0188: Suboptimal control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in French patients after an acute coronary syndrome. Contemporary data from DYSIS IIACS study

AimTo document low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values during hospitalization of ACS patients with/without lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) at admission, and achievement of the ESC LDL-C target (LDL-C≤70mg/dL) at 4 months following the acute event using data from the French cohort of the DYSIS IIACS study.MethodsDYSIS IIACS was a multicentre prospective observational cohort study (recruitment: Oct 2013 to Oct 2014) conducted in 24 coronary care units in France. Adults hospitalized for an ACS event and who had a lipid panel measured within 24 hours of admission were consecutively enrolled. Eligible patients had to be on LLT for≥3 months or taking no LLT. A telephone follow-up interview was carried out with patients (or their next of kin) 120±15 days after the index event.ResultsOf the 468 patients enrolled, 50.6% had ST-elevation myocardial infarction/left bundle branch block, 40.8% had non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 8.5% had unstable angina. Of the 277 (59.2%) patients on LLT at admission, 25.3% had an LDL-C<70mg/dl (Table). Most patients (96.4%) were on statin therapy at discharge (mean+SD dose calculated in atorvastatin 49±28mg/day). Non-statin LLT was used in 5.6% patients at discharge (61.5% with a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor). At 120 days after admission, 50.9% of ACS patients with follow-up data had achieved the LDL-C target.ConclusionsThese observational data from contemporary French clinical practice in coronary care units indicate suboptimal LDL-C control, with a substantial proportion of very high cardiovascular risk patients presenting with elevated LDL-C despite taking LLT. Four months after the acute event, half of the patients (with data) failed to achieve the target, with a large difference between mean value and target LDL-C.Abstract 0188 – Table: Characteristics of and lipid values in ACS patients: during hospitalization and at 120 daysAll patients (n=468)LLT at admission (n=277)No LLT at admission (n=191)Age (years)65±1267±1261±12***Men80.178.083.2Diabetes type 221.827.413.6**Chronic kidney disease3.84.03.7Lipid variables (within 24 h of admission)LDL-C (mg/dL)110.6±43.493.6±36.4135.3±40.9***LDL<70mg/dL (%)16.925.34.7***Difference between mean and target values (mg/dL)52.1±38.337.0±32.169.3±37.5***Statin at hospital discharge96.497.594.8Lipid variables (120 days after admission)(n=159)(n=86)(n=73)LDL-C (mg/dL)76.1±31.179.7±31.171.9±30.7*LDL-C<70mg/dL50.941.961.6*Difference between mean and target values (mg/dL)29.7±25.828.0±26.532.6±24.7Data are mean±SD or %.*P<0.05**P?0.001**P?0.0001 (LLT vs no LLT

0191: Poor achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in French patients with stable coronary heart disease. Contemporary data from DYSIS II CHD study

AimWe sought to determine achievement of lipid targets according to current European guidelines (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C]≤70mg/dL) in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD) with or without lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), in the French cohort of the Dyslipidemia International Study IICHD (DYSIS IICHD).MethodsDYSIS IICHD was a multicentre observational cross-sectional study conducted from July 2013 to October 2014 in 27 centres in France. Adults with stable CHD (defined as≥1 of the following:>50% stenosis on coronary angiography or computed tomography, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary bypass graft, history of ACS>3 months previously) and a fasting lipid profile done within the previous 12 months were consecutively enrolled. Eligible patients had to be on LLT for≥3 months or taking no LLT.ResultsA total of 436 CHD patients were enrolled. Of the 424 patients (97.2%) on LLT, 91.5% were on statin treatment at the moment of inclusion (mean±SD dose calculated in atorvastatin 27±23mg/day). Non-statin LLT was used in 17.7% patients (79.2% were on a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor). Mean±SD LDL-C was 87.4±30.5mg/dL, 28.4% achieved LDL-C<70mg/dL, and 67.7% had an LDL-C<100mg/dL (Table).Abstract 0191 – Table: Characteristics of lipid values in patients with stable CHDAll patients (n=436)LLT (n=424)No LLT (n=12)Age (years)69±1269±1274±12Men80.079.791.7ACS>3 months previously70.070.066.7Diabetes type 227.027.316.7Chronic kidney disease5.05.20Lipid variablesLDL-C (mg/dL)87.4±30.586.0±29.6135.3±24.5**LDL<70mg/dL28.429.20*Distance to target of<70mg/dL (mg/dL)31.1±24.229.7±23.265.3±24.5**LDL<100mg/dL67.769.38.3**Data are mean±SD or %.*P<0.05**P?0.0001 (LLT vs no LLT)ConclusionsThese observational data from contemporary clinical practice in France indicate suboptimal lipid control, with over two-thirds of high-risk CHD patients failing to achieve the LDL-C target despite taking LLT, and a large difference between mean value and target LDL-C. More-intensive treatment is required to optimize achievement of lipid goals in CHD

