single-center Italian survey

: The official variations of status epilepticus (SE) International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE, 2015) diagnostic criteria and the non-convulsive SE (NCSE) Salzburg Consensus Criteria (2013), impose the collection of updated population-based epidemiological Italian data. In this study, we aimed at evaluating (a) the frequency of SE in our hospital adopting the new ILAE 2015 SE diagnostic criteria and NCSE Salzburg Consensus Criteria, (b) the frequency of adherence to current treatment guidelines for SE and their relationship with patients' outcome, and (c) reliability of standardized prognostic scales (Status Epilepticus Severity Score-STESS-and modified STESS) for short-term outcome prediction in the setting of the newest diagnostic criteria for SE and NCSE. Detailed clinical and electrophysiological data collected in a 1-year retrospective hospital-based single-center survey on SE at Parma Hospital, Northern Italy are provided. Non-adherence to current treatment guidelines was recorded in around 50% cases, but no relation to outcome was appreciated. Mortality in our cohort increased from 30 to 50% when follow-up was extended to 30 days. STESS score was strongly correlated with short-term mortality risk (OR 18.9, 2.2-163.5, CI), and we confirm its role as easy-to-use tool for outcome evaluation also when the new ILAE diagnostic SE criteria are applied

Clear Improvement in Real-World Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Survival : A Comparison With Randomized Controlled Trials

This study was funded by the Compagnia di San Paolo, the Cariplo Foundation and the European Commission (grant number 801520 HP-JA-2017, Innovative Partnership for Action Against Cancer, iPAAC Joint Action). The sources of the funding played no role in designing the study, collecting, analyzing, or interpreting the data, writing the report, or deciding whether or not to submit the article for publication. This research was (partially) funded by Italian Ministry of Health "Ricerca Corrente" funds.Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been improving the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but there are still large differences in survival among European countries. This raises questions on the added value of results from population-based studies, which use real-world data, compared to results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients with CML. There are also questions about the extent of the findings on RCTs effectiveness for patients in the general population. We compare survival data extracted from our previous systematic review and meta-analysis of CML RCTs with the latest updated population-based survival data of EUROCARE-6, the widest collaborative study on cancer survival in Europe. The EUROCARE-6 CML survival estimated in patients (15-64 years) diagnosed in 2000-2006 vs. 2007-2013 revealed that the prognostic improvement highlighted by RCTs was confirmed in real-world settings, too. The study shows, evaluating for the first time all European regions, that the optimal outcome figures obtained in controlled settings for CML are also achievable (and indeed achieved) in real-world settings with prompt introduction of TKIs in daily clinical practice. However, some differences still persist, particularly in Eastern European countries, where overall survival values are lower than elsewhere, probably due to a delayed introduction of TKIs. Our results suggest an insufficient adoption of adequate protocols in daily clinical practice in those countries where CML survival values remain lower in real life than the values obtained in RCTs. New high-resolution population-based studies may help to identify failures in the clinical pathways followed there

Survival of European adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer in 2010-2014.

BACKGROUND We used the comprehensive definition of AYA (age 15 to 39 years) to update 5-year relative survival (RS) estimates for AYAs in Europe and across countries and to evaluate improvements in survival over time. METHODS We used data from EUROCARE-6. We analysed 700,000 AYAs with cancer diagnosed in 2000-2013 (follow-up to 2014). We focused the analyses on the 12 most common cancers in AYA. We used period analysis to estimate 5-year RS in Europe and 5-year RS differences in 29 countries (2010-2014 period estimate) and over time (2004-06 vs. 2010-14 period estimates). FINDINGS 5-year RS for all AYA tumours was 84%, ranging from 70% to 90% for most of the 12 tumours analysed. The exceptions were acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, acute myeloid leukaemia, and central nervous system tumours, presenting survival of 59%, 61%, and 62%, respectively. Differences in survival were observed among European countries for all cancers, except thyroid cancers and ovarian germ-cell tumours. Survival improved over time for most cancers in the 15- to 39-year-old age group, but for fewer cancers in adolescents and 20- to 29-year-olds. INTERPRETATION This is the most comprehensive study to report the survival of 12 cancers in AYAs in 29 European countries. We showed variability in survival among countries most likely due to differences in stage at diagnosis, access to treatment, and lack of referral to expert centres. Survival has improved especially for haematological cancers. Further efforts are needed to improve survival for other cancers as well, especially in adolescents

