Do alcohol product labels stating lower strength verbal description, percentage alcohol‐by‐volume, or their combination affect wine consumption? A bar laboratory adaptive randomised controlled trial

A previous research study concluded that wine and beer labelled as lower in strength increase consumption compared with the same drinks labelled as regular strength. The label included both a verbal and numerical descriptor of strength. The present study aimed to estimate the effect of each of these label components. Adaptive, parallel group randomised controlled trial, comprising an internal pilot sample (N = 90) and a confirmatory sample (N = 57). University bar laboratory in London UK. One-hundred and forty-seven weekly wine drinkers were sampled from a nationally representative English panel. Participants were randomised to one of three groups to taste test wine in a bar-laboratory, varying only in the label displayed: (i) verbal descriptor only (Super Low); (ii) numerical descriptor only (4%ABV); and (iii) verbal descriptor and numerical descriptor combined (Super Low 4%ABV) [each group n = 49]. The primary outcome was total volume (ml) of wine consumed. Participants randomised to the numerical descriptor label group (4%ABV: M = 155.12ml, B = 20.30, 95% CI = 3.92, 36.69, p-value = 0.016) and combined verbal and numerical descriptor label group (Super Low 4%ABV: M = 154.59ml, B = 20.68, 95%CI = 4.32, 37.04, p-value = 0.014) drank significantly greater amounts than those randomised to the verbal descriptor label group (Super Low: M = 125.65ml). This bar laboratory study estimated that a greater quantity of 'lower' strength wine was consumed when the label included a numerical strength descriptor compared with a verbal only strength descriptor. [Abstract copyright: This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Do alcohol product labels stating lower strength verbal description, percentage alcohol‐by‐volume, or their combination affect wine consumption? A bar laboratory adaptive randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims A previous research study concluded that wine and beer labelled as lower in strength increase consumption compared with the same drinks labelled as regular strength. The label included both a verbal and numerical descriptor of strength. The present study aimed to estimate the effect of each of these label components. Design Adaptive, parallel group randomised controlled trial, comprising an internal pilot sample (n1 = 90) and a confirmatory sample (n2 = 57). Setting University bar laboratory in London, United Kingdom (UK). Participants A total of 147 weekly wine drinkers were sampled from a nationally representative English panel. Intervention Participants were randomised to one of three groups to taste test wine in a bar‐laboratory, varying only in the label displayed: (i) verbal descriptor only (Super Low); (ii) numerical descriptor only (4% alcohol by volume (ABV)); and (iii) verbal descriptor and numerical descriptor combined (Super Low 4%ABV) (each group n = 49). Measurements The primary outcome was total volume (ml) of wine consumed. Findings Participants randomised to the numerical descriptor label group (4%ABV: M = 155.12 ml, B = 20.30; 95% CI = 3.92, 36.69; P value = 0.016) and combined verbal and numerical descriptor label group (Super Low 4%ABV: M = 154.59 ml, B = 20.68; 95% CI = 4.32, 37.04; P value = 0.014) drank significantly greater amounts than those randomised to the verbal descriptor label group (Super Low: M = 125.65 ml). Conclusions This bar laboratory study estimated that a greater quantity of ‘lower’ strength wine was consumed when the label included a numerical strength descriptor compared with a verbal only strength descriptor

How, when, and why is social class linked to mental health and wellbeing? A systematic meta-review.

Meta-reviews synthesising research on social class and mental health and wellbeing are currently limited and focused on specific facets of social class (e.g., social capital) or mental health and wellbeing (e.g., mental health disorders), and none sought to identify mechanisms in this relationship. The present meta-review sought to (1) assess the overall relationship between social class and mental health and wellbeing, (2) determine the mechanisms that act in this relationship, and (3) evaluate the strength of evidence available. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021214731). We systematically searched twelve databases in September 2022 and identified 149 eligible reviews from 38,257 records screened. Quality of evidence was assessed with the JBI levels of evidence and risk of bias with the ROBIS tool. A large but low-quality evidence base points to class-based inequalities in mental health and wellbeing, with the strongest available evidence linking lower social positions to an increased risk of depression. In terms of different facets of stratification, the best available evidence suggests that deprivation (e.g., poverty), socioeconomic status, income, and subjective social status are consequential for individuals' mental health and wellbeing. However, high-quality evidence for the roles of education, occupation, other economic resources (e.g., wealth), and social capital is currently limited. Most reviews employed individual-level measures (e.g., income), as opposed to interpersonal- (e.g., social capital) or community-level (e.g., neighbourhood deprivation) measures. Considering mechanisms, we found some evidence for mediation via subjective social status, sense of control, and experiences of stress and trauma. There was also some evidence that higher socioeconomic status can provide a buffer for neighbourhood deprivation, lower social capital, and lower subjective social status. Future research employing experimental or quasi-experimental methods, and systematic reviews with a low risk of bias, are necessary to advance this area of research. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Equality hypocrisy, inconsistency, and prejudice: The unequal application of the universal human right to equality