Use of guideline-recommended management in established coronary heart disease in the observational DYSIS II study

Abstract Background Guidelines recommend lifestyle modification and medications to control risk factors in coronary heart disease (CHD). Using data from the observational DYSIS II study, we sought to evaluate the use of guideline-recommended treatments at discharge for acute coronary syndromes or in the chronic phase for CHD, and participation in rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs. Methods and results Between 2013 and 2014, 10,661 patients (3867 with ACS, 6794 with stable CHD) were enrolled in 332 primary and secondary care centers in 18 countries (Asia-Pacific, Europe, Middle East/Africa). Patients with incident ACS were younger and more likely to be smokers than patients with recurrent ACS or stable CHD (both p  Conclusions The high prevalence of risk factors in all CHD patients and reduced rates of secondary prevention medications in stable CHD offer areas for improvement. Translational aspects The findings of DYSIS II may reinforce the importance of adopting a healthy lifestyle and prescribing (by clinicians) and adhering (by patients) to evidence-based medications in the management of coronary heart disease, not only during the short-term but also over the longer term after a cardiac ischemic event. The results may help to increase the proportion of ACS patients who are referred to cardiac rehabilitation centres

ACHIEVEMENT OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY TARGETS IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

International audienc

ACHIEVEMENT OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY TARGETS IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

56th Congress of the European-Renal-Association (ERA)-European-Dialysis-and-Transplant-Association (EDTA) - Burden, Access and Disparities in Kidney Disease, Budapest, HUNGARY, JUN 13-16, 2019International audienc

Achievement of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets in CKD

International audienceWe describe the characteristics of patients with moderate/advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to receipt of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and whether they achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets for high- and very high-risk patients.MethodsCKD-REIN (NCT03381950), a prospective cohort study conducted in 40 nephrology clinics in France, enrolled 3033 patients with moderate (stage G3) or advanced (stage G4/G5) CKD (2013−2016) who had not been on chronic dialysis or undergone kidney transplantation. Data were collected from patients’ interviews and medical records. Patients were followed up at 1 year.ResultsAmong 2542 patients (mean [SD] age 67 [13] years, 34% women) with LDL-C measurements at baseline (mean [SD] LDL-C 2.7 [1.1] mmol/l; cholesterol 4.8 [1.3] mmol/l), 63% were on LLT; 24% were at high (CKD stage G3, no cardiovascular disease [CVD] or diabetes) and 74% at very high (CKD stage G3 with diabetes or CVD, or CKD stage G4/5) cardiovascular risk. Among high-risk patients, 45% of those on statin and/or ezetimibe achieved the LDL-C treatment target (<2.6 mmol/l). Among very high-risk patients, the percentage at goal (<1.8 mmol/l) was 38% for CKD stage G3 and 29% for stage G4/5. There was a trend toward higher achievement of LDL-C targets with increasing LLT intensity (adjusted odds ratios for moderate vs. low intensity 1.20; 95% confidence interval 0.92–1.56; high vs. low intensity 1.46; 1.02–2.09; Ptrend = 0.036).ConclusionMany patients with CKD stage G3−G5 who are eligible for LLT are not treated, and those on LLT rarely achieve LDL-C targets

New Strategies for the Development of Lipid Lowering Therapies to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk

The very high occurrence of cardiovascular events presents a major public health issue because treatment remains suboptimal. Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins or ezetimibe in combination with a statin reduces major adverse cardiovascular events. The cardiovascular risk reduction in relation to the absolute LDL-C reduction is linear for most interventions without evidence of attenuation or increase in risk at low LDL-C levels. Opportunities for innovation in dyslipidaemia treatment should address the substantial risk of lipid-associated cardiovascular events among patients optimally treated per guidelines but who cannot achieve LDL-C goals, could benefit from additional LDL-C lowering therapy, or experience side effects of statins. Fresh approaches are needed to identify promising drug targets early and develop them efficiently. The Cardiovascular Round Table of the ESC convened a workshop to discuss new lipid lowering strategies for cardiovascular risk reduction. Opportunities to improve treatment approaches and the efficient study of new therapies were explored. Circulating biomarkers may not be fully reliable proxy indicators of the relationship between treatment effect and clinical outcome. Mendelian randomization studies may better inform development strategies and refine treatment targets before phase 3. Trials should match the drug to appropriate lipid and patient profile, and guidelines may move towards a precision-based approach to individual patient management. Stakeholder collaboration is needed to ensure continued innovation and better international coordination of both regulatory aspects and guidelines. It should be noted that risk may also be addressed through increased attention to other risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, overweight, and inactivity.status: publishe