Diabetes and Second Neoplasia Impact on Prognosis in Pre-Fibrotic Primary Myelofibrosis

The 2016 WHO classification recognized pre-fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) as a distinct entity. Nevertheless, a prognostic model specific for pre-PMF is still lacking. Our aim was to identify the most relevant clinical, histological, and driver mutation information at diagnosis to evaluate outcomes in pre-PMF patients in the real-world setting. We firstly assessed the association between IPSS or DIPSS at diagnosis and response variables in 378 pre-PMF patients. A strict association was observed between IPSS and DIPSS and occurrence of death. Other analyzed endpoints were not associated with IPSS or DIPSS as thrombo-hemorrhagic events at diagnosis or during follow-up, or did not show a clinical plausibility, as transformation into acute leukemia or overt PMF. The only covariates which were significantly associated with death were diabetes and second neoplasia, and were therefore included in two different prognostic settings: the first based on IPSS at diagnosis [class 1 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 3.34 (1.85–6.04); class 2 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 12.55 (5.04–31.24)], diabetes [OR (95%CIs): 2.95 (1.41–6.18)], and second neoplasia [OR (95%CIs): 2.88 (1.63–5.07)]; the second with DIPSS at diagnosis [class 1 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 3.40 (1.89–6.10); class 2 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 25.65 (7.62–86.42)], diabetes [OR (95%CIs): 2.89 (1.37–6.09)], and second neoplasia [OR (95%CIs): 2.97 (1.69–5.24)]. In conclusion, our study underlines the importance of other additional risk factors, such as diabetes and second neoplasia, to be evaluated, together with IPSS and DIPSS, to better define prognosis in pre-PMF patients

Diabetes and Second Neoplasia Impact on Prognosis in Pre-Fibrotic Primary Myelofibrosis

The 2016 WHO classification recognized pre-fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) as a distinct entity. Nevertheless, a prognostic model specific for pre-PMF is still lacking. Our aim was to identify the most relevant clinical, histological, and driver mutation information at diagnosis to evaluate outcomes in pre-PMF patients in the real-world setting. We firstly assessed the association between IPSS or DIPSS at diagnosis and response variables in 378 pre-PMF patients. A strict association was observed between IPSS and DIPSS and occurrence of death. Other analyzed endpoints were not associated with IPSS or DIPSS as thrombo-hemorrhagic events at diagnosis or during follow-up, or did not show a clinical plausibility, as transformation into acute leukemia or overt PMF. The only covariates which were significantly associated with death were diabetes and second neoplasia, and were therefore included in two different prognostic settings: the first based on IPSS at diagnosis [class 1 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 3.34 (1.85–6.04); class 2 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 12.55 (5.04–31.24)], diabetes [OR (95%CIs): 2.95 (1.41–6.18)], and second neoplasia [OR (95%CIs): 2.88 (1.63–5.07)]; the second with DIPSS at diagnosis [class 1 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 3.40 (1.89–6.10); class 2 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 25.65 (7.62–86.42)], diabetes [OR (95%CIs): 2.89 (1.37–6.09)], and second neoplasia [OR (95%CIs): 2.97 (1.69–5.24)]. In conclusion, our study underlines the importance of other additional risk factors, such as diabetes and second neoplasia, to be evaluated, together with IPSS and DIPSS, to better define prognosis in pre-PMF patients

Presepsin levels (pg/mL) in term neonates classified by the variables under study, singly considered (means ± standard errors).

<p>Presepsin levels (pg/mL) in term neonates classified by the variables under study, singly considered (means ± standard errors).</p

Centiles of the distribution of presepsin levels (pg/mL) in term and preterm neonates.

<p>Centiles of the distribution of presepsin levels (pg/mL) in term and preterm neonates.</p