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 21(3) of Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology (see record 2015-17043-001). In the article, the copyright should have been “© 2015 The Author(s)”. In addition, the author note should have included a license statement, which is provided in this correction.] In Western culture, there appears to be widespread endorsement of Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (which stresses equality and freedom). But do people really apply their equality values equally, or are their principles and application systematically discrepant, resulting in equality hypocrisy? The present study, conducted with a representative national sample of adults in the United Kingdom (N = 2,895), provides the first societal test of whether people apply their value of “equality for all” similarly across multiple types of status minority (women, disabled people, people aged over 70, Blacks, Muslims, and gay people). Drawing on theories of intergroup relations and stereotyping we examined, relation to each of these groups, respondents’ judgments of how important it is to satisfy their particular wishes, whether there should be greater or reduced equality of employment opportunities, and feelings of social distance. The data revealed a clear gap between general equality values and responses to these specific measures. Respondents prioritized equality more for “paternalized” groups (targets of benevolent prejudice: women, disabled, over 70) than others (Black people, Muslims, and homosexual people), demonstrating significant inconsistency. Respondents who valued equality more, or who expressed higher internal or external motivation to control prejudice, showed greater consistency in applying equality. However, even respondents who valued equality highly showed significant divergence in their responses to paternalized versus nonpaternalized groups, revealing a degree of hypocrisy. Implications for strategies to promote equality and challenge prejudice are discussed

Atención en un centro de parto según las recomendaciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud

Centros de parto constituem modelo que\ud adota tecnologia apropriada na assistência\ud à parturiente. O objetivo foi caracterizar\ud a assistência intraparto em um centro de\ud parto extra-hospitalar quanto às práticas\ud recomendadas pela Organização Mundial\ud da Saúde (OMS). Estudo descritivo sobre\ud 1.079 partos assistidos de 2006 a 2009 na\ud Casa do Parto de Sapopemba, São Paulo,\ud Brasil. Os resultados mostraram ausculta\ud intermitente (média=7 controles); posição\ud materna no expulsivo semissentada\ud (82,3%), lateral (16,0%), outras (1,7%);\ud aceitação da dieta (95,6%); acompanhante\ud (93,3%); até três exames vaginais (85,4%);\ud banho de aspersão (84,0%), deambulação\ud (68,0%), massagem (60,1%), exercícios\ud com bola suíça (51,7%); amniotomia\ud (53,4%); ocitocina na dilatação (31,0%),\ud banho de imersão (29,3%), ocitocina no\ud expulsivo (25,8%) e episiotomia (14,1%).\ud Concluiu-se que os profissionais do centro\ud de parto utilizam práticas recomendadas\ud pela OMS, contudo existem práticas cujo\ud uso pode ser reduzido, tais como amniotomia,\ud administração de ocitocina, episiotomia\ud e posição semissentada no expulsivoBirth centers are maternal care models\ud that use appropriate technology when\ud providing care to birthing women. This\ud descriptive study aimed to characterize intrapartum\ud care in a freestanding birth center,\ud in light of the practices recommended\ud by the World Health Organization (WHO),\ud with 1,079 assisted births from 2006 to\ud 2009 in the Sapopemba Birth Center, São\ud Paulo, Brazil. Results included the use of\ud intermittent auscultation (mean=7 controls);\ud maternal positions during delivery:\ud semi-sitting (82.3%), side-lying (16.0%),\ud other positions (1.7%), oral intake (95.6%);\ud companionship (93.3%); exposure to up\ud to three vaginal examinations (85.4%),\ud shower bathing (84.0%), walking (68.0%),\ud massage (60.1%), exercising with a Swiss\ud ball (51.7%); amniotomy (53.4%), oxytocin\ud use during the first (31.0%) and second\ud stages of labor (25.8%), bath immersion\ud (29.3%) and episiotomy (14.1%). In this\ud birth center, care providers used practices\ud recommended by the WHO, although\ud some practices might have been applied\ud less frequentlyCentros de parto constituyen un modelo\ud que adopta la tecnología apropiada en la\ud atención a la parturienta. El objetivo fue caracterizar\ud la atención intraparto en un centro\ud de parto extra-hospitalario en relación a las\ud prácticas recomendadas por la Organización\ud Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Estudio descriptivo\ud sobre 1.079 partos atendidos del 2006 al\ud 2009 en la Casa de Parto de Sapopemba, São\ud Paulo, Brasil. Los resultados mostraron: auscultación\ud intermitente (media=7 controles);\ud posición materna en el expulsivo - semisentada\ud (82,3%), lateral (16,0%), otras (1,7%);\ud aceptación de dieta (95,6%); acompañante\ud (93,3%); hasta tres exámenes vaginales\ud (85,4%); baño en ducha (84,0%), deambulación\ud (68,0%), masaje (60,1%), ejercicios con\ud pelota suiza (51,7%); amniotomía (53,4%);\ud oxitocina durante la dilatación (31,0%), baño\ud de inmersión (29,3%), oxitocina durante el\ud expulsivo (25,8%) y episiotomía (14,1%). Se\ud concluyó que los profesionales del centro de\ud parto utilizan prácticas recomendadas por\ud la OMS, pero existen algunas prácticas cuyo\ud uso puede reducirse, tales como la amniotomía,\ud administración de oxitocina, episiotomía\ud y posición semisentada en el período\ud expulsivoCNPqPIBIC 115521/2008-

A DNA methylation classifier of cervical precancer based on human papillomavirus and human genes

Cancer Research UK. Grant Number: C569/A1040

Effect of Cutting Date on Quality of Red Clover Forage

Development stage or plant age is an important factor determining the chemical composition and quality of red clover forage (Ignjatovic et al., 2001). In early spring, young red clover plants have large leaf mass, high contents of moisture, protein and minerals and a low fibre content. In the course of the growing season, under the effects of long days and high temperatures, the plant undergoes morphological changes: leaves grow more slowly, the stem elongates, dry matter yield increases and quality drops, especially digestibility and the contents of protein and minerals

Impact of lower strength alcohol labelling on consumption: A randomised controlled trial

Objective: Labels indicating low/light versions of tobacco and foods are perceived as less harmful which may encourage people to consume more. There is an absence of evidence concerning the impact on consumption of labelling alcohol products as lower in strength. The current study tests the hypothesis that labelling wine and beer as lower in alcohol increases their consumption. Methods: Weekly wine and beer drinkers (n=264) sampled from a representative panel of the general population of England were randomised to one of three groups to taste test drinks in a bar-laboratory varying only in the label displayed; Group 1: verbal descriptor Super Low combined with 4%ABV for wine/1%ABV for beer; Group 2: verbal descriptor Low combined with 8%ABV for wine/3%ABV for beer; Group 3: No verbal descriptors of strength (Regular). Primary outcome was total volume (ml) of drink consumed. Results: The results supported the study hypothesis: the total amount of drink consumed increased as the label on the drink denoted successively lower alcohol strength, BLin=.71, p=.015, [95%CI=0.13/1.30]. Group contrasts showed significant differences between those offered drinks labelled as Super Low (M=213.77) compared to Regular (M=176.85), B=1.43, p=.019, [95%CI=0.24/2.61]. There was no significant difference in amount consumed between those offered drinks labelled as Low compared to Regular. Conclusions: These results suggest that labelling drinks as lower in strength increases the amount consumed. Further studies are warranted to test for replication in non-laboratory settings and to estimate whether any effects are at a level with the potential to harm health. Trial registration: ISRCTN1